This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 12.06 05:05:09.42 +26:06:06.0
177.34574 -9.02531 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -1 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:09.42 +26:06:06.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:09.42 +26:06:06.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.1914* 05 05 09.42 +26 06 06.0 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 13.12 04:38:08.28 +25:12:08.9
174.23446 -14.37328 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 -1 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:38:08.28 +25:12:08.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:38:08.28 +25:12:08.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.1914* 04 38 08.28 +25 12 08.9 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 13.37 04:39:20.66 +29:03:31.6
171.38484 -11.68310 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:20.66 +29:03:31.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:20.66 +29:03:31.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.1914* 04 39 20.66 +29 03 31.6 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 13.45 04:33:15.62 +25:46:26.8
173.04850 -14.84375 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -1 1 2 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:33:15.62 +25:46:26.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:33:15.62 +25:46:26.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 09.1914* 04 33 15.62 +25 46 26.8 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 13.75 04:44:34.27 +34:44:55.8
167.71581 -7.15415 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha -1 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:34.27 +34:44:55.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:34.27 +34:44:55.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 14.20 04:44:21.97 +30:51:39.5
170.69542 -9.69014 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1189 Terentia 1 -1 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:21.97 +30:51:39.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:21.97 +30:51:39.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 13.52 05:12:49.53 +30:05:36.7
175.09262 -5.31085 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia 1 -1 2 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:49.53 +30:05:36.7: 15.75 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:49.53 +30:05:36.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.75 +/- 0.23
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461322.6914,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261009.1914 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 09.1914 2461322.6914 13.43 05:05:13.08 +34:57:54.7
170.20442 -3.71215 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS 6852120
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 R1 12.800 R1 2451532.00000 62.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:13.08 +34:57:54.7: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:13.08 +34:57:54.7: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6852120,2461322.6914,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6852120 20261009.1914 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461322.69171527 09.10.2026 04:35:54.199 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15266
Objects passed selection criteria: 15210
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12043
Average stars matched: 11722.5 (97.3387 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 00:22:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461322.69171527 09.10.2026 04:35:54.199 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 109 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116899
Objects passed selection criteria: 116668
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88545.5
Average stars matched: 85184.2 (96.2039 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Oct 9 00:25:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461322.69112808
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:52.539 +29:57:25.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:52.539 +29:57:25.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0484 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:49.532 +29:57:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:49.532 +29:57:54.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0508 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:52.539 +29:57:25.21
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:49.532 +29:57:54.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01353 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kH1ihi38Gi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R0IDA09QO8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pkfyuAIFB8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O9oxXUpRjj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.kH1ihi38Gi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R0IDA09QO8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pkfyuAIFB8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, bad_region=0, passed=7903
Got 7903 stars (including 7584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7903 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=10.210 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.325 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.727 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.986 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.986 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.773 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.773 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=1.555 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.509 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.523 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.769 worst_region_rms_after=0.773 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.773
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.769 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.769 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.509 arcsec matched=4769
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=750 n_q2=869 n_q3=1160 n_q4=1990 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O9oxXUpRjj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=7922
Got 7922 stars (including 7600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7922 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=10.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.531 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.726 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.017 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.017 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.710 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=1.468 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.755 worst_region_rms_after=0.710 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.887 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.710
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.755 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.755 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.503 arcsec matched=4768
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=761 n_q2=870 n_q3=1148 n_q4=1989 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.516 worst_q_ratio=1.184
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4769 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 21118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.55 +30:10:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21181_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 21181_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.20 +31:27:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 21196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.50 +28:42:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 21203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.27 +32:10:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.40 +28:36:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.65 +30:42:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.53 +27:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.40 +35:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.40 +26:08:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.37 +34:08:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11181_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 11181_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:48.56 +29:25:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:52.539 +29:57:25.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:52.539 +29:57:25.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0484 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:49.532 +29:57:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:49.532 +29:57:54.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0508 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:52.539 +29:57:25.21
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:49.532 +29:57:54.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01353 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8edHurJWoz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FnsTRk4t7v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DlTopTGXSl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iZQWuhewqY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6879 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6879 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8edHurJWoz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FnsTRk4t7v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DlTopTGXSl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2426, bad_region=38, passed=49079
Got 49079 stars (including 46559 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=10.363 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.728 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.979 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.979 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.740 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.544 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.746 worst_region_rms_after=0.740 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.029 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.740
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.746 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.746 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.508 arcsec matched=4775
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=779 n_q2=854 n_q3=1205 n_q4=1937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iZQWuhewqY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2491, bad_region=39, passed=49593
Got 49593 stars (including 46995 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=10.459 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.958 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.958 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.730 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.005 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.005 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=1.460 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.500 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.738 worst_region_rms_after=0.700 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.880 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.700
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.738 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.738 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.500 arcsec matched=4770
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=775 n_q2=849 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_233645_TTUQ1b1x1_2296823_o9gnoiMq/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:20:40.87 +33:57:53.4: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:20:40.87 +33:57:53.4: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:40.87 +33:57:53.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5937 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:09.42 +26:06:06.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:09.42 +26:06:06.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:47.89 +32:14:41.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:38:08.28 +25:12:08.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:47.89 +32:14:41.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:47.89 +32:14:41.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1710 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:38:08.28 +25:12:08.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:20.66 +29:03:31.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:33:15.62 +25:46:26.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:34.27 +34:44:55.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:20.66 +29:03:31.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:33:15.62 +25:46:26.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.13 +29:58:35.4: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:34.27 +34:44:55.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.13 +29:58:35.4: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.13 +29:58:35.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3294 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:21.97 +30:51:39.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:21.97 +30:51:39.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:49.53 +30:05:36.7: 15.75 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:49.53 +30:05:36.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.75 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:12:49.53 +30:05:36.7: ref_mag=15.75 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.5126 delta=2.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:13.08 +34:57:54.7: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:13.08 +34:57:54.7: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:05:13.08 +34:57:54.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4298 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151616.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151756.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74507.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:45.71 +32:23:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151112_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151112_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.69 +29:52:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151114_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151114_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:41.64 +32:01:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:37.05 +33:23:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.83 +33:05:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.83 +34:09:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.45 +34:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151282_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151282_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.16 +33:47:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.08 +34:07:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151308_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151308_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.36 +34:07:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.88 +33:06:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151353_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151353_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.75 +32:42:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151361_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 151361_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.07 +30:30:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.53 +34:49:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.04 +34:06:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.90 +26:55:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.83 +28:37:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151413_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151413_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.37 +34:07:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151430_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.47 +31:23:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151432_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151432_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.72 +34:23:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.64 +32:33:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.10 +28:31:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.48 +33:11:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151515_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151515_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.03 +26:25:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151532_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151532_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.20 +34:24:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151545_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151545_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.66 +26:10:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.87 +29:47:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151592_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151592_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.59 +30:33:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151593_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151593_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.46 +34:06:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151614_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151614_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 151616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.16 +32:26:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151632_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151632_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.30 +31:44:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.80 +29:45:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.82 +31:24:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 151664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151688_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151688_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:53.40 +32:52:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151735_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151735_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.56 +34:00:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151754_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 151754_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151756_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 151756_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151775_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151775_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151800_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151800_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.19 +31:04:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151868_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151868_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.70 +30:29:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151873_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151873_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.23 +29:33:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151876_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151876_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:41.80 +28:20:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151927_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 151927_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.17 +33:06:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 151962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:05.01 +27:11:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.57 +31:18:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58983_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 58983_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:29.56 +30:47:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.14 +24:57:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:51.37 +28:31:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:50.99 +26:46:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.22 +30:48:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:02.70 +30:45:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.40 +26:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.17 +32:02:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.93 +29:15:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 141054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.60 +30:06:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140765_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 140765_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.65 +30:10:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.49 +34:32:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.97 +25:22:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.73 +28:10:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.30 +25:24:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.52 +28:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.20 +25:01:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.26 +27:01:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74507_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 74507_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.40 +33:50:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.57 +29:52:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.49 +28:42:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.65 +28:00:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 03816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.71 +27:26:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:27.11 +32:51:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 58752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:25.68 +31:09:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84851_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 84851_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.96 +29:02:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 72284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.27 +25:58:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:17.55 +32:11:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.00 +31:53:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.37 +35:03:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:03.23 +31:38:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.82 +29:00:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.41 +26:08:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:35.98 +32:55:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.28 +31:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:36.66 +25:59:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.92 +30:05:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.49 +27:22:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 12426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:00.31 +33:56:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:23.07 +29:29:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:57.01 +27:27:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.15 +27:03:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.71 +24:38:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 85504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:48.56 +29:25:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:58.79 +25:08:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.16 +30:38:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.50 +34:37:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.21 +26:43:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 69229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:42.56 +30:32:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:22.59 +27:44:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.38 +29:42:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63791_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 63791_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:28.80 +30:37:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.72 +29:20:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 96324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:23.85 +25:15:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.39 +34:08:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.65 +30:42:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:19.97 +34:08:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.77 +32:28:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.40 +25:08:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.41 +28:36:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_23-35-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
