This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 04 12 15.96 +20 58 25.9 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,7.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 7.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 11.87 03:39:57.04 +21:30:24.4
167.16990 -26.54691 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -2 0 2 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:57.04 +21:30:24.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:57.04 +21:30:24.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 39 57.04 +21 30 24.4 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 12.44 03:28:15.56 +17:17:26.3
168.01023 -31.53011 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia 0 -0 0 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:15.56 +17:17:26.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:15.56 +17:17:26.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 28 15.56 +17 17 26.3 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 04 12 15.96 +20 58 26.0 7.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,7.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 7.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 12.86 04:08:45.69 +17:48:21.5
175.38443 -24.37929 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 -0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:45.69 +17:48:21.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:45.69 +17:48:21.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 04 08 45.69 +17 48 21.5 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 13.89 03:24:52.84 +23:30:09.5
162.74353 -27.26596 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:52.84 +23:30:09.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:52.84 +23:30:09.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 24 52.84 +23 30 09.5 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 13.92 03:48:19.33 +17:12:05.1
172.11780 -28.32265 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 0 -1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:19.33 +17:12:05.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:19.33 +17:12:05.1: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 48 19.33 +17 12 05.1 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 14.03 03:24:41.20 +18:55:41.9
166.01040 -30.84040 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -0 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:41.20 +18:55:41.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:41.20 +18:55:41.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 24 41.20 +18 55 41.9 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 13.94 04:13:53.92 +23:25:10.5
171.80744 -19.69189 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -0 0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:13:53.92 +23:25:10.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:13:53.92 +23:25:10.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 04 13 53.92 +23 25 10.5 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 14.48 03:46:08.26 +23:15:50.4
167.03928 -24.28436 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:08.26 +23:15:50.4: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:08.26 +23:15:50.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 46 08.26 +23 15 50.4 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 14.73 03:13:27.16 +22:16:01.3
161.22225 -29.84847 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.640 Brambilla 0 -0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:13:27.16 +22:16:01.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:13:27.16 +22:16:01.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 13 27.16 +22 16 01.3 14.7 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 14.71 03:14:14.92 +17:20:58.7
164.92311 -33.63246 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania 0 0 0 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:14.92 +17:20:58.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:14.92 +17:20:58.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 14 14.92 +17 20 58.7 14.7 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.3619 2461322.8619 14.85 03:35:30.40 +19:42:07.0
167.65148 -28.58566 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita -1 -0 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:30.40 +19:42:07.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:30.40 +19:42:07.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.3619* 03 35 30.40 +19 42 07.0 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.8619,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.3619 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461322.86218656 09.10.2026 08:41:22.919 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11911
Objects passed selection criteria: 11906
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11407.8
Average stars matched: 11017.8 (96.5813 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237068 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 03:47:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461322.86218656 09.10.2026 08:41:22.919 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 200
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 73492
Objects passed selection criteria: 73301
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 70425.8
Average stars matched: 67231.8 (95.4647 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 523228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 03:49:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.86157050
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:24.178 +22:01:10.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:24.178 +22:01:10.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:21.621 +22:00:49.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:21.621 +22:00:49.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0477 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:24.178 +22:01:10.45
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:21.621 +22:00:49.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01146 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kD2gmmtSCz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UipVCHPgye
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ccXQyYPdII
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EI03teeJ4l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.kD2gmmtSCz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UipVCHPgye (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ccXQyYPdII (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=822, bad_region=0, passed=11641
Got 11641 stars (including 10800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=12.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.818 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.818 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.998 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.998 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=1.365 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.405 worst_region_rms_after=0.361 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.120 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.361
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:24.207 +22:01:09.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11641 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3907056.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.365 -> 0.288 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4920 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4761 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4761 pairs (4920 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=12.242 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.826 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.826 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.967 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.967 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.358 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.358 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.357 worst_region_rms_after=0.358 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.357 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.358
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.358 vs 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1460 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EI03teeJ4l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=816, bad_region=0, passed=11583
Got 11583 stars (including 10757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=12.316 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.048 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.048 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.087 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.087 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.367 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=1.335 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.402 worst_region_rms_after=0.367 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.130 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.367
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.402 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec matched=4920
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1053 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1521 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.116
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420_astrometric_residuals.png (4761 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_034300_TTUQ1b1x1_3128930_7jMCu3nS/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:57.04 +21:30:24.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:15.56 +17:17:26.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:42.42 +26:53:57.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.92 +20:05:27.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.92 +22:50:49.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.37 +21:54:05.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:42.42 +26:53:57.1: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:15.56 +17:17:26.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.92 +22:50:49.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.92 +20:05:27.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:57.04 +21:30:24.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:37.86 +21:30:45.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:42.42 +26:53:57.1: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3854 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.92 +20:05:27.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3455 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.92 +22:50:49.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3562 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4263 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.37 +21:54:05.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.37 +21:54:05.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4735 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:37.86 +21:30:45.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:37.86 +21:30:45.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4932 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20763.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 20585_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20653_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20653_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 20698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20744_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20744_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20763_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 20763_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.05 +18:01:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.79 +25:42:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20775_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20775_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.85 +23:09:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20784_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20784_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87017_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87017_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87019_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87019_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87020_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87020_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87024_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87024_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87026_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87026_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87037_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87037_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87039_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87039_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87043_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87043_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87045_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87045_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87060_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87060_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87062_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87062_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87066_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87066_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87069_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87069_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87074_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87074_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87077_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87077_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87083_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87083_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.91 +25:06:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87084_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87084_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:29.40 +17:56:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87085_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87085_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87089_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87089_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87090_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87090_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.78 +18:58:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87099_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87099_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:24.06 +20:37:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87104_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87104_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87179_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87179_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.18 +24:32:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87224_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87224_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:57.06 +21:30:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:15.56 +17:17:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87298_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87298_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87351_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87351_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87352_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87352_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87422_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 87422_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87542_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87542_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87561_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87561_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.84 +18:13:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87565_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87565_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.43 +23:20:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87629_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87629_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.51 +26:35:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87648_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87648_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87747_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87747_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:59.95 +18:28:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 87772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87859_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 87859_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87899_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 87899_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 87920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 87923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88074_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88074_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88084_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88084_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88177_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88177_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88188_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88188_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.13 +26:26:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88215_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88215_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:03.99 +18:04:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88259_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88259_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88264_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88264_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88266_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88266_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:17.98 +23:45:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88329_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88329_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88338_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 88338_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88371_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 88371_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88373_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88373_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:44.78 +24:28:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88403_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88403_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88405_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88405_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88448_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88448_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88487_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88487_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88539_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 88539_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88544_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88544_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88561_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88561_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88567_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88567_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88585_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88585_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88652_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88652_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88661_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88661_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 88667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88668_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88668_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88669_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88669_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88677_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88677_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88687_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88687_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88704_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88704_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88711_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88711_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88716_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88716_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88720_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88720_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88724_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88724_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88727_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88727_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88732_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88732_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88739_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88739_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88748_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88748_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88760_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88774_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88774_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88788_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88788_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88794_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88794_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88795_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88795_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88800_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88800_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88802_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88802_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88804_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88804_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88806_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88806_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88807_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88807_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88810_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88810_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88811_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88811_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88814_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88814_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88821_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88821_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88823_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88823_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88825_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88825_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88828_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88828_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88836_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88836_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88841_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88841_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88842_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88842_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88843_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88843_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88846_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88846_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88851_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88851_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88853_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88853_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88865_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88865_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88868_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88868_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88869_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88869_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88884_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88884_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88909_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88909_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88910_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88910_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 88998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89100_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89100_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89139_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89139_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89185_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89185_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89190_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89190_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89196_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89196_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89225_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 89225_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 07135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38529_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 38529_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 01746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_03-41-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
