This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2339 2461321.7339 11.93 05:39:16.91 +30:27:46.5
177.97722 -0.36548 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 0 -1 1 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:16.91 +30:27:46.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:16.91 +30:27:46.5: 16.07 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.07 +/- 0.36
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7339,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2339 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2339 2461321.7339 13.64 05:55:33.82 +27:36:08.7
182.26712 1.19701 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.214 Aschera -0 -0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:33.82 +27:36:08.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:33.82 +27:36:08.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2339* 05 55 33.82 +27 36 08.7 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7339,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2339 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2339 2461321.7339 14.12 06:19:01.32 +33:04:40.5
179.88941 8.26423 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX22" ZTF J061902.06+330500.0
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.134 r Y 0.240 r 2458441.92890 0.223540800000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.984 Gretia -1 1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:19:01.32 +33:04:40.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:01.32 +33:04:40.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J061902.06+330500.0,2461321.7339,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J061902.06+330500.0 20261008.2339 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461321.73420790 08.10.2026 05:37:05.563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22503
Objects passed selection criteria: 22369
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15758.8
Average stars matched: 14608.2 (92.6993 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:17:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461321.73420790 08.10.2026 05:37:05.563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 154
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 179247
Objects passed selection criteria: 178751
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 132883
Average stars matched: 123372 (92.8424 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 635652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:19:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.73354304
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.914 +30:00:41.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.914 +30:00:41.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.976 +30:00:02.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.976 +30:00:02.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:01.914 +30:00:41.33
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:00.976 +30:00:02.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01133 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HjWcC9wJfJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lDua4lcUm3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RUKuET5rtG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ka3LSkft9t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13642 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HjWcC9wJfJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=5792, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 18877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1282 n_q2=975 n_q3=1593 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lDua4lcUm3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=5776, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 18855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1281 n_q2=975 n_q3=1594 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RUKuET5rtG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=870, bad_region=2237, passed=12479
Got 12479 stars (including 9466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=6.644 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.363 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.702 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.953 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.953 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.541 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.807 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.807 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=1.575 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.541 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.834 worst_region_rms_after=0.807 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.905 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.807
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.834 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.834 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.545 arcsec matched=4782
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=1410 n_q2=817 n_q3=1757 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ka3LSkft9t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=868, bad_region=2280, passed=12637
Got 12637 stars (including 9590 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=6.733 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.297 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.673 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.949 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.949 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.795 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.795 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.480 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.535 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.866 worst_region_rms_after=0.795 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.717 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.795
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.866 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.866 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.545 arcsec matched=4784
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=1401 n_q2=831 n_q3=1754 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.299
ref2=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits sigma_overall=0.547 worst_q_ratio=1.206
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits sigma_overall=0.536 worst_q_ratio=1.258
reference average sigma_overall=0.4745 worst_q_ratio=1.285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4778 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272_astrometric_residuals.png (4782 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273_astrometric_residuals.png (4784 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31543_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 31543_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.35 +32:32:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31546_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 31546_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.58 +29:29:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33446_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 33446_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.27 +32:03:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34327_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 34327_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.22 +32:35:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.14 +28:29:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.914 +30:00:41.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.914 +30:00:41.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.976 +30:00:02.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.976 +30:00:02.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:01.914 +30:00:41.33
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:00.976 +30:00:02.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01133 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lcC0CFYiJM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vt3Mr6RDGC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xgx09qFbos
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cU7ajcMegP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14294 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14294 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 122 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.7 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lcC0CFYiJM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=32425, bad_region=34270, passed=212766
Got 212766 stars (including 150203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1332 n_q2=876 n_q3=1615 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Vt3Mr6RDGC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=32176, bad_region=34340, passed=212605
Got 212605 stars (including 150130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212605 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1324 n_q2=908 n_q3=1589 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Xgx09qFbos (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7949, bad_region=14178, passed=103057
Got 103057 stars (including 81551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103057 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=6.709 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.612 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.711 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.995 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.995 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=1.592 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.886 worst_region_rms_after=0.809 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.890 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.809
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.886 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.886 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.548 arcsec matched=4761
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=1461 n_q2=828 n_q3=1665 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cU7ajcMegP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=8074, bad_region=14290, passed=103003
Got 103003 stars (including 81260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103003 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=6.786 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.086 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.086 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.677 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.965 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.965 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.825 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=1.495 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.539 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.890 worst_region_rms_after=0.825 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.707 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.825
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.890 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.890 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.545 arcsec matched=4761
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=1459 n_q2=837 n_q3=1670 n_q4=795 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-36-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_041512_TTUQ2b1x1_423766_BgnCaGYL/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:04.87 +34:10:47.7: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:56.95 +33:20:06.2: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:00.99 +34:08:31.0: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:51.13 +28:50:35.2: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:42:48.77 +30:12:42.5: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:40.86 +31:22:53.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:04.87 +34:10:47.7: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:51.13 +28:50:35.2: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:00.99 +34:08:31.0: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:56.95 +33:20:06.2: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:04.87 +34:10:47.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9888 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:40.86 +31:22:53.6: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:42:48.77 +30:12:42.5: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:51.13 +28:50:35.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1708 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:00.99 +34:08:31.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0307 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:56.95 +33:20:06.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6476 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:40.86 +31:22:53.6: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8579 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:48.77 +30:12:42.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3198 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:04.85 +32:09:17.5: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:30.46 +28:05:54.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:09.13 +29:19:17.5: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:24.99 +32:25:57.2: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:47.38 +29:46:10.8: 8.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:42.60 +33:37:28.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:04.85 +32:09:17.5: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:04.85 +32:09:17.5: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=13.1082 delta=-2.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:16.91 +30:27:46.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:30.46 +28:05:54.3: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:30.46 +28:05:54.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0214 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:24.99 +32:25:57.2: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:09.13 +29:19:17.5: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.99 +32:25:57.2: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8697 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:47.38 +29:46:10.8: 8.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:09.13 +29:19:17.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5764 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:47.38 +29:46:10.8: ref_mag=8.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.0085 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:42.60 +33:37:28.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:42.60 +33:37:28.2: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4716 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:16.91 +30:27:46.5: 16.07 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.07 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:39:16.91 +30:27:46.5: ref_mag=16.07 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=11.9286 delta=4.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:57.23 +29:12:54.8: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:47.80 +27:54:07.2: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:47.80 +27:54:07.2: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:41.26 +33:29:04.6: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:47.80 +27:54:07.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3200 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:57.23 +29:12:54.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:57.23 +29:12:54.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4276 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:06.17 +32:08:02.2: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:41.26 +33:29:04.6: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:41.26 +33:29:04.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4976 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:06.17 +32:08:02.2: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.17 +32:08:02.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6609 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:33.82 +27:36:08.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:43.12 +28:45:53.7: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:42:47.10 +31:17:22.8: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:33.82 +27:36:08.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:43.12 +28:45:53.7: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:11.60 +30:31:29.4: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:43.12 +28:45:53.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5655 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:19:01.32 +33:04:40.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:42:47.10 +31:17:22.8: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:47.10 +31:17:22.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0820 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:31.56 +31:05:35.8: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.17 +32:23:09.0: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:11.60 +30:31:29.4: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:01.32 +33:04:40.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:11.60 +30:31:29.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0761 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:31.56 +31:05:35.8: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:31.56 +31:05:35.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3736 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.17 +32:23:09.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.17 +32:23:09.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9888 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out254406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out258287.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239236_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239236_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239246_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239246_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239262_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239262_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:08.09 +29:34:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239265_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239265_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239272_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239272_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239285_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239285_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239287_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239287_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239289_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239289_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:54.38 +30:12:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239295_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239295_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:27.47 +29:38:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239298_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239298_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:09.76 +30:12:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239301_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239301_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:38.56 +32:59:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239303_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239303_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:24.35 +25:37:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239310_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239310_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.28 +26:25:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239316_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239316_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:09.64 +28:21:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239318_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239318_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:34.80 +28:48:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239320_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239320_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:36.87 +33:26:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239324_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239324_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:40.61 +26:27:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239329_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239329_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:25.18 +32:54:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239331_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239331_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239334_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239334_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:58.01 +33:00:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239338_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239338_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:12.49 +30:49:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239341_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239341_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:10.61 +30:44:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239343_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239343_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:04.80 +29:12:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239344_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239344_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:46.62 +29:04:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239347_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239347_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:59.71 +30:16:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239356_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239356_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.58 +33:31:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239360_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239360_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239362_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239362_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:48.11 +26:06:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239364_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239364_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:19.61 +33:23:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239366_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239366_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239378_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239378_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.79 +27:35:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239379_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239379_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.90 +27:18:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239380_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239380_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239381_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239381_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:11.83 +26:16:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239384_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239384_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239390_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239390_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239394_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239394_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239395_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 239395_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.57 +29:29:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241344_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 241344_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.27 +32:03:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242304_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 242304_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242612_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 242612_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.60 +27:35:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243293_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 243293_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.89 +25:55:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243697_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 243697_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.55 +28:29:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244351_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 244351_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.38 +28:38:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245207_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 245207_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.70 +26:04:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245808_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 245808_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.59 +26:00:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246169_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 246169_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.32 +31:10:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246355_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 246355_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:01.39 +33:16:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246417_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 246417_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.02 +26:41:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246421_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 246421_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:11.93 +29:28:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246611_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 246611_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.11 +33:06:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247457_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247457_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.60 +27:35:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247522_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247522_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:55.26 +28:47:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247656_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247656_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.30 +25:47:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247750_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247750_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:10.44 +29:22:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247848_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247848_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.37 +32:06:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247913_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247913_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.12 +32:38:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247917_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 247917_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:32.12 +27:49:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248134_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 248134_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.80 +31:57:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248512_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 248512_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.76 +30:30:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248727_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 248727_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.56 +32:59:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248814_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 248814_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.64 +26:42:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248864_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 248864_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.77 +31:04:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248891_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 248891_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:52.96 +28:27:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249185_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 249185_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:10.93 +31:26:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249305_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 249305_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:11.23 +27:55:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250041_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250041_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:38.20 +32:48:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250045_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250045_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:40.80 +28:13:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250536_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250536_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:07.30 +28:15:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250549_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250549_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:31.50 +33:12:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250590_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250590_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:29.07 +29:37:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250677_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250677_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:32.94 +32:17:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250909_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 250909_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:27.25 +27:37:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251101_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251101_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.38 +27:03:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251108_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251108_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:27.16 +29:36:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251328_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251328_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.27 +32:48:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251550_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251550_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.22 +30:31:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251600_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251600_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251658_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251658_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251768_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251768_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.24 +31:02:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251856_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 251856_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.73 +31:54:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 252279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:54.80 +28:13:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252369_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 252369_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:47.29 +27:43:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252480_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 252480_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252544_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 252544_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.07 +29:34:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252651_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 252651_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.50 +32:04:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252934_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 252934_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:50.08 +27:12:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253067_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253067_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253076_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253076_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:17.36 +30:39:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253102_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253102_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:28.02 +29:33:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253679_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253679_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:30.26 +32:57:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253719_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253719_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:20.36 +27:20:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253776_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253776_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:36.74 +27:09:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253808_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253808_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:11.00 +28:07:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253972_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253972_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:39.67 +30:45:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253997_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 253997_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:43.37 +29:45:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:56.04 +30:13:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254185_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254185_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:12.53 +26:17:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254192_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254192_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:56.68 +30:42:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254362_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254362_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.91 +29:59:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254406_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 254406_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254508_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254508_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:00.84 +34:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254617_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254617_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254875_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 254875_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:18.48 +30:03:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255744_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 255744_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:42.22 +32:49:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255852_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 255852_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256023_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 256023_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:21.71 +31:52:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256374_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 256374_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:29.79 +34:14:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256807_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 256807_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:47.45 +29:54:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256956_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 256956_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:43.54 +29:46:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257223_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 257223_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:04.85 +34:06:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257440_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 257440_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258287_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 258287_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226173_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 226173_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145762_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 145762_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.52 +29:32:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.67 +29:51:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.01 +28:29:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31213_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 31213_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.30 +32:13:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-08_00-37-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks