This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 11.11 05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2
181.04390 -7.87954 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 0 1 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 18 36.45 +23 46 41.2 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 19.6 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461321.7297,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261008.2297 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 12.14 05:04:46.39 +26:05:20.6
177.30434 -9.10221 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:46.39 +26:05:20.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:46.39 +26:05:20.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 04 46.39 +26 05 20.6 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 12.93 05:51:11.45 +16:41:53.0
191.17093 -5.19257 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso -2 -0 2 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:11.45 +16:41:53.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:11.45 +16:41:53.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 51 11.45 +16 41 53.0 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 19.6 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461321.7297,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261008.2297 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 13.06 05:16:05.15 +21:36:53.5
182.51893 -9.58025 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:05.15 +21:36:53.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:05.15 +21:36:53.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 16 05.15 +21 36 53.5 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 13.79 05:02:15.50 +25:03:22.2
177.80550 -10.17195 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:15.50 +25:03:22.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:15.50 +25:03:22.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 02 15.50 +25 03 22.2 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 13.63 05:43:47.63 +19:39:43.7
187.71123 -5.18456 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla 1 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:47.63 +19:39:43.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:47.63 +19:39:43.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 08.2297* 05 43 47.63 +19 39 43.7 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.2297 2461321.7297 12.55 06:01:56.78 +25:00:19.5
185.23200 1.14142 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 0 -1 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:56.78 +25:00:19.5: 15.63 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:56.78 +25:00:19.5: 15.56 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.7297,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.2297 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461321.72999086 08.10.2026 05:31:01.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20374
Objects passed selection criteria: 20313
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16563.2
Average stars matched: 16331.2 (98.5993 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 00:45:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461321.72999086 08.10.2026 05:31:01.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 175
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 104 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151373
Objects passed selection criteria: 151014
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120292
Average stars matched: 116553 (96.8917 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 8 00:49:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.72936856
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:05.451 +21:59:11.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:05.451 +21:59:11.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0560 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.088 +21:59:29.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:08.088 +21:59:29.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0451 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:05.451 +21:59:11.78
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:08.088 +21:59:29.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01127 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AGVPgEXOkB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3k50ORw9DH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zqX0cxzIXO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k2DcZEtGEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AGVPgEXOkB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3k50ORw9DH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zqX0cxzIXO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=550, bad_region=0, passed=11319
Got 11319 stars (including 10753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11319 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5198)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=9.561 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.273 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.273 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.918 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.312 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.622 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.737 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.473 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.666 worst_region_rms_after=0.622 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.641 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.622
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.666 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.666 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.476 arcsec matched=4727
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=997 n_q2=1348 n_q3=851 n_q4=1531 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.k2DcZEtGEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=560, bad_region=0, passed=11420
Got 11420 stars (including 10847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=9.666 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.468 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.856 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.271 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.230 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.559 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4724 robust_rms_before=1.722 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.700 worst_region_rms_after=0.559 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.550 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.559
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.205 +21:59:27.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11420 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3507923.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.722 -> 0.423 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4724 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4500 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4500 pairs (4724 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4500 robust_rms=9.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.034 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.034 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4500 robust_rms=0.837 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.197 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.174 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4500 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.557 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4500 robust_rms_before=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.555 worst_region_rms_after=0.557 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.555 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.557 vs 0.555 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=4500 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=961 n_q2=1286 n_q3=809 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.222
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.201
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (4727 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (4500 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:46.39 +26:05:20.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:42.65 +25:11:11.8: 9.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:42.65 +25:11:11.8: 9.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:42.65 +25:11:11.8: ref_mag=9.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4951 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:46.39 +26:05:20.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30751.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30670_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 30670_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30751_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 30751_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30766_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 30766_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 30871_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.19 +17:53:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.04 +20:30:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.00 +20:10:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.47 +20:22:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 31s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2
05:04:46.39 +26:05:20.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:05.451 +21:59:11.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:05.451 +21:59:11.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0560 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:08.205 +21:59:27.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:08.205 +21:59:27.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:05.451 +21:59:11.78
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:08.205 +21:59:27.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GLDKOGB5dG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2RjJIRxlqu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0VmEFrPWAh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GGj6BReGP4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 164 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GLDKOGB5dG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2RjJIRxlqu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0VmEFrPWAh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4446, bad_region=41, passed=76659
Got 76659 stars (including 72070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4718 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=9.869 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.278 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.278 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.906 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.232 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.223 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4718 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4718 robust_rms_before=1.719 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.476 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.673 worst_region_rms_after=0.623 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.586 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.623
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.673 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.673 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.457 arcsec matched=4718
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits N_match=4718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1029 n_q2=1292 n_q3=863 n_q4=1534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GGj6BReGP4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4549, bad_region=41, passed=76491
Got 76491 stars (including 71784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4724 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=10.013 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.041 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.041 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.844 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.284 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.148 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4724 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.562 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.562 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4724 robust_rms_before=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.563 worst_region_rms_after=0.562 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.563 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.562
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.563 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.423 arcsec matched=4724
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=4724 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1017 n_q2=1294 n_q3=868 n_q4=1545 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-30-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0236.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-08_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_003232_TTUQ1b1x1_861089_obCse4xC/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:04.50 +22:01:59.8: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:53.71 +22:47:02.5: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:58.69 +16:53:29.0: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:50.71 +23:56:24.9: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:01.75 +24:18:01.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:04.50 +22:01:59.8: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:58.69 +16:53:29.0: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:53.71 +22:47:02.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:04.50 +22:01:59.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7483 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:58.69 +16:53:29.0: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7870 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:53.71 +22:47:02.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5925 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:50.71 +23:56:24.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:01.75 +24:18:01.3: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:50.71 +23:56:24.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9756 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:01.75 +24:18:01.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9996 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:11.45 +16:41:53.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:10.27 +17:59:29.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:11.45 +16:41:53.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:10.27 +17:59:29.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:10.27 +17:59:29.6: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8930 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:39.39 +19:18:23.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:09.48 +19:25:06.8: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:39.39 +19:18:23.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:39.39 +19:18:23.2: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6982 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.98 +21:52:56.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:09.48 +19:25:06.8: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:09.48 +19:25:06.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9130 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.98 +21:52:56.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.98 +21:52:56.5: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3232 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:05.15 +21:36:53.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:05.15 +21:36:53.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.73 +22:34:33.5: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.73 +22:34:33.5: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.73 +22:34:33.5: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8449 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:24.23 +26:25:39.9: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:28.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:52.51 +27:10:50.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:24.23 +26:25:39.9: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:24.23 +26:25:39.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9056 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:28.9: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.67 +25:20:28.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2560 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:52.51 +27:10:50.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:52.51 +27:10:50.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.39 +20:57:18.3: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:15.50 +25:03:22.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.39 +20:57:18.3: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.39 +20:57:18.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4838 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:40.24 +23:42:07.8: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:15.50 +25:03:22.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:40.24 +23:42:07.8: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:40.24 +23:42:07.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2281 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:02.2: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:02.2: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.82 +21:33:02.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6602 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:29:19.12 +21:33:28.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:19.12 +21:33:28.7: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:19.12 +21:33:28.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4718 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.14 +21:09:55.2: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.14 +21:09:55.2: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.14 +21:09:55.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6123 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:38.04 +22:58:43.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:36.44 +22:50:24.9: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:38.04 +22:58:43.0: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:38.04 +22:58:43.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6841 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:36.44 +22:50:24.9: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:36.44 +22:50:24.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8859 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:47.63 +19:39:43.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:47.63 +19:39:43.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:56.78 +25:00:19.5: 15.63 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:56.78 +25:00:19.5: 15.56 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:01:56.78 +25:00:19.5: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=12.5573 delta=3.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:15.27 +22:50:21.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:15.27 +22:50:21.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:15.27 +22:50:21.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9231 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:56.01 +22:51:48.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:56.01 +22:51:48.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.01 +22:51:48.1: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9543 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183739.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192253.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 129s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:13.94 +23:33:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:56.28 +23:05:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:00.20 +23:20:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:10.02 +26:28:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190593_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:30.26 +19:22:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.28 +19:47:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190604_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190606_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.34 +18:25:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:02.15 +25:23:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.18 +17:57:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:20.62 +18:14:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.93 +24:13:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.16 +18:20:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:17.82 +24:43:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.06 +22:41:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.03 +18:32:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:57.74 +17:08:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.66 +16:41:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190707_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190707_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.94 +26:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:36.45 +23:46:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 190727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190836_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190836_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:46.37 +26:05:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.68 +26:44:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.86 +25:55:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190996_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190996_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.71 +22:27:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 190999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.85 +23:48:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191035_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191035_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.98 +26:25:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.75 +23:02:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191092_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:39.97 +26:04:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.72 +19:34:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191141_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191141_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.97 +25:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191188_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191188_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.63 +20:46:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191218_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191218_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.94 +23:48:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191237_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191237_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.97 +20:10:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.07 +24:36:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.26 +18:59:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191279_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191279_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.35 +18:33:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.09 +23:12:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191306_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191306_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.24 +22:45:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191327_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191327_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.14 +26:25:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.42 +20:26:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191354_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191354_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.23 +25:24:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191362_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 191362_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191370_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191370_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.73 +22:40:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.79 +25:24:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191377_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.96 +23:55:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191396_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191396_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.61 +25:09:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191407_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191407_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.24 +20:53:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191418_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191418_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.98 +19:35:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191427_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191427_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.76 +19:32:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.57 +21:46:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191448_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191448_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191451_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191451_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.66 +20:02:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191481_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191481_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.28 +23:15:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191490_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191490_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.27 +25:47:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191498_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191498_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.15 +18:34:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191543_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191543_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.35 +25:09:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191547_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.34 +18:40:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191550_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191550_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.78 +18:25:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191551_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191551_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:00.38 +25:58:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.95 +25:15:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:51.85 +18:15:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.77 +23:11:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.95 +26:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191628_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.53 +24:25:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.44 +26:25:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.95 +17:11:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191651_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191651_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.68 +22:45:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.73 +20:05:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191722_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 191722_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191733_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191733_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.40 +20:56:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191736_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191736_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.00 +22:58:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191739_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191739_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.30 +24:57:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191750_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191750_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:02.82 +25:16:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.13 +24:24:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191759_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191759_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:46.64 +22:17:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191762_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191762_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.30 +26:18:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191800_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191800_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191805_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191805_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.08 +24:22:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.22 +18:44:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191817_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191817_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.58 +21:24:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.28 +23:07:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191823_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191823_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.61 +18:46:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.88 +24:21:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191873_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191873_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.52 +22:29:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191900_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191900_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.55 +25:22:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.14 +22:06:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191923_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191923_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.41 +20:09:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.50 +21:47:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191960_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191960_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.82 +17:59:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.63 +25:41:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 191986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.44 +18:11:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:23.17 +25:19:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.05 +24:06:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.93 +20:00:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.33 +24:22:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.44 +20:26:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192125_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192125_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.91 +19:23:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192198_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192198_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.38 +22:27:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192200_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192200_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.88 +21:26:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 192247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.74 +21:19:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192253_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 192253_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.46 +17:54:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.43 +25:01:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:53.31 +20:56:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.37 +20:16:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.58 +19:30:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.72 +23:22:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183739_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 183739_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.11 +24:59:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:57.90 +22:13:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.48 +26:13:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.02 +24:53:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.76 +23:10:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.73 +22:30:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.02 +22:46:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.45 +24:45:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.43 +21:44:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.17 +24:10:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.32 +25:40:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.37 +20:19:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.75 +19:21:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.57 +21:25:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.73 +22:47:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.19 +17:59:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63923_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 63923_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:21.67 +22:53:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.19 +25:59:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.13 +20:22:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:25.34 +17:43:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62312_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 62312_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.50 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.13 +17:45:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.81 +22:48:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.44 +19:25:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.18 +17:53:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.79 +16:57:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.14 +21:51:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.48 +19:44:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.86 +21:13:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.43 +20:28:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.00 +20:10:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-08_00-31-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0237 did not pass the final checks
