This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.0520 2461321.5520 12.56 19:01:57.08 -31:31:16.7
5.21074 -15.85393 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 0 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:01:57.08 -31:31:16.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:01:57.08 -31:31:16.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461321.5520,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261008.0520 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.0520 2461321.5520 12.94 18:32:40.18 -33:22:28.3
0.89902 -10.95542 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V3528 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.700 pg 17.200 pg 2436720.00000 267.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:32:40.18 -33:22:28.3: 14.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:32:40.18 -33:22:28.3: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3528 Sgr,2461321.5520,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3528 Sgr 20261008.0520 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.0520 2461321.5520 12.39 19:01:55.26 -37:23:40.8
359.50086 -18.01408 galactic CrA Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" DG CrA
Type: CTTS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 V 14.200 V Ge-Ke
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:01:55.26 -37:23:40.8: 13.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:01:55.26 -37:23:40.8: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DG CrA,2461321.5520,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DG CrA 20261008.0520 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.0520 2461321.5520 11.31 18:54:05.54 -30:02:32.8
5.93456 -13.72177 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J185406-3002.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.520 V Y 1.060 V 2452401.00000 175.627396000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:54:05.54 -30:02:32.8: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:54:05.54 -30:02:32.8: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185406-3002.4,2461321.5520,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185406-3002.4 20261008.0520 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.0520 2461321.5520 12.35 18:31:38.04 -31:35:51.6
2.43277 -9.99087 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V3499 Sgr
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.000 pg 15.600 pg 2436710.00000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:31:38.04 -31:35:51.6: 13.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:31:38.04 -31:35:51.6: 13.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3499 Sgr,2461321.5520,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3499 Sgr 20261008.0520 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 08.0520 2461321.5520 12.18 18:42:39.93 -31:02:36.3
3.96599 -11.88601 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" KQ Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.100 V < 17.200 V 2454410.00000 187.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:42:39.93 -31:02:36.3: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:42:39.93 -31:02:36.3: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KQ Sgr,2461321.5520,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KQ Sgr 20261008.0520 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461321.55224694 08.10.2026 01:15:04.136 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8823
Objects passed selection criteria: 8802
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6732
Average stars matched: 6282.5 (93.3229 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 21:36:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461321.55224694 08.10.2026 01:15:04.136 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 225
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 173 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 109871
Objects passed selection criteria: 109673
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85206.5
Average stars matched: 78363 (91.9683 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 565852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 21:41:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461321.55173985
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.282 -34:01:37.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.282 -34:01:37.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0279 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.245 -34:01:55.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.245 -34:01:55.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0326 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:58.282 -34:01:37.68
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:58.245 -34:01:55.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00492 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sQ2WpZmvg9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E9DX4gKhi4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xcEQVxziYx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mAgq2fruPc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9747 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18854 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7752 out of 8001 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8001 out of 9747 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.309500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.309500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9747 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18854 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7752 out of 8001 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8001 out of 9747 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 9637 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7334 to 291.6528 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7334 to 291.6528 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4569 deg
Loaded 18877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7647 out of 7892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7892 out of 9637 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.sQ2WpZmvg9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=676, bad_region=1425, passed=9747
Got 9747 stars (including 7720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9747 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5299)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.748 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=1680 n_q2=647 n_q3=1783 n_q4=703 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E9DX4gKhi4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=703, bad_region=1428, passed=9637
Got 9637 stars (including 7580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=1671 n_q2=649 n_q3=1782 n_q4=711 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xcEQVxziYx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, bad_region=1723, passed=6852
Got 6852 stars (including 4720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4649 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4547 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4547 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4652 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4545 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4545 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 4545 stars left (next iteration limit 5001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4545 robust_rms=7.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4545 robust_rms=0.752 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.025 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.025 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4545 robust_rms=0.685 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.854 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.854 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4545 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.710 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.685 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.979 worst_region_rms_after=0.854 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.362 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.854
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.276 -34:01:38.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6852 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1087674.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.909 -> 0.685 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.4 arcsec, 4545 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4293 pairs (4545 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4293 robust_rms=7.147 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.242 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.242 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4293 robust_rms=0.736 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.025 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.025 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4293 robust_rms=0.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.850 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4293 robust_rms_before=0.668 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.668 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.669 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.852 worst_region_rms_after=0.850 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.852 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.850
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.277 -34:01:38.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6852 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1096680.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.668 -> 0.669 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 2, search radius 3.3 arcsec, 4293 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4291 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4291 pairs (4293 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: the re-match converged after 2 cycles (pair count changed by 0.0%) - keeping the current solution with these pairs
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4291 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4291 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=4291 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.798 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.733 n_q1=1308 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1077 n_q4=886 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mAgq2fruPc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, bad_region=1884, passed=7329
Got 7329 stars (including 5033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=7.206 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.982 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.982 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.723 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.970 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.970 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=0.883 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.692 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.660 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.999 worst_region_rms_after=0.852 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.258 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.852
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.240 -34:01:55.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7329 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1087656.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.883 -> 0.660 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.3 arcsec, 4813 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4556 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4556 pairs (4813 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4556 robust_rms=7.012 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4556 robust_rms=0.710 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.967 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.967 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4556 robust_rms=0.648 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.846 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.846 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4556 robust_rms_before=0.648 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.648 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.648 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.846 worst_region_rms_after=0.846 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.846 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.846
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.240 -34:01:55.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7329 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1096697.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.648 -> 0.648 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4556 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4556 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 2, search radius 3.2 arcsec, 4556 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4552 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4552 pairs (4556 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: the re-match converged after 2 cycles (pair count changed by 0.1%) - keeping the current solution with these pairs
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4552 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4552 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=4552 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.766 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.771 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1126 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits sigma_overall=0.671 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits sigma_overall=0.660 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.666 worst_q_ratio=1.197
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.658 worst_q_ratio=1.171
reference average sigma_overall=0.6655 worst_q_ratio=1.121
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050_astrometric_residuals.png (4813 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.64 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051_astrometric_residuals.png (4813 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.64 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (4291 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (4552 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:57:41.54 -33:50:47.1: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:36:40.76 -29:50:49.4: 10.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:32:11.34 -35:47:55.9: 11.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:58:50.87 -29:50:15.9: 11.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:53:08.15 -31:26:20.6: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:32:11.34 -35:47:55.9: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:58:50.87 -29:50:15.9: 11.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:57:41.54 -33:50:47.1: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:36:40.76 -29:50:49.4: 10.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:50.87 -29:50:15.9: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8670 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:32:11.34 -35:47:55.9: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8297 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:41.54 -33:50:47.1: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9338 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:40.76 -29:50:49.4: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5528 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:53:08.15 -31:26:20.6: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:08.15 -31:26:20.6: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9682 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20820_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20820_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:15.20 -37:02:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20865_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20865_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:31.58 -35:03:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20926_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 20926_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:00.30 -31:11:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21174_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21174_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21300_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21300_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.51 -31:08:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21404_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21404_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:39.36 -30:22:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21469_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21469_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21495_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21495_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21542_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21542_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21560_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21560_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:40.55 -30:43:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21571_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21571_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21591_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21591_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:43.09 -33:45:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01938_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 01938_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:41.14 -36:48:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.277 -34:01:38.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.277 -34:01:38.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.240 -34:01:55.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.240 -34:01:55.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:58.277 -34:01:38.14
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:58.240 -34:01:55.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00488 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QfQ0CWkchg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8hyVjguMTw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9V0Jcr909y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V4gs3zMsg1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 119127 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14049 out of 15978 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15978 out of 119127 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.071400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.071400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 119127 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14049 out of 15978 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15978 out of 119127 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 123059 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6989 to 291.7304 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6989 to 291.7304 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4568 deg
Loaded 18963 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14010 out of 15963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15963 out of 123059 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 137 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QfQ0CWkchg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=8489, bad_region=10831, passed=119125
Got 119125 stars (including 100241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 119125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5315)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.743 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.632 n_q1=1709 n_q2=665 n_q3=1727 n_q4=729 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8hyVjguMTw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=8929, bad_region=11024, passed=123053
Got 123053 stars (including 103547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 123053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5307)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=1716 n_q2=667 n_q3=1721 n_q4=720 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9V0Jcr909y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=4396, bad_region=14125, passed=74312
Got 74312 stars (including 57152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4829 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=7.186 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.763 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.763 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=0.738 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.994 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.994 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=0.671 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.844 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.844 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4829 robust_rms_before=0.675 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.660 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.671 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.857 worst_region_rms_after=0.844 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.857 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.844
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.857 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.857 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.660 arcsec matched=4829
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=4829 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.816 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=1553 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1255 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.V4gs3zMsg1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=4762, bad_region=15067, passed=77771
Got 77771 stars (including 59416 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=6.974 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.519 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.718 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.966 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.966 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.651 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.836 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.836 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=0.654 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.660 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.651 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.838 worst_region_rms_after=0.836 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.838 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.836
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.838 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.838 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.654 arcsec matched=4833
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.807 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.649 n_q1=1569 n_q2=1084 n_q3=1267 n_q4=913 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-14-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_210717_TTUQ2b1x1_1862860_mMnIDgd2/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:54:19.75 -37:17:11.5: 13.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:34:55.48 -31:28:35.3: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:31:50.91 -32:42:45.5: 12.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:33.83 -33:50:19.9: 13.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:35:11.83 -32:48:32.0: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:50:23.53 -35:35:55.6: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:53:39.12 -35:15:46.4: 13.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:27:43.48 -35:12:09.1: 13.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:50:23.53 -35:35:55.6: 13.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:35:11.83 -32:48:32.0: 13.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:31:50.91 -32:42:45.5: 12.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:34:55.48 -31:28:35.3: 13.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:23.53 -35:35:55.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3696 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:50.91 -32:42:45.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9532 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:55.48 -31:28:35.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9847 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:11.83 -32:48:32.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9879 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:33.83 -33:50:19.9: 13.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:33.83 -33:50:19.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3410 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:54:19.75 -37:17:11.5: 13.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:53:39.12 -35:15:46.4: 13.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:19.75 -37:17:11.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2293 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:39.12 -35:15:46.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1511 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:33:25.94 -30:06:01.5: 12.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:27:43.48 -35:12:09.1: 13.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:27:43.48 -35:12:09.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0871 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:33:25.94 -30:06:01.5: 12.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:25.94 -30:06:01.5: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.6583 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:31:56.34 -29:41:57.0: 13.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:02:50.28 -31:51:37.8: 12.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:30:25.17 -30:57:48.3: 12.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:05:15.71 -32:38:19.5: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:54:25.62 -32:43:49.9: 12.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:48:54.08 -30:59:27.2: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:47:09.54 -36:05:20.7: 12.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:30:25.17 -30:57:48.3: 12.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:02:50.28 -31:51:37.8: 12.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:31:56.34 -29:41:57.0: 13.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:05:15.71 -32:38:19.5: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:50.28 -31:51:37.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8750 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:15.71 -32:38:19.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6224 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:56.34 -29:41:57.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.5346 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:25.17 -30:57:48.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4938 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:02:49.73 -31:21:10.0: 12.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:54:25.62 -32:43:49.9: 12.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:48:54.08 -30:59:27.2: 11.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:54.08 -30:59:27.2: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1399 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:25.62 -32:43:49.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6109 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:26:42.64 -32:22:02.7: 11.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:47:09.54 -36:05:20.7: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:09.54 -36:05:20.7: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2160 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:42:26.32 -31:21:15.5: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:02:49.73 -31:21:10.0: 12.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:49.73 -31:21:10.0: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3040 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:26:42.64 -32:22:02.7: 11.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:42.64 -32:22:02.7: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7727 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:42:26.32 -31:21:15.5: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:26.32 -31:21:15.5: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7500 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:36:40.72 -29:50:48.6: 10.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:36:40.72 -29:50:48.6: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:40.72 -29:50:48.6: ref_mag=10.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5304 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:52:01.12 -31:54:57.8: 12.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:09:01.95 -36:52:13.7: 12.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:45:13.82 -35:52:14.5: 12.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:02:21.87 -36:00:14.6: 12.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:30:48.55 -31:28:26.1: 12.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:52:01.12 -31:54:57.8: 12.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:01.12 -31:54:57.8: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0477 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:01:57.08 -31:31:16.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:02:21.87 -36:00:14.6: 12.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:45:13.82 -35:52:14.5: 12.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:09:01.95 -36:52:13.7: 12.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:21.87 -36:00:14.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4117 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:01.95 -36:52:13.7: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3313 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:13.82 -35:52:14.5: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1830 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:30:48.55 -31:28:26.1: 12.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:48.55 -31:28:26.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1283 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:27:57.34 -33:18:52.3: 11.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:01:57.08 -31:31:16.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:27:57.34 -33:18:52.3: 11.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:27:57.34 -33:18:52.3: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3492 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:40:33.69 -33:50:14.4: 12.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:35:57.09 -34:54:08.7: 12.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:56:18.56 -36:22:15.2: 12.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:40:33.69 -33:50:14.4: 12.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:33.69 -33:50:14.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5792 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:35:57.09 -34:54:08.7: 12.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:57.09 -34:54:08.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7138 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:56:18.56 -36:22:15.2: 12.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:18.56 -36:22:15.2: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.7890 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:56.12 -33:14:44.0: 12.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:01:35.87 -36:21:10.4: 13.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:05:46.29 -38:09:29.4: 13.38 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:02:58.93 -37:41:15.7: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:56.12 -33:14:44.0: 12.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:01:35.87 -36:21:10.4: 13.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:56.12 -33:14:44.0: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0010 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:35.87 -36:21:10.4: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1167 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:05:46.29 -38:09:29.4: 13.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:46.29 -38:09:29.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1383 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:58:30.94 -36:06:46.6: 12.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:02:58.93 -37:41:15.7: 13.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:58.93 -37:41:15.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2593 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:08:47.66 -36:01:59.3: 13.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:47:44.71 -38:12:36.5: 13.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:58:30.94 -36:06:46.6: 12.95 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:30.94 -36:06:46.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0712 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:39:00.60 -31:08:55.7: 13.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:08:47.66 -36:01:59.3: 13.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:32:40.18 -33:22:28.3: 14.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:47.66 -36:01:59.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.2868 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:47:44.71 -38:12:36.5: 13.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:04:27.18 -38:07:54.4: 13.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:44.71 -38:12:36.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.0500 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:39:00.60 -31:08:55.7: 13.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:51:18.96 -37:54:21.9: 13.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:00.60 -31:08:55.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0693 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:32:40.18 -33:22:28.3: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:07:42.78 -37:21:05.7: 13.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:32:40.18 -33:22:28.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=12.9427 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:28:04.46 -30:40:46.6: 13.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:04:27.18 -38:07:54.4: 13.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:27.18 -38:07:54.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2237 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:51:18.96 -37:54:21.9: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:18.96 -37:54:21.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2883 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:06:21.20 -38:13:13.6: 13.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:07:42.78 -37:21:05.7: 13.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:42.78 -37:21:05.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3681 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:28:04.46 -30:40:46.6: 13.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:04.46 -30:40:46.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9149 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:03:49.48 -36:02:02.1: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:06:21.20 -38:13:13.6: 13.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:36:38.19 -37:05:43.9: 13.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:59:05.45 -37:54:35.3: 13.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:21.20 -38:13:13.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4949 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:03:49.48 -36:02:02.1: 13.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:49.48 -36:02:02.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5100 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:21.68 -37:03:18.8: 13.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:59:05.45 -37:54:35.3: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:05.45 -37:54:35.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9755 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:36:38.19 -37:05:43.9: 13.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:38.19 -37:05:43.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2191 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:07:54.10 -37:38:25.8: 13.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:38.66 -33:33:50.9: 13.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:21.68 -37:03:18.8: 13.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:21.68 -37:03:18.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3392 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:57:52.00 -38:15:04.8: 13.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:07:54.10 -37:38:25.8: 13.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:54.10 -37:38:25.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3057 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:38.66 -33:33:50.9: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:38.66 -33:33:50.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4322 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:06:32.82 -35:59:48.5: 13.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:57:52.00 -38:15:04.8: 13.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:52.00 -38:15:04.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3844 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:57:16.92 -37:32:58.1: 13.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:37:39.59 -30:41:58.3: 13.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:06:32.82 -35:59:48.5: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:32.82 -35:59:48.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2530 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:38:50.97 -35:27:38.4: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:57:16.92 -37:32:58.1: 13.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:16.92 -37:32:58.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4006 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:37:39.59 -30:41:58.3: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:39.59 -30:41:58.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1779 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:40:11.76 -38:17:33.5: 13.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:38:50.97 -35:27:38.4: 13.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:51:23.78 -35:39:52.4: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:50.97 -35:27:38.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1916 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:44.49 -37:02:31.8: 13.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:54:02.66 -37:46:34.8: 13.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:44.49 -37:02:31.8: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:40:11.76 -38:17:33.5: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:11.76 -38:17:33.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3898 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:51:23.78 -35:39:52.4: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:44.49 -37:02:31.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4638 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:23.78 -35:39:52.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4126 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:59.24 -37:00:27.0: 13.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:54:02.66 -37:46:34.8: 13.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:02.66 -37:46:34.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5713 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:51:35.06 -36:57:49.4: 13.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:42:49.37 -32:41:49.6: 14.46 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:59.24 -37:00:27.0: 13.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:59.24 -37:00:27.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4992 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:51:35.06 -36:57:49.4: 13.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:42:49.37 -32:41:49.6: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:35.06 -36:57:49.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3166 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.30
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:42:49.37 -32:41:49.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.30 new_mean_mag=13.2018 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:28:49.69 -29:49:34.4: 13.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:28:49.69 -29:49:34.4: 13.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:49.69 -29:49:34.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2416 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:01:55.26 -37:23:40.8: 13.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:01:55.26 -37:23:40.8: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:01:55.26 -37:23:40.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.3899 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:54:05.54 -30:02:32.8: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:54:05.54 -30:02:32.8: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:54:05.54 -30:02:32.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3083 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:31:38.04 -31:35:51.6: 13.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:26:24.83 -31:55:47.0: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:31:38.04 -31:35:51.6: 13.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:31:38.04 -31:35:51.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.3477 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:26:24.83 -31:55:47.0: 12.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:42:39.93 -31:02:36.3: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:24.83 -31:55:47.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8197 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:42:39.93 -31:02:36.3: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:42:39.93 -31:02:36.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.1786 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out153654.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12066.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151919.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74847.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80497.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85770.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 92s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143159_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143159_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143164_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143164_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143165_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143165_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143166_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143166_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143167_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143167_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143171_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143171_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143174_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143174_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:22.50 -34:49:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143178_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143178_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143180_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143180_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143186_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143186_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143195_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143195_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143198_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143198_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143199_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143199_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:14.66 -36:00:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143201_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143201_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:56.04 -31:35:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143206_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143206_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143207_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143207_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143208_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143208_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143210_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143210_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143212_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143212_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143220_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143220_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143221_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143221_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143222_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143222_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143226_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143226_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143227_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143227_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143228_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143228_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:32.27 -31:13:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143229_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143229_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:28.95 -36:22:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143626_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143626_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:31.57 -35:03:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143672_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143672_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:00.32 -31:11:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144055_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144055_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144230_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144230_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144436_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144436_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:43.18 -33:45:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144474_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144474_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:14.41 -35:28:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144592_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144592_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:49.53 -36:42:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144637_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144637_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:41.71 -30:09:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144705_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144705_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:16.50 -33:49:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144835_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144835_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:19.13 -30:29:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144871_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144871_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.44 -32:49:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144940_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 144940_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:41.07 -31:47:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145302_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145302_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145394_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145394_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:59.49 -30:08:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145438_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145438_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:33.00 -38:00:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145524_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145524_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:48.33 -36:02:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145651_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145651_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:18.25 -34:54:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145713_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145713_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:34.12 -30:32:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145797_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 145797_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:46.50 -36:16:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146305_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146305_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146455_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146455_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:49.56 -33:37:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146588_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146588_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:57.64 -34:20:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146661_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146661_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146715_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146715_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:13.50 -29:47:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146874_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146874_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:21.78 -37:02:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146918_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 146918_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147182_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 147182_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147262_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 147262_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147582_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 147582_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:16.80 -31:23:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147609_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 147609_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147991_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 147991_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:46.08 -33:22:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148119_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 148119_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148168_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 148168_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:16.72 -34:12:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148452_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 148452_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148488_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 148488_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:55.93 -30:12:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148490_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 148490_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:42.52 -36:49:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148565_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 148565_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:17.37 -33:32:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148787_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 148787_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149275_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149275_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.21 -33:35:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149294_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149294_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149563_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149563_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:56.44 -29:53:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149574_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149574_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:06.51 -29:53:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149590_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149590_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:08.02 -30:53:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149765_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149765_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149796_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 149796_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:36.32 -34:58:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150234_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 150234_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.95 -36:29:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150707_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 150707_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150741_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 150741_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150841_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 150841_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151001_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151001_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:19.37 -30:36:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151065_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151065_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151125_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151125_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:08.13 -29:50:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151498_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151498_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:37.36 -32:14:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151688_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151688_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151774_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151774_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:46.44 -34:40:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151842_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151842_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151846_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151846_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151911_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 151911_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151919_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 151919_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152051_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152051_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152318_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152318_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152328_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152328_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152518_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152518_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152588_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152588_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152640_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152640_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152668_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152668_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152707_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152707_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152873_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152873_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152935_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152935_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152974_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 152974_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153006_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153006_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153071_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153071_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153123_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153123_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153185_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153185_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:07.49 -30:52:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153203_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153203_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153225_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153225_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153257_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153257_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153272_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153272_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153330_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153330_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153488_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153488_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153539_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153539_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153654_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153654_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:49.37 -32:41:49.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153671_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153671_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153942_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 153942_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:45.74 -34:33:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154002_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 154002_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:16.46 -34:54:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154017_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 154017_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27589_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 27589_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:23.19 -35:38:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21822_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21822_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:52.49 -36:11:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110583_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 110583_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.47 -31:08:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134082_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 134082_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:06.29 -36:22:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15057_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 15057_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:15.17 -37:02:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141267_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 141267_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:27.23 -33:13:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07412_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 07412_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:17.63 -38:05:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12066_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 12066_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59381_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 59381_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:17.99 -33:09:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66880_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 66880_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:21.23 -32:35:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134964_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 134964_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:32.97 -35:36:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133491_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 133491_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.49 -30:48:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34164_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 34164_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:21.05 -35:06:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80497_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 80497_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115353_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 115353_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36282_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 36282_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:25.42 -34:57:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65644_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 65644_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:20.28 -32:38:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84148_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 84148_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:40.61 -30:43:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114197_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 114197_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:20.78 -31:43:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35550_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 35550_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:32.27 -34:58:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12966_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 12966_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:28.46 -37:16:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74847_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 74847_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16719_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 16719_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:41.05 -36:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116150_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 116150_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_20-15-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
