This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3903 2461321.8903 13.43 06:06:16.31 -07:05:54.7
214.19073 -13.25431 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" ASAS J060617-0705.9
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V < 15.300 V 2454556.00000 332.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:16.31 -07:05:54.7: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:16.31 -07:05:54.7: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J060617-0705.9,2461321.8903,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J060617-0705.9 20261008.3903 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8903,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3903 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
First image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Last image: 2461321.89061323 08.10.2026 09:22:18.983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12719
Objects passed selection criteria: 12667
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9618.25
Average stars matched: 8901.75 (92.5506 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 07:03:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
First image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Last image: 2461321.89061323 08.10.2026 09:22:18.983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83296
Objects passed selection criteria: 83059
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65039.2
Average stars matched: 60214.2 (92.5814 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 502936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 07:04:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.89002115
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.601 -09:59:39.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.601 -09:59:39.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.954 -10:00:05.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.954 -10:00:05.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0250 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:59.601 -09:59:39.00
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:01.954 -10:00:05.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01208 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L46QgvCNz5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vmBYguzyci
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tY6bKyobia
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kWarWPbrx8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8159 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14264 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8159 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14264 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14284 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9867 to 98.2111 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9867 to 98.2111 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8169 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14284 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.0 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
2.3 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.3 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.L46QgvCNz5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1343, bad_region=2733, passed=14264
Got 14264 stars (including 10431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1685 n_q2=730 n_q3=1676 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vmBYguzyci (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1364, bad_region=2703, passed=14284
Got 14284 stars (including 10470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1693 n_q2=722 n_q3=1685 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tY6bKyobia (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=896, bad_region=3372, passed=11180
Got 11180 stars (including 7176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4845 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=8.030 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.581 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.581 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.608 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.030 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.030 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.524 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4845 robust_rms_before=0.751 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.418 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.542 worst_region_rms_after=0.524 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.138 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.524
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.418 arcsec matched=4845
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits N_match=4845 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=1437 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1363 n_q4=1032 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kWarWPbrx8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=900, bad_region=3376, passed=11191
Got 11191 stars (including 7175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11191 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=8.071 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.687 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.649 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.947 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.947 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.539 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.539 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=0.784 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.557 worst_region_rms_after=0.539 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.132 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.539
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.557 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.557 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.445 arcsec matched=4850
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=1442 n_q2=1012 n_q3=1370 n_q4=1026 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.232
ref2=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.263
new1=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.101
new2=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.095
reference average sigma_overall=0.3305 worst_q_ratio=1.2475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (4843 matched stars from wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500_astrometric_residuals.png (4845 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501_astrometric_residuals.png (4850 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22067_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 22067_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:04.02 -10:58:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.601 -09:59:39.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.601 -09:59:39.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.954 -10:00:05.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.954 -10:00:05.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0250 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:59.601 -09:59:39.00
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:01.954 -10:00:05.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01208 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GHZw4t15a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2I2wSf05Uz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lJ4PQxsEXV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KHmMxyR7H1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92121 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 10806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7488 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 92121 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.704800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.704800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 92121 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 10806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7488 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 92121 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 92267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9848 to 98.2344 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5505 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9848 to 98.2344 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5505 deg
Loaded 10804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7526 out of 9140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9140 out of 92267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
1.9 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
2.1 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.4 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4GHZw4t15a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=7576, bad_region=13356, passed=92101
Got 92101 stars (including 72002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1617 n_q2=737 n_q3=1710 n_q4=779 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2I2wSf05Uz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=7571, bad_region=13382, passed=92252
Got 92252 stars (including 72080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92252 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1642 n_q2=719 n_q3=1707 n_q4=775 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lJ4PQxsEXV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4582, bad_region=18730, passed=70617
Got 70617 stars (including 48738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=7.981 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.996 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.996 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.523 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4847 robust_rms_before=0.736 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.410 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.545 worst_region_rms_after=0.523 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.137 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.523
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.545 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.415 arcsec matched=4847
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits N_match=4847 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1491 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1314 n_q4=996 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KHmMxyR7H1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4481, bad_region=18815, passed=71194
Got 71194 stars (including 49285 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=8.050 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.608 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.640 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.969 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.969 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.532 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4848 robust_rms_before=0.765 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.570 worst_region_rms_after=0.532 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.136 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.532
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.570 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.570 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.430 arcsec matched=4848
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1498 n_q2=1042 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1000 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-21-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0500.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_070111_TTUQ2b1x1_2172051_NEqKSt0i/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:54:27.24 -08:14:56.2: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:57:47.81 -10:17:40.9: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:50:32.03 -12:08:57.1: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:54:26.79 -08:56:36.8: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:43:27.18 -12:42:27.8: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:57:52.41 -09:23:34.0: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:46:19.89 -11:28:00.6: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:15:25.24 -07:22:05.4: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:59:03.31 -06:58:09.6: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:12.41 -08:29:25.9: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:57:47.81 -10:17:40.9: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:54:26.79 -08:56:36.8: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:54:27.24 -08:14:56.2: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:57:52.41 -09:23:34.0: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:15:25.24 -07:22:05.4: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:59:03.31 -06:58:09.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:50:32.03 -12:08:57.1: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:46:19.89 -11:28:00.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:43:27.18 -12:42:27.8: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:47.81 -10:17:40.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2295 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:26.79 -08:56:36.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3432 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:19.89 -11:28:00.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6078 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:03.31 -06:58:09.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1566 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:32.03 -12:08:57.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0794 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:27.24 -08:14:56.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1099 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:52.41 -09:23:34.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6442 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:25.24 -07:22:05.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5692 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:27.18 -12:42:27.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8307 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:12.41 -08:29:25.9: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:12.41 -08:29:25.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6847 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:01:52.76 -14:07:45.0: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:01.98 -07:35:27.8: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:12:49.75 -05:44:07.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:17:06.56 -06:08:14.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:56:33.05 -12:51:44.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:16.31 -07:05:54.7: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:07:24.95 -14:00:40.3: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:14:50.52 -11:09:25.3: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:01:52.76 -14:07:45.0: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:52.76 -14:07:45.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0254 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:12:49.75 -05:44:07.8: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:17:06.56 -06:08:14.6: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:01.98 -07:35:27.8: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:49.75 -05:44:07.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5258 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:01.98 -07:35:27.8: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2134 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:06.56 -06:08:14.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2260 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:00:37.04 -09:49:16.5: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:16.31 -07:05:54.7: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:14:50.52 -11:09:25.3: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:56:33.05 -12:51:44.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:07:24.95 -14:00:40.3: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:06:16.31 -07:05:54.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4170 delta=1.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:50.52 -11:09:25.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8419 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:24.95 -14:00:40.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7392 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:33.05 -12:51:44.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7302 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:00:37.04 -09:49:16.5: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:37.04 -09:49:16.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9172 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:14:52.78 -11:09:14.6: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:57:19.05 -08:26:34.3: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:03.67 -12:47:45.5: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:51:17.12 -13:06:18.7: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:11:03.24 -11:46:15.2: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:13:32.74 -11:28:14.1: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:14:52.78 -11:09:14.6: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:52.78 -11:09:14.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9867 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:57:19.05 -08:26:34.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:03.67 -12:47:45.5: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:19.05 -08:26:34.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9245 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:03.67 -12:47:45.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9653 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:17:13.22 -06:18:14.0: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:51:17.12 -13:06:18.7: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:17.12 -13:06:18.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9810 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:11:03.24 -11:46:15.2: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:13:32.74 -11:28:14.1: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:03.24 -11:46:15.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0045 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:32.74 -11:28:14.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0411 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:17:13.22 -06:18:14.0: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:16:57.68 -09:26:38.0: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:13.22 -06:18:14.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0238 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:07:01.86 -12:04:14.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:03:13.12 -08:25:30.0: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:00:51.24 -08:43:08.1: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:15:07.94 -08:38:26.9: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:16:57.68 -09:26:38.0: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:57.68 -09:26:38.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9602 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:04:07.75 -09:50:54.7: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:15:07.32 -06:31:31.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:07:01.86 -12:04:14.3: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:03:13.12 -08:25:30.0: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:00:51.24 -08:43:08.1: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:01.86 -12:04:14.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9218 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:13.12 -08:25:30.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1912 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:51.24 -08:43:08.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0515 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:15:07.94 -08:38:26.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:07.94 -08:38:26.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1906 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:49:09.66 -13:02:43.8: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:04:07.75 -09:50:54.7: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:07.75 -09:50:54.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2812 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:15:07.32 -06:31:31.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:07.32 -06:31:31.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0078 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:49:09.66 -13:02:43.8: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:09.66 -13:02:43.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4615 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:04.40 -09:37:12.8: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:04:14.88 -13:42:12.5: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:11:53.86 -07:47:52.6: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:00:04.82 -13:58:26.3: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:08:01.34 -13:53:25.5: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:04.40 -09:37:12.8: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:04.40 -09:37:12.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4032 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:13:40.04 -11:34:28.6: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:00:04.82 -13:58:26.3: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:11:53.86 -07:47:52.6: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:04:14.88 -13:42:12.5: 14.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:59:39.80 -14:13:02.4: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:53.86 -07:47:52.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5432 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:04.82 -13:58:26.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3438 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:14.88 -13:42:12.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2533 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:08:01.34 -13:53:25.5: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:01.34 -13:53:25.5: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5938 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:11:16.08 -10:22:27.3: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:13:40.04 -11:34:28.6: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:40.04 -11:34:28.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6799 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:59:39.80 -14:13:02.4: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:39.80 -14:13:02.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5511 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:11:16.08 -10:22:27.3: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:16.08 -10:22:27.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6408 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:17:10.33 -10:18:25.6: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:45:01.86 -12:25:06.6: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:17:10.33 -10:18:25.6: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:10.33 -10:18:25.6: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6337 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:45:01.86 -12:25:06.6: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:01.86 -12:25:06.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6866 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108821_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108821_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108829_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108829_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108842_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108842_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108845_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108845_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108846_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108846_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108848_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108848_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108859_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108859_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108860_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108860_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:11.71 -08:35:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108863_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108863_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108864_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108864_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108865_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108865_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108869_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108869_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108871_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 108871_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:40.99 -12:33:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112332_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 112332_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:42.74 -07:53:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112608_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 112608_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112986_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 112986_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:52.50 -14:08:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113230_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 113230_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113291_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 113291_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:57.92 -13:55:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113416_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 113416_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113447_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 113447_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:18.80 -06:41:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113557_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 113557_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.45 -12:04:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113845_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 113845_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:16.16 -13:25:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114170_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 114170_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114672_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 114672_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115277_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115277_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115603_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115603_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115784_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115784_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115804_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115804_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:27.67 -11:15:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115810_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115810_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:47.20 -13:20:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115875_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115875_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115903_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 115903_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116173_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116173_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116255_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116255_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:41.34 -07:22:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116316_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116316_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116351_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 116351_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116401_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116401_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116458_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116458_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116481_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116481_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:35.22 -07:48:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116560_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116560_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116561_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116561_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:30.30 -11:20:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116745_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116745_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116776_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116776_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116829_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 116829_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117392_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 117392_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117443_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 117443_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117472_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 117472_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117549_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 117549_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118277_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 118277_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118302_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 118302_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118465_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 118465_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118626_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 118626_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118755_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 118755_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118837_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 118837_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119056_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 119056_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119208_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 119208_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119219_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 119219_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119342_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 119342_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119447_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 119447_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 52672_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:04.00 -10:58:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46017_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 46017_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:35.64 -10:01:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30686_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501
The candidate 30686_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_04-22-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0501 did not pass the final checks