This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.4527 2461322.9527 12.08 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6
229.18591 49.17950 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.16 Psyche -0 -0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.4527* 10 12 47.51 +10 29 59.6 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9527,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4527 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.4527 2461322.9527 13.30 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3
230.13733 58.09231 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis -0 1 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.4527* 10 45 47.64 +14 21 20.3 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9527,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4527 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.4527 2461322.9527 13.62 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4
227.20778 54.50495 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 0 0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.4527* 10 29 34.55 +14 06 43.4 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9527,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4527 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.4527 2461322.9527 13.38 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2
233.74418 60.34275 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.187 Lamberta -0 -0 0 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.4527* 10 57 37.79 +13 52 25.2 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9527,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4527 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.4527 2461322.9527 14.02 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3
226.34018 51.37217 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-20or
Type: UV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.900 g 23.400 g L1.5+L3
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.4527* 10 17 07.57 +13 08 36.3 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-20or,2461322.9527,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-20or 20261009.4527 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461322.95301808 09.10.2026 10:52:10.762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5542
Objects passed selection criteria: 5527
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4449.75
Average stars matched: 4350 (97.7583 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:54:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461322.95301808 09.10.2026 10:52:10.762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 64
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27961
Objects passed selection criteria: 27882
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24195.5
Average stars matched: 23244.2 (96.0685 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:55:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.95238608
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Image size: 945.6'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fAXMTjT89V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vcDNVdyIhu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OatXRcRDwo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kEXVb0ipOY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.729050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.729050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg
Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg
Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fAXMTjT89V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5744
Got 5744 stars (including 5420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4407 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4406 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4399 stars left (next iteration limit 4838)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4399 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vcDNVdyIhu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=5709
Got 5709 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4405 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4397 stars left (next iteration limit 4836)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4397 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OatXRcRDwo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=245, bad_region=0, passed=3220
Got 3220 stars (including 2972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2570 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 2570 stars left (next iteration limit 2827)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2570 robust_rms=10.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.395 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.395 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2570 robust_rms=0.752 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.190 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2570 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.517 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2570 robust_rms_before=1.850 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.540 worst_region_rms_after=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.464
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.540 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.540 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.400 arcsec matched=2570
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits N_match=2570 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=652 n_q2=611 n_q3=675 n_q4=632 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kEXVb0ipOY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1, passed=3346
Got 3346 stars (including 2979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2590 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2589 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 2583 stars left (next iteration limit 2841)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2583 robust_rms=10.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.331 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2583 robust_rms=0.728 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.984 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.946 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2583 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.564 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.465 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2583 robust_rms_before=1.834 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.552 worst_region_rms_after=0.564 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.006 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.465
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.552 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.552 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec matched=2583
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits N_match=2583 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=654 n_q2=617 n_q3=668 n_q4=644 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.140
ref2=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new1=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new2=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.356
reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.156
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (4399 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (4397 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528_astrometric_residuals.png (2570 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529_astrometric_residuals.png (2583 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.4: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.4: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.07 +11:41:08.4: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9697 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 20284_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 20334_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Image size: 945.6'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76
Second-epoch image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:39:52.624 +14:01:06.11
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:50.105 +14:00:41.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PuBeuO043Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0h3aMqXTNy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IPA5VU4F35
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HDbWQUqPs1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.605650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.605650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg
Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PuBeuO043Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1176, bad_region=0, passed=29525
Got 29525 stars (including 28308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4403 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4398 stars left (next iteration limit 4836)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4398 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0h3aMqXTNy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1170, bad_region=0, passed=29431
Got 29431 stars (including 28231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4394 stars left (next iteration limit 4833)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4394 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1039 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IPA5VU4F35 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=581, bad_region=42, passed=19365
Got 19365 stars (including 18709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4326 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4315 stars left (next iteration limit 4744)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4315 robust_rms=10.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.194 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.194 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4315 robust_rms=0.734 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.018 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.895 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4315 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.519 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4315 robust_rms_before=1.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.475 worst_region_rms_after=0.519 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.080 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.481
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.475 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.397 arcsec matched=4315
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits N_match=4315 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1162 n_q2=970 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1048 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HDbWQUqPs1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=643, bad_region=42, passed=19346
Got 19346 stars (including 18631 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4328 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4748)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=10.800 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.950 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.950 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.724 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.988 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.988 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4318 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.588 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4318 robust_rms_before=1.845 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.536 worst_region_rms_after=0.588 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.096 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.536 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec matched=4318
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1165 n_q2=963 n_q3=1148 n_q4=1042 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-51-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0528.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_055300_TTUQ1b1x1_2972846_z6Qo5iAi/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:30:17.36 +14:56:36.1: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:13.22 +15:42:17.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.4: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:43.46 +14:13:33.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:35.27 +13:25:48.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:59.28 +18:28:08.6: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:14:14.71 +14:09:35.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:35.27 +13:25:48.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:30:17.36 +14:56:36.1: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.4: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:59.28 +18:28:08.6: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:13.22 +15:42:17.7: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:43.46 +14:13:33.2: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:35.27 +13:25:48.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7955 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:59.28 +18:28:08.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0704 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:17.36 +14:56:36.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3699 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:26.82 +09:25:56.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8590 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:11.70 +11:58:38.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5297 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:13.22 +15:42:17.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9194 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:43.46 +14:13:33.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4551 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:28.28 +10:06:25.1: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:14:14.71 +14:09:35.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:14.71 +14:09:35.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5437 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.1: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3866 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:28.28 +10:06:25.1: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:28.28 +10:06:25.1: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9758 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:20:56.00 +12:29:13.1: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:30.38 +17:24:39.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:43.56 +12:29:19.9: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.5: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:10.35 +11:03:54.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:30.38 +17:24:39.1: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:47.51 +10:29:59.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.5: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:47.64 +14:21:20.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:43.56 +12:29:19.9: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:30.38 +17:24:39.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6539 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:20:56.00 +12:29:13.1: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.06 +11:41:08.5: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1951 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:43.56 +12:29:19.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6644 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:56.00 +12:29:13.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1618 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:37.79 +13:52:25.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:34.55 +14:06:43.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:10.35 +11:03:54.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:10.35 +11:03:54.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:17:07.57 +13:08:36.3: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:46.33 +12:53:44.1: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:50.74 +18:59:19.9: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:37.05 +11:38:38.6: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:42.75 +10:34:46.3: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:22.95 +13:21:45.4: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:50.74 +18:59:19.9: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:37.05 +11:38:38.6: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:46.33 +12:53:44.1: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:50.74 +18:59:19.9: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3065 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:37.05 +11:38:38.6: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1360 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:46.33 +12:53:44.1: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0998 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:42.75 +10:34:46.3: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:42.75 +10:34:46.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2097 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:22.95 +13:21:45.4: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:22.95 +13:21:45.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2854 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:31.54 +12:36:22.3: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.3: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:44.24 +09:43:33.4: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:30.86 +13:03:38.1: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:03.45 +18:19:58.7: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:31.54 +12:36:22.3: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:31.54 +12:36:22.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3248 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.3: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.23 +11:57:02.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2313 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:44.24 +09:43:33.4: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:44.24 +09:43:33.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:30.86 +13:03:38.1: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:03.45 +18:19:58.7: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:30.86 +13:03:38.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2621 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:03.45 +18:19:58.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5096 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:36.69 +13:04:41.7: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.1: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:44.00 +18:06:01.6: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:58.31 +09:36:56.2: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:21.14 +17:13:19.7: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:36.69 +13:04:41.7: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:36.69 +13:04:41.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2561 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.1: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:50.01 +12:52:44.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4016 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:44.00 +18:06:01.6: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:44.00 +18:06:01.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3653 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:21.14 +17:13:19.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:58.31 +09:36:56.2: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:21.14 +17:13:19.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5623 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:58.31 +09:36:56.2: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2360 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:03.55 +12:09:47.1: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:01.00 +11:44:42.2: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:21.99 +15:34:03.8: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:50.00 +09:55:46.1: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:12:11.32 +09:33:03.0: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:03.55 +12:09:47.1: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:21.99 +15:34:03.8: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:01.00 +11:44:42.2: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:03.55 +12:09:47.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4782 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:21.99 +15:34:03.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5381 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:01.00 +11:44:42.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3954 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:12:11.32 +09:33:03.0: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:50.00 +09:55:46.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:11.32 +09:33:03.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3309 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:50.00 +09:55:46.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3403 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:44.25 +14:36:46.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:25.09 +13:13:30.5: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:25.89 +12:34:38.2: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:39.08 +18:12:17.7: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:11:07.95 +16:23:03.9: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:44.25 +14:36:46.7: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:25.89 +12:34:38.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:25.09 +13:13:30.5: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:39.08 +18:12:17.7: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:44.25 +14:36:46.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2931 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:25.89 +12:34:38.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4244 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:39.08 +18:12:17.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4223 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:25.09 +13:13:30.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3928 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:11:07.95 +16:23:03.9: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:07.95 +16:23:03.9: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5602 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:13:42.40 +15:51:25.5: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:49.56 +12:43:53.7: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:08:16.33 +16:51:32.8: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:10:04.33 +11:08:03.1: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:09:16.81 +16:54:07.3: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:13:42.40 +15:51:25.5: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:49.56 +12:43:53.7: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:08:16.33 +16:51:32.8: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:10:04.33 +11:08:03.1: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:42.40 +15:51:25.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5536 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:16.33 +16:51:32.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5680 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:49.56 +12:43:53.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3931 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:04.33 +11:08:03.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3543 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:09:16.81 +16:54:07.3: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:16.81 +16:54:07.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5277 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32854.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32151_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32158_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:43.59 +16:31:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32159_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32162_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32164_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:32.37 +16:10:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32167_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:39.51 +17:42:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32171_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32171_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32175_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32176_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:06.86 +12:30:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32177_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32178_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32235_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32235_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 32297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32573_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32573_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32625_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32625_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:39.22 +17:13:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32691_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32691_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32747_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 32747_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32791_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 32791_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32816_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 32816_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32836_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32836_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32854_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 32854_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32865_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32865_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32868_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32868_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32937_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32937_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:59.88 +09:37:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32944_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32944_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32952_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32952_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32961_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32971_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32971_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32979_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32979_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:11.57 +18:36:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32980_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 32980_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33027_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33027_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33033_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33038_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33038_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33040_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33040_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33044_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33044_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33055_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33055_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33058_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33058_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33060_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33067_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33081_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33082_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33086_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33086_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33088_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33088_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33089_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33089_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:04.80 +09:51:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33102_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33102_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33103_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33103_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33126_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33126_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33128_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33128_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33139_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33139_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33155_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33169_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33191_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 33191_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08974_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529
The candidate 08974_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_05-52-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0529 did not pass the final checks