This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3439 2461322.8439 11.84 03:39:57.46 +21:30:24.0
167.17134 -26.54590 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:57.46 +21:30:24.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:57.46 +21:30:24.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3439* 03 39 57.46 +21 30 24.0 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8439,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3439 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3439 2461322.8439 13.90 03:24:53.32 +23:30:09.2
162.74520 -27.26489 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:53.32 +23:30:09.2: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:53.32 +23:30:09.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3439* 03 24 53.32 +23 30 09.2 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8439,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3439 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3439 2461322.8439 14.10 03:24:41.64 +18:55:44.0
166.01151 -30.83884 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:41.64 +18:55:44.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:41.64 +18:55:44.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3439* 03 24 41.64 +18 55 44.0 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8439,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3439 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3439 2461322.8439 14.52 03:46:08.69 +23:15:46.0
167.04152 -24.28416 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:08.69 +23:15:46.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:08.69 +23:15:46.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3439* 03 46 08.69 +23 15 46.0 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8439,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3439 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3439 2461322.8439 14.83 03:35:30.85 +19:42:09.2
167.65252 -28.58403 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita -1 -0 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:30.85 +19:42:09.2: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:30.85 +19:42:09.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3439* 03 35 30.85 +19 42 09.2 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8439,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3439 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3439 2461322.8439 15.10 03:53:02.66 +19:02:27.6
171.55145 -26.22755 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola 0 -0 0 15.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:02.66 +19:02:27.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:02.66 +19:02:27.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3439* 03 53 02.66 +19 02 27.6 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8439,15.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3439 15.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461322.84417758 09.10.2026 08:15:26.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10988
Objects passed selection criteria: 10954
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8800.75
Average stars matched: 8020.75 (91.1371 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:25:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461322.84417758 09.10.2026 08:15:26.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 117
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68476
Objects passed selection criteria: 68256
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55975.2
Average stars matched: 50935.5 (90.9965 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 284876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:26:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.84363440
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.750 +22:00:01.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.750 +22:00:01.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:30.937 +21:59:35.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:30.937 +21:59:35.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.750 +22:00:01.62
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:30.937 +21:59:35.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01005 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eLSLyfLPPW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.woHtTKOw6A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NhTItJYGhR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LTnPlJwEve
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.eLSLyfLPPW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=2358, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.woHtTKOw6A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=2356, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 8229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NhTItJYGhR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=752, bad_region=2497, passed=11268
Got 11268 stars (including 8157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4930 robust_rms=7.562 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.703 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.703 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4930 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.934 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4930 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.459 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4930 robust_rms_before=1.193 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.514 worst_region_rms_after=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.459
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.762 +22:00:00.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11268 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1107464.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.193 -> 0.356 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4930 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4810 pairs (4930 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=7.530 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.606 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.606 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.932 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.456 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.456 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4810 robust_rms_before=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.456
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.763 +22:00:00.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11268 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1108004.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.354 -> 0.355 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=4810 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1346 n_q2=808 n_q3=1437 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LTnPlJwEve (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=739, bad_region=2493, passed=11181
Got 11181 stars (including 8081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=7.544 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.843 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.843 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.874 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.874 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.458 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4928 robust_rms_before=1.203 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.498 worst_region_rms_after=0.458 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.041 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.498 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.380 arcsec matched=4928
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1370 n_q2=835 n_q3=1463 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.268
ref2=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.094
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.087
reference average sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.2855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (4810 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:57.46 +21:30:24.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.6: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.55 +21:12:57.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.04 +22:37:08.0: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:57.46 +21:30:24.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.55 +21:12:57.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.04 +22:37:08.0: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4504 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1705 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.55 +21:12:57.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4484 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4643 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.04 +22:37:08.0: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4378 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4368 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3723 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20913_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 20913_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.81 +24:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21540_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 21540_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21867_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 21867_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22094_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 22094_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22142_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 22142_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22168_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 22168_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22188_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 22188_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22189_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 22189_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22197_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 22197_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:39:57.46 +21:30:24.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.763 +22:00:00.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.763 +22:00:00.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:30.937 +21:59:35.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:30.937 +21:59:35.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.763 +22:00:00.43
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:30.937 +21:59:35.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00985 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I1euEG03bF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kMf8nnpAmp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M45I862CvZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZdwdpeQlhm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.I1euEG03bF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4312, bad_region=11991, passed=71162
Got 71162 stars (including 55414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kMf8nnpAmp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4374, bad_region=12029, passed=71479
Got 71479 stars (including 55644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5423)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.M45I862CvZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3879, bad_region=11617, passed=64797
Got 64797 stars (including 50116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=7.589 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.752 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.975 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.975 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.465 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.465 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.355 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.471 worst_region_rms_after=0.465 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.471 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.465
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.471 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec matched=4920
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=1404 n_q2=860 n_q3=1460 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZdwdpeQlhm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3919, bad_region=11652, passed=64992
Got 64992 stars (including 50248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4925 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4925 robust_rms=7.557 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.136 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.136 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4925 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.906 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.906 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4925 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.467 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4925 robust_rms_before=1.182 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.491 worst_region_rms_after=0.467 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.031 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.467
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.491 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.368 arcsec matched=4925
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=4925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1403 n_q2=851 n_q3=1468 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-14-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_052158_TTUQ2b1x1_1075038_x7G5EOgn/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:43.95 +25:41:48.9: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:31.02 +24:30:30.2: 15.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:40.04 +18:59:25.9: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:00.43 +25:26:55.0: 14.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:09.10 +25:17:14.2: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:09.28 +20:36:19.7: 14.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:25.18 +18:54:48.6: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:16.32 +25:59:17.4: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:42.31 +23:40:07.4: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:30.07 +24:28:12.0: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:40.04 +18:59:25.9: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:31.02 +24:30:30.2: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:16.32 +25:59:17.4: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:43.95 +25:41:48.9: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:09.28 +20:36:19.7: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:00.43 +25:26:55.0: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:25.18 +18:54:48.6: 14.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:40.04 +18:59:25.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9343 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:09.10 +25:17:14.2: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:42.31 +23:40:07.4: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:16.32 +25:59:17.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1574 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:31.02 +24:30:30.2: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0807 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:09.28 +20:36:19.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6666 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:00.43 +25:26:55.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=15.0198 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:43.95 +25:41:48.9: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.0030 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:42.31 +23:40:07.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0854 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:25.18 +18:54:48.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9063 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:09.10 +25:17:14.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.1098 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:30.07 +24:28:12.0: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:30.07 +24:28:12.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6607 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:59.89 +22:59:38.4: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:56.71 +23:39:42.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:46.55 +22:43:44.5: 14.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:56.84 +25:06:36.9: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:38.64 +18:31:52.4: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:03.87 +25:06:46.1: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:59.89 +22:59:38.4: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:59.89 +22:59:38.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4884 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:46.55 +22:43:44.5: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:46.55 +22:43:44.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4320 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:38.64 +18:31:52.4: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:56.71 +23:39:42.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:56.84 +25:06:36.9: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:38.64 +18:31:52.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9546 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:56.71 +23:39:42.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2748 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:56.84 +25:06:36.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1143 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:10.42 +20:15:10.3: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:03.87 +25:06:46.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:03.87 +25:06:46.1: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1241 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:53.32 +23:30:09.2: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:10.42 +20:15:10.3: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:10.42 +20:15:10.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8981 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:41.64 +18:55:44.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:52.24 +18:47:14.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:41.75 +23:51:23.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:23.91 +19:48:46.6: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.20 +25:53:24.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:11.72 +19:50:30.4: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.19 +25:03:02.5: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:53.32 +23:30:09.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:07.28 +21:12:58.7: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:52.24 +18:47:14.9: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:41.64 +18:55:44.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:52.24 +18:47:14.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0543 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:41.75 +23:51:23.0: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.20 +25:53:24.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.75 +23:51:23.0: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2658 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:23.91 +19:48:46.6: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.20 +25:53:24.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2987 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:23.91 +19:48:46.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2652 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.19 +25:03:02.5: 14.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.19 +25:03:02.5: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3523 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:11.72 +19:50:30.4: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:11.72 +19:50:30.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3783 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:07.28 +21:12:58.7: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:07.28 +21:12:58.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3216 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:25.07 +24:45:32.7: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:52.74 +21:09:08.2: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:08.69 +23:15:46.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.32 +18:35:15.2: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:45.97 +26:01:57.5: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:52.95 +20:23:29.2: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:30.67 +21:24:08.5: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:25.07 +24:45:32.7: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:25.07 +24:45:32.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5549 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:08.69 +23:15:46.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:52.74 +21:09:08.2: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.32 +18:35:15.2: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:52.74 +21:09:08.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4919 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:30.67 +21:24:08.5: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.32 +18:35:15.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5434 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:45.97 +26:01:57.5: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:58.73 +25:03:53.5: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:30.67 +21:24:08.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6720 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:52.95 +20:23:29.2: 15.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:45.97 +26:01:57.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7983 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:52.95 +20:23:29.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8472 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:58.73 +25:03:53.5: 14.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:58.73 +25:03:53.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6822 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:18.87 +24:24:42.7: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:35.48 +22:11:42.8: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:39.57 +24:58:34.7: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:30.85 +19:42:09.2: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:27:35.61 +22:53:32.7: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:04.58 +26:12:30.8: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:18.87 +24:24:42.7: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:18.87 +24:24:42.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7690 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:30.85 +19:42:09.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:35.48 +22:11:42.8: 15.46 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:39.57 +24:58:34.7: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:35.48 +22:11:42.8: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0359 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:39.57 +24:58:34.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8091 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:27:35.61 +22:53:32.7: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:04.58 +26:12:30.8: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:35.61 +22:53:32.7: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0847 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:04.58 +26:12:30.8: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9906 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:11.19 +23:00:51.9: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:11.19 +23:00:51.9: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:11.19 +23:00:51.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0534 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:16.19 +24:19:41.6: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:26.87 +25:50:21.4: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.30 +20:40:12.4: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:48.68 +18:24:07.7: 15.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:43.26 +23:56:08.2: 16.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:16.19 +24:19:41.6: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:16.19 +24:19:41.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0513 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:48.68 +18:24:07.7: 15.67 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:26.87 +25:50:21.4: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:48.68 +18:24:07.7: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0786 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.30 +20:40:12.4: 15.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:43.26 +23:56:08.2: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:26.87 +25:50:21.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1063 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.30 +20:40:12.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1336 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:43.26 +23:56:08.2: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1187 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:41.40 +19:23:03.7: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:41.40 +19:23:03.7: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:41.40 +19:23:03.7: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=15.1321 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:28.73 +18:33:51.7: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:21.13 +25:29:37.5: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:58.24 +18:01:01.1: 15.59 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:32.57 +19:11:27.2: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:06.30 +21:30:32.7: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:06.30 +21:30:32.7: 15.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:28.73 +18:33:51.7: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:06.30 +21:30:32.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0268 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:21.13 +25:29:37.5: 15.58 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:58.24 +18:01:01.1: 15.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:32.57 +19:11:27.2: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:28.73 +18:33:51.7: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1086 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:21.13 +25:29:37.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0274 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:58.24 +18:01:01.1: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1921 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:32.57 +19:11:27.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1082 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:20.19 +23:34:17.2: 15.67 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:20.19 +23:34:17.2: 15.38 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:20.19 +23:34:17.2: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1443 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:05.67 +23:45:25.0: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:19.14 +18:52:51.9: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:27:08.94 +24:11:32.9: 15.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:23.26 +18:48:24.5: 15.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:22.79 +21:30:40.5: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:05.67 +23:45:25.0: 15.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:23.26 +18:48:24.5: 15.65 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:22.79 +21:30:40.5: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:23.26 +18:48:24.5: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1611 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:05.67 +23:45:25.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1536 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:27:08.94 +24:11:32.9: 15.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:19.14 +18:52:51.9: 15.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:22.79 +21:30:40.5: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0249 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:08.94 +24:11:32.9: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1222 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:19.14 +18:52:51.9: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2218 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:13.02 +26:12:11.3: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:55.45 +25:09:57.5: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:13.02 +26:12:11.3: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:44.65 +22:08:57.3: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:34.87 +25:54:31.3: 15.60 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:35.58 +21:31:19.2: 15.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:28.81 +18:37:33.5: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:13.02 +26:12:11.3: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1334 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:34.87 +25:54:31.3: 15.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:55.45 +25:09:57.5: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:34.87 +25:54:31.3: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2338 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:44.65 +22:08:57.3: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:35.58 +21:31:19.2: 15.72 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:28.81 +18:37:33.5: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:55.45 +25:09:57.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8757 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:44.65 +22:08:57.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1197 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:35.58 +21:31:19.2: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1621 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:28.81 +18:37:33.5: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2259 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:10.49 +24:09:40.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:10.49 +24:09:40.0: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:10.49 +24:09:40.0: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=15.1787 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:02.66 +19:02:27.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:02.66 +19:02:27.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95835.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86078_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86078_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86081_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86081_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86083_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86083_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86084_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86084_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86087_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86087_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86110_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86110_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86115_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86115_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86116_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86116_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86117_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86117_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86119_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86119_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86121_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86121_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86123_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86123_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86129_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86129_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86605_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 86605_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.82 +24:29:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87191_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 87191_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:57.46 +21:30:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88312_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 88312_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:40.52 +18:47:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:07.69 +23:38:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88586_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 88586_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:54.79 +25:11:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89030_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89030_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89144_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89144_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.58 +24:51:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89413_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89413_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:24.23 +22:45:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89458_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89458_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.40 +23:20:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89615_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89615_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.30 +24:29:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89835_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89835_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:23.45 +24:31:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89916_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 89916_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:13.01 +23:36:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90876_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 90876_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90879_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 90879_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91136_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 91136_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:36.95 +25:08:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91530_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 91530_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:15.06 +24:34:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91681_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 91681_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91871_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 91871_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92325_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 92325_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92525_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 92525_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92732_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 92732_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92855_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 92855_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92990_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 92990_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93297_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 93297_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93902_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 93902_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.47 +24:18:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93941_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 93941_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94024_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 94024_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 94402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94732_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 94732_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94751_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 94751_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94761_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 94761_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94896_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 94896_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95067_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 95067_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 95103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95804_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 95804_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95835_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
Preparing report for the candidate 95835_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95939_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 95939_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96043_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96043_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96335_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96335_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96347_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96347_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96362_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96362_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96371_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96371_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96501_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96501_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96502_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96502_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96546_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96546_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96569_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96569_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96690_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96690_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96699_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96699_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96765_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96765_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96777_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96777_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96798_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96798_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96810_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96810_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96811_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96811_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96869_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96869_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96898_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96898_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96928_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96928_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96954_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96954_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96962_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96962_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96986_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 96986_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 97105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97133_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 97133_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97213_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 97213_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97241_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447
The candidate 97241_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_03-15-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0447 did not pass the final checks
