This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3465 2461322.8465 14.53 04:48:38.32 +23:05:30.9
177.47903 -13.83511 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1219 Britta -0 -0 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:38.32 +23:05:30.9: 16.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:38.32 +23:05:30.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3465* 04 48 38.32 +23 05 30.9 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8465,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3465 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3465 2461322.8465 13.27 04:38:05.16 +25:12:53.8
174.21680 -14.37432 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:05.16 +25:12:53.8: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:05.16 +25:12:53.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3465* 04 38 05.16 +25 12 53.8 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8465,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3465 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3465 2461322.8465 13.49 04:33:15.70 +25:46:41.6
173.04548 -14.84084 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 10.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:15.70 +25:46:41.6: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:15.70 +25:46:41.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3465* 04 33 15.70 +25 46 41.6 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8465,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3465 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3465 2461322.8465 14.44 04:54:00.39 +21:30:02.4
179.55750 -13.81820 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 11.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula 0 0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:00.39 +21:30:02.4: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:00.39 +21:30:02.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3465* 04 54 00.39 +21 30 02.4 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8465,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3465 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3465 2461322.8465 14.59 04:18:59.32 +23:55:47.5
172.24774 -18.48963 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California -0 -0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:59.32 +23:55:47.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:59.32 +23:55:47.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3465* 04 18 59.32 +23 55 47.5 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8465,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3465 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3465 2461322.8465 14.98 04:44:03.39 +20:28:25.3
178.93660 -16.28575 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 0 -1 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:03.39 +20:28:25.3: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:03.39 +20:28:25.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3465* 04 44 03.39 +20 28 25.3 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8465,14.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3465 14.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461322.84677369 09.10.2026 08:19:11.247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10765
Objects passed selection criteria: 10730
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8232.75
Average stars matched: 7554.75 (91.7646 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:26:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461322.84677369 09.10.2026 08:19:11.247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78339
Objects passed selection criteria: 78107
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61460.2
Average stars matched: 56338.2 (91.6662 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 474404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:27:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.84613463
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.098 +21:59:32.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.098 +21:59:32.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0039 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.239 +22:00:20.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.239 +22:00:20.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.098 +21:59:32.39
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.239 +22:00:20.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01798 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.896rDZef6b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CeWKuSDbMq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QtlCRuP0CB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CMNJt6y6He
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.896rDZef6b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CeWKuSDbMq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QtlCRuP0CB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=752, bad_region=3375, passed=10940
Got 10940 stars (including 7014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=8.056 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.951 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.951 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.850 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.499 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.499 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.113 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.410 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.383 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.540 worst_region_rms_after=0.499 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.218 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.499
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.540 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.540 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.410 arcsec matched=4865
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=1431 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1483 n_q4=822 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CMNJt6y6He (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=729, bad_region=3362, passed=10855
Got 10855 stars (including 6954 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.074 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.056 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.056 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.812 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.812 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.133 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.563 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.240 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.522
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.563 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.426 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1437 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1478 n_q4=822 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.155
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.121
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:50.03 +22:54:23.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.8: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.4: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.50 +21:14:33.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:11.79 +21:37:59.2: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.26 +21:57:43.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:32.66 +22:04:44.1: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:11.79 +21:37:59.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.4: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:11.79 +21:37:59.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5082 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4628 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.8: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.26 +21:57:43.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:32.66 +22:04:44.1: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:50.03 +22:54:23.8: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.50 +21:14:33.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.26 +21:57:43.5: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3624 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5553 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:50.03 +22:54:23.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5440 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:32.66 +22:04:44.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5365 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.50 +21:14:33.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4769 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21843_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 21843_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21933_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 21933_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 21981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22028_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 22028_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22034_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 22034_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22072_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 22072_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22085_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 22085_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.56 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.098 +21:59:32.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.098 +21:59:32.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0039 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:58.239 +22:00:20.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:58.239 +22:00:20.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:55.098 +21:59:32.39
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:58.239 +22:00:20.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01798 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uyJ2vxQZ4T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aahoV5uOeE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.weNoD9Xotg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7JVbxYCIeT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uyJ2vxQZ4T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aahoV5uOeE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.weNoD9Xotg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4813, bad_region=16315, passed=69799
Got 69799 stars (including 50379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.105 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.746 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.517 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.102 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.532 worst_region_rms_after=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.209 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.517
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.532 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.532 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.407 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=1470 n_q2=1097 n_q3=1485 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7JVbxYCIeT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4741, bad_region=16444, passed=70453
Got 70453 stars (including 50887 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70453 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.093 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.766 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.766 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.882 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.882 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.528 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.122 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.535 worst_region_rms_after=0.528 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.235 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.528
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.414 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=1467 n_q2=1096 n_q3=1477 n_q4=831 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052356_TTUQ2b1x1_1112947_GmPfQVEc/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:28.03 +24:16:23.0: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:26.71 +24:33:36.9: 15.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:32.88 +20:21:36.2: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:38.38 +18:39:23.1: 15.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:20.73 +24:07:48.9: 15.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:50.49 +21:13:57.4: 14.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.80 +23:07:54.6: 14.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:01.46 +24:13:02.1: 15.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:37.89 +22:25:10.5: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:51.37 +19:57:31.5: 15.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:20.73 +24:07:48.9: 14.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:01.46 +24:13:02.1: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:32.88 +20:21:36.2: 14.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.80 +23:07:54.6: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:26.71 +24:33:36.9: 15.68 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:38.38 +18:39:23.1: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:50.49 +21:13:57.4: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:37.89 +22:25:10.5: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:51.37 +19:57:31.5: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:20.73 +24:07:48.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.1493 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:01.46 +24:13:02.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2662 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:32.88 +20:21:36.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9887 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:28.03 +24:16:23.0: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:26.71 +24:33:36.9: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0778 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:38.38 +18:39:23.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0004 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.80 +23:07:54.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0413 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:37.89 +22:25:10.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0824 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:51.37 +19:57:31.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1282 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:50.49 +21:13:57.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1294 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:28.03 +24:16:23.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0992 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:31.71 +25:47:53.8: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.76 +23:22:18.5: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:04.94 +21:57:38.7: 14.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:43.60 +19:50:56.7: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:55.28 +23:01:42.1: 14.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:38.32 +23:05:30.9: 16.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:41.37 +25:10:25.5: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:54.90 +26:13:26.7: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:13.60 +21:46:21.3: 14.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:38.94 +18:06:53.6: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:31.71 +25:47:53.8: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.76 +23:22:18.5: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:41.37 +25:10:25.5: 14.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:31.71 +25:47:53.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8165 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:38.32 +23:05:30.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:54.90 +26:13:26.7: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.76 +23:22:18.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1371 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:41.37 +25:10:25.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0497 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:43.60 +19:50:56.7: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:55.28 +23:01:42.1: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:04.94 +21:57:38.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:54.90 +26:13:26.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1534 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:13.60 +21:46:21.3: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:43.60 +19:50:56.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7264 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:04.94 +21:57:38.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.4120 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:55.28 +23:01:42.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5244 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:13.60 +21:46:21.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.7226 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:38.94 +18:06:53.6: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:38.94 +18:06:53.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0741 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:41.61 +23:57:27.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:17.58 +20:33:27.8: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:13.48 +21:18:38.5: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:19.88 +21:30:58.2: 13.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:05.16 +25:12:53.8: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:15.70 +25:46:41.6: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:17.58 +20:33:27.8: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:13.48 +21:18:38.5: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:41.61 +23:57:27.2: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:17.58 +20:33:27.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7260 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:13.48 +21:18:38.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9976 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:41.61 +23:57:27.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6833 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:19.88 +21:30:58.2: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:19.88 +21:30:58.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9799 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.26 +22:58:08.0: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:05.16 +25:12:53.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:15.70 +25:46:41.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:11.03 +23:04:44.8: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.23 +26:03:38.5: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.26 +22:58:08.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.26 +22:58:08.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9291 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:14.62 +20:33:18.2: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:11.03 +23:04:44.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.23 +26:03:38.5: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:11.03 +23:04:44.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1036 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.23 +26:03:38.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2514 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.34 +19:20:16.2: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.79 +18:49:54.4: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.31 +17:51:20.6: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:14.62 +20:33:18.2: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:14.62 +20:33:18.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3025 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.7: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.79 +18:49:54.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.79 +18:49:54.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3477 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.31 +17:51:20.6: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.34 +19:20:16.2: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.31 +17:51:20.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4573 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.34 +19:20:16.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3481 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:38.22 +19:03:11.6: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:55.49 +23:59:01.7: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.7: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.73 +23:02:02.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4803 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:38.22 +19:03:11.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:38.22 +19:03:11.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4059 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:55.49 +23:59:01.7: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.49 +23:59:01.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5365 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:00.39 +21:30:02.4: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:59.32 +23:55:47.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:59.90 +23:02:15.3: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.71 +17:44:05.4: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.42 +19:42:38.6: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:00.39 +21:30:02.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:59.32 +23:55:47.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:59.90 +23:02:15.3: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.71 +17:44:05.4: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:59.90 +23:02:15.3: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5777 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.71 +17:44:05.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5173 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.22 +19:10:17.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.42 +19:42:38.6: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.42 +19:42:38.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3687 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:27.03 +19:47:05.1: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.22 +19:10:17.0: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.22 +19:10:17.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4371 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:52.24 +22:46:48.2: 14.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:27.03 +19:47:05.1: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:27.03 +19:47:05.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6276 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.01 +22:09:14.0: 14.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:52.24 +22:46:48.2: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:52.24 +22:46:48.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7904 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:21.08 +22:55:29.2: 14.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:39.13 +22:55:18.2: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.01 +22:09:14.0: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.01 +22:09:14.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7192 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.46 +20:35:37.3: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:21.08 +22:55:29.2: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:21.08 +22:55:29.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6110 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:39.13 +22:55:18.2: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:39.13 +22:55:18.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8214 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:49.78 +18:40:30.7: 14.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.46 +20:35:37.3: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.46 +20:35:37.3: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9320 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:55.36 +19:07:15.9: 14.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:49.78 +18:40:30.7: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:49.78 +18:40:30.7: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8619 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:02.10 +25:53:06.1: 15.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:08.60 +20:39:42.5: 15.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:55.36 +19:07:15.9: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:55.36 +19:07:15.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7384 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:02.10 +25:53:06.1: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:02.10 +25:53:06.1: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1129 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:08.60 +20:39:42.5: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:08.60 +20:39:42.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9896 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:38.03 +22:23:11.6: 15.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:16.92 +21:41:09.0: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:38.03 +22:23:11.6: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:38.03 +22:23:11.6: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1391 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:42.99 +18:45:58.3: 15.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:16.92 +21:41:09.0: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:16.92 +21:41:09.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0203 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:29.04 +18:16:18.9: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:28.42 +25:47:23.3: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:42.99 +18:45:58.3: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:42.99 +18:45:58.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0305 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:29.04 +18:16:18.9: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:29.04 +18:16:18.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9322 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:28.42 +25:47:23.3: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:28.42 +25:47:23.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1313 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:58.63 +24:51:21.7: 15.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:20.52 +25:10:29.0: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:58.63 +24:51:21.7: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:58.63 +24:51:21.7: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1027 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:20.52 +25:10:29.0: 15.78 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:22.25 +19:42:07.4: 15.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:20.52 +25:10:29.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0377 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.76 +20:48:28.9: 15.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:36.52 +18:09:56.7: 15.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:22.25 +19:42:07.4: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:22.25 +19:42:07.4: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0365 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:36.52 +18:09:56.7: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.76 +20:48:28.9: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:36.52 +18:09:56.7: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1174 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.76 +20:48:28.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1668 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:44.54 +19:52:22.7: 15.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:06.12 +21:25:42.7: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:44.54 +19:52:22.7: 15.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:44.54 +19:52:22.7: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1587 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:58.09 +21:44:40.6: 15.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:06.12 +21:25:42.7: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.12 +21:25:42.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0073 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:34.92 +20:04:28.3: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:59.07 +18:21:49.3: 15.70 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:58.09 +21:44:40.6: 15.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:58.09 +21:44:40.6: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2297 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:34.92 +20:04:28.3: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:59.07 +18:21:49.3: 15.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:34.92 +20:04:28.3: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0874 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:59.07 +18:21:49.3: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1042 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:31.61 +19:07:25.3: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:20.23 +25:53:18.1: 15.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:31.61 +19:07:25.3: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:20.23 +25:53:18.1: 15.85 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:17.12 +17:57:56.2: 15.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:31.61 +19:07:25.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0370 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:20.23 +25:53:18.1: ref_mag=15.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2775 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:03.39 +20:28:25.3: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:10.65 +22:31:20.0: 15.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:17.12 +17:57:56.2: 15.47 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:17.12 +17:57:56.2: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1945 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:03.39 +20:28:25.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:10.65 +22:31:20.0: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:10.65 +22:31:20.0: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2279 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:52.07 +22:09:14.9: 14.98 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:00.70 +24:25:12.4: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:52.07 +22:09:14.9: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:00.70 +24:25:12.4: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:00.70 +24:25:12.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9607 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:52.07 +22:09:14.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0417 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:37.77 +25:43:56.4: 15.68 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:51.78 +18:15:57.4: 15.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:37.77 +25:43:56.4: 15.83 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:37.77 +25:43:56.4: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0638 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:51.78 +18:15:57.4: 15.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:51.78 +18:15:57.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2161 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:29.30 +20:19:48.7: 15.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:38.11 +18:44:15.4: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:29.30 +20:19:48.7: 15.87 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:38.11 +18:44:15.4: 15.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.30 +20:19:48.7: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2393 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:38.11 +18:44:15.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1091 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:58.50 +17:42:48.3: 15.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:31.03 +19:05:21.5: 15.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:58.50 +17:42:48.3: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:58.50 +17:42:48.3: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0930 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:31.03 +19:05:21.5: 15.53 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:31.03 +19:05:21.5: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2705 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:52.16 +20:57:55.7: 15.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:47.50 +21:15:04.6: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:47.50 +21:15:04.6: 15.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:52.16 +20:57:55.7: 15.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:47.50 +21:15:04.6: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1945 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:52.16 +20:57:55.7: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2063 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:12.24 +21:32:32.9: 15.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:23.80 +19:46:27.0: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:12.24 +21:32:32.9: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:12.24 +21:32:32.9: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1337 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:23.80 +19:46:27.0: 15.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:23.80 +19:46:27.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1547 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:10.59 +20:43:49.6: 15.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:10.59 +20:43:49.6: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:10.59 +20:43:49.6: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1079 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103658.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108514.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100474_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100474_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100487_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100487_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100488_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100488_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100490_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100494_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100494_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100496_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100496_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100501_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100501_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100503_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100503_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:29.05 +21:46:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100507_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100507_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100511_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 100511_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100513_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100513_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100518_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100518_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100522_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100522_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100525_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100525_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100526_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100526_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100527_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100527_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100528_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100528_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100529_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100529_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100530_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100530_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.37 +25:22:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100531_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 100531_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101207_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 101207_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102196_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 102196_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103160_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 103160_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.35 +22:42:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103658_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 103658_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103680_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 103680_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.71 +22:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103942_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 103942_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.22 +19:58:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104202_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 104202_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 104929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.53 +18:42:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106049_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 106049_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 106141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.60 +17:55:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106893_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 106893_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.93 +21:03:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106924_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 106924_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106984_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 106984_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107347_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 107347_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.49 +23:36:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107358_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 107358_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.03 +20:19:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107589_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 107589_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.49 +23:36:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107786_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 107786_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108201_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108201_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108274_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108274_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108367_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108392_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108392_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108414_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108414_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108417_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108417_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:59.16 +18:07:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 108498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 108514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108543_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108543_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108655_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108655_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108693_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108693_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108782_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108782_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108935_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 108935_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.51 +21:44:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109219_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 109219_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109251_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 109251_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.75 +20:33:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109494_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 109494_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109855_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 109855_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.10 +22:53:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110067_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 110067_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110428_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 110428_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111062_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111062_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111092_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111092_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111259_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111259_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111376_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111376_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111446_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111446_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111505_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111505_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111596_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111596_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111679_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111679_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111720_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111720_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111819_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111819_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111833_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111833_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111889_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111889_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111915_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111915_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111927_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111951_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111951_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111993_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 111993_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112013_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112013_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112041_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112041_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112116_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112116_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112120_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112120_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112133_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112133_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112288_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112288_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112304_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112304_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112316_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 112316_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112363_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112363_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112383_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112383_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112463_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112463_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112514_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112521_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112521_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112539_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112539_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112640_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112640_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112708_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112708_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112717_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112717_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112856_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112856_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112939_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112939_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112942_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 112942_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113052_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 113052_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.39 +24:28:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.43 +18:37:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-19-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0451 did not pass the final checks
