This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.1914 2461323.6914 9.07 20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3
47.33195 -23.55087 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0482 Aqr
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.160 V 11.510 V 2452820.00000 165.500000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3: 10.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0482 Aqr,2461323.6914,9.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0482 Aqr 20261010.1914 9.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.1914 2461323.6914 13.20 20:24:30.12 -01:35:16.9
42.53539 -21.34898 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.397 Vienna -0 -1 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:24:30.12 -01:35:16.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:24:30.12 -01:35:16.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.6914,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.1914 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.1914 2461323.6914 13.74 20:25:32.69 -03:12:02.6
41.13959 -22.34408 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste -0 -0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:25:32.69 -03:12:02.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:25:32.69 -03:12:02.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461323.6914,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261010.1914 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 10.1914 2461323.6914 11.47 20:44:25.01 -04:49:57.6
41.99646 -27.26420 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" Y Aqr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.100 V 15.500 V 2452240.00000 382.340000000000 M6.5e-M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:25.01 -04:49:57.6: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:25.01 -04:49:57.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Y Aqr,2461323.6914,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Y Aqr 20261010.1914 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461323.69166378 10.10.2026 04:35:49.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 24
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15036
Objects passed selection criteria: 14978
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11841.2
Average stars matched: 10763 (90.8941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 23:50:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461323.69166378 10.10.2026 04:35:49.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 66 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 107074
Objects passed selection criteria: 106743
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84041.2
Average stars matched: 76874.8 (91.4726 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551356 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 23:52:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461323.69109194
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.202 -02:04:34.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.202 -02:04:34.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0635 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.676 -02:05:06.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.676 -02:05:06.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0726 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.202 -02:04:34.37
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:15.676 -02:05:06.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01101 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XfjecuMaF6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ly7ZL9nYaD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vmfBO0slTN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TWeL9DlAbu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to +3.2706 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to 3.2706 deg
Loaded 10818 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8911 out of 9375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9375 out of 15695 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.3 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XfjecuMaF6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1089, bad_region=3208, passed=15674
Got 15674 stars (including 11577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1531 n_q2=830 n_q3=1646 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ly7ZL9nYaD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=3247, passed=15695
Got 15695 stars (including 11591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=1520 n_q2=826 n_q3=1643 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vmfBO0slTN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=982, bad_region=2781, passed=14217
Got 14217 stars (including 10815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=7.757 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.763 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.763 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.648 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4826 robust_rms_before=0.799 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.737 worst_region_rms_after=0.648 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.066 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.648
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.187 -02:04:34.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14217 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1803977.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.799 -> 0.460 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4826 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4668 pairs (4826 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=7.605 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.297 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.757 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.757 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.638 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4668 robust_rms_before=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.637 worst_region_rms_after=0.638 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.637 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.638
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.638 vs 0.637 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4668 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=1459 n_q2=928 n_q3=1416 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TWeL9DlAbu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1056, bad_region=2776, passed=14072
Got 14072 stars (including 10668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14072 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=7.782 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.274 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.769 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.769 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.649 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.649 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4826 robust_rms_before=0.770 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.737 worst_region_rms_after=0.649 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.031 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.649
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.659 -02:05:07.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14072 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1804034.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.770 -> 0.454 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4826 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4670 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4670 pairs (4826 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=7.638 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.984 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.984 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.755 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.640 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4670 robust_rms_before=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.448 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.640 worst_region_rms_after=0.640 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.640 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.640
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.640 vs 0.640 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=4670 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=1447 n_q2=928 n_q3=1429 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.217
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.147
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.460 worst_q_ratio=1.226
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.249
reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.182
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4860 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (4668 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (4670 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:38:38.98 +00:51:25.5: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:38:40.55 -02:11:05.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:49:39.93 -00:20:57.3: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:34.26 -02:32:31.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:32:14.83 +00:59:45.0: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:22.11 -01:08:11.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:22.19 -02:00:10.7: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:52.61 -00:56:10.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:19.54 -00:28:36.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:49:39.93 -00:20:57.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:34.26 -02:32:31.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:38:38.98 +00:51:25.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:32:14.83 +00:59:45.0: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:38:40.55 -02:11:05.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:39.93 -00:20:57.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9345 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:38.98 +00:51:25.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9206 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:34.26 -02:32:31.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8640 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:14.83 +00:59:45.0: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9772 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:40.55 -02:11:05.2: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1090 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:34.01 -02:09:20.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:22.11 -01:08:11.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:22.11 -01:08:11.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1024 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:52.61 -00:56:10.6: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:19.54 -00:28:36.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:22.19 -02:00:10.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:52.61 -00:56:10.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1211 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:22.19 -02:00:10.7: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1068 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:19.54 -00:28:36.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1897 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:34.01 -02:09:20.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:34.01 -02:09:20.5: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1653 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:30:04.89 -02:02:25.9: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:08.59 -04:03:06.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:25.00 -04:49:57.7: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3: 10.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:30:04.89 -02:02:25.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:08.59 -04:03:06.6: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:04.89 -02:02:25.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1473 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:08.59 -04:03:06.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1098 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:25.00 -04:49:57.7: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:44:25.00 -04:49:57.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2997 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3: ref_mag=10.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.0686 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20121.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20826_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20826_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20828_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20828_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21440_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 21440_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.21 -05:17:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21935_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 21935_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:35.73 +00:43:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21948_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 21948_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:00.73 +00:55:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22505_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 22505_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:18.74 -01:59:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22508_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 22508_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:29.59 +01:48:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22718_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 22718_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22772_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 22772_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23127_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23127_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23144_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23144_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:15.09 -02:53:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23175_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23175_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23194_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23194_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23231_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23231_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23263_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23263_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23292_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23292_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23346_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23346_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23364_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 23364_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.16 -04:32:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.85 +00:56:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20121_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20121_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:25.00 -04:49:57.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.629 6914370581707743232 311.10472735462 -04.83353360019 9.5869 7.9601 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.629#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12180_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 12180_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 03205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:56.35 -05:08:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:40:53.89 +01:11:10.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.187 -02:04:34.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.187 -02:04:34.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.659 -02:05:07.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.659 -02:05:07.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0727 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.187 -02:04:34.76
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:15.659 -02:05:07.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01100 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GLw7AcnHjr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BaYPDTcLIi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fc0nw06zck
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nW8iwafN08
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.544800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.544800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 116829 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to +3.2723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to 3.2723 deg
Loaded 10830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7953 out of 9799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9799 out of 116829 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.4 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GLw7AcnHjr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=9969, bad_region=16899, passed=116431
Got 116431 stars (including 90648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1574 n_q2=897 n_q3=1525 n_q4=862 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BaYPDTcLIi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=10115, bad_region=16944, passed=116800
Got 116800 stars (including 90836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1556 n_q2=906 n_q3=1529 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fc0nw06zck (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=8481, bad_region=12949, passed=81870
Got 81870 stars (including 63757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=7.857 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.320 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.757 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.757 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.613 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4820 robust_rms_before=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.623 worst_region_rms_after=0.613 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.623 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.613
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.623 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.623 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.455 arcsec matched=4820
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=1533 n_q2=894 n_q3=1549 n_q4=844 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nW8iwafN08 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8940, bad_region=13343, passed=83603
Got 83603 stars (including 64996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 467 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=7.748 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.108 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.108 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.758 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.758 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.641 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4819 robust_rms_before=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.648 worst_region_rms_after=0.641 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.648 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.641
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.648 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.648 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.441 arcsec matched=4819
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=1540 n_q2=898 n_q3=1551 n_q4=830 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_234342_TTUQ2b1x1_114417_XFr89wha/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:30.55 -02:08:44.1: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:38:22.03 -02:30:35.1: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:41:17.15 -05:33:12.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:22:23.73 -01:21:13.1: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:04.81 -01:37:39.7: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:49:30.06 -04:11:07.1: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:49:27.83 -04:00:53.3: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:05.13 -05:43:36.3: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:37:00.02 +01:45:27.4: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:51.24 -04:09:41.3: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:51.24 -04:09:41.3: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:05.13 -05:43:36.3: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:37:00.02 +01:45:27.4: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:38:22.03 -02:30:35.1: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:41:17.15 -05:33:12.3: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:30.55 -02:08:44.1: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:49:30.06 -04:11:07.1: 15.33 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:49:27.83 -04:00:53.3: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:04.81 -01:37:39.7: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:22:23.73 -01:21:13.1: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:51.24 -04:09:41.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3480 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:05.13 -05:43:36.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8853 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:00.02 +01:45:27.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9560 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:22.03 -02:30:35.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6972 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:17.15 -05:33:12.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9411 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:30.55 -02:08:44.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7362 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:30.06 -04:11:07.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5694 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:27.83 -04:00:53.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5702 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:23.73 -01:21:13.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1611 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:04.81 -01:37:39.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0813 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:09.28 +02:06:05.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:05.25 +00:47:17.2: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:20:39.41 +00:27:43.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:19:06.62 -04:22:47.8: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:37.71 -02:26:06.1: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:51:57.78 -05:53:58.5: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:14.68 -03:21:35.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:06.31 +00:22:30.4: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:48.73 +02:01:21.7: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:20:39.41 +00:27:43.5: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:05.25 +00:47:17.2: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:09.28 +02:06:05.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:39.41 +00:27:43.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6225 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:37.71 -02:26:06.1: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:05.25 +00:47:17.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1308 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:09.28 +02:06:05.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8845 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:37.71 -02:26:06.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9848 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:51:57.78 -05:53:58.5: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:19:06.62 -04:22:47.8: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:57.78 -05:53:58.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3896 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:06.62 -04:22:47.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4489 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:06.31 +00:22:30.4: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:14.68 -03:21:35.8: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:06.31 +00:22:30.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4210 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:14.68 -03:21:35.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3920 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:48.73 +02:01:21.7: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:48.73 +02:01:21.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8308 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:24:30.12 -01:35:16.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:25:32.69 -03:12:02.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:53.21 -05:10:47.1: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:13.71 -03:28:50.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:11.74 -00:06:52.3: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:29.66 -03:50:07.3: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:03.43 +00:00:41.2: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:24:30.12 -01:35:16.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:14.49 -06:02:07.5: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:23:47.98 -03:51:11.2: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:34.31 -05:53:12.1: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:53.21 -05:10:47.1: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:25:32.69 -03:12:02.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:53.21 -05:10:47.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9045 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:11.74 -00:06:52.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:29.66 -03:50:07.3: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:11.74 -00:06:52.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0188 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:13.71 -03:28:50.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:03.43 +00:00:41.2: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:29.66 -03:50:07.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0850 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:13.71 -03:28:50.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5975 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:03.43 +00:00:41.2: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9350 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:14.49 -06:02:07.5: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:14.49 -06:02:07.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4867 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:23:47.98 -03:51:11.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:47.98 -03:51:11.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0996 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:34.31 -05:53:12.1: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:34.31 -05:53:12.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4764 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:52:03.20 +01:33:21.0: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:51:51.02 -04:32:09.5: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:24.87 -06:05:40.9: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:51:42.11 -03:26:58.5: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:02.37 -05:22:30.1: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:54.08 -04:53:44.2: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:14.70 -04:27:02.8: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:52:03.20 +01:33:21.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:03.20 +01:33:21.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6568 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:24.87 -06:05:40.9: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:47.06 -01:35:26.5: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:51:51.02 -04:32:09.5: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:24.87 -06:05:40.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6703 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:51.02 -04:32:09.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6944 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:51:42.11 -03:26:58.5: 15.31 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:02.37 -05:22:30.1: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:42.11 -03:26:58.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6696 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:02.37 -05:22:30.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6389 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:54.08 -04:53:44.2: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:14.70 -04:27:02.8: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:54.08 -04:53:44.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7826 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:14.70 -04:27:02.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8557 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:47.06 -01:35:26.5: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:47.06 -01:35:26.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5557 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:07.78 -04:26:51.4: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:07.78 -04:26:51.4: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:07.78 -04:26:51.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5966 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:25.01 -04:49:57.6: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:25.01 -04:49:57.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:44:25.01 -04:49:57.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4771 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142696.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135869_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135869_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135873_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135873_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135880_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135880_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135885_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135885_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135888_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135888_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135899_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135899_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135906_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135906_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135908_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135908_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135910_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135910_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135911_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135911_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135913_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135913_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135915_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135915_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135920_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135920_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:26.84 +02:11:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135921_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135921_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135923_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 135923_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137145_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 137145_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:00.74 +00:55:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137188_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 137188_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:35.74 +00:43:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137777_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 137777_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:29.64 +01:48:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139343_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 139343_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139985_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 139985_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140028_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 140028_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:26.67 +01:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142576_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 142576_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142632_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 142632_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.71 +01:48:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142696_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 142696_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144657_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 144657_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145364_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 145364_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145719_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 145719_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146911_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 146911_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147407_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 147407_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 147717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148982_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 148982_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150720_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 150720_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151254_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 151254_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151406_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 151406_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151700_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 151700_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151729_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 151729_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151778_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 151778_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151999_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 151999_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152143_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 152143_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152279_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 152279_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152299_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 152299_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152355_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 152355_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:18.75 -01:59:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 93717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:25.20 +01:48:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 108889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:20.14 +00:16:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18618_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 18618_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.16 -05:17:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86259_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 86259_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:24.00 -00:49:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22718_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 22718_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.17 -04:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.82 +00:56:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99867_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 99867_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:53.88 +01:11:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18839_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 18839_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_23-35-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks