This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 43 34.95 +01 43 58.1 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,7.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 7.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 42 58.94 +01 41 35.9 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,10.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 10.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 43 34.94 +01 43 58.0 7.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,7.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 7.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 42 58.94 +01 41 36.0 10.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,10.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 10.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 12.43 01:10:43.53 -04:06:09.8
135.07900 -66.51852 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga 0 -0 0 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:10:43.53 -04:06:09.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:10:43.53 -04:06:09.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 01 10 43.53 -04 06 09.8 12.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 12.54 01:01:38.19 +01:52:35.5
128.17584 -60.89134 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:38.19 +01:52:35.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:38.19 +01:52:35.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 01 01 38.19 +01 52 35.5 12.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 12.65 00:34:13.50 -02:33:04.1
112.68424 -65.07985 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.384 Burdigala -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:34:13.50 -02:33:04.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:34:13.50 -02:33:04.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 34 13.50 -02 33 04.1 12.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 13.66 01:10:02.77 +00:43:31.2
132.81024 -61.78899 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.522 Helga 0 0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:10:02.77 +00:43:31.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:10:02.77 +00:43:31.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 01 10 02.77 +00 43 31.2 13.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 13.83 00:44:12.72 +00:29:26.1
119.04005 -62.32655 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:12.72 +00:29:26.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:12.72 +00:29:26.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 44 12.72 +00 29 26.1 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 13.86 00:54:48.95 -04:16:10.7
125.09897 -67.12717 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.155 Scylla -1 -0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:54:48.95 -04:16:10.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:54:48.95 -04:16:10.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 54 48.95 -04 16 10.7 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 13.91 01:00:16.76 -05:08:57.0
128.79717 -67.92017 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia 0 -0 0 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:00:16.76 -05:08:57.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:00:16.76 -05:08:57.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 01 00 16.76 -05 08 57.0 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 14.42 00:44:14.33 +01:59:47.4
119.24037 -60.82364 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.853 Nansenia -1 -1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:14.33 +01:59:47.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:14.33 +01:59:47.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 44 14.33 +01 59 47.4 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,14.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 14.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3905 2461320.8905 14.69 00:48:09.48 -03:47:30.1
120.86720 -66.65029 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2577 Litva 0 -0 0 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:48:09.48 -03:47:30.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:48:09.48 -03:47:30.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3905* 00 48 09.48 -03 47 30.1 14.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8905,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3905 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461320.89076111 07.10.2026 09:22:31.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4403
Objects passed selection criteria: 4400
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4260.75
Average stars matched: 4141.75 (97.2071 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:56:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461320.89076111 07.10.2026 09:22:31.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 348
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 56 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24191
Objects passed selection criteria: 24135
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23217.8
Average stars matched: 22453.5 (96.7083 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:58:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.89031718
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.603 -02:03:20.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.603 -02:03:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.352 -02:03:13.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.352 -02:03:13.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0532 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.603 -02:03:20.31
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:26.352 -02:03:13.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00358 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PoExLXCXVG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bUI0Wcb1Yp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mTQL4D2FJn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FZD0LKL2Gg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.864150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.864150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3227 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3227 deg
Loaded 3971 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3212 out of 3360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.PoExLXCXVG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=1270, passed=5517
Got 5517 stars (including 3949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 3862 stars left (next iteration limit 4248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=3862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1232 n_q2=744 n_q3=1161 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bUI0Wcb1Yp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=1257, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 3794 stars left (next iteration limit 4173)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=3794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1201 n_q2=734 n_q3=1146 n_q4=713 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mTQL4D2FJn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=316, bad_region=1179, passed=5524
Got 5524 stars (including 4090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5524 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4005 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3997 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3997 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4005 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3998 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3998 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3998 stars left (next iteration limit 4396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3998 robust_rms=7.799 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.251 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.251 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3998 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.616 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3998 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.365 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3998 robust_rms_before=0.920 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.358 worst_region_rms_after=0.365 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.171 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.365
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.358 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec matched=3998
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits N_match=3998 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1310 n_q2=779 n_q3=1176 n_q4=733 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FZD0LKL2Gg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=315, bad_region=1189, passed=5534
Got 5534 stars (including 4101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4015 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4015 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4010 stars left (next iteration limit 4411)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4010 robust_rms=7.627 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.429 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4010 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.603 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4010 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.380 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4010 robust_rms_before=0.906 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.353 worst_region_rms_after=0.380 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.135 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.380
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.290 arcsec matched=4010
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=4010 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1320 n_q2=776 n_q3=1192 n_q4=722 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.239
ref2=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.042
reference average sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.267
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (3862 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (3794 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (3998 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (4010 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:53:24.41 -01:50:28.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:53:24.41 -01:50:28.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:24.41 -01:50:28.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0930 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 20186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 20190_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20197_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 20197_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.603 -02:03:20.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.603 -02:03:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.352 -02:03:13.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.352 -02:03:13.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0532 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.603 -02:03:20.31
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:26.352 -02:03:13.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00358 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UwEAq0IW5P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YfhUra7Mlj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DzqdZ5ILDi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UcyChzJCn9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 30077 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3182 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 30077 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 217 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UwEAq0IW5P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1068, bad_region=5575, passed=29508
Got 29508 stars (including 23045 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1604 n_q2=899 n_q3=1497 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YfhUra7Mlj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1115, bad_region=5717, passed=30066
Got 30066 stars (including 23434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1593 n_q2=894 n_q3=1493 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DzqdZ5ILDi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1264, bad_region=4476, passed=27100
Got 27100 stars (including 21871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=7.574 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.184 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.184 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=0.922 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.377 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.147 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.303 arcsec matched=4831
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1642 n_q2=889 n_q3=1462 n_q4=838 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UcyChzJCn9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1226, bad_region=4439, passed=26942
Got 26942 stars (including 21748 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26942 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5310)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4828 robust_rms=7.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.277 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4828 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.610 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4828 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.375 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4828 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.359 worst_region_rms_after=0.375 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.116 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.375
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.359 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=4828
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1640 n_q2=882 n_q3=1466 n_q4=840 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-21-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_100610_TTUQ2b1x1_2564537_pXlFl8ok/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:41:04.15 -03:03:33.0: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:56:17.55 -02:24:51.1: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:38.19 +01:52:35.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:10:43.53 -04:06:09.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:41:04.15 -03:03:33.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:56:17.55 -02:24:51.1: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:41:04.15 -03:03:33.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3727 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:17.55 -02:24:51.1: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6674 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:34:13.50 -02:33:04.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:10:43.53 -04:06:09.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:38.19 +01:52:35.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:34:13.50 -02:33:04.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:06:10.54 +01:57:41.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:06:10.54 +01:57:41.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:10.54 +01:57:41.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1258 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:10:02.77 +00:43:31.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:10:02.77 +00:43:31.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:12.72 +00:29:26.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:12.72 +00:29:26.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:54:48.95 -04:16:10.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:00:16.76 -05:08:57.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:54:48.95 -04:16:10.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:00:16.76 -05:08:57.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:44:14.33 +01:59:47.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:44:14.33 +01:59:47.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:15:50.68 -04:54:58.6: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:16:25.63 -01:54:06.2: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:15:50.68 -04:54:58.6: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:25.63 -01:54:06.2: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:50.68 -04:54:58.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6336 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:25.63 -01:54:06.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6244 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:39:48.52 +00:59:07.0: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:36:20.42 +01:43:09.2: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:48:09.48 -03:47:30.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:39:48.52 +00:59:07.0: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:48.52 +00:59:07.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4882 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:48:09.48 -03:47:30.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:36:20.42 +01:43:09.2: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:20.42 +01:43:09.2: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7327 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:18:32.89 +01:45:09.0: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:32.89 +01:45:09.0: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:15:35.41 +02:06:45.6: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:32.89 +01:45:09.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7913 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:13:56.52 +02:04:13.5: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:50.68 -06:15:13.2: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:15:35.41 +02:06:45.6: 15.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:35.41 +02:06:45.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8708 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:13:56.52 +02:04:13.5: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:56.52 +02:04:13.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7322 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:50.68 -06:15:13.2: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:50.68 -06:15:13.2: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8341 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:06:26.14 -05:13:26.0: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:06:26.14 -05:13:26.0: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:26.14 -05:13:26.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8159 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31935.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32048.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32089.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32106.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 42s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 15s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31870_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31870_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31887_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 31887_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31890_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 31890_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31895_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31895_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31896_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31896_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31897_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31900_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31904_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31907_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31907_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31911_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31911_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31922_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 31922_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31927_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 31927_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31930_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31930_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31933_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31933_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31935_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 31935_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31936_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31940_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31940_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31941_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31941_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31942_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31942_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31945_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31945_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31947_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31947_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31948_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31948_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31950_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31950_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31952_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31952_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31953_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31953_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31954_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31954_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31956_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31956_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31957_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31957_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31959_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31959_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31964_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31964_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31969_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31969_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31971_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31971_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31973_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31973_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31974_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31974_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31976_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31976_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31977_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31977_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31978_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31978_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31982_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31982_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31983_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31983_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31985_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31985_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31986_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31986_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31988_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31988_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31993_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31993_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31995_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31995_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31996_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31996_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31999_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 31999_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32002_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32002_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32005_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32005_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32007_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32007_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32009_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32009_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32011_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32011_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32017_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32017_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32018_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32018_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32019_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32019_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32022_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32022_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32024_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32024_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32026_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32027_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32029_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32029_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32033_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32033_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32034_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32034_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32035_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32035_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32037_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32037_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32038_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32038_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32039_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32039_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32041_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32041_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32044_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32044_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32045_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32045_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32046_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32046_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32048_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 32048_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32049_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32049_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32050_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32050_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32053_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32053_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32058_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32058_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32060_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32060_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32061_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32061_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32063_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32063_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32067_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32067_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32069_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32069_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32074_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32074_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32075_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32075_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32077_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32077_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32079_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32079_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32080_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32080_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32082_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32082_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32083_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32083_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32085_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32085_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 32089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32093_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32093_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32094_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32094_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32096_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32096_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32098_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32098_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32099_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32099_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32102_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 32102_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32103_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32103_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32106_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 32106_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32110_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32110_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32114_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32115_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32115_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32118_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32118_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32119_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32119_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32120_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32120_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32122_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32122_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32123_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32123_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32125_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32125_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32126_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32126_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32128_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32128_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32129_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32129_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32131_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32131_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32133_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32133_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32135_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32135_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32136_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32137_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32139_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32139_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32140_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32140_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32142_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32142_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32144_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32144_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32150_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32150_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32152_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32154_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32154_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32157_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32157_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32158_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32159_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32163_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32163_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32164_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32165_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32165_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32166_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32167_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32169_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32171_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32171_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32172_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32172_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32174_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32175_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32177_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32178_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32180_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32180_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32181_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32182_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32182_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32183_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32185_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32187_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32187_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32188_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32188_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32190_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32191_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32191_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32192_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32192_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32193_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32193_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32194_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32194_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32200_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32200_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32203_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32203_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32204_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32204_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32209_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 32209_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32211_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32211_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32212_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32212_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32217_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32217_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32218_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32218_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32219_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32219_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32220_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32220_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32222_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32222_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32224_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32224_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32225_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32225_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32226_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32226_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32237_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32238_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32238_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32239_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32239_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32242_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32242_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32244_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32244_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32245_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32247_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32249_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32249_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32251_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32251_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32253_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32253_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32255_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32255_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32259_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32259_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32261_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32261_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32262_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32262_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32263_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32263_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32264_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32264_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 32265_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32272_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32274_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32274_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32276_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32276_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32277_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32277_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32278_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32278_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32279_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32279_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32280_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32280_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32281_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32281_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32283_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32283_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32285_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32285_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32286_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32286_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32287_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32287_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32298_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32298_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32304_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32304_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32306_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32306_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32307_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32307_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32310_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32310_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32312_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32312_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32315_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32315_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32318_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32318_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32319_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32319_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32321_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 32321_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30164_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417
The candidate 30164_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_04-22-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0417 did not pass the final checks
