This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 12.96 04:08:50.08 +17:49:20.7
175.38388 -24.35535 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 -0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:50.08 +17:49:20.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:50.08 +17:49:20.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 04 08 50.08 +17 49 20.7 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 13.59 03:57:50.02 +15:33:44.4
175.25095 -27.82411 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:50.02 +15:33:44.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:50.02 +15:33:44.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 03 57 50.02 +15 33 44.4 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 13.72 04:52:19.19 +17:31:46.7
182.61204 -16.50840 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:19.19 +17:31:46.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:19.19 +17:31:46.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 04 52 19.19 +17 31 46.7 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 14.12 03:58:33.88 +15:27:46.0
175.46894 -27.76302 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -0 0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:33.88 +15:27:46.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:33.88 +15:27:46.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 03 58 33.88 +15 27 46.0 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 14.45 03:58:22.63 +11:09:51.0
179.09476 -30.67353 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -0 0 0 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:22.63 +11:09:51.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:22.63 +11:09:51.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 03 58 22.63 +11 09 51.0 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 14.68 04:14:28.22 +12:59:07.7
180.41686 -26.49654 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda -0 0 0 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:28.22 +12:59:07.7: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:28.22 +12:59:07.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 04 14 28.22 +12 59 07.7 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.3723 2461321.8723 14.86 04:01:00.24 +11:52:45.9
178.96007 -29.71850 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1055 Tynka -0 1 1 14.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:00.24 +11:52:45.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:00.24 +11:52:45.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.3723* 04 01 00.24 +11 52 45.9 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.8723,14.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.3723 14.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461321.87270716 08.10.2026 08:56:31.899 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9979
Objects passed selection criteria: 9971
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9343.75
Average stars matched: 8961.25 (95.9064 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 03:58:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461321.87270716 08.10.2026 08:56:31.899 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58475
Objects passed selection criteria: 58344
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54533.8
Average stars matched: 52783.2 (96.7901 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 04:00:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.87191547
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:41.062 +13:58:39.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:41.062 +13:58:39.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0226 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:38.925 +13:59:10.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:38.925 +13:59:10.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0139 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:41.062 +13:58:39.15
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:38.925 +13:59:10.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01227 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OJ99KGPdy8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fyDEhVBGps
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KspZiigTS4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CuRgVB3hjA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
3.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.OJ99KGPdy8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fyDEhVBGps (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KspZiigTS4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=9893
Got 9893 stars (including 9368 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=14.037 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.679 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.714 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.714 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.488 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.208 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.522 worst_region_rms_after=0.488 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.988 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.488
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.522 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.522 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.313 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1374 n_q3=1152 n_q4=1291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CuRgVB3hjA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, bad_region=0, passed=9915
Got 9915 stars (including 9384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=14.098 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.651 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.480 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.234 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.480 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.025 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.480
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1057 n_q2=1373 n_q3=1154 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.222
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.199
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.1: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:35.65 +15:49:48.5: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:31.11 +15:35:14.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:18.47 +14:34:59.9: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:31.45 +13:55:48.2: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.81 +15:19:04.8: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.2: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:31.11 +15:35:14.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:35.65 +15:49:48.5: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:31.45 +13:55:48.2: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:18.47 +14:34:59.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:31.11 +15:35:14.5: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1880 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.60 +16:29:05.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3654 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:35.65 +15:49:48.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4598 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:31.45 +13:55:48.2: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4602 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.81 +15:19:04.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:18.47 +14:34:59.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4273 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3965 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.14 +13:06:46.1: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4358 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2641 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.81 +15:19:04.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3630 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.2: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4626 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:23.50 +14:15:26.3: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:10.17 +14:35:40.4: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:46.10 +11:13:30.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:10.17 +14:35:40.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:23.50 +14:15:26.3: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:46.10 +11:13:30.9: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:10.17 +14:35:40.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4911 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:46.10 +11:13:30.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5084 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:23.50 +14:15:26.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4849 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20389_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20389_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20392_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:43.91 +13:42:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20406_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20419_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20424_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20428_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20428_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20437_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20439_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20443_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20443_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:00.07 +12:20:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20449_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20451_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20451_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20452_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20452_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.98 +14:32:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.28 +17:32:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:41.062 +13:58:39.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:41.062 +13:58:39.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0226 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:38.925 +13:59:10.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:38.925 +13:59:10.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0139 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:41.062 +13:58:39.15
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:38.925 +13:59:10.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01227 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C6YbJ67Qlf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YVsZ30jy7r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pk8fpxybJu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sc6iozgZNT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.C6YbJ67Qlf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YVsZ30jy7r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299
Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pk8fpxybJu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2530, bad_region=48, passed=49568
Got 49568 stars (including 46927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=14.127 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.603 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.720 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.485 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.196 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.522 worst_region_rms_after=0.485 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.989 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.485
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.522 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.522 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1071 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1154 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sc6iozgZNT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2524, bad_region=48, passed=49749
Got 49749 stars (including 47113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49749 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=14.216 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.501 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.501 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.755 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.478 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.224 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.478 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.025 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.478
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.316 arcsec matched=4872
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1060 n_q2=1349 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-55-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_035732_TTUQ1b1x1_2487045_2c87gPlC/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:39.21 +14:38:40.9: 14.94 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:53.90 +18:45:51.3: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:16.73 +11:22:12.4: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:36.26 +18:55:09.4: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:11.03 +10:38:43.8: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:37.87 +13:31:19.6: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:26:44.28 +10:51:26.0: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.75 +11:19:32.0: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:26:43.60 +13:15:50.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:07.94 +11:54:55.0: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:36.26 +18:55:09.4: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:53.90 +18:45:51.3: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:07.94 +11:54:55.0: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:16.73 +11:22:12.4: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:26:44.28 +10:51:26.0: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:53.90 +18:45:51.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8823 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.26 +18:55:09.4: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5429 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:07.94 +11:54:55.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5509 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:39.21 +14:38:40.9: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.75 +11:19:32.0: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:26:43.60 +13:15:50.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:16.73 +11:22:12.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6479 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:44.28 +10:51:26.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7260 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:37.87 +13:31:19.6: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:11.03 +10:38:43.8: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.21 +14:38:40.9: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6274 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.75 +11:19:32.0: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8512 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:43.60 +13:15:50.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8422 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:37.87 +13:31:19.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1693 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:11.03 +10:38:43.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2087 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:50.08 +17:49:20.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:22.85 +16:16:06.0: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:50.02 +15:33:44.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:38.64 +17:55:22.0: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.43 +14:25:57.4: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:11.27 +17:52:55.7: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:51:49.01 +13:37:45.3: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.45 +18:01:07.5: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:19.19 +17:31:46.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:50.08 +17:49:20.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:22.85 +16:16:06.0: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:50.02 +15:33:44.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:22.85 +16:16:06.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8901 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:38.64 +17:55:22.0: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:38.64 +17:55:22.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9599 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.45 +18:01:07.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:11.27 +17:52:55.7: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.43 +14:25:57.4: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:51:49.01 +13:37:45.3: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.45 +18:01:07.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9851 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:19.19 +17:31:46.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.51 +17:25:28.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4776 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:11.27 +17:52:55.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7189 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.43 +14:25:57.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7308 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:49.01 +13:37:45.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8321 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:33.88 +15:27:46.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:52.15 +18:55:04.2: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:08.97 +12:05:43.3: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:22.63 +11:09:51.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:59.10 +18:07:08.8: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:33.88 +15:27:46.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:38.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:52.15 +18:55:04.2: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:28.22 +12:59:07.7: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:52.15 +18:55:04.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3055 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:22.63 +11:09:51.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:59.10 +18:07:08.8: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:08.97 +12:05:43.3: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:59.10 +18:07:08.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4727 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:08.97 +12:05:43.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2923 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:38.6: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:28.22 +12:59:07.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.82 +17:39:38.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6123 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:20.47 +15:14:04.9: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:29.08 +15:42:24.4: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:08.12 +12:34:22.3: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:20.47 +15:14:04.9: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:29.08 +15:42:24.4: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:20.47 +15:14:04.9: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8287 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:29.08 +15:42:24.4: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7452 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:08.12 +12:34:22.3: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:45.62 +17:25:01.4: 15.60 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:08.12 +12:34:22.3: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8892 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:45.62 +17:25:01.4: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:45.62 +17:25:01.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0297 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:54.42 +18:22:20.7: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:43.27 +17:33:27.4: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:05:58.59 +18:51:43.3: 15.54 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:54.42 +18:22:20.7: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:54.42 +18:22:20.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9545 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:43.27 +17:33:27.4: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:43.27 +17:33:27.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9981 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:05:58.59 +18:51:43.3: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:58.59 +18:51:43.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8993 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:46.07 +13:12:17.8: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:00.24 +11:52:45.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:16.02 +16:12:57.2: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:46.07 +13:12:17.8: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:46.07 +13:12:17.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9239 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:37.53 +18:09:13.4: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:00.24 +11:52:45.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:16.02 +16:12:57.2: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:37.53 +18:09:13.4: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:16.02 +16:12:57.2: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0089 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:37.53 +18:09:13.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9601 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:24.59 +17:54:29.6: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:46.22 +16:39:50.2: 15.60 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:43.50 +16:22:07.1: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:24.59 +17:54:29.6: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:24.59 +17:54:29.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7759 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:43.50 +16:22:07.1: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:43.50 +16:22:07.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9884 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:46.22 +16:39:50.2: 15.54 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:46.22 +16:39:50.2: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0616 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:01.26 +13:20:44.6: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:20.01 +18:51:12.8: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:43.92 +14:44:45.3: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:01.26 +13:20:44.6: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:01.26 +13:20:44.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7950 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:20.01 +18:51:12.8: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:43.92 +14:44:45.3: 15.40 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:20.01 +18:51:12.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0129 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:43.92 +14:44:45.3: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9932 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:11.90 +13:22:58.1: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:35.92 +12:34:29.4: 15.69 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:17.88 +13:13:28.8: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:11.90 +13:22:58.1: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:11.90 +13:22:58.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8094 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:17.88 +13:13:28.8: 15.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:35.92 +12:34:29.4: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:17.88 +13:13:28.8: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9395 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:35.92 +12:34:29.4: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9404 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:57:40.97 +18:27:46.2: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:44.55 +11:36:45.0: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:36.25 +14:55:37.3: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:57:40.97 +18:27:46.2: 15.56 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:40.97 +18:27:46.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0020 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:44.55 +11:36:45.0: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:44.55 +11:36:45.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1347 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:36.25 +14:55:37.3: 15.78 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:36.25 +14:55:37.3: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1571 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:39.63 +11:02:58.7: 15.70 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:36.30 +17:39:10.6: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:19.78 +14:53:09.5: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:39.63 +11:02:58.7: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:39.63 +11:02:58.7: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0592 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:19.78 +14:53:09.5: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:24.12 +15:08:36.4: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:36.30 +17:39:10.6: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:19.78 +14:53:09.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0874 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:36.30 +17:39:10.6: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8821 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:24.12 +15:08:36.4: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:24.12 +15:08:36.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9757 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:02.50 +09:22:55.8: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:48:23.49 +17:48:01.8: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:29.91 +14:14:13.8: 15.48 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:14.62 +10:11:20.5: 15.53 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:44:27.78 +16:43:10.2: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:48:23.49 +17:48:01.8: 15.41 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:02.50 +09:22:55.8: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:23.49 +17:48:01.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9546 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:02.50 +09:22:55.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9809 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:29.91 +14:14:13.8: 15.66 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:29.91 +14:14:13.8: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1248 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:14.62 +10:11:20.5: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:14.62 +10:11:20.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8925 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:44:27.78 +16:43:10.2: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:27.78 +16:43:10.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0845 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:58:44.20 +16:31:10.3: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:49:20.23 +13:46:16.8: 15.59 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:58:44.20 +16:31:10.3: 15.55 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:44.20 +16:31:10.3: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0078 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:49:20.23 +13:46:16.8: 15.51 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:20.23 +13:46:16.8: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0485 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76074.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77227.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77459.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75653_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75653_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75662_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75662_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75665_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75665_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75667_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75667_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75678_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75678_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75679_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75679_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75690_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75690_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75691_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 75691_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76074_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76074_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76353_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76353_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76471_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76471_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76473_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76473_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76522_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76522_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76525_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76525_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76616_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76616_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76635_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76635_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76779_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 76779_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76893_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76893_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76904_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76904_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:58.26 +10:13:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76906_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76906_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.24 +17:20:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76968_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 76968_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77119_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 77119_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77195_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77195_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77227_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 77227_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77259_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77259_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77272_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77272_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77430_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77430_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77442_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77442_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77448_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77448_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77459_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 77459_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77463_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77463_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77479_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77479_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77492_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77492_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77499_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77499_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77504_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77504_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77519_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77519_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77527_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77527_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77571_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77571_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77584_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77584_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77609_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77609_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77636_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77638_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77638_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77668_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77668_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77697_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77697_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77703_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77703_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77713_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77713_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77771_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77771_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77785_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77785_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77813_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77813_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77832_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 77832_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23217_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 23217_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.43 +11:10:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.45 +18:37:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17713_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 17713_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +17:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.69 +09:56:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08853_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 08853_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_03-56-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
