This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3599 2461320.8599 12.85 03:13:31.32 +01:40:26.5
178.57782 -45.29463 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.464 Megaira 0 -0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:31.32 +01:40:26.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:31.32 +01:40:26.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3599* 03 13 31.32 +01 40 26.5 12.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8599,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3599 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3599 2461320.8599 13.34 03:16:54.37 +07:32:18.1
173.65388 -40.58950 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.619 Triberga 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:54.37 +07:32:18.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:54.37 +07:32:18.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3599* 03 16 54.37 +07 32 18.1 13.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8599,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3599 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3599 2461320.8599 14.21 03:25:53.65 +05:08:08.3
177.97514 -40.67738 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1104 Syringa -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:25:53.65 +05:08:08.3: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:25:53.65 +05:08:08.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3599* 03 25 53.65 +05 08 08.3 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8599,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3599 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3599 2461320.8599 14.65 03:46:51.45 +04:42:57.7
182.79434 -37.02081 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1665 Gaby 0 -1 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:51.45 +04:42:57.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:51.45 +04:42:57.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3599* 03 46 51.45 +04 42 57.7 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8599,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3599 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3599 2461320.8599 14.70 03:55:22.56 +05:09:23.2
184.02206 -35.09446 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1403 Idelsonia 0 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:22.56 +05:09:23.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:22.56 +05:09:23.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3599* 03 55 22.56 +05 09 23.2 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8599,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3599 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461320.86027059 07.10.2026 08:38:37.379 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7314
Objects passed selection criteria: 7311
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6901
Average stars matched: 6674.25 (96.7142 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 09:58:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461320.86027059 07.10.2026 08:38:37.379 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 74 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40390
Objects passed selection criteria: 40295
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38665.5
Average stars matched: 37100.5 (95.9525 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 261196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:01:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.85950259
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:44.356 +06:03:10.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:44.356 +06:03:10.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0703 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:43.021 +06:02:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:43.021 +06:02:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:44.356 +06:03:10.32
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:43.021 +06:02:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01245 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pc7leEh8H4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LHoHdoFK3n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R7JmyOesMO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zS2u6W9Ofz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6696 to +11.2487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6696 to 11.2487 deg
Loaded 4348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 6511 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.1 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Pc7leEh8H4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6894
Got 6894 stars (including 6363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LHoHdoFK3n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=1, passed=6511
Got 6511 stars (including 6031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R7JmyOesMO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, bad_region=0, passed=7206
Got 7206 stars (including 6714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7206 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=14.020 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.707 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.707 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=1.013 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.338 worst_region_rms_after=0.313 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.080 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.313
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.281 arcsec matched=4883
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1305 n_q2=1303 n_q3=1033 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.013
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zS2u6W9Ofz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, bad_region=0, passed=7174
Got 7174 stars (including 6681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=14.019 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.933 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.933 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.684 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.684 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.320 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.042 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.341 worst_region_rms_after=0.320 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.083 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.320
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.288 arcsec matched=4879
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1320 n_q2=1300 n_q3=1019 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.316
ref2=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.013
new2=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.043
reference average sigma_overall=0.2865 worst_q_ratio=1.295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:22:17.58 +05:22:45.0: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:28:59.91 +05:26:59.1: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:21:51.07 +05:42:34.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:32:47.96 +08:12:35.9: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:25:45.91 +03:34:17.6: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:28:59.91 +05:26:59.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:32:47.96 +08:12:35.9: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:59.91 +05:26:59.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3831 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:47.96 +08:12:35.9: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2997 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:22:17.58 +05:22:45.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:25:45.91 +03:34:17.6: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:21:51.07 +05:42:34.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:17.58 +05:22:45.0: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1651 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:45.91 +03:34:17.6: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3708 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:51.07 +05:42:34.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3739 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20190_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:28.64 +01:35:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20265_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20318_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20335_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20344_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20344_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20346_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20346_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20347_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:44.356 +06:03:10.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:44.356 +06:03:10.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0703 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:43.021 +06:02:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:43.021 +06:02:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:44.356 +06:03:10.32
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:43.021 +06:02:30.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01245 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0nE82dY5C6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I7Vt8MkdJz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.28SV97l4fX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lGhK3F2syv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.819500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.819500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec +0.6695 to +11.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec 0.6695 to 11.2585 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3421 out of 3757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3757 out of 36794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0nE82dY5C6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1702, bad_region=4, passed=40128
Got 40128 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1335 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I7Vt8MkdJz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1580, bad_region=2, passed=36779
Got 36779 stars (including 35146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.28SV97l4fX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1593, bad_region=48, passed=39298
Got 39298 stars (including 37610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39298 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=14.024 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.983 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.983 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.314 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.314 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.994 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.276 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.336 worst_region_rms_after=0.314 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.079 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.314
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.336 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.276 arcsec matched=4876
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1320 n_q3=1022 n_q4=1218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.029
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lGhK3F2syv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1572, bad_region=47, passed=39512
Got 39512 stars (including 37831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39512 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=13.951 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.025 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.025 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.691 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.320 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=1.024 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.333 worst_region_rms_after=0.320 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.079 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.320
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.281 arcsec matched=4878
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1320 n_q3=1010 n_q4=1218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-37-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_035501_TTUQ1b1x1_652037_evco5pNG/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:36:41.31 +10:50:41.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:22:21.67 +05:23:39.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:30:35.32 +04:54:11.3: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:25.52 +04:10:54.1: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:21.27 +10:20:54.2: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:06.22 +05:42:09.7: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:31:52.47 +04:17:48.7: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:37:35.00 +02:04:43.4: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:52.31 +03:04:38.3: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:36:41.31 +10:50:41.4: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:41.31 +10:50:41.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1662 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:25.52 +04:10:54.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:21.27 +10:20:54.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:30:35.32 +04:54:11.3: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:22:21.67 +05:23:39.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:25.52 +04:10:54.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2550 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.27 +10:20:54.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0898 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:21.67 +05:23:39.2: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8505 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:35.32 +04:54:11.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9010 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:37:35.00 +02:04:43.4: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.00 +02:04:43.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6302 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:31:52.47 +04:17:48.7: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:06.22 +05:42:09.7: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:52.47 +04:17:48.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6427 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:06.22 +05:42:09.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6877 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:52.31 +03:04:38.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:52.31 +03:04:38.3: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8471 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:20:58.69 +08:27:33.4: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:19.17 +08:09:11.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:31.32 +01:40:26.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:54.37 +07:32:18.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:53.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:29.28 +03:56:44.5: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:26.30 +04:43:57.8: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:20:58.69 +08:27:33.4: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:31.32 +01:40:26.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:58.69 +08:27:33.4: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5059 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:25:53.65 +05:08:08.3: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:19.17 +08:09:11.3: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:19.17 +08:09:11.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1937 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:54.37 +07:32:18.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:26.30 +04:43:57.8: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:53.3: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:26.30 +04:43:57.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2135 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:53.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9027 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:25:53.65 +05:08:08.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:29.28 +03:56:44.5: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:29.28 +03:56:44.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4203 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:12:43.13 +08:25:27.9: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:51.26 +09:21:41.0: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:12:43.13 +08:25:27.9: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:43.13 +08:25:27.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1433 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:51.26 +09:21:41.0: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:51.26 +09:21:41.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1668 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:46.50 +10:50:08.0: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:42.71 +06:20:54.6: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:46.50 +10:50:08.0: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:46.50 +10:50:08.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6000 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:42.71 +06:20:54.6: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:42.71 +06:20:54.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7460 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:59.14 +06:16:30.0: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:33.86 +03:29:49.4: 15.40 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:39.22 +07:50:39.3: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:42.18 +05:25:54.3: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:52.89 +10:22:58.0: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:39.22 +07:50:39.3: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:39.22 +07:50:39.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8239 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:33.86 +03:29:49.4: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:59.14 +06:16:30.0: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:42.18 +05:25:54.3: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:33.86 +03:29:49.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9662 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:59.14 +06:16:30.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8873 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:42.18 +05:25:54.3: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8999 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:52.89 +10:22:58.0: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:52.89 +10:22:58.0: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7064 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:12:31.92 +04:34:22.0: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:16.68 +06:57:28.2: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:12:31.92 +04:34:22.0: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:54:33.00 +04:50:09.1: 15.33 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:31.92 +04:34:22.0: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8653 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:16.68 +06:57:28.2: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:16.68 +06:57:28.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9992 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:21.80 +08:31:58.9: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:51.45 +04:42:57.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:58.87 +03:00:56.7: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:56:31.03 +08:36:31.0: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:54:33.00 +04:50:09.1: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:33.00 +04:50:09.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9064 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:21.80 +08:31:58.9: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:58.87 +03:00:56.7: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:21.80 +08:31:58.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8802 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:58.87 +03:00:56.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8148 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:51.45 +04:42:57.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:14.31 +03:53:29.2: 15.52 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:56:31.03 +08:36:31.0: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:31.03 +08:36:31.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7502 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:09.47 +07:34:39.5: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:14.31 +03:53:29.2: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:14.31 +03:53:29.2: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8682 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:57.77 +04:58:24.2: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:28.02 +08:34:51.3: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:09.47 +07:34:39.5: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:24.12 +09:23:34.5: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:09.47 +07:34:39.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9098 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:28.02 +08:34:51.3: 15.12 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:28.02 +08:34:51.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9223 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:57.77 +04:58:24.2: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:57.77 +04:58:24.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9149 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:24.12 +09:23:34.5: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:22.56 +05:09:23.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:24.12 +09:23:34.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6455 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:50.63 +01:55:54.4: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:22.56 +05:09:23.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:04.87 +01:20:00.5: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:50.63 +01:55:54.4: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:50.63 +01:55:54.4: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8208 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:56.55 +06:05:47.1: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:14.27 +05:58:17.8: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:04.87 +01:20:00.5: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:04.87 +01:20:00.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0066 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:08:06.76 +09:06:00.9: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:11:40.56 +11:03:01.5: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:14.27 +05:58:17.8: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:14.27 +05:58:17.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9021 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:56.55 +06:05:47.1: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:56.55 +06:05:47.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9860 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:11:40.56 +11:03:01.5: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:08:06.76 +09:06:00.9: 15.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:06.76 +09:06:00.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9857 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:40.56 +11:03:01.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9764 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:21:01.86 +11:02:25.8: 15.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:11.31 +03:20:52.4: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:21:01.86 +11:02:25.8: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:29.40 +02:40:45.1: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:01.86 +11:02:25.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9911 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:38.48 +09:39:15.7: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:11.31 +03:20:52.4: 15.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:25.83 +08:38:42.8: 15.82 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:11.31 +03:20:52.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0056 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:23.39 +10:52:08.5: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:29.40 +02:40:45.1: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:29.40 +02:40:45.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9075 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:25.83 +08:38:42.8: 15.62 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:25.83 +08:38:42.8: ref_mag=15.72 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=15.0436 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:23.39 +10:52:08.5: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:38.48 +09:39:15.7: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:23.39 +10:52:08.5: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9303 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:38.48 +09:39:15.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8557 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:21.49 +05:20:23.7: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:15.60 +06:58:08.3: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:58.48 +04:42:21.7: 15.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:21.49 +05:20:23.7: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:21.49 +05:20:23.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0058 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:37.71 +10:20:15.4: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:15.60 +06:58:08.3: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:15.60 +06:58:08.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1292 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:38.44 +04:25:11.2: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:37.71 +10:20:15.4: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:37.71 +10:20:15.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0739 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:41.85 +09:32:30.8: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:12:19.59 +01:50:00.4: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:19.02 +04:44:38.7: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:58.48 +04:42:21.7: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:58.48 +04:42:21.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9722 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:38.44 +04:25:11.2: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:38.44 +04:25:11.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0950 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:41.85 +09:32:30.8: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:41.85 +09:32:30.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9683 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:12:19.59 +01:50:00.4: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:19.59 +01:50:00.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0324 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:19.02 +04:44:38.7: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:19.02 +04:44:38.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9961 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:06.05 +09:54:06.8: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:48.74 +10:28:49.5: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:34.30 +01:57:32.8: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:06.05 +09:54:06.8: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:39.31 +02:32:14.5: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:06.05 +09:54:06.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0695 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:08:16.78 +04:47:43.1: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:48.74 +10:28:49.5: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:48.74 +10:28:49.5: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0071 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:34.30 +01:57:32.8: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:34.30 +01:57:32.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0203 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:36.67 +04:51:46.6: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:17:22.24 +06:12:19.9: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:39.31 +02:32:14.5: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:08:16.78 +04:47:43.1: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:39.31 +02:32:14.5: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0841 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:16.78 +04:47:43.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0993 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:16.99 +02:21:13.8: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:15.80 +10:24:44.8: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:36.67 +04:51:46.6: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:36.67 +04:51:46.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7808 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:17:22.24 +06:12:19.9: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:22.24 +06:12:19.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0581 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:16.99 +02:21:13.8: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:16.99 +02:21:13.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8941 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:15.80 +10:24:44.8: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:15.80 +10:24:44.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9092 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:26:36.76 +09:30:31.0: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:45:32.81 +02:08:47.1: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:57.94 +02:44:54.1: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:43:05.87 +07:51:16.8: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:26:36.76 +09:30:31.0: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:36.76 +09:30:31.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0756 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:45:03.26 +02:34:40.4: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:45:32.81 +02:08:47.1: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:32.81 +02:08:47.1: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0265 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:57.94 +02:44:54.1: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:57.94 +02:44:54.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8425 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:52:21.89 +10:16:11.8: 15.37 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:56:06.67 +07:35:58.3: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:56:03.84 +07:21:53.0: 15.40 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:43:05.87 +07:51:16.8: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:45:03.26 +02:34:40.4: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:05.87 +07:51:16.8: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0296 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:03.26 +02:34:40.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9204 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:55:23.62 +02:54:46.5: 15.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:52:21.89 +10:16:11.8: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:56:06.67 +07:35:58.3: 15.45 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:21.89 +10:16:11.8: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0135 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:06.67 +07:35:58.3: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9503 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:47:37.67 +10:06:15.3: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:56:03.84 +07:21:53.0: 15.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:03.84 +07:21:53.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0500 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:55:23.62 +02:54:46.5: 15.32 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:23.62 +02:54:46.5: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0281 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:47:37.67 +10:06:15.3: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:37.67 +10:06:15.3: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9367 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51712.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52264.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52730.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51439_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51439_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51446_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51446_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51452_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51452_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51455_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51455_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51459_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51459_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51461_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51461_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51462_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51462_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51463_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51463_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51464_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51464_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51465_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51465_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:28.63 +01:35:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51553_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51553_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51653_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51653_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51712_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 51712_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51750_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51750_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:19.99 +05:01:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51787_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51787_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.29 +09:11:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51872_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 51872_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51908_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 51908_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52106_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52106_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52191_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52191_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 52264_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52266_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52266_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52360_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52398_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:39.73 +01:47:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52446_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52505_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52526_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52573_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52616_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52634_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52647_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52654_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52654_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52655_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52656_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52657_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52657_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52659_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 52669_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52676_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52676_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52679_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52680_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52685_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52697_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52709_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52714_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52721_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 52730_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52733_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52743_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52760_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52770_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52789_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52794_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52796_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52801_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52810_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52822_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52828_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52838_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52849_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52855_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52864_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52866_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52868_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52870_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52873_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52885_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52890_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52893_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52893_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52901_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52910_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52918_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52958_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52967_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52967_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52969_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52975_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52979_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52991_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52994_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 52998_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53024_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53053_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53068_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53073_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53074_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53075_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 53080_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20784_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 20784_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15612_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 15612_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18606_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427
The candidate 18606_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-38-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks
