This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2304 2461322.7304 12.10 05:39:38.86 +30:30:30.4
177.98065 -0.27452 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 0 -0 0 11.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:38.86 +30:30:30.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:38.86 +30:30:30.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7304,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2304 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2304 2461322.7304 13.59 05:56:11.69 +27:37:46.6
182.31399 1.33152 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.214 Aschera -0 -0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:11.69 +27:37:46.6: 16.09 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:11.69 +27:37:46.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.09 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2304* 05 56 11.69 +27 37 46.6 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7304,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2304 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2304 2461322.7304 13.51 06:19:50.39 +33:06:23.8
179.94226 8.42985 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.984 Gretia -0 1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:19:50.39 +33:06:23.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:50.39 +33:06:23.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7304,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2304 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2304 2461322.7304 14.15 05:53:52.07 +33:19:22.1
177.13684 3.76414 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.907 Rhoda -1 -1 2 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:52.07 +33:19:22.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:52.07 +33:19:22.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7304,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2304 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461322.73072591 09.10.2026 05:32:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22641
Objects passed selection criteria: 22526
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16101.5
Average stars matched: 14895.2 (92.5085 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246576 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 04:59:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461322.73072591 09.10.2026 05:32:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 73 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 180150
Objects passed selection criteria: 179646
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 131996
Average stars matched: 122202 (92.5797 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 570116 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 05:01:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.73013819
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.129 +30:03:17.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.129 +30:03:17.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0572 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.400 +30:03:04.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.400 +30:03:04.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0545 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:00.129 +30:03:17.98
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:03.400 +30:03:04.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01238 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zl4misjyoI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b0MkTXAzyO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EEkzRlPgbB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y5J3duLRQi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13642 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zl4misjyoI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=5792, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 18877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1282 n_q2=975 n_q3=1593 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b0MkTXAzyO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=5776, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 18855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1281 n_q2=975 n_q3=1594 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EEkzRlPgbB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=855, bad_region=2203, passed=13141
Got 13141 stars (including 10158 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=6.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.558 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.558 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.017 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.017 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.833 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.492 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.565 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.907 worst_region_rms_after=0.833 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.100 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.833
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.907 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.907 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.565 arcsec matched=4780
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.537 n_q1=1414 n_q2=796 n_q3=1788 n_q4=782 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.y5J3duLRQi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=872, bad_region=2213, passed=13257
Got 13257 stars (including 10249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13257 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=6.803 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.832 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.645 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.912 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.912 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.840 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.840 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.615 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.536 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.940 worst_region_rms_after=0.840 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.403 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.840
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 941.5'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.498 +30:03:03.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13257 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3614619.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.615 -> 0.536 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4779 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4562 pairs (4779 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4562 robust_rms=6.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.747 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4562 robust_rms=0.636 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.883 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.883 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4562 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4562 robust_rms_before=0.525 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.525 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.813 worst_region_rms_after=0.809 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.813 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.809
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 941.5'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.498 +30:03:03.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13257 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3618741.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.525 -> 0.525 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4562 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4562 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4562 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=1354 n_q2=748 n_q3=1701 n_q4=759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.299
ref2=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.556 worst_q_ratio=1.115
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.540 worst_q_ratio=1.055
reference average sigma_overall=0.4745 worst_q_ratio=1.285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4778 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4562 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31542_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 31542_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.37 +32:33:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31545_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 31545_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:56.79 +29:43:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31546_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 31546_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.14 +32:31:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31547_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 31547_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.53 +29:29:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33336_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 33336_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.27 +32:03:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34350_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 34350_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.33 +32:13:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.13 +28:29:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.129 +30:03:17.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.129 +30:03:17.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0572 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 941.5'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.498 +30:03:03.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.498 +30:03:03.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0542 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:00.129 +30:03:17.98
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:03.498 +30:03:03.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01284 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XJ5XoUai0R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.coV3exqjIQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AGeSkwnfl3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KLn0jnDeCY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14294 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14294 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 116 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.7 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XJ5XoUai0R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=32425, bad_region=34270, passed=212766
Got 212766 stars (including 150203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1332 n_q2=876 n_q3=1615 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.coV3exqjIQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=32176, bad_region=34340, passed=212605
Got 212605 stars (including 150130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212605 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1324 n_q2=908 n_q3=1589 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AGeSkwnfl3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=7848, bad_region=12297, passed=99937
Got 99937 stars (including 80359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=6.521 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.783 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.783 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.640 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.072 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.072 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.557 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.842 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.842 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4764 robust_rms_before=1.493 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.566 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.557 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.874 worst_region_rms_after=0.842 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.087 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.842
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.874 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.566 arcsec matched=4764
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.534 n_q1=1466 n_q2=790 n_q3=1726 n_q4=782 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KLn0jnDeCY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=7801, bad_region=12410, passed=98929
Got 98929 stars (including 79304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=6.810 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.033 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.033 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.651 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.948 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.948 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4762 robust_rms_before=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.573 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.875 worst_region_rms_after=0.877 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.875 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.877
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.875 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.875 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.536 arcsec matched=4762
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=1460 n_q2=791 n_q3=1730 n_q4=781 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-31-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045601_TTUQ2b1x1_3433156_aXNSljDl/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:04.97 +29:30:10.9: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:32.88 +28:08:50.4: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:24.76 +32:04:18.8: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:26.35 +30:13:09.6: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:40.52 +28:35:08.5: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:53.11 +31:11:41.4: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:40.52 +28:35:08.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:04.97 +29:30:10.9: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:24.76 +32:04:18.8: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:32.88 +28:08:50.4: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:26.35 +30:13:09.6: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:53.11 +31:11:41.4: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:04.97 +29:30:10.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9334 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:40.52 +28:35:08.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8437 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:32.88 +28:08:50.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6311 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:26.35 +30:13:09.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1739 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:53.11 +31:11:41.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0872 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:24.76 +32:04:18.8: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7651 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:21.25 +34:19:41.1: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:21.25 +34:19:41.1: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:09.13 +29:19:18.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:21.25 +34:19:41.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0336 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:38.86 +30:30:30.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:09.13 +29:19:18.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:38.86 +30:30:30.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:09.13 +29:19:18.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5445 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:58.23 +28:38:07.0: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:36.51 +30:08:07.5: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:11.69 +27:37:46.6: 16.09 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:58.23 +28:38:07.0: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:58.23 +28:38:07.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4713 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:19:50.39 +33:06:23.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:36.51 +30:08:07.5: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:36.51 +30:08:07.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5899 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:28.80 +29:34:12.7: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:11.69 +27:37:46.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.09 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:11.69 +27:37:46.6: ref_mag=16.09 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.5894 delta=2.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:50.39 +33:06:23.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:28.80 +29:34:12.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:28.80 +29:34:12.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5816 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:09.86 +29:31:52.2: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:09.86 +29:31:52.2: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:09.86 +29:31:52.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8639 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:03.10 +27:43:30.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:52.07 +33:19:22.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:03.10 +27:43:30.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:03.10 +27:43:30.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8053 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:52.07 +33:19:22.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out254160.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out254562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out258415.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239221_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239221_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239224_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239224_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239227_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239227_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239234_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239234_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239242_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239242_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239244_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239244_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239249_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239249_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239270_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239270_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:10.62 +30:44:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:27.64 +29:38:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239281_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239281_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239288_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239288_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:46.66 +29:05:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239289_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239289_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:37.43 +33:50:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239290_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239290_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.23 +26:25:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239297_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239297_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:09.72 +30:12:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239302_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239302_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:12.59 +30:49:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239307_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239307_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:17.48 +31:49:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239313_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239313_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:11.34 +27:55:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239321_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239321_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239324_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239324_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.95 +27:18:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239328_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239328_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.82 +27:35:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239329_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239329_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:11.88 +26:16:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239330_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239330_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239334_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 239334_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.52 +29:29:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241213_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 241213_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.27 +32:03:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242725_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 242725_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.64 +27:35:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243471_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 243471_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243646_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 243646_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.61 +28:29:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245113_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 245113_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.70 +26:04:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246119_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 246119_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.70 +32:30:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246186_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 246186_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.82 +29:32:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246229_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 246229_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.63 +26:00:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246271_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 246271_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.38 +31:10:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246723_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 246723_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.34 +32:06:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246917_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 246917_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.00 +29:29:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247331_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 247331_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.03 +26:41:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247404_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 247404_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.10 +33:06:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247617_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 247617_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.55 +27:35:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247795_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 247795_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:55.27 +28:47:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248039_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248039_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.78 +31:57:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248240_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248240_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.90 +33:02:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248268_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248268_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:10.42 +29:22:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248565_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248565_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.75 +30:30:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248566_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248566_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.51 +30:42:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248825_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248825_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:50.70 +27:58:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248866_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248866_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:10.93 +31:26:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248929_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248929_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.30 +25:47:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248934_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 248934_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:31.99 +27:49:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249235_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249235_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.64 +26:42:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249313_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249313_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:52.96 +28:27:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249401_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249401_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.16 +32:38:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249535_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249535_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:50.93 +33:20:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249636_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249636_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:04.82 +30:32:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249782_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249782_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:02.44 +27:17:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249925_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 249925_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:32.99 +32:17:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250160_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250160_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:13.03 +32:45:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250345_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250345_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:27.30 +27:37:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250452_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250452_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:29.13 +29:37:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250461_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250461_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:07.08 +30:36:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250863_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250863_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:38.32 +32:48:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250912_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250912_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:41.24 +29:59:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250952_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250952_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.84 +32:30:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250961_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 250961_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.68 +31:54:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251163_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 251163_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:03.13 +27:56:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251232_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 251232_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:31.54 +33:12:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251700_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 251700_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.60 +33:48:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252154_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 252154_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.32 +27:03:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252561_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 252561_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:27.18 +29:36:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252565_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 252565_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.57 +32:04:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252585_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 252585_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:40.67 +28:13:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 252801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:37.86 +31:04:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252818_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 252818_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:20.28 +31:33:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253126_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253126_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:02.83 +31:03:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253184_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253184_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:35.94 +32:36:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253245_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253245_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.21 +30:31:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253323_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253323_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253360_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253360_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253638_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253638_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.26 +31:02:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253644_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253644_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.21 +32:48:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253974_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 253974_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:27.31 +31:08:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254160_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 254160_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254406_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 254406_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:28.52 +28:58:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254440_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 254440_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.75 +31:18:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254562_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 254562_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254616_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 254616_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254776_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 254776_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:36.71 +26:26:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 254801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:54.64 +28:13:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255253_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 255253_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:37.10 +31:38:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255410_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 255410_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:11.03 +27:35:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255546_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 255546_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:12.49 +32:19:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255891_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 255891_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:59.85 +32:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255896_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 255896_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256131_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256131_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:28.05 +32:19:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256158_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256158_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:06.15 +32:08:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256300_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256300_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:17.09 +30:27:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256601_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256601_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:56.65 +30:42:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256659_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256659_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.58 +28:59:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256661_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256661_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:59.26 +28:37:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256852_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256852_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:09.36 +28:09:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256923_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 256923_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:27.93 +29:32:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257397_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 257397_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258147_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 258147_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:19.92 +28:59:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258415_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 258415_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259724_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 259724_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:47.46 +29:54:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259791_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 259791_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.91 +30:52:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.03 +28:29:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.30 +25:59:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226816_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 226816_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:35.22 +33:07:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34005_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 34005_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:13.07 +33:26:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.45 +29:32:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125354_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 125354_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:10.89 +29:04:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.63 +30:45:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.66 +29:51:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.36 +32:13:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:59.19 +27:29:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117421_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 117421_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-09_00-32-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks