This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 9.27 08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9
254.87093 5.76030 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" UU Pyx
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.800 pg < 15.500 pg 2452690.50000 162.300000000000 Me
ATTENTION: measured mag 9.27 is 4.5 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 13.80 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9: 13.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UU Pyx,2461320.9917,9.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UU Pyx 20261007.4917 9.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 10.34 08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8
252.03550 -2.03722 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" LV Pup
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.900 V < 15.100 V 2428155.00000 311.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
LV Pup,2461320.9917,10.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
LV Pup 20261007.4917 10.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 9.46 08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0
254.48165 6.18884 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" BH Pyx
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.580 V < 15.000 V 2452805.00000 322.000000000000 M5S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0: 10.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0: 10.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.43 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BH Pyx,2461320.9917,9.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BH Pyx 20261007.4917 9.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 7.63 08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4
255.06237 -2.72947 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" AS Pup
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.300 V 11.400 V 2453768.00000 328.000000000000 M7e-M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4: 8.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4: 8.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.73 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AS Pup,2461320.9917,7.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AS Pup 20261007.4917 7.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 12.44 08:10:48.82 -32:52:06.0
250.74064 0.36011 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0346 Pup
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.092 Ic Y 2.298 Ic 560.300000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:10:48.82 -32:52:06.0: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:10:48.82 -32:52:06.0: 14.71 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0346 Pup,2461320.9917,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0346 Pup 20261007.4917 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 10.92 08:23:19.26 -35:24:57.4
254.30030 1.07805 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" TV Pup
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 pg 15.000 pg 378.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:23:19.26 -35:24:57.4: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:23:19.26 -35:24:57.4: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TV Pup,2461320.9917,10.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TV Pup 20261007.4917 10.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 11.36 08:26:04.24 -30:06:41.1
250.28534 4.59890 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0594 Pup
Type: RV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 V 13.400 V 2453077.70000 58.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:26:04.24 -30:06:41.1: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:26:04.24 -30:06:41.1: 12.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0594 Pup,2461320.9917,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0594 Pup 20261007.4917 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 9.69 08:08:56.50 -37:28:15.2
254.39295 -2.46788 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 3928
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.000 V < 14.000 V 2401900.00000 325.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:08:56.50 -37:28:15.2: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:08:56.50 -37:28:15.2: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 3928,2461320.9917,9.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 3928 20261007.4917 9.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 10.40 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.6
250.44411 4.52139 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CO Pup
Type: CWA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.440 V 11.500 V 2452717.10000 16.042000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.6: 11.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.6: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CO Pup,2461320.9917,10.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CO Pup 20261007.4917 10.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 10.35 08:07:03.56 -32:38:45.4
250.12514 -0.18178 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0519 Pup
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.100 V 12.000 V 2453436.30000 475.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:07:03.56 -32:38:45.4: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:07:03.56 -32:38:45.4: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0519 Pup,2461320.9917,10.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0519 Pup 20261007.4917 10.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 12.06 08:02:05.81 -36:17:08.6
252.65741 -2.99019 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GDS_J0802056-361708
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.900 r Y 0.430 r M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:02:05.81 -36:17:08.6: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:02:05.81 -36:17:08.6: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0802056-361708,2461320.9917,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0802056-361708 20261007.4917 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 12.06 07:49:30.63 -32:43:10.7
248.25838 -3.36897 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J074930-3243.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.157 Ic Y 0.488 Ic 2452642.80000 115.200000000000 M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:49:30.63 -32:43:10.7: 12.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:49:30.63 -32:43:10.7: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J074930-3243.1,2461320.9917,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J074930-3243.1 20261007.4917 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4917 2461320.9917 12.10 08:42:49.84 -36:08:33.8
257.23750 3.82979 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J084250-3608.6
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.131 Ic Y 1.212 Ic 2453633.70000 439.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:42:49.84 -36:08:33.8: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:42:49.84 -36:08:33.8: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J084250-3608.6,2461320.9917,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J084250-3608.6 20261007.4917 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461136.59122270 06.04.2026 02:11:11.641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
First image: 2461136.59122270 06.04.2026 02:11:11.641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Last image: 2461320.99200265 07.10.2026 11:48:19.029 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14484
Objects passed selection criteria: 14447
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12056.5
Average stars matched: 11688.8 (96.9498 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 12:34:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461136.59122270 06.04.2026 02:11:11.641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
First image: 2461136.59122270 06.04.2026 02:11:11.641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Last image: 2461320.99200265 07.10.2026 11:48:19.029 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 87 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 123658
Objects passed selection criteria: 123433
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 105754
Average stars matched: 101313 (95.8004 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 516240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 12:36:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.99130282
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:20:52.446 -34:00:38.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Image size: 942.8'x627.7' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:21:14.283 -33:59:14.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:20:52.446 -34:00:38.17
Second-epoch image center 08:21:14.283 -33:59:14.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0789 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Image size: 942.7'x627.7' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:21:15.790 -33:58:43.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:20:52.446 -34:00:38.17
Second-epoch image center 08:21:15.790 -33:58:43.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0867 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:21:14.283 -33:59:14.68
Second-epoch second image center 08:21:15.790 -33:58:43.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00999 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SZwTWcrbBj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AgbbCuedvr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pc6Ycc45wa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CY7N0KbTTe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14942 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.3301 to 135.2911 deg, Dec -39.2872 to -28.4077 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.3301 to 135.2911 deg, Dec -39.2872 to -28.4077 deg
Loaded 26003 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11585 out of 12071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12071 out of 14942 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.597900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.597900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14942 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.3301 to 135.2911 deg, Dec -39.2872 to -28.4077 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.3301 to 135.2911 deg, Dec -39.2872 to -28.4077 deg
Loaded 26003 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11585 out of 12071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12071 out of 14942 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 15218 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.3104 to 135.2890 deg, Dec -39.2869 to -28.3706 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.3104 to 135.2890 deg, Dec -39.2869 to -28.3706 deg
Loaded 26108 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11747 out of 12249 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12249 out of 15218 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.4 pix Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.7 pix fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
2.7 pix fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.3 mag. Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SZwTWcrbBj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1211, bad_region=0, passed=14942
Got 14942 stars (including 13718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14942 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.009 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.879 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1349 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.446
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AgbbCuedvr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1268, bad_region=0, passed=15218
Got 15218 stars (including 13937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.689 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.938 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.888 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1131 n_q3=1347 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.362
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pc6Ycc45wa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=720, bad_region=0, passed=9346
Got 9346 stars (including 8614 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4837 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=10.350 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.484 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=0.780 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.222 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.926 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4837 robust_rms=0.613 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.722 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.681 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4837 robust_rms_before=1.499 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.580 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.613 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.719 worst_region_rms_after=0.722 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.260 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.681
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.719 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.719 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.580 arcsec matched=4837
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits N_match=4837 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=1248 n_q2=850 n_q3=1676 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CY7N0KbTTe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=681, bad_region=0, passed=9042
Got 9042 stars (including 8355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=10.764 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.386 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.783 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.049 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.968 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.649 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.785 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.758 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4834 robust_rms_before=1.307 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.590 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.649 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.718 worst_region_rms_after=0.785 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.019 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.758
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.718 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.718 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.590 arcsec matched=4834
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=1241 n_q2=859 n_q3=1669 n_q4=1065 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.698 worst_q_ratio=1.446
ref2=Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits sigma_overall=0.689 worst_q_ratio=1.362
new1=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits sigma_overall=0.555 worst_q_ratio=1.275
new2=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits sigma_overall=0.562 worst_q_ratio=1.294
reference average sigma_overall=0.6935 worst_q_ratio=1.404
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (4860 matched stars from wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (4860 matched stars from wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536_astrometric_residuals.png (4837 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pup-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:20:50.39 -28:58:38.6: 10.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:08:56.55 -37:28:15.1: 12.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:52:07.29 -38:52:44.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9: 13.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:41:00.83 -39:04:57.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:07:49.83 -35:54:00.2: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.7: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0: 10.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4: 8.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:52:07.29 -38:52:44.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:52:07.29 -38:52:44.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:20:50.39 -28:58:38.6: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:07:49.83 -35:54:00.2: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0: 10.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:41:00.83 -39:04:57.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:41:00.83 -39:04:57.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.7: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:08:56.55 -37:28:15.1: 12.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.3359 delta=2.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:50.39 -28:58:38.6: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0055 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0: ref_mag=10.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4677 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.7: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4333 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:08:56.55 -37:28:15.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=9.6406 delta=3.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=9.2700 delta=3.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4: 8.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.73 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4: ref_mag=8.73 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=7.6272 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20371.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21137.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21331.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01339.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08675.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21103.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21240.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21033_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 21033_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21103_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 21103_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21137_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 21137_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:56.55 -37:28:15.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.662 5541106087911645056 122.23539364631 -37.47087169357 9.9467 8.2999 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.662#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21223_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 21223_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21240_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 21240_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21277_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 21277_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21331_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 21331_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:49.83 -35:54:00.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.722 5544815737054716416 121.95744187911 -35.89992054977 10.5453 9.4240 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.722#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21373_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 21373_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:54.21 -29:33:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08675_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 08675_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 20371_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.556 5643564972301150208 126.54979381463 -30.28562187129 10.7769 10.0670 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.556#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01339_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 01339_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Pup-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:09:39.99 -38:10:28.4
08:43:40.99 -32:31:39.0
08:43:12.07 -33:05:45.9
08:04:27.13 -35:15:11.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:20:52.446 -34:00:38.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Image size: 942.8'x627.7' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:21:14.283 -33:59:14.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:20:52.446 -34:00:38.17
Second-epoch image center 08:21:14.283 -33:59:14.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0789 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Image size: 942.7'x627.7' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:21:15.790 -33:58:43.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:20:52.446 -34:00:38.17
Second-epoch image center 08:21:15.790 -33:58:43.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0867 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:21:14.283 -33:59:14.68
Second-epoch second image center 08:21:15.790 -33:58:43.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00999 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k5Qwk3f0x5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rFPNHzCnyP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YTv1AgfDFC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tbK39wjI98
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 132037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.3025 to 135.3575 deg, Dec -39.2952 to -28.3517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.3025 to 135.3575 deg, Dec -39.2952 to -28.3517 deg
Loaded 26236 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17756 out of 21157 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21157 out of 132037 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.410050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.410050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 132037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.3025 to 135.3575 deg, Dec -39.2952 to -28.3517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.3025 to 135.3575 deg, Dec -39.2952 to -28.3517 deg
Loaded 26236 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17756 out of 21157 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21157 out of 132037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 134376 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.3028 to 135.3209 deg, Dec -39.2901 to -28.3510 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.3028 to 135.3209 deg, Dec -39.2901 to -28.3510 deg
Loaded 26201 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17706 out of 21125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21125 out of 134376 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.1 pix Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.5 pix fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
2.5 pix fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.5 mag. Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.k5Qwk3f0x5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=12979, bad_region=0, passed=132015
Got 132015 stars (including 118905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 132015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 132015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 132015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 132015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.931 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.939 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1290 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.372
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rFPNHzCnyP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=13323, bad_region=0, passed=134344
Got 134344 stars (including 120867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 134344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.898 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.916 n_q1=1277 n_q2=1112 n_q3=1287 n_q4=1195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.369
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YTv1AgfDFC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=5155, bad_region=4, passed=81127
Got 81127 stars (including 75856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=10.733 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.092 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.092 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.787 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.205 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.944 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.617 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.719 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=1.508 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.575 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.617 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.709 worst_region_rms_after=0.719 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.202 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.689
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.709 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.709 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.575 arcsec matched=4855
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.563 n_q1=1255 n_q2=839 n_q3=1673 n_q4=1088 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tbK39wjI98 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=5, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4821, bad_region=4, passed=78190
Got 78190 stars (including 73262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=11.080 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.164 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.164 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.790 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.062 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.653 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.769 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=1.310 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.584 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.653 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.719 worst_region_rms_after=0.798 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.011 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.769
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.719 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.719 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.584 arcsec matched=4855
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=1250 n_q2=838 n_q3=1668 n_q4=1099 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-47-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0536.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_070347_TTUQ1b1x1_2712851_R897XStS/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pup-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:23:02.34 -32:53:09.0: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:04:00.19 -37:09:46.6: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:07:33.15 -31:04:52.8: 12.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:23:15.40 -34:29:59.6: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:09:40.12 -30:26:08.2: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:02:25.18 -31:12:04.1: 12.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:48:19.90 -35:34:15.4: 12.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:36:56.53 -31:57:34.3: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:47:09.15 -29:11:12.5: 12.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:07:33.15 -31:04:52.8: 12.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:23:02.34 -32:53:09.0: 12.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:09:40.12 -30:26:08.2: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:23:15.40 -34:29:59.6: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:04:00.19 -37:09:46.6: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:02:25.18 -31:12:04.1: 12.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:48:19.90 -35:34:15.4: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:47:09.15 -29:11:12.5: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:33.15 -31:04:52.8: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8588 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:40.12 -30:26:08.2: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9369 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:02.34 -32:53:09.0: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0112 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:36:56.53 -31:57:34.3: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:15.40 -34:29:59.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1283 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:04:00.19 -37:09:46.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9616 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:19.90 -35:34:15.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6850 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:25.18 -31:12:04.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1241 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:47:09.15 -29:11:12.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6769 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:36:56.53 -31:57:34.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6817 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:19:02.26 -33:14:17.1: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:19:02.26 -33:14:17.1: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:02.26 -33:14:17.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7181 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:44:45.75 -36:46:32.8: 12.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:57:30.07 -31:17:46.5: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:26:12.97 -32:57:44.5: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:57:08.86 -30:48:51.4: 12.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:25:59.00 -36:16:20.3: 12.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:59:46.28 -31:07:00.6: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:05:49.18 -33:09:43.8: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:51:20.17 -35:07:46.9: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:57:30.07 -31:17:46.5: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:05:49.18 -33:09:43.8: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:59:46.28 -31:07:00.6: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:25:59.00 -36:16:20.3: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:57:08.86 -30:48:51.4: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:44:45.75 -36:46:32.8: 12.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:51:20.17 -35:07:46.9: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:30.07 -31:17:46.5: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6977 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:59:46.28 -31:07:00.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6619 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:26:12.97 -32:57:44.5: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:59.00 -36:16:20.3: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1033 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:08.86 -30:48:51.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4194 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:20.17 -35:07:46.9: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2407 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:45.75 -36:46:32.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5038 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:12.97 -32:57:44.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2085 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:48:13.70 -35:11:00.9: 12.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:31:13.21 -36:48:09.6: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:48:13.70 -35:11:00.9: 12.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:13.70 -35:11:00.9: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2365 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:07:49.84 -35:54:00.2: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:52:07.27 -38:52:44.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:41:00.83 -39:04:57.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:10:32.86 -30:53:59.7: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:09:43.01 -35:11:15.5: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:31:13.21 -36:48:09.6: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:13.21 -36:48:09.6: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7550 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:00:11.37 -32:42:33.0: 11.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:07:49.84 -35:54:00.2: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:58:44.27 -32:35:01.6: 10.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:41:00.83 -39:04:57.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:41:00.83 -39:04:57.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:52:07.27 -38:52:44.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:52:07.27 -38:52:44.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:10:32.86 -30:53:59.7: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:32.86 -30:53:59.7: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3312 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:09:43.01 -35:11:15.5: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:43.01 -35:11:15.5: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3202 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:06:08.30 -37:17:46.4: 14.46 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:00:11.37 -32:42:33.0: 11.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:58:44.27 -32:35:01.6: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:00:11.37 -32:42:33.0: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1011 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:58:44.27 -32:35:01.6: ref_mag=10.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0420 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:06:08.30 -37:17:46.4: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:02:50.28 -31:12:16.4: 11.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:06:08.30 -37:17:46.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=11.0144 delta=3.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:46:45.39 -38:59:20.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:20:21.07 -32:13:57.5: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:30:39.15 -31:20:25.1: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:02:50.28 -31:12:16.4: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:50.28 -31:12:16.4: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5629 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:31:49.49 -39:11:49.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:30:39.15 -31:20:25.1: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:46:45.39 -38:59:20.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:46:45.39 -38:59:20.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:20:21.07 -32:13:57.5: 14.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:20:21.07 -32:13:57.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=11.6365 delta=2.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:31:49.49 -39:11:49.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:49.49 -39:11:49.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:55:02.67 -38:49:20.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:55:02.67 -38:49:20.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:55:02.67 -38:49:20.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:17:07.57 -31:26:37.7: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:10:48.82 -32:52:06.0: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:17:07.57 -31:26:37.7: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:00:23.67 -30:51:46.3: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:17:07.57 -31:26:37.7: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3954 delta=-1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:52:15.56 -30:50:19.7: 12.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:10:48.82 -32:52:06.0: 14.71 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:10:48.82 -32:52:06.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=12.4408 delta=2.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:49:29.90 -29:19:47.7: 12.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:00:23.67 -30:51:46.3: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:00:23.67 -30:51:46.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6825 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:52:15.56 -30:50:19.7: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:52:15.56 -30:50:19.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7166 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:49:29.90 -29:19:47.7: 12.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:29.90 -29:19:47.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8040 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:01:58.42 -35:08:27.3: 12.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:01:33.35 -31:47:10.0: 12.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:50:34.90 -29:19:00.4: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:38:56.96 -29:19:59.8: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:01:33.35 -31:47:10.0: 12.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:50:34.90 -29:19:00.4: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:33.35 -31:47:10.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6697 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:01:58.42 -35:08:27.3: 12.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:34.90 -29:19:00.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6660 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:58.42 -35:08:27.3: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5799 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:38:56.96 -29:19:59.8: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:38:56.96 -29:19:59.8: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6777 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:01:57.95 -31:08:28.7: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:02:25.07 -32:30:59.0: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:43:00.97 -35:34:39.6: 12.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:50:24.05 -33:30:09.7: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:02:25.07 -32:30:59.0: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:01:57.95 -31:08:28.7: 12.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:43:00.97 -35:34:39.6: 12.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:57.95 -31:08:28.7: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8387 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:00.97 -35:34:39.6: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6765 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:50:24.05 -33:30:09.7: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:24.05 -33:30:09.7: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7063 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:10:57.17 -32:14:30.9: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:10:57.17 -32:14:30.9: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:57.17 -32:14:30.9: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7356 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:57:09.67 -35:13:43.0: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:57:09.67 -35:13:43.0: 12.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:09.67 -35:13:43.0: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6929 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:43:41.49 -37:19:38.8: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:43:41.49 -37:19:38.8: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:52:16.78 -32:23:16.5: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:56:44.80 -29:21:22.7: 14.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:52:16.78 -32:23:16.5: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:52:16.78 -32:23:16.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1471 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:56:44.80 -29:21:22.7: 14.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:56:44.80 -29:21:22.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2258 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:54:30.68 -32:28:34.3: 13.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:54:30.68 -32:28:34.3: 13.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:30.68 -32:28:34.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0771 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:08:21.67 -29:13:20.5: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:56:11.70 -29:01:41.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:55:11.44 -29:53:21.6: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:57:21.54 -32:29:44.0: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:08:21.67 -29:13:20.5: 13.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:56:11.70 -29:01:41.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:56:11.70 -29:01:41.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:21.67 -29:13:20.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2521 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:55:35.28 -32:17:19.7: 14.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:55:11.44 -29:53:21.6: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:55:11.44 -29:53:21.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2067 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:57:21.54 -32:29:44.0: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:21.54 -32:29:44.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4216 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:56:36.55 -30:34:29.8: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:55:35.28 -32:17:19.7: 14.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:55:35.28 -32:17:19.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.5477 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:52:31.34 -32:06:18.2: 13.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:03:34.50 -34:20:51.2: 14.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:56:36.55 -30:34:29.8: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:56:36.55 -30:34:29.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4324 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:58:00.19 -29:46:46.4: 14.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:52:31.34 -32:06:18.2: 13.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:03:32.04 -29:58:37.5: 13.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:03:34.50 -34:20:51.2: 14.61 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:52:31.34 -32:06:18.2: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5679 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:03:34.50 -34:20:51.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.4375 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:58:00.19 -29:46:46.4: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:58:00.19 -29:46:46.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6535 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:03:32.04 -29:58:37.5: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:03:32.04 -29:58:37.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6452 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:23:19.26 -35:24:57.4: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:26:04.24 -30:06:41.1: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:23:19.26 -35:24:57.4: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:04:55.17 -30:20:56.8: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:23:19.26 -35:24:57.4: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=10.9211 delta=2.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:26:04.24 -30:06:41.1: 12.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:26:04.24 -30:06:41.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3554 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:04:55.17 -30:20:56.8: 13.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:53:32.85 -34:18:58.6: 14.63 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:04:55.17 -30:20:56.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.7448 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:07:17.16 -31:54:22.3: 13.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:53:32.85 -34:18:58.6: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:53:32.85 -34:18:58.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=12.3336 delta=2.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:07:17.16 -31:54:22.3: 13.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:17.16 -31:54:22.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.6120 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:08:56.50 -37:28:15.2: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.6: 11.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:08:56.50 -37:28:15.2: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:08:56.50 -37:28:15.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=9.6902 delta=3.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.6: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:26:11.94 -30:17:07.6: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4082 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:07:03.56 -32:38:45.4: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:07:03.56 -32:38:45.4: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:07:03.56 -32:38:45.4: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3519 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:02:05.81 -36:17:08.6: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 07:49:30.63 -32:43:10.7: 12.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:02:05.81 -36:17:08.6: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:02:05.81 -36:17:08.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0639 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 07:49:30.63 -32:43:10.7: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:49:30.63 -32:43:10.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0538 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:58:06.73 -35:21:24.5: 12.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:58:06.73 -35:21:24.5: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-11-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 08:42:49.84 -36:08:33.8: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:58:06.73 -35:21:24.5: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9625 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-12-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 08:42:49.84 -36:08:33.8: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:42:49.84 -36:08:33.8: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.0630 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146747.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out156051.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out156379.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out156518.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out156779.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out156938.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out157961.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out158417.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out158443.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out144737.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13072.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33734.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91172.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92016.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 38s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155984_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 155984_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155988_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 155988_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156007_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156007_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156014_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156014_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156015_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156015_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156020_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156020_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156022_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156022_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156029_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156029_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156030_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156030_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156035_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156035_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156036_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156036_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:56.61 -34:23:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156040_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156040_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156046_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156046_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156048_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156048_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156049_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156049_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156051_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156051_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:49.18 -33:09:43.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.288 5547613027782240768 121.45481727397 -33.16181876897 12.6385 10.6661 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.288#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156052_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156052_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156053_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156053_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156061_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156061_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156063_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156063_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156065_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156065_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156066_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156066_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:53:31.47 -29:58:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156067_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156067_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156069_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156069_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:44:31.76 -35:05:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156071_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156071_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156074_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156074_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156076_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156076_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:57:39.66 -36:19:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156078_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156078_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156304_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156304_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156335_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156335_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156379_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156379_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:49.84 -35:54:00.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.816 5544815737054716416 121.95744187911 -35.89992054977 10.5453 9.4240 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156425_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156425_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:54.23 -29:33:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156468_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156468_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156482_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156482_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156518_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156518_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:08.30 -37:17:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.966 5544104696638022144 121.53389692032 -37.29623640006 10.5871 9.4233 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.966#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156649_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156649_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156779_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156779_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:21.07 -32:13:57.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.732 5547200676558348032 125.08722622669 -32.23258805045 10.6988 9.4749 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.732#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156824_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156824_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156938_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156938_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:39.15 -31:20:25.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.092 5643213192993949184 127.66309301462 -31.34060770572 12.1403 10.2129 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.092#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156939_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156939_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:54.76 -29:44:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156949_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156949_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156978_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156978_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:20.81 -29:07:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156980_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 156980_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.55 -37:58:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157090_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157090_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:34.12 -29:59:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157136_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157136_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157206_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157206_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:55:23.34 -33:25:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157334_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157334_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:36.16 -29:42:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157347_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157347_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:22.78 -33:05:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157456_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157456_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:25.18 -33:12:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157501_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157501_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157503_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157503_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:47:22.64 -38:42:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157623_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 157623_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157688_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157688_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157748_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157748_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157751_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157751_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157768_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157768_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:23.94 -32:22:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157800_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157800_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157844_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157844_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157855_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157855_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157869_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157869_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157934_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157934_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157958_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157958_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157961_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157961_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:25.07 -32:30:59.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.572 5594243526377998208 120.60408693734 -32.51608460112 12.1991 10.0413 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157987_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157987_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157988_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 157988_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:37.27 -33:40:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158025_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158025_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:07.53 -30:53:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158045_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158045_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158087_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158087_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:58.11 -29:43:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158159_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158159_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:19.48 -31:47:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158171_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158171_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:25.12 -36:56:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158249_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158249_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158397_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158397_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:53:50.79 -29:33:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158417_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158417_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:41.49 -37:19:38.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.649 5529288841871060736 130.92239712121 -37.32770018609 12.8607 10.7768 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.649#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158420_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158420_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158443_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158443_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:44.80 -29:21:22.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.361 5597349470620390912 119.18630799495 -29.35651827129 12.2677 10.8572 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.361#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158495_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158495_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158497_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158497_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:19.21 -30:42:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158580_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158580_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:28.74 -32:45:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158728_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158728_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158890_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158890_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158950_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 158950_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159061_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159061_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159065_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159065_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159068_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159068_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159156_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159156_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159157_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159157_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159173_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159173_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159192_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 159192_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33734_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 33734_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91172_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 91172_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146747_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 146747_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:55.17 -30:20:56.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.868 5596262156699121664 121.22972741127 -30.34860817992 11.2195 9.6602 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.868#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112435_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 112435_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:19.33 -29:56:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144737_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 144737_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:53:32.85 -34:18:58.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143468_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 143468_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61578_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 61578_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:12.07 -33:05:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91132_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 91132_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:30.59 -30:09:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13072_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 13072_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92016_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 92016_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72099_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 72099_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24487_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 24487_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68587_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 68587_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28995_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 28995_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23909_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 23909_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70514_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 70514_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:40.97 -32:31:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35555_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 35555_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:27.14 -35:15:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06745_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537
The candidate 06745_fd_Pup-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_06-48-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0537 did not pass the final checks
