This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,8.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 8.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,8.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 8.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 12.20 23:30:06.52 -05:02:24.6
78.06482 -60.61810 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:06.52 -05:02:24.6: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:06.52 -05:02:24.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 13.67 23:58:09.40 -00:12:21.1
95.32200 -60.18988 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -0 0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:58:09.40 -00:12:21.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:58:09.40 -00:12:21.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 14.14 00:27:54.68 -03:05:29.6
108.75013 -65.31347 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4212 Sansyu-Asuke -0 -0 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:54.68 -03:05:29.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:54.68 -03:05:29.6: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.2428* 00 27 54.68 -03 05 29.6 14.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 14.34 00:12:34.07 +00:26:18.9
102.63000 -60.89177 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA -0 0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:12:34.07 +00:26:18.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:12:34.07 +00:26:18.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 14.51 00:19:47.80 -04:55:27.6
102.77736 -66.54997 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3133 Sendai -1 0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:19:47.80 -04:55:27.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:19:47.80 -04:55:27.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 14.26 23:42:30.54 -06:49:01.0
80.94145 -63.91634 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.864 Aase 1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:42:30.54 -06:49:01.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:42:30.54 -06:49:01.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.2428 2461322.7428 14.36 23:36:56.78 -04:41:31.5
81.28309 -61.38558 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa 1 -0 1 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:56.78 -04:41:31.5: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:56.78 -04:41:31.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.7428,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.2428 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461322.74321071 09.10.2026 05:50:03.405 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6236
Objects passed selection criteria: 6234
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5866.25
Average stars matched: 5519 (94.0805 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 01:35:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461322.74321071 09.10.2026 05:50:03.405 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 158
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33122
Objects passed selection criteria: 33037
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31517.8
Average stars matched: 29121.5 (92.3971 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 01:36:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.74246163
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.101 -02:00:40.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.101 -02:00:40.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.946 -02:00:10.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.946 -02:00:10.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.101 -02:00:40.79
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.946 -02:00:10.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01458 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M9FfyoaE4u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XlS8IVHeA0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AKUdVgDW9P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CmCniViCs4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.M9FfyoaE4u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XlS8IVHeA0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AKUdVgDW9P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=1, passed=6335
Got 6335 stars (including 5875 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8568 through 0 to 8.1421, gap 8.1421 to 351.8568
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8563 through 0 to 8.1427, gap 8.1427 to 351.8563
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=13.788 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.180 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.180 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.695 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.271 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.310 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.949 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.271 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.322 worst_region_rms_after=0.310 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.100 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.272 arcsec matched=4882
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1239 n_q2=1233 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CmCniViCs4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=6357
Got 6357 stars (including 5925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8568 through 0 to 8.1421, gap 8.1421 to 351.8568
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8563 through 0 to 8.1427, gap 8.1427 to 351.8563
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=13.790 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.881 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.881 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.759 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.311 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.285 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=0.950 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.324 worst_region_rms_after=0.311 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.095 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.285
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.277 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1233 n_q2=1247 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.187
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.190
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-48-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0256.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-09_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_005100_TTUQ1b1x1_2183679_fNYzi5IH/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:53.01 -05:30:59.5: 9.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.9: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:53.61 -00:48:58.1: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:41.15 -01:44:55.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:14.09 +02:14:51.9: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:14.09 +02:14:51.9: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:53.61 -00:48:58.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:53.01 -05:30:59.5: 10.01 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:41.15 -01:44:55.4: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:53.61 -00:48:58.1: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1363 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:14.09 +02:14:51.9: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0968 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:53.01 -05:30:59.5: ref_mag=9.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1178 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.9: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1152 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:41.15 -01:44:55.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0979 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.96 +00:47:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20274_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20274_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20281_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 20281_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20451_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20451_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20455_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20455_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.44 -01:12:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20465_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20465_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20468_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 20468_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32839_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32839_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32840_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32840_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32842_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32842_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32843_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32843_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32850_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32850_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32856_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32856_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32857_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32857_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32859_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 32859_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32866_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 32866_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33088_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33088_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33147_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33147_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33162_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33162_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33182_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33182_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:52.12 +00:04:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33315_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33315_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33452_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33452_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33570_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33570_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33579_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33579_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33633_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33633_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33802_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33802_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33810_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33812_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33812_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33814_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33814_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:26.65 -05:32:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33861_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33861_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33888_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33888_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33899_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33899_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33906_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33906_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33910_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33910_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33928_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33928_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33943_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33943_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33973_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33973_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33986_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33986_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33987_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33987_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 34004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34013_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34013_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34016_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34016_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34017_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34017_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34018_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34018_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34034_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34034_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34036_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34036_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34037_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34037_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34038_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34038_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34040_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34040_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34043_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34043_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34045_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34045_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34046_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34046_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34062_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34062_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34076_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34076_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34081_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34081_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34084_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34084_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34089_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34089_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34092_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34092_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34105_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34105_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34123_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34123_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34131_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34131_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34133_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34133_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34134_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34134_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34137_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 34137_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34151_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34151_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34153_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34153_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34155_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34155_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34157_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34157_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34164_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34164_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34165_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34165_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34168_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34168_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34174_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34176_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34176_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34178_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34178_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34182_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34182_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34190_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34191_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34191_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34200_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34200_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34208_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34208_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34209_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34209_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34218_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34218_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34224_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34224_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34230_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34230_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34233_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34233_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34236_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34236_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34247_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34247_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34248_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34248_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34249_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34249_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34250_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34250_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34254_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34254_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34255_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34255_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34256_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34256_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34263_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34263_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34265_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34265_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34269_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34269_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34277_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34303_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34303_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34308_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34308_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34330_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34330_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34335_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34335_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34339_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34339_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34343_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34343_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34344_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34344_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34347_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34347_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34349_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34349_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34378_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34378_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34419_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34419_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34441_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257
The candidate 34441_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-09_00-50-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0257 did not pass the final checks
