NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    12.08    10:12:47.50 +10:29:59.8   0881 0881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.08    10:12:47.53 +10:29:59.4   0887 0885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4527  2461322.9527  12.08  10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6
229.18591  49.17950 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
16 Psyche                  -0     -0       0  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6:  15.66 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6:  15.69 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.36    10:45:47.62 +14:21:20.5   5636 3452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.24    10:45:47.66 +14:21:20.1   5642 3456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4527  2461322.9527  13.30  10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3
230.13733  58.09231 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
42 Isis                    -0      1       1  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3:  15.95 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.63    10:29:34.52 +14:06:44.2   3287 3171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.61    10:29:34.59 +14:06:42.6   3293 3175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4527  2461322.9527  13.62  10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4
227.20778  54.50495 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
94 Aurora                   0      0       0  13.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.38    10:57:37.73 +13:52:25.8   7378 3288   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.37    10:57:37.84 +13:52:24.6   7385 3292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4527  2461322.9527  13.38  10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2
233.74418  60.34275 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
187 Lamberta                -0     -0       0  13.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2:  15.84 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.93    10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.4   1481 2510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.11    10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.1   1487 2514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 09.4527  2461322.9527  14.02  10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3
226.34018  51.37217 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.4 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 4"  ASASSN-20or                   
Type: UV
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    14.900   g            23.400   g                                                 L1.5+L3                      
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3:  15.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3:  15.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 5

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 592567 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 592567 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits

renamed 'Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 542.1009 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.8695 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2004.3673 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 549.2085 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2003.1991 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 549.8385 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.69741 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T05:51:16.1573041' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-09T10:51:16.1573041' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61322.4522703355 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-09T10:51:26.0608706' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61322.4523849539 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.99600627414 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995099125548 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.7611111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 82.9983333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.86896526481411 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits :) Spent 0.558734 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-09T05:52:10.7625815' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-09T10:52:10.7625815' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61322.452902338 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-09T10:52:20.6638627' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61322.4530169331 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.996006240477 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995099321155 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9477777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1177777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82315685766157 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits :) Spent 0.546996 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/d_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits


fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.95238608 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Image size: 945.6'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 Second-epoch second image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fAXMTjT89V Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vcDNVdyIhu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OatXRcRDwo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kEXVb0ipOY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.729050 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.729050 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.fAXMTjT89V (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5744 Got 5744 stars (including 5420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4407 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4399 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4406 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4399 stars left (next iteration limit 4838) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4399 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vcDNVdyIhu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=5709 Got 5709 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4397 stars left (next iteration limit 4836) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4397 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.OatXRcRDwo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=245, bad_region=0, passed=3220 Got 3220 stars (including 2972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3220 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 2570 stars left (next iteration limit 2827) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2570 robust_rms=10.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.395 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.395 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2570 robust_rms=0.752 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.190 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2570 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.517 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.464 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2570 robust_rms_before=1.850 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.540 worst_region_rms_after=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.464 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.540 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.540 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.400 arcsec matched=2570 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits N_match=2570 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=652 n_q2=611 n_q3=675 n_q4=632 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.kEXVb0ipOY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1, passed=3346 Got 3346 stars (including 2979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3346 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2590 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2583 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3346 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2589 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3346 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3346 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 2583 stars left (next iteration limit 2841) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2583 robust_rms=10.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.331 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.331 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2583 robust_rms=0.728 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.984 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.946 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2583 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.564 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.465 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2583 robust_rms_before=1.834 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.552 worst_region_rms_after=0.564 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.006 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.465 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.552 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.552 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec matched=2583 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits N_match=2583 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=654 n_q2=617 n_q3=668 n_q4=644 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.140 ref2=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.172 new1=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new2=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.356 reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.156 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (4399 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (4397 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528_astrometric_residuals.png (2570 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529_astrometric_residuals.png (2583 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.4: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.4: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.4: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9697 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 20284_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    10.99    10:15:12.06 +11:41:07.9   1222 1616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    10.95    10:15:12.08 +11:41:08.8   1228 1621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 20334_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.17    10:52:09.04 +10:28:56.1   6726 1191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Image size: 945.6'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 Second-epoch second image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PuBeuO043Q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0h3aMqXTNy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IPA5VU4F35 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HDbWQUqPs1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.605650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.605650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.PuBeuO043Q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1176, bad_region=0, passed=29525 Got 29525 stars (including 28308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29525 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4398 stars left (next iteration limit 4836) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4398 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.0h3aMqXTNy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1170, bad_region=0, passed=29431 Got 29431 stars (including 28231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29431 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4394 stars left (next iteration limit 4833) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4394 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1039 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.IPA5VU4F35 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=581, bad_region=42, passed=19365 Got 19365 stars (including 18709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19365 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4313 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4315 stars left (next iteration limit 4744) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4315 robust_rms=10.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.194 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.194 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4315 robust_rms=0.734 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.018 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.895 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4315 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.519 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.481 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4315 robust_rms_before=1.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.475 worst_region_rms_after=0.519 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.080 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.481 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.475 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.397 arcsec matched=4315 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits N_match=4315 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1162 n_q2=970 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1048 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HDbWQUqPs1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=643, bad_region=42, passed=19346 Got 19346 stars (including 18631 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19346 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4328 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19346 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19346 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19346 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4748) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=10.800 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.950 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.950 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.724 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.988 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.988 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.588 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.503 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4318 robust_rms_before=1.845 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.536 worst_region_rms_after=0.588 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.096 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.503 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.536 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec matched=4318 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1165 n_q2=963 n_q3=1148 n_q4=1042 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:30:17.36 +14:56:36.1: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:13.22 +15:42:17.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.4: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:43.46 +14:13:33.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:35.27 +13:25:48.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:59.28 +18:28:08.6: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:14.71 +14:09:35.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:35.27 +13:25:48.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:30:17.36 +14:56:36.1: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.4: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:59.28 +18:28:08.6: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:13.22 +15:42:17.7: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:43.46 +14:13:33.2: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:35.27 +13:25:48.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7955 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:59.28 +18:28:08.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0704 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:17.36 +14:56:36.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3699 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8590 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5297 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:13.22 +15:42:17.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9194 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:43.46 +14:13:33.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4551 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:28.28 +10:06:25.1: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:14.71 +14:09:35.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:14.71 +14:09:35.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5437 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.1: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3866 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:28.28 +10:06:25.1: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:28.28 +10:06:25.1: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9758 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:56.00 +12:29:13.1: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:30.38 +17:24:39.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:43.56 +12:29:19.9: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.5: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:10.35 +11:03:54.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:30.38 +17:24:39.1: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.5: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:43.56 +12:29:19.9: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:30.38 +17:24:39.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6539 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:56.00 +12:29:13.1: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.5: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1951 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:43.56 +12:29:19.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6644 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:56.00 +12:29:13.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1618 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:10.35 +11:03:54.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:10.35 +11:03:54.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:46.33 +12:53:44.1: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:50.74 +18:59:19.9: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:37.05 +11:38:38.6: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:42.75 +10:34:46.3: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:22.95 +13:21:45.4: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:50.74 +18:59:19.9: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:37.05 +11:38:38.6: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:46.33 +12:53:44.1: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:50.74 +18:59:19.9: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3065 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:37.05 +11:38:38.6: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1360 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:46.33 +12:53:44.1: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0998 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:42.75 +10:34:46.3: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:42.75 +10:34:46.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2097 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:22.95 +13:21:45.4: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:22.95 +13:21:45.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2854 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:31.54 +12:36:22.3: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.3: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:44.24 +09:43:33.4: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:30.86 +13:03:38.1: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:03.45 +18:19:58.7: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:31.54 +12:36:22.3: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:31.54 +12:36:22.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3248 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.3: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2313 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:44.24 +09:43:33.4: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:44.24 +09:43:33.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:30.86 +13:03:38.1: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:03.45 +18:19:58.7: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:30.86 +13:03:38.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2621 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:03.45 +18:19:58.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5096 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:36.69 +13:04:41.7: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.1: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:44.00 +18:06:01.6: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:58.31 +09:36:56.2: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:21.14 +17:13:19.7: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:36.69 +13:04:41.7: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:36.69 +13:04:41.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2561 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.1: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4016 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:44.00 +18:06:01.6: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:44.00 +18:06:01.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3653 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:21.14 +17:13:19.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:58.31 +09:36:56.2: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:21.14 +17:13:19.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5623 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:58.31 +09:36:56.2: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2360 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:03.55 +12:09:47.1: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:01.00 +11:44:42.2: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:21.99 +15:34:03.8: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:50.00 +09:55:46.1: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:11.32 +09:33:03.0: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:03.55 +12:09:47.1: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:21.99 +15:34:03.8: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:01.00 +11:44:42.2: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:03.55 +12:09:47.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4782 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:21.99 +15:34:03.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5381 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:01.00 +11:44:42.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3954 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:11.32 +09:33:03.0: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:50.00 +09:55:46.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:11.32 +09:33:03.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3309 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:50.00 +09:55:46.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3403 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:44.25 +14:36:46.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:25.09 +13:13:30.5: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:25.89 +12:34:38.2: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:39.08 +18:12:17.7: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:07.95 +16:23:03.9: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:44.25 +14:36:46.7: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:25.89 +12:34:38.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:25.09 +13:13:30.5: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:39.08 +18:12:17.7: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:44.25 +14:36:46.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2931 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:25.89 +12:34:38.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4244 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:39.08 +18:12:17.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4223 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:25.09 +13:13:30.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3928 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:07.95 +16:23:03.9: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:07.95 +16:23:03.9: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5602 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:13:42.40 +15:51:25.5: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.56 +12:43:53.7: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:16.33 +16:51:32.8: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:04.33 +11:08:03.1: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:16.81 +16:54:07.3: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:13:42.40 +15:51:25.5: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.56 +12:43:53.7: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:16.33 +16:51:32.8: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:04.33 +11:08:03.1: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:42.40 +15:51:25.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5536 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:16.33 +16:51:32.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5680 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.56 +12:43:53.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3931 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:04.33 +11:08:03.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3543 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:16.81 +16:54:07.3: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:16.81 +16:54:07.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5277 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32854.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32151_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.41    10:30:17.34 +14:56:36.5   3368 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.34    10:30:17.39 +14:56:35.8   3374 3680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.94    10:42:13.25 +15:42:17.7   5070 4228   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.91    10:42:13.19 +15:42:17.8   5075 4233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32158_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.88    10:14:43.40 +16:31:41.3   1067 4553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:14:43.59 +16:31:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32159_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.15    10:09:59.28 +18:28:09.2   0333 5717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.03    10:09:59.29 +18:28:08.0   0339 5722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.86    10:10:26.83 +09:25:56.1   0542 0214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.86    10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.7   0548 0219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.89    10:09:32.31 +16:10:19.5   0311 4318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:09:32.37 +16:10:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32167_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.64    10:17:11.65 +11:58:39.2   1514 1804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.45    10:17:11.75 +11:58:38.1   1520 1809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.04    10:12:39.55 +17:42:56.2   0743 5268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:12:39.51 +17:42:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32171_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32171_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.45    10:08:43.42 +14:13:33.9   0214 3127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.46    10:08:43.49 +14:13:32.5   0220 3132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    12.86    10:42:35.25 +13:25:47.2   5203 2866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.75    10:42:35.29 +13:25:49.4   5210 2871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    12.54    10:14:14.69 +14:09:35.5   1035 3110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.54    10:14:14.72 +14:09:35.5   1041 3115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32176_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.49    10:15:06.86 +12:30:00.0   1201 2114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:15:06.86 +12:30:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32177_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    12.35    10:31:01.84 +17:50:07.7   3392 5425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.43    10:31:01.71 +17:50:08.5   3397 5429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32178_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    12.04    10:20:28.30 +10:06:24.7   2041 0691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    11.93    10:20:28.26 +10:06:25.6   2047 0695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32235_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32235_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    11.22    10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.1   1222 1616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    11.17    10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.9   1228 1621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 Preparing report for the candidate 32297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32573_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32573_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.20    10:20:56.01 +12:29:12.5   2059 2135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.13    10:20:55.98 +12:29:13.6   2064 2140   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32625_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32625_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.92    11:08:39.16 +17:13:21.2   8833 5456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 11:08:39.22 +17:13:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.60    10:12:30.33 +17:24:38.6   0720 5077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.72    10:12:30.42 +17:24:39.7   0726 5082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32691_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32691_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.65    10:10:43.58 +12:29:20.2   0539 2080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    13.68    10:10:43.54 +12:29:19.7   0545 2085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32747_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 Preparing report for the candidate 32747_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32791_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 Preparing report for the candidate 32791_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32816_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 Preparing report for the candidate 32816_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32836_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32836_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    13.98    10:08:10.36 +11:03:53.6   0175 1200   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.19    10:08:10.33 +11:03:56.0   0180 1205   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32854_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 Preparing report for the candidate 32854_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32865_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32865_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.12    10:08:36.98 +11:38:39.3   0234 1556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.18    10:08:37.13 +11:38:37.9   0240 1560   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32868_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32868_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.07    10:09:46.32 +12:53:44.1   0390 2323   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.14    10:09:46.35 +12:53:44.1   0396 2327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32937_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32937_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.40    10:08:59.95 +09:37:21.7   0325 0327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:08:59.88 +09:37:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32944_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32944_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.30    10:08:50.72 +18:59:19.8   0157 6034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.32    10:08:50.75 +18:59:20.0   0163 6038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32952_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32952_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.15    10:08:42.77 +10:34:45.8   0263 0906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.30    10:08:42.72 +10:34:46.8   0269 0911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.20    10:08:22.92 +13:21:44.8   0175 2601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.41    10:08:22.98 +13:21:46.0   0181 2605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32971_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32971_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.22    10:08:49.21 +11:57:02.0   0260 1743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.25    10:08:49.26 +11:57:02.7   0266 1748   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32979_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32979_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.31    10:09:11.59 +18:36:45.9   0220 5808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:09:11.57 +18:36:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32980_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 32980_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.33    10:08:31.57 +12:36:23.1   0207 2141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.32    10:08:31.51 +12:36:21.4   0213 2146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.13    10:11:44.22 +09:43:32.6   0733 0402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.14    10:11:44.25 +09:43:34.2   0739 0406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33027_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33027_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.27    10:08:30.85 +13:03:38.6   0199 2418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.26    10:08:30.87 +13:03:37.6   0205 2422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33033_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.50    10:10:03.46 +18:19:58.4   0345 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.52    10:10:03.44 +18:19:58.9   0351 5638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33038_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33038_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.30    10:08:36.70 +13:04:41.3   0213 2429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.22    10:08:36.69 +13:04:42.1   0219 2433   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33040_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33040_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.35    10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.3   0400 2313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.50    10:09:50.01 +12:52:43.9   0405 2317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33044_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33044_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.39    10:09:43.89 +18:06:02.0   0302 5491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.34    10:09:44.11 +18:06:01.2   0308 5495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33055_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33055_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.55    10:09:21.25 +17:13:18.1   0261 4953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.61    10:09:21.02 +17:13:21.4   0266 4958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33058_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33058_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.25    10:10:58.30 +09:36:56.6   0619 0329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.22    10:10:58.32 +09:36:55.7   0625 0334   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33060_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.42    10:11:03.53 +12:09:46.6   0594 1884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.64    10:11:03.57 +12:09:47.7   0600 1888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33067_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.41    10:10:00.92 +11:44:43.5   0443 1624   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.37    10:10:01.09 +11:44:40.8   0450 1628   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33081_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.55    10:09:22.02 +15:34:03.5   0289 3945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.51    10:09:21.95 +15:34:04.0   0295 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33082_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.30    10:12:11.23 +09:33:05.7   0804 0298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.37    10:12:11.41 +09:33:00.3   0811 0301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33086_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33086_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.34    10:10:50.02 +09:55:46.7   0593 0521   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.34    10:10:49.97 +09:55:45.5   0599 0525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33088_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33088_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.36    10:08:25.05 +13:13:30.1   0182 2517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.42    10:08:25.13 +13:13:30.8   0188 2522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33089_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33089_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.38    10:10:44.20 +14:36:47.1   0507 3370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.24    10:10:44.30 +14:36:46.3   0514 3375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.38    10:09:04.79 +09:51:18.5   0334 0469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits **** FOUND 10:09:04.80 +09:51:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33102_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33102_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.42    10:09:25.82 +12:34:38.6   0343 2128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.43    10:09:25.95 +12:34:37.7   0350 2132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33103_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33103_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.51    10:08:39.11 +18:12:17.1   0142 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.37    10:08:39.04 +18:12:18.2   0147 5557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33126_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33126_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.55    10:11:07.86 +16:23:03.7   0536 4448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.57    10:11:08.04 +16:23:04.2   0543 4453   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33128_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33128_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.46    10:08:49.53 +12:43:54.4   0250 2219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.35    10:08:49.59 +12:43:53.0   0257 2223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33139_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33139_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.40    10:10:04.38 +11:08:02.1   0461 1252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.32    10:10:04.29 +11:08:04.1   0467 1257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.57    10:08:16.40 +16:51:32.8   0107 4729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.57    10:08:16.25 +16:51:32.9   0113 4734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.53    10:13:42.37 +15:51:25.7   0925 4137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.57    10:13:42.43 +15:51:25.2   0931 4141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33191_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 33191_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 09.45239    2461322.95239    14.61    10:09:16.79 +16:54:07.1   0255 4758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    14.50    10:09:16.84 +16:54:07.5   0261 4762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08974_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 The candidate 08974_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 09.45302    2461322.95302    12.29    10:32:54.90 +15:56:14.6   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3 ########### Completed Leo-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3 ################################################################################### 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461322.95238608 -observatory V36 14:29:22.99 -17:31:54.2 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:09:34.33 -21:05:55.5 Venus (-4.6mag) 08:35:24.09 +19:51:21.2 Mars (1.1mag) 09:33:06.14 +15:11:09.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:43:00.07 +01:40:25.7 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:16.51 +20:58:27.5 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:32.11 -00:24:23.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:12.26 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:02:47.76 -03:28:05.7 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 9 05:54 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461322.95238608: 09:33:03.11 +15:11:26.7 Io (6.1mag) 09:32:59.43 +15:11:47.7 Europa (6.2mag) 09:32:56.62 +15:12:03.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:32:38.70 +15:13:38.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:32:42.10 +15:32:07.4 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:33:04.84 +15:11:16.9 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:31:35.65 +15:32:21.0 Elara (17.5mag) 09:35:39.48 +14:33:54.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:31:50.68 +15:37:44.5 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:54.06 +01:40:45.8 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:56.26 +01:40:10.5 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:42:25.96 +01:37:41.7 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:44.75 +01:40:34.3 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:41:20.55 +01:28:09.3 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 9 05:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461322.95238608: 02:35:29.11 +21:19:40.4 JWST 18:24:47.61 +21:25:17.4 Chandra 14:02:10.18 -61:56:01.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 9 05:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461322.95238608 -observatory V36 03:46:38.42 +20:11:23.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:23:01.05 -33:32:33.2 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:00.38 -72:16:30.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:04.01 +34:35:39.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:00:00.04 +48:24:23.6 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:29:24.33 +25:28:42.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:00:59.81 +35:28:01.8 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:24.06 +41:36:46.9 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:03.36 -13:33:53.4 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:13:29.94 +16:09:14.9 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:49:02.53 -02:33:30.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:34:40.55 +65:58:07.0 15.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:38:17.59 +43:33:32.8 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:43:47.88 +14:04:07.2 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:28:40.01 -12:02:54.1 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:31:43.46 +19:15:44.5 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:56:09.29 -32:06:43.4 14.4mag 10P/Tempel 02:08:04.62 +39:01:43.7 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:09:56.10 -08:00:18.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:23:40.39 -08:48:34.0 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:33:10.07 +16:13:04.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:01:56.90 +14:25:53.9 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:31:52.58 +39:41:19.6 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:58:05.02 +14:50:08.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:37:01.89 +13:42:15.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:01:51.86 -31:39:39.3 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:49:26.09 +19:23:34.6 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:56:48.17 +01:46:21.3 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:15:02.08 +35:30:05.9 16.9mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:13:40.79 +02:07:02.1 14.1mag 169P/NEAT 03:30:17.99 +04:50:40.4 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 06:00:25.78 +44:47:28.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:24:06.30 +25:41:29.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:54:16.42 +31:44:49.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 9 05:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 9 05:54 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 9 05:54 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 03:50:13.324 -35:19:48.52 AT 2026acrb 2026-09-22.31 21.9011 03:40:52.819 -34:49:11.26 AT 2026acra 2026-09-22.31 22.0744 03:20:08.542 -35:04:16.71 AT 2026acqz 2026-09-22.31 22.6351 03:34:19.381 -35:08:14.08 AT 2026acqy 2026-09-22.31 21.41 03:42:18.468 -34:14:55.59 AT 2026acqx 2026-09-22.31 22.1984 22:24:44.060 +20:59:06.05 AT 2026acqw 2026-09-16.56 20.82 21:40:02.160 +15:00:30.81 AT 2026acqv 2026-09-10.70 21.85 21:39:01.640 +18:47:42.43 AT 2026acqu 2026-09-10.70 22.23 00:12:12.410 +04:58:03.37 AT 2026acqt 2026-09-20.79 22.48 23:43:42.930 +01:57:31.27 AT 2026acqs 2026-09-20.78 22.68 23:45:18.660 +05:45:16.42 AT 2026acqr 2026-09-20.78 22.55 23:40:19.150 +05:20:07.86 AT 2026acqq 2026-09-20.78 22.43 02:13:52.020 +01:45:39.64 AT 2026acqp 2026-09-19.92 22.81 01:07:33.770 +02:42:27.03 AT 2026acqo 2026-09-19.90 22.6 02:21:01.513 +01:39:33.18 AT 2026acqn 2026-09-19.85 23.05 23:15:45.160 +04:54:53.74 AT 2026acqm 2026-09-19.81 22.59 22:47:46.190 +02:11:28.63 AT 2026acql 2026-09-19.80 22.32 23:00:11.810 +04:09:17.60 AT 2026acqk 2026-09-17.77 21.72 01:30:04.370 +00:37:22.70 AT 2026acqj 2026-09-16.84 22.86 01:11:15.050 -01:08:02.84 AT 2026acqi 2026-09-16.84 22.76 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 9 05:54 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 66 C