This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3740 2461321.8740 13.80 04:52:19.21 +17:31:46.3
182.61218 -16.50840 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 0 0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:52:19.21 +17:31:46.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:52:19.21 +17:31:46.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3740* 04 52 19.21 +17 31 46.3 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8740,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3740 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3740 2461321.8740 13.73 05:31:59.39 +14:20:37.3
190.80063 -10.36909 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.670 Ottegebe 1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:31:59.39 +14:20:37.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:31:59.39 +14:20:37.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3740* 05 31 59.39 +14 20 37.3 13.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8740,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3740 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3740 2461321.8740 14.63 05:48:38.81 +11:31:59.0
195.35409 -8.32394 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.635 Vundtia -1 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:48:38.81 +11:31:59.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:48:38.81 +11:31:59.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3740* 05 48 38.81 +11 31 59.0 14.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8740,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3740 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3740 2461321.8740 14.83 05:14:33.18 +13:25:31.2
189.27474 -14.43493 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1114 Lorraine 1 -3 3 15.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:33.18 +13:25:31.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:33.18 +13:25:31.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3740* 05 14 33.18 +13 25 31.2 14.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8740,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3740 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3740 2461321.8740 10.80 05:46:16.92 +15:36:57.6
191.50669 -6.75740 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J054617+1537.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.750 V Y 0.620 V 2453044.10000 174.512955000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:46:16.92 +15:36:57.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:46:16.92 +15:36:57.6: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3740* 05 46 16.92 +15 36 57.6 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J054617+1537.0,2461321.8740,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J054617+1537.0 20261008.3740 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
First image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Last image: 2461321.87455624 08.10.2026 08:59:11.659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 32
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19717
Objects passed selection criteria: 19701
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18651.8
Average stars matched: 17859.8 (95.7537 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:03:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
First image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Last image: 2461321.87455624 08.10.2026 08:59:11.659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 80 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 125671
Objects passed selection criteria: 125456
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 115858
Average stars matched: 111020 (95.8236 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 582332 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:05:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.87341448
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:01.241 +14:00:08.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:01.241 +14:00:08.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:04.316 +13:59:27.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:04.316 +13:59:27.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:01.241 +14:00:08.44
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:04.316 +13:59:27.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01687 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sAzWy8ZQqy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZBsJqX4ncP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qMhuJXOZm8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z0LCw6jZZv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6481 to +19.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6481 to 19.2997 deg
Loaded 8940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6904 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 18778 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.977900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.977900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6481 to +19.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6481 to 19.2997 deg
Loaded 8940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6904 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 18778 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 19240 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5715 to 88.1444 deg, Dec +8.4866 to +19.3515 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5715 to 88.1444 deg, Dec 8.4866 to 19.3515 deg
Loaded 8970 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6863 out of 7649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7649 out of 19240 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
2.1 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
3.3 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
3.3 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
15.6 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.sAzWy8ZQqy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1816, bad_region=0, passed=18778
Got 18778 stars (including 16932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1490 n_q2=933 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZBsJqX4ncP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1850, bad_region=0, passed=19240
Got 19240 stars (including 17364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=934 n_q2=1346 n_q3=910 n_q4=1585 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qMhuJXOZm8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1172, bad_region=0, passed=18598
Got 18598 stars (including 17409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=13.175 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.879 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=0.923 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.710 worst_region_rms_after=0.623 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.052 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.623
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:01.243 +14:00:07.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18598 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2766169.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.923 -> 0.332 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4787 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4585 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4585 pairs (4787 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4585 robust_rms=12.925 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.554 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4585 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.851 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.851 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4585 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.610 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4585 robust_rms_before=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.622 worst_region_rms_after=0.610 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.622 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.610
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:01.245 +14:00:07.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18598 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2767759.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.325 -> 0.324 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4585 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=971 n_q2=1242 n_q3=929 n_q4=1443 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.z0LCw6jZZv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1131, bad_region=2, passed=18500
Got 18500 stars (including 17348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=13.031 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.146 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.146 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.913 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.913 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.640 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=0.925 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.729 worst_region_rms_after=0.640 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.072 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.640
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:04.326 +13:59:26.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18500 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2766186.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.925 -> 0.323 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4792 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4588 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4588 pairs (4792 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4588 robust_rms=12.841 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.744 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.744 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4588 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4588 robust_rms=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.621 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4588 robust_rms_before=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.622 worst_region_rms_after=0.621 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.622 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.621
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:04.326 +13:59:26.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18500 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2767872.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.318 -> 0.319 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4588 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4588 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4588 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=969 n_q2=1241 n_q3=941 n_q4=1437 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.347
ref2=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.031
new1=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.264
new2=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.194
reference average sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.189
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346_astrometric_residuals.png (4763 matched stars from wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (4585 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429_astrometric_residuals.png (4588 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:20:05.34 +18:08:14.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:51:24.87 +14:39:57.8: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:24:06.89 +13:29:22.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:16:17.51 +12:13:41.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:53:13.98 +18:22:01.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:23:46.70 +15:07:59.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:12:32.38 +10:28:40.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:53:13.98 +18:22:01.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:13.98 +18:22:01.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:20:05.34 +18:08:14.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:51:24.87 +14:39:57.8: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:16:17.51 +12:13:41.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:24:06.89 +13:29:22.7: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:17.51 +12:13:41.1: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3266 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:24.87 +14:39:57.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3769 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:06.89 +13:29:22.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3626 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:05.34 +18:08:14.1: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1669 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:15:18.27 +15:30:41.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:19:55.76 +15:00:34.1: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:23:46.70 +15:07:59.4: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:12:32.38 +10:28:40.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:46.70 +15:07:59.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3810 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:32.38 +10:28:40.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3265 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:12:42.80 +13:54:56.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:15:18.27 +15:30:41.6: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:19:55.76 +15:00:34.1: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:18.27 +15:30:41.6: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4399 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:55.76 +15:00:34.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4349 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:17:54.73 +14:06:41.2: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:27:34.48 +14:08:25.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:20:53.41 +13:40:21.9: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:37:57.44 +16:18:18.2: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:12:42.80 +13:54:56.7: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:42.80 +13:54:56.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4606 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:27:34.48 +14:08:25.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:17:54.73 +14:06:41.2: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:34.48 +14:08:25.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4203 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:54.73 +14:06:41.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4691 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:37:57.44 +16:18:18.2: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:20:53.41 +13:40:21.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:57.44 +16:18:18.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4368 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:53.41 +13:40:21.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4336 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21929_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 21929_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22064_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22064_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.51 +15:40:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22172_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22172_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.04 +17:02:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22174_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22174_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:36.93 +12:44:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22223_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22223_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:58.90 +14:34:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22256_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22256_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:40.82 +11:59:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22261_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22261_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:55.02 +10:11:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22279_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22279_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22300_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22300_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22305_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22305_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22307_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22307_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22308_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22308_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22309_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22309_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:10.27 +09:40:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22321_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22321_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:14.41 +13:44:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22322_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22322_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22330_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22330_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:27.35 +12:48:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22333_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22333_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22339_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22339_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:19.85 +15:37:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22344_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22344_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22349_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22349_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22353_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22353_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:20.33 +14:41:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22359_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22359_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22360_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22360_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22362_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22362_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22364_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22364_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22373_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22373_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.29 +11:40:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17500_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 17500_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.58 +10:19:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02571_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 02571_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.31 +17:54:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03372_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 03372_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.38 +17:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:01.245 +14:00:07.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:01.245 +14:00:07.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:04.326 +13:59:26.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:04.326 +13:59:26.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0239 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:01.245 +14:00:07.57
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:04.326 +13:59:26.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01689 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PYrNzVM2tE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xIlYVTBNWx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dAAalmWYwR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jy9CzuWlWX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 133414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6339 to +19.3006 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6339 to 19.3006 deg
Loaded 8958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5727 out of 7746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7746 out of 133414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.848900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.848900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 133414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6339 to +19.3006 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6339 to 19.3006 deg
Loaded 8958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5727 out of 7746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7746 out of 133414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 134593 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5715 to 88.1446 deg, Dec +8.4624 to +19.3542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5715 to 88.1446 deg, Dec 8.4624 to 19.3542 deg
Loaded 8990 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5766 out of 7720 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7720 out of 134593 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
2.0 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
15.8 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PYrNzVM2tE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=13989, bad_region=9, passed=133386
Got 133386 stars (including 119147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 133386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.220 n_q1=1388 n_q2=971 n_q3=1291 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xIlYVTBNWx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=13660, bad_region=5, passed=134562
Got 134562 stars (including 120666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 134562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1010 n_q2=1302 n_q3=953 n_q4=1496 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dAAalmWYwR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=8512, bad_region=48, passed=99335
Got 99335 stars (including 90662 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=13.749 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.509 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.861 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.861 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.328 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.612 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.328 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.617 worst_region_rms_after=0.612 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.617 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.612
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.617 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.617 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.329 arcsec matched=4770
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1034 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1011 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Jy9CzuWlWX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=8460, bad_region=46, passed=99307
Got 99307 stars (including 90677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99307 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=13.723 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.953 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.953 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.880 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.880 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.627 worst_region_rms_after=0.627 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.627 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.627
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.627 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.627 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec matched=4773
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1281 n_q3=1001 n_q4=1446 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-57-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_040002_TTUQ1b1x1_2623999_PxTMhfhr/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:00:34.16 +13:31:30.9: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:34:08.41 +17:22:50.4: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:38:51.18 +11:58:43.7: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:08:02.83 +16:06:07.3: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:48:03.27 +18:24:13.5: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:04:10.70 +09:35:36.0: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:49:31.99 +14:29:15.8: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:50:19.30 +12:23:41.9: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:44:57.93 +17:57:02.0: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:50:19.30 +12:23:41.9: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:38:51.18 +11:58:43.7: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:48:03.27 +18:24:13.5: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:04:10.70 +09:35:36.0: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:00:34.16 +13:31:30.9: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:49:31.99 +14:29:15.8: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:34:08.41 +17:22:50.4: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:19.30 +12:23:41.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1363 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:51.18 +11:58:43.7: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2531 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:08:02.83 +16:06:07.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:03.27 +18:24:13.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5290 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:10.70 +09:35:36.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8289 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:34.16 +13:31:30.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8963 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:31.99 +14:29:15.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2537 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:08.41 +17:22:50.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2001 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:02.83 +16:06:07.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5906 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:44:57.93 +17:57:02.0: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:52:30.82 +16:44:15.0: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:57.93 +17:57:02.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4003 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:52:30.82 +16:44:15.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:30.82 +16:44:15.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:01.52 +17:27:37.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:51:59.53 +15:38:05.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:52:19.21 +17:31:46.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:01.52 +17:27:37.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:52:19.21 +17:31:46.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:51:59.53 +15:38:05.0: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:31:59.39 +14:20:37.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:52:24.55 +15:48:16.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:01.52 +17:27:37.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6565 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:59.53 +15:38:05.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6158 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:54.3: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:31:59.39 +14:20:37.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:52:24.55 +15:48:16.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:54.3: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:55:22.47 +12:16:04.1: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.55 +15:48:16.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:54.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1703 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:52:55.59 +16:43:17.4: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:01.81 +11:29:56.9: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:55:22.47 +12:16:04.1: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:37:20.55 +13:35:27.0: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:22.47 +12:16:04.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0538 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:52:55.59 +16:43:17.4: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:01.81 +11:29:56.9: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:01.81 +11:29:56.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0337 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:55.59 +16:43:17.4: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2473 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:50:03.02 +13:29:37.8: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:37:20.55 +13:35:27.0: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:20.55 +13:35:27.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1551 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:10:08.47 +12:54:11.1: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:50:03.02 +13:29:37.8: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:04:44.59 +09:59:40.2: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:03.02 +13:29:37.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2354 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:23:32.11 +18:34:29.8: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:10:08.47 +12:54:11.1: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:15:05.96 +18:21:43.1: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:08.47 +12:54:11.1: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2470 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:04:44.59 +09:59:40.2: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:31:34.10 +12:03:37.4: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:44.59 +09:59:40.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1554 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:23:32.11 +18:34:29.8: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:15:05.96 +18:21:43.1: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:32.11 +18:34:29.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2917 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:05.96 +18:21:43.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3321 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:52:25.68 +15:46:57.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:31:34.10 +12:03:37.4: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:34.10 +12:03:37.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1967 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:52:25.68 +15:46:57.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:25.68 +15:46:57.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:07:49.85 +17:36:43.0: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:07:49.85 +17:36:43.0: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:49.85 +17:36:43.0: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4291 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:27:49.92 +17:44:02.4: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:32:39.20 +15:39:17.1: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:53:10.70 +18:16:35.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:15:45.27 +16:44:32.7: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:53:10.70 +18:16:35.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:10.70 +18:16:35.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:00:29.48 +18:07:13.9: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:32:39.20 +15:39:17.1: 14.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:27:49.92 +17:44:02.4: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:39.20 +15:39:17.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5309 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:59:48.60 +19:09:34.6: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:49.92 +17:44:02.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5309 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:58:57.44 +19:09:20.3: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:59:48.60 +19:09:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:48.60 +19:09:34.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:58:57.44 +19:09:20.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:57.44 +19:09:20.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:15:45.27 +16:44:32.7: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:00:29.48 +18:07:13.9: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:33:14.38 +13:01:55.7: 15.70 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:48:38.81 +11:31:59.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:45.27 +16:44:32.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7527 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:29.48 +18:07:13.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6974 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:50:19.98 +18:02:09.9: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:02:09.75 +16:57:08.5: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:02:19.25 +19:09:02.2: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:33.18 +13:25:31.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:02:19.25 +19:09:02.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:19.25 +19:09:02.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:33:14.38 +13:01:55.7: 16.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:48:38.81 +11:31:59.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.83 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:14.38 +13:01:55.7: ref_mag=15.83 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7100 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:02:09.75 +16:57:08.5: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:50:19.98 +18:02:09.9: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:09.75 +16:57:08.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7917 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:19.98 +18:02:09.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8652 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:33.18 +13:25:31.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:13:43.61 +17:05:53.9: 15.52 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:53:06.80 +17:27:44.4: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:24:18.96 +16:53:35.6: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:13:43.61 +17:05:53.9: 15.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:52:31.23 +18:26:44.9: 15.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:43.61 +17:05:53.9: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0188 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:53:06.80 +17:27:44.4: 15.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:06.80 +17:27:44.4: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9781 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:24:18.96 +16:53:35.6: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:18.96 +16:53:35.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0269 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:52:31.23 +18:26:44.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:31.23 +18:26:44.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:46:16.92 +15:36:57.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:46:16.92 +15:36:57.6: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:46:16.92 +15:36:57.6: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8048 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161010.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161080.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50971.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158362_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158362_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158371_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158371_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:28.48 +15:54:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158384_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158384_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158389_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158389_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158393_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158393_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158397_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158397_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158407_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158407_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158412_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158412_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158414_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158414_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158445_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158445_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158452_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158452_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158454_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158454_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:07.36 +15:23:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158458_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158458_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158459_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158459_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.25 +18:20:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158460_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158460_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:58.34 +18:26:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158990_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 158990_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.70 +09:43:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159018_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159018_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:38.79 +15:48:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159050_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159050_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.86 +18:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159195_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159195_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:59.80 +10:07:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159242_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159242_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:42.08 +10:53:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159264_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159264_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:57.92 +17:31:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159266_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159266_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:36.55 +11:29:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159389_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159389_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:40.91 +11:30:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159501_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159501_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:31.44 +18:36:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159586_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159586_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:55.47 +11:24:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159621_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159621_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159663_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159663_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159678_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159678_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:21.35 +11:59:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159705_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 159705_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159724_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159724_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:12.45 +15:59:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159804_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159804_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:27.82 +12:39:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159822_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159822_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:21.89 +17:17:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159833_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 159833_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159903_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159903_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.72 +17:59:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159946_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 159946_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:30.96 +16:34:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160021_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160021_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:28.02 +14:29:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160169_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160169_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:08.00 +17:15:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160184_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160184_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:48.42 +16:42:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160186_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160186_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160195_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160195_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:02.75 +10:20:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160211_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160211_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160226_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160226_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.41 +12:45:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160241_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160241_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:02.19 +16:34:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160245_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160245_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:32.27 +11:59:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160284_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160284_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:16.88 +17:20:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160301_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160301_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160306_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160306_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160319_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160319_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:15.74 +18:34:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160321_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160321_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160331_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160331_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:09.48 +18:20:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160338_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160338_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160339_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160339_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.80 +17:58:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160353_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160353_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160354_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160354_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160363_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160363_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160388_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160388_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:00.97 +09:50:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160439_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160439_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160502_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160502_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160513_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160513_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.89 +13:34:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160515_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160515_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160523_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160523_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:44.43 +18:15:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160533_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160533_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:16.54 +12:24:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160539_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160539_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160546_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160546_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:12.62 +17:42:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160554_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160554_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:37.38 +13:58:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160583_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160583_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:42.38 +15:54:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160589_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160589_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.44 +17:33:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160620_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160620_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:28.65 +17:29:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160760_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160760_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160833_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160833_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160874_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160874_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160927_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160927_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160932_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160932_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160981_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160981_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160994_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 160994_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161010_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161010_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:14.38 +13:01:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.735 3341461539558550656 083.30949129856 +13.03189291292 13.9649 12.4672 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.735#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161041_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 161041_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161055_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161055_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161066_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161066_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161080_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 161080_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161095_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161095_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161109_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161109_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161136_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161136_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161189_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161189_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161231_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 161231_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85270_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 85270_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:01.17 +13:02:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66970_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 66970_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:58.97 +14:34:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 113921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.87 +11:10:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104791_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 104791_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:36.95 +12:44:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 125355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:40.84 +11:59:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123993_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 123993_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:34.93 +12:54:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119960_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 119960_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:36.02 +11:33:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 102277_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.57 +10:19:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17024_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 17024_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.28 +17:54:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83918_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 83918_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:52.75 +13:10:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51774_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 51774_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.52 +15:40:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50888_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 50888_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:19.04 +15:45:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 129120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:01.91 +12:13:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50971_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 50971_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22297_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 22297_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks