This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.4120 2461322.9120 12.59 05:29:30.19 -17:41:21.9
220.48930 -25.80255 galactic Lep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.183 Istria 0 -0 0 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:29:30.19 -17:41:21.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:29:30.19 -17:41:21.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9120,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4120 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.9120,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.4120 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
First image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Last image: 2461322.91227694 09.10.2026 09:53:30.728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10670
Objects passed selection criteria: 10658
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10019.5
Average stars matched: 9631 (96.1226 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:01:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
First image: 2461058.69662478 18.01.2026 04:42:58.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Last image: 2461322.91227694 09.10.2026 09:53:30.728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 62
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 62609
Objects passed selection criteria: 62464
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57782.5
Average stars matched: 55679.5 (96.3605 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 280280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:03:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.91165127
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:20.609 -18:00:34.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:20.609 -18:00:34.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0906 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:18.380 -18:00:51.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:18.380 -18:00:51.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0819 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:20.609 -18:00:34.66
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:18.380 -18:00:51.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00999 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ctrRIJxDoC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pZdEroebww
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fBKG26ZcH1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jr3jxa1tTp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg
Loaded 9860 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6881 out of 7251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7251 out of 9607 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
3.0 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
3.0 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ctrRIJxDoC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=819, bad_region=0, passed=9993
Got 9993 stars (including 9160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1398 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pZdEroebww (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=851, bad_region=0, passed=9607
Got 9607 stars (including 8741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1417 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fBKG26ZcH1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=598, bad_region=0, passed=10381
Got 10381 stars (including 9772 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=12.955 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.973 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.973 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.728 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.728 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.386 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4922 robust_rms_before=0.713 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.427 worst_region_rms_after=0.386 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.824 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.386
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.427 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4922
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1060 n_q2=1352 n_q3=1121 n_q4=1389 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Jr3jxa1tTp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=618, bad_region=0, passed=10356
Got 10356 stars (including 9728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=12.878 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.150 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.150 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.692 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.692 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.411 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.733 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.405 worst_region_rms_after=0.411 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.846 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.411
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.405 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.286 arcsec matched=4918
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1074 n_q2=1343 n_q3=1119 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.317
ref2=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.356
new1=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.220
new2=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.179
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.3365
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:29:28.15 -16:09:01.6: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:34:08.94 -15:16:00.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:36:10.58 -16:26:26.5: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:01.22 -17:17:23.9: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:00.65 -16:32:34.0: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:38.55 -17:39:39.1: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:24:10.11 -18:05:48.5: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:20:39.54 -16:13:38.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:36:10.58 -16:26:26.5: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:00.65 -16:32:34.0: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:01.22 -17:17:23.9: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:34:08.94 -15:16:00.3: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:29:28.15 -16:09:01.6: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:10.58 -16:26:26.5: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8925 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:00.65 -16:32:34.0: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7656 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:08.94 -15:16:00.3: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8942 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:01.22 -17:17:23.9: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8846 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:28.15 -16:09:01.6: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7443 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:03.78 -18:46:07.1: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:38.55 -17:39:39.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:38.55 -17:39:39.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9268 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:24:10.11 -18:05:48.5: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:10.11 -18:05:48.5: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9672 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:18.13 -19:17:40.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9597 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:20:39.54 -16:13:38.8: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:39.54 -16:13:38.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9348 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:03.78 -18:46:07.1: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:03.78 -18:46:07.1: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9840 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:22:04.70 -18:02:28.8: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:30:13.91 -16:56:52.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:00.58 -16:57:44.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:00.58 -16:57:44.5: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:00.58 -16:57:44.5: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9925 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:22:04.70 -18:02:28.8: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:30:13.91 -16:56:52.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:04.70 -18:02:28.8: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9655 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:13.91 -16:56:52.5: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9950 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20382_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20384_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20384_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:03.55 -15:33:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:44.63 -15:55:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20459_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:04.31 -16:22:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20592_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:05.34 -16:43:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20597_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:22.45 -17:51:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20643_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20643_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20651_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20651_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20678_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20678_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20688_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20688_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20690_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20690_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20695_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20700_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20700_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20701_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20701_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20703_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20703_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:13.03 -18:11:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20705_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20708_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20708_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20709_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20709_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20712_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20712_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20714_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 20714_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:24.76 -17:04:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:36.48 -14:48:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:20.609 -18:00:34.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:20.609 -18:00:34.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0906 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:18.380 -18:00:51.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:18.380 -18:00:51.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0819 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:20.609 -18:00:34.66
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:18.380 -18:00:51.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00999 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w5eXczJVza
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tY4lXacL6B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x5mKqbMW5F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UUtr2HJsQK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Loaded 9904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7112 out of 8122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8122 out of 64337 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.682750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.682750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 64337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Loaded 9904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7112 out of 8122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8122 out of 64337 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 64139 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6237 to 88.6352 deg, Dec -23.3362 to -12.4074 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6237 to 88.6352 deg, Dec -23.3362 to -12.4074 deg
Loaded 9907 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7100 out of 8133 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8133 out of 64139 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 60 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
1.9 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.8 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
2.8 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.3 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w5eXczJVza (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3724, bad_region=1, passed=64313
Got 64313 stars (including 60489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1323 n_q2=1109 n_q3=1414 n_q4=1080 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tY4lXacL6B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3682, bad_region=1, passed=64117
Got 64117 stars (including 60325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1431 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.x5mKqbMW5F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2545, bad_region=44, passed=51808
Got 51808 stars (including 49155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=13.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.143 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.143 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.720 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.706 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.412 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.818 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.270 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1058 n_q2=1324 n_q3=1159 n_q4=1378 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UUtr2HJsQK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2520, bad_region=45, passed=52489
Got 52489 stars (including 49860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=13.246 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.271 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.271 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.695 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.407 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.728 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.409 worst_region_rms_after=0.407 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.845 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.407
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.409 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.287 arcsec matched=4918
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1316 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1370 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-52-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0494.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_045727_TTUQ1b1x1_3639845_HSIhmGHD/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:52:43.26 -16:38:07.2: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:56.96 -15:36:41.4: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:07:50.70 -16:58:58.5: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:53.22 -13:55:02.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:50:05.04 -16:31:57.3: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:49:42.43 -18:49:26.9: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:49:38.53 -15:25:59.5: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:49:38.53 -15:25:59.5: 13.86 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:50:05.04 -16:31:57.3: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.5: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:53.22 -13:55:02.8: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:49:42.43 -18:49:26.9: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:56.96 -15:36:41.4: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:52:43.26 -16:38:07.2: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:38.53 -15:25:59.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8555 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:05.04 -16:31:57.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1748 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:53.22 -13:55:02.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8750 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:42.43 -18:49:26.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0599 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:56.96 -15:36:41.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3565 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3047 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:43.26 -16:38:07.2: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2545 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:07:50.70 -16:58:58.5: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:50.70 -16:58:58.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2949 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:29:30.19 -17:41:21.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:30:47.07 -19:24:07.8: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:29:30.19 -17:41:21.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:18.58 -15:20:19.6: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:47:48.91 -18:36:03.6: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:36.04 -15:12:38.5: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:14.24 -14:50:56.2: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:46:52.62 -18:43:33.4: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:50:55.87 -18:36:21.3: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:30:47.07 -19:24:07.8: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:47.07 -19:24:07.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4901 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:08:32.69 -18:11:41.2: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:36.04 -15:12:38.5: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:18.58 -15:20:19.6: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:47:48.91 -18:36:03.6: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:50:55.87 -18:36:21.3: 13.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:36.04 -15:12:38.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8217 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:48.91 -18:36:03.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6766 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:18.58 -15:20:19.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6543 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:46:52.62 -18:43:33.4: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:55.87 -18:36:21.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6901 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:52.62 -18:43:33.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6340 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:14.24 -14:50:56.2: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:14.24 -14:50:56.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5242 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:08:32.69 -18:11:41.2: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:32.69 -18:11:41.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8363 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:25.09 -12:50:10.3: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:41:23.90 -14:23:57.0: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:26:56.85 -16:18:50.2: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:15:28.55 -15:13:31.4: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:51:12.64 -13:25:48.7: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:31:26.92 -14:54:28.4: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:41:23.90 -14:23:57.0: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:28.55 -15:13:31.4: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:23.90 -14:23:57.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9365 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:28.55 -15:13:31.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1513 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:48:02.85 -16:36:02.6: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:15:25.09 -12:50:10.3: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:26:56.85 -16:18:50.2: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:25.09 -12:50:10.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9902 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:56.85 -16:18:50.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9232 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:32:59.10 -18:26:41.7: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:51:12.64 -13:25:48.7: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:12.64 -13:25:48.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3363 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:31:26.92 -14:54:28.4: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:26.92 -14:54:28.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2173 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:48:02.85 -16:36:02.6: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:02.85 -16:36:02.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3555 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:32:59.10 -18:26:41.7: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:59.10 -18:26:41.7: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2935 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:02:01.63 -13:25:06.1: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:18:44.76 -13:48:51.9: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:53:23.02 -12:59:57.3: 14.96 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:36:05.01 -14:41:50.8: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:51:53.25 -13:31:30.7: 14.50 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:49:57.63 -14:03:06.9: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:53:23.02 -12:59:57.3: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:02:01.63 -13:25:06.1: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:23.02 -12:59:57.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5272 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:18:44.76 -13:48:51.9: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:44.76 -13:48:51.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2978 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:01.63 -13:25:06.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2492 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:36:05.01 -14:41:50.8: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:07:58.08 -19:34:10.6: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:05.01 -14:41:50.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3349 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:51:53.25 -13:31:30.7: 14.64 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:53.25 -13:31:30.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4032 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:50:47.84 -13:13:51.3: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:49:57.63 -14:03:06.9: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:57.63 -14:03:06.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2930 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:07:58.08 -19:34:10.6: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:58.08 -19:34:10.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4132 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:50:47.84 -13:13:51.3: 14.87 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:47.84 -13:13:51.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4794 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:04:08.63 -13:51:49.0: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:53:55.63 -15:46:25.0: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:03:36.63 -14:44:48.9: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:36:12.88 -14:01:12.3: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:59:38.09 -13:46:51.8: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:04:36.52 -15:09:45.2: 15.22 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:04:08.63 -13:51:49.0: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:03:36.63 -14:44:48.9: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:08.63 -13:51:49.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5171 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:36.63 -14:44:48.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5045 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:53:55.63 -15:46:25.0: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:55.63 -15:46:25.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4907 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:36:12.88 -14:01:12.3: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:57:53.58 -18:26:33.9: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:12.88 -14:01:12.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4342 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:59:38.09 -13:46:51.8: 15.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:00:26.08 -15:50:22.6: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:38.09 -13:46:51.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7174 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:42.85 -14:58:29.3: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:04:36.52 -15:09:45.2: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:36.52 -15:09:45.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4768 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:57:53.58 -18:26:33.9: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:53.58 -18:26:33.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5191 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:00:26.08 -15:50:22.6: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:26.08 -15:50:22.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5510 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:42.85 -14:58:29.3: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:42.85 -14:58:29.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6545 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:02:33.85 -18:41:33.8: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:59:22.89 -16:58:13.7: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:35:25.95 -15:42:28.5: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:51:46.23 -16:09:51.7: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:48:56.94 -14:35:26.5: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:02:33.85 -18:41:33.8: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:33.85 -18:41:33.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6445 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:59:22.89 -16:58:13.7: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:35:25.95 -15:42:28.5: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:22.89 -16:58:13.7: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4836 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:25.95 -15:42:28.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6033 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:51:46.23 -16:09:51.7: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:46.23 -16:09:51.7: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2592 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:48:56.94 -14:35:26.5: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:56.94 -14:35:26.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6362 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79924.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 76s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79331_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79331_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79333_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79333_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79336_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79336_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79339_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79339_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79343_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79343_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79344_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79344_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79354_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79354_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79355_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79355_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:02.46 -16:26:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79364_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79364_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79366_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79366_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.35 -18:30:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79441_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79441_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:04.33 -16:22:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79578_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 79578_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:05.32 -16:43:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79924_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 79924_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80370_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80370_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:58.06 -14:22:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80487_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80487_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80497_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80497_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80572_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80572_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80725_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80725_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:50.03 -15:48:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80734_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80734_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80797_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80797_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80815_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 80815_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80833_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80833_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80852_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80852_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80854_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80854_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80875_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80875_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:03.31 -15:07:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80922_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80922_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80928_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80928_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80988_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 80988_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81057_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81057_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81058_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81058_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:48.63 -19:27:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81113_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81113_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81214_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81214_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81233_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81233_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81234_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81234_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81236_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81236_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81241_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81241_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81244_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81244_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81259_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81259_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81294_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81294_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81303_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81303_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81339_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81339_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81343_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81343_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81361_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81361_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81371_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81371_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81397_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81397_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81414_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81414_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81417_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81417_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81418_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81418_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81422_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81422_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81441_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81441_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81449_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81449_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81458_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81458_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81475_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81475_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81490_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81490_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81495_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81495_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81534_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 81534_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34473_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 34473_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:13.03 -18:11:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19424_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 19424_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:44.64 -15:55:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13926_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 13926_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495
The candidate 11444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_04-53-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0495 did not pass the final checks