This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3856 2461321.8856 12.81 03:13:03.45 +01:36:27.5
178.53521 -45.42496 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.464 Megaira -0 -0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:03.45 +01:36:27.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:03.45 +01:36:27.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3856* 03 13 03.45 +01 36 27.5 12.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8856,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3856 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3856 2461321.8856 13.37 03:16:31.78 +07:21:44.5
173.72675 -40.78090 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.619 Triberga -0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:31.78 +07:21:44.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:31.78 +07:21:44.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3856* 03 16 31.78 +07 21 44.5 13.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8856,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3856 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3856 2461321.8856 14.51 03:26:06.34 +05:02:46.0
178.10893 -40.69969 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1104 Syringa 0 0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:26:06.34 +05:02:46.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:26:06.34 +05:02:46.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3856* 03 26 06.34 +05 02 46.0 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8856,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3856 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461321.88588132 08.10.2026 09:15:30.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7378
Objects passed selection criteria: 7374
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6949
Average stars matched: 6674.25 (96.0462 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:19:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461321.88588132 08.10.2026 09:15:30.146 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40084
Objects passed selection criteria: 40000
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38361
Average stars matched: 36880.5 (96.1406 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 260928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:20:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.88531051
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:32.071 +05:59:53.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:32.071 +05:59:53.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0592 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:32.311 +05:59:14.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:32.311 +05:59:14.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0563 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:32.071 +05:59:53.86
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:32.311 +05:59:14.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01106 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TifcunYXZ1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kf6k0SqVbM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UZtXNu9eix
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bhSWkiwfTJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6696 to +11.2487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6696 to 11.2487 deg
Loaded 4348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 6511 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.1 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.TifcunYXZ1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6894
Got 6894 stars (including 6363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Kf6k0SqVbM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=1, passed=6511
Got 6511 stars (including 6031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UZtXNu9eix (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, bad_region=0, passed=7321
Got 7321 stars (including 6860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=13.637 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.012 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.746 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.934 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.347 worst_region_rms_after=0.329 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.097 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.279 arcsec matched=4877
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1297 n_q2=979 n_q3=1349 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bhSWkiwfTJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, bad_region=0, passed=7243
Got 7243 stars (including 6786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=13.671 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.037 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.037 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.715 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.327 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.327 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.343 worst_region_rms_after=0.327 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.092 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.327
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.284 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1296 n_q2=973 n_q3=1348 n_q4=1263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.316
ref2=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.203
new2=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.179
reference average sigma_overall=0.2865 worst_q_ratio=1.295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:28:59.87 +05:26:59.2: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:20:58.76 +08:27:32.4: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:22:17.59 +05:22:44.9: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:20:58.76 +08:27:32.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:22:17.59 +05:22:44.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:28:59.87 +05:26:59.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:58.76 +08:27:32.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2843 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:17.59 +05:22:44.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2223 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:59.87 +05:26:59.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3730 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 20335_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 20339_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 20354_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:32.071 +05:59:53.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:32.071 +05:59:53.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0592 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:32.311 +05:59:14.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:32.311 +05:59:14.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0563 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:32.071 +05:59:53.86
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:32.311 +05:59:14.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01106 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.afJsalvaiv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OoLda0t8lQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZCevlg8HxZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IUfcGbfpTe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.819500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.819500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec +0.6695 to +11.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec 0.6695 to 11.2585 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3421 out of 3757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3757 out of 36794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.afJsalvaiv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1702, bad_region=4, passed=40128
Got 40128 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1335 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OoLda0t8lQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1580, bad_region=2, passed=36779
Got 36779 stars (including 35146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZCevlg8HxZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1438, bad_region=48, passed=38730
Got 38730 stars (including 37177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38730 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=13.763 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.163 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.163 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.328 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4868 robust_rms_before=0.939 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.341 worst_region_rms_after=0.328 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.092 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.328
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.275 arcsec matched=4868
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1288 n_q2=974 n_q3=1355 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IUfcGbfpTe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1481, bad_region=48, passed=38882
Got 38882 stars (including 37284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=13.785 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.056 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.056 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.929 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.350 worst_region_rms_after=0.329 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.094 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.281 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1293 n_q2=976 n_q3=1351 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-14-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041617_TTUQ1b1x1_453226_nkVcnR3i/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:47:42.00 +05:25:14.0: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:08:52.05 +05:09:12.0: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:57:11.54 +08:07:53.9: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:54.59 +09:19:22.0: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:22.37 +03:13:10.5: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:47:49.26 +06:29:29.6: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:44:30.94 +09:51:24.6: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:17.23 +03:37:13.0: 14.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:15:01.91 +01:03:21.9: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:21.30 +10:20:54.0: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:47:49.26 +06:29:29.6: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:57:11.54 +08:07:53.9: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:22.37 +03:13:10.5: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:47:42.00 +05:25:14.0: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:49.26 +06:29:29.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7439 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:15:01.91 +01:03:21.9: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:08:52.05 +05:09:12.0: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:54.59 +09:19:22.0: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:17.23 +03:37:13.0: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:11.54 +08:07:53.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5807 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:44:30.94 +09:51:24.6: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:42.00 +05:25:14.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7774 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:22.37 +03:13:10.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2000 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:01.91 +01:03:21.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5570 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:52.05 +05:09:12.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6122 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:54.59 +09:19:22.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5294 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:17.23 +03:37:13.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8568 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:30.94 +09:51:24.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8160 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:21.30 +10:20:54.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.30 +10:20:54.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0523 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:20:58.74 +08:27:32.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:06.30 +03:59:47.0: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:03.45 +01:36:27.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:51.31 +09:21:42.3: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:31.78 +07:21:44.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:56:31.03 +08:36:29.2: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:52:49.49 +09:59:42.8: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:52:33.73 +10:37:01.5: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:26:06.34 +05:02:46.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:12.93 +06:33:53.4: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:31.78 +07:21:44.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:20:58.74 +08:27:32.7: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:06.30 +03:59:47.0: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:52:49.49 +09:59:42.8: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:56:31.03 +08:36:29.2: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:03.45 +01:36:27.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:58.74 +08:27:32.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3782 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:51.31 +09:21:42.3: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:06.30 +03:59:47.0: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2837 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:49.49 +09:59:42.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4066 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:31.03 +08:36:29.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7115 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:51.31 +09:21:42.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2515 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:12.93 +06:33:53.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:52:33.73 +10:37:01.5: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:26:06.34 +05:02:46.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:12.93 +06:33:53.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6103 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:33.73 +10:37:01.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6802 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:09.48 +10:20:43.6: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:45:03.39 +02:34:39.4: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:52:42.99 +01:26:37.9: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:51.82 +08:02:48.9: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:57:00.18 +09:41:33.5: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:53.78 +05:36:45.6: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:39.26 +07:50:40.2: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:09.48 +10:20:43.6: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:51.82 +08:02:48.9: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:52:42.99 +01:26:37.9: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:45:03.39 +02:34:39.4: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:09.48 +10:20:43.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7172 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:51.82 +08:02:48.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6964 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:57:00.18 +09:41:33.5: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:03.39 +02:34:39.4: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7348 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:42.99 +01:26:37.9: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8647 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:00.18 +09:41:33.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8262 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:53.78 +05:36:45.6: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:53.78 +05:36:45.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6559 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:39.26 +07:50:40.2: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:39.26 +07:50:40.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7815 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:22:00.59 +10:59:54.9: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:44:39.82 +01:21:19.3: 15.46 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:30.86 +09:10:46.9: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:04.79 +01:20:01.5: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:17.39 +01:25:26.1: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:27.99 +01:44:34.8: 15.51 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:21:01.90 +11:02:25.2: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:22:00.59 +10:59:54.9: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:00.59 +10:59:54.9: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9507 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:44:39.82 +01:21:19.3: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:30.86 +09:10:46.9: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:04.79 +01:20:01.5: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:39.82 +01:21:19.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9090 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:17.39 +01:25:26.1: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:30.86 +09:10:46.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9163 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:04.79 +01:20:01.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8349 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:17.39 +01:25:26.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8531 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:21:01.90 +11:02:25.2: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:27.99 +01:44:34.8: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:01.90 +11:02:25.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9448 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:27.99 +01:44:34.8: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8745 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:49.38 +02:14:06.4: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:46.53 +10:50:06.6: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:48.75 +10:28:47.9: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:20.25 +08:13:14.9: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:45.69 +01:29:27.9: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:17.85 +02:01:28.0: 15.35 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:52.84 +10:22:57.1: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:49.38 +02:14:06.4: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:48.75 +10:28:47.9: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:46.53 +10:50:06.6: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:20.25 +08:13:14.9: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:49.38 +02:14:06.4: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9411 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:48.75 +10:28:47.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9480 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:46.53 +10:50:06.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6833 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:20.25 +08:13:14.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8438 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:45.69 +01:29:27.9: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:45.69 +01:29:27.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7543 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:17.85 +02:01:28.0: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:17.85 +02:01:28.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9295 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:52.84 +10:22:57.1: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:52.84 +10:22:57.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0818 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:02.95 +02:42:51.6: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:01.79 +09:47:00.9: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:13.97 +05:31:02.3: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:50:50.34 +10:17:41.7: 15.45 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:27.91 +08:34:50.8: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:06.98 +03:07:39.4: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:08:08.82 +09:57:58.5: 14.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:02.95 +02:42:51.6: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:13.97 +05:31:02.3: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:01.79 +09:47:00.9: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:02.95 +02:42:51.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8446 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:13.97 +05:31:02.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9430 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:01.79 +09:47:00.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8840 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:50:50.34 +10:17:41.7: 15.61 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:27.91 +08:34:50.8: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:50.34 +10:17:41.7: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.9017 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:27.91 +08:34:50.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9434 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:06.98 +03:07:39.4: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:06.98 +03:07:39.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9026 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:08:08.82 +09:57:58.5: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:08.82 +09:57:58.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9847 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:02.29 +03:02:30.1: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:26:03.74 +03:31:03.4: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:02.44 +04:36:54.8: 15.40 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:24.23 +04:29:34.1: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:36.76 +04:51:46.1: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:08:04.17 +05:55:39.0: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:37.82 +10:20:15.2: 15.52 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:02.44 +04:36:54.8: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:02.29 +03:02:30.1: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:24.23 +04:29:34.1: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:36.76 +04:51:46.1: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:26:03.74 +03:31:03.4: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:02.44 +04:36:54.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8796 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:02.29 +03:02:30.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7495 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:24.23 +04:29:34.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9447 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:36.76 +04:51:46.1: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9811 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:03.74 +03:31:03.4: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9752 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:08:04.17 +05:55:39.0: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:04.17 +05:55:39.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9620 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:37.82 +10:20:15.2: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:37.82 +10:20:15.2: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9185 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:39.79 +03:51:08.1: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:44.27 +08:28:26.6: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:17.37 +09:20:03.8: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:02.51 +09:05:37.2: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:49.80 +10:05:59.2: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:30.30 +09:58:57.7: 15.33 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:58.41 +02:28:54.3: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:17.37 +09:20:03.8: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:39.79 +03:51:08.1: 15.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:02.51 +09:05:37.2: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:44.27 +08:28:26.6: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:17.37 +09:20:03.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0495 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:44.27 +08:28:26.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0338 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:02.51 +09:05:37.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0472 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:39.79 +03:51:08.1: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0063 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:49.80 +10:05:59.2: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:49.80 +10:05:59.2: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0858 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:30.30 +09:58:57.7: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:58.41 +02:28:54.3: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:30.30 +09:58:57.7: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9883 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:58.41 +02:28:54.3: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0631 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:23.45 +10:52:08.1: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:23.45 +10:52:08.1: 15.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:23.45 +10:52:08.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0656 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51916.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51420_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51420_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51421_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51421_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51427_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51427_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51430_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51430_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51431_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51431_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51433_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51433_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51435_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51435_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51438_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51438_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:19.83 +04:15:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51439_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51439_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51442_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51442_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51447_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51447_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51620_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51620_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51726_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 51726_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51764_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 51764_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:19.96 +05:01:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51916_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 51916_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52299_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52299_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52356_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52356_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:32.95 +08:47:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52388_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52533_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52564_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52585_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 52593_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52607_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52651_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52661_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52667_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52667_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52686_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52732_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52737_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52742_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52746_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52746_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52762_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52762_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52796_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52797_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52801_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52813_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52814_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52819_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52836_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52845_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52849_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52850_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52851_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52851_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52856_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52856_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52859_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52870_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52874_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52875_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52898_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52907_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52909_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52923_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52925_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52935_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52945_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52956_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52959_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52962_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52965_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 52990_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 53023_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 53029_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 53034_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 53056_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53059_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 53059_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 53060_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28921_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 28921_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09433_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 09433_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_04-15-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks