This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 12.49 03:29:07.40 +17:27:10.6
168.06593 -31.27208 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 0 0 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:07.40 +17:27:10.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:07.40 +17:27:10.6: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 29 07.40 +17 27 10.6 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 13.26 03:03:33.28 +15:53:52.6
163.53907 -36.34990 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.149 Medusa -0 -0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:33.28 +15:53:52.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:33.28 +15:53:52.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 03 33.28 +15 53 52.6 13.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 13.99 03:49:03.44 +17:12:52.1
172.24853 -28.18948 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -0 -0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:49:03.44 +17:12:52.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:49:03.44 +17:12:52.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 49 03.44 +17 12 52.1 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 14.12 03:25:28.46 +18:59:23.2
166.13027 -30.67351 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:28.46 +18:59:23.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:28.46 +18:59:23.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 25 28.46 +18 59 23.2 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 14.07 03:58:51.64 +15:26:36.7
175.53968 -27.72381 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona 0 -0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:51.64 +15:26:36.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:51.64 +15:26:36.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 58 51.64 +15 26 36.7 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 14.81 03:15:16.59 +17:20:09.3
165.16312 -33.48981 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania -0 0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:16.59 +17:20:09.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:16.59 +17:20:09.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 15 16.59 +17 20 09.3 14.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3529 2461320.8529 14.65 03:58:33.39 +11:12:55.1
179.08358 -30.60677 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -1 1 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:33.39 +11:12:55.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:33.39 +11:12:55.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3529* 03 58 33.39 +11 12 55.1 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8529,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3529 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461320.85321094 07.10.2026 08:28:27.425 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8260
Objects passed selection criteria: 8255
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7844.5
Average stars matched: 7539.25 (96.1087 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 11:51:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461320.85321094 07.10.2026 08:28:27.425 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 63 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50216
Objects passed selection criteria: 50086
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48109.8
Average stars matched: 45878.2 (95.3616 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 268832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 11:54:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.85255601
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:16.263 +14:02:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:16.263 +14:02:45.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0506 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:18.878 +14:02:19.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:18.878 +14:02:19.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:16.263 +14:02:45.70
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:18.878 +14:02:19.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01283 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ObMpKth5Hq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VFxjgcafJQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XgG0dSZ7wD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZkWDdJCUMf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ObMpKth5Hq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=0, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 7157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VFxjgcafJQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=0, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 7177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XgG0dSZ7wD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, bad_region=0, passed=8081
Got 8081 stars (including 7554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=13.867 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.008 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.008 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.683 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.311 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=1.085 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.321 worst_region_rms_after=0.311 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.074 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.311
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.289 arcsec matched=4896
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=992 n_q2=1168 n_q3=1395 n_q4=1341 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.038
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZkWDdJCUMf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, bad_region=0, passed=8069
Got 8069 stars (including 7549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8069 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=13.862 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.129 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.744 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.744 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.325 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=1.082 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.347 worst_region_rms_after=0.325 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.130 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.325
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.292 arcsec matched=4895
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=996 n_q2=1179 n_q3=1390 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.327
ref2=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.038
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.106
reference average sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:23.56 +13:29:49.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:17.23 +17:33:29.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:55.29 +16:23:48.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:42.80 +16:16:51.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:54.91 +19:07:00.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:10.31 +13:46:02.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:23.56 +13:29:49.8: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:17.23 +17:33:29.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:17.23 +17:33:29.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4449 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.3: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:23.56 +13:29:49.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3881 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:00.84 +16:04:03.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4306 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:55.29 +16:23:48.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:10.31 +13:46:02.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:55.29 +16:23:48.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3656 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:42.80 +16:16:51.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:54.91 +19:07:00.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:10.31 +13:46:02.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4546 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:42.80 +16:16:51.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3709 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:54.91 +19:07:00.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4459 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20395_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20396_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20396_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20548_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20548_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:23.43 +16:01:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20585_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20594_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20598_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 20599_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.67 +11:24:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:16.263 +14:02:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:16.263 +14:02:45.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0506 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:18.878 +14:02:19.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:18.878 +14:02:19.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:16.263 +14:02:45.70
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:18.878 +14:02:19.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01283 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zptIeiuWUE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G95MYHBsP3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E40X16xNDH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.74bxwckrlB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.8 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
15.8 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.8 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zptIeiuWUE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2222, bad_region=4, passed=48568
Got 48568 stars (including 46270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.G95MYHBsP3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=5, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 46257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E40X16xNDH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2065, bad_region=45, passed=48186
Got 48186 stars (including 45996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=13.844 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.061 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.061 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.720 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.062 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.323 worst_region_rms_after=0.313 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.052 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.313
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.323 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.280 arcsec matched=4884
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1025 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1376 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.74bxwckrlB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2085, bad_region=47, passed=48342
Got 48342 stars (including 46133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=13.814 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.328 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.773 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.773 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.329 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.059 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.284 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.341 worst_region_rms_after=0.329 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.095 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.284 arcsec matched=4884
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1367 n_q4=1324 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-27-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_034227_TTUQ1b1x1_2924527_ZKAmysbc/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:37:52.14 +10:46:42.7: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:20.81 +10:45:12.4: 14.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:03.12 +15:22:57.6: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:17.80 +11:34:26.6: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:18.22 +09:53:34.9: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:24.18 +11:41:12.0: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:17:24.27 +09:38:16.8: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:35.86 +11:15:00.7: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:48.19 +17:08:29.0: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:15.69 +10:07:12.0: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:03.12 +15:22:57.6: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:15.69 +10:07:12.0: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:20.81 +10:45:12.4: 15.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:37:52.14 +10:46:42.7: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:24.18 +11:41:12.0: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:15.69 +10:07:12.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6497 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:20.81 +10:45:12.4: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0953 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:52.14 +10:46:42.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6547 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:24.18 +11:41:12.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8984 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:48.19 +17:08:29.0: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:03.12 +15:22:57.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9351 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:18.22 +09:53:34.9: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:35.86 +11:15:00.7: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:17.80 +11:34:26.6: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:17:24.27 +09:38:16.8: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:48.19 +17:08:29.0: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0266 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:18.22 +09:53:34.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7079 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:24.27 +09:38:16.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7568 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:35.86 +11:15:00.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6330 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:17.80 +11:34:26.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1687 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:57.34 +16:12:55.0: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:04.13 +18:55:11.7: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:49.91 +10:59:16.6: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:45.02 +14:04:33.1: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:30:26.28 +10:06:11.9: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:44:31.98 +09:13:15.9: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:28.28 +13:27:56.5: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:07.40 +17:27:10.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:33.28 +15:53:52.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:57.34 +16:12:55.0: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:57.34 +16:12:55.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8013 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:04.13 +18:55:11.7: 14.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:45.02 +14:04:33.1: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:28.28 +13:27:56.5: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:04.13 +18:55:11.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7189 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:49.91 +10:59:16.6: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:30:26.28 +10:06:11.9: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:45.02 +14:04:33.1: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6839 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:28.28 +13:27:56.5: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7625 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:44:31.98 +09:13:15.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:26.28 +10:06:11.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4941 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:49.91 +10:59:16.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7214 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:07.40 +17:27:10.6: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:31.98 +09:13:15.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8252 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:33.28 +15:53:52.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:49:03.44 +17:12:52.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:28.46 +18:59:23.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.54 +17:10:26.7: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:24.33 +14:19:15.0: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:18.74 +16:26:06.3: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:51.64 +15:26:36.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:09.67 +12:02:07.2: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:18.79 +10:38:19.4: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:49:03.44 +17:12:52.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:28.46 +18:59:23.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.54 +17:10:26.7: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:51.64 +15:26:36.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:18.74 +16:26:06.3: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.54 +17:10:26.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3629 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:24.33 +14:19:15.0: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:09.67 +12:02:07.2: 14.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:18.74 +16:26:06.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4817 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:24.33 +14:19:15.0: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4592 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:09.67 +12:02:07.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8206 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:18.79 +10:38:19.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:18.79 +10:38:19.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4687 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:52.25 +14:15:29.6: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:36.55 +14:40:19.9: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:42.73 +12:53:46.7: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:16.59 +17:20:09.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:33.39 +11:12:55.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:52.25 +14:15:29.6: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:52.25 +14:15:29.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7543 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:36.55 +14:40:19.9: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:42.73 +12:53:46.7: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:16.59 +17:20:09.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:36.55 +14:40:19.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7494 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:42.73 +12:53:46.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6641 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:33.39 +11:12:55.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:29:16.94 +15:01:16.5: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:23.70 +17:28:14.8: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:16.25 +12:24:59.3: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:29:16.94 +15:01:16.5: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:23.70 +17:28:14.8: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:16.94 +15:01:16.5: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8317 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:23.70 +17:28:14.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8507 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:16.25 +12:24:59.3: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:16.25 +12:24:59.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7003 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:09.87 +10:37:09.3: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:39.40 +18:02:01.4: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:50.05 +12:24:37.3: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:39.40 +18:02:01.4: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:09.87 +10:37:09.3: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:39.40 +18:02:01.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8267 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:50.05 +12:24:37.3: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:09.87 +10:37:09.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9429 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:50.05 +12:24:37.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9870 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:36.57 +09:21:15.3: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:00:58.47 +09:45:24.6: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:00.32 +15:36:41.0: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:36.57 +09:21:15.3: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:36.57 +09:21:15.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9854 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:00:58.47 +09:45:24.6: 15.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:00.32 +15:36:41.0: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:58.47 +09:45:24.6: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8560 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:00.32 +15:36:41.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9370 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:06.58 +10:31:16.5: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:29.99 +14:32:40.7: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:14.85 +14:45:30.8: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:06.58 +10:31:16.5: 15.44 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:06.58 +10:31:16.5: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0661 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:29.99 +14:32:40.7: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:29.99 +14:32:40.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0866 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:14.85 +14:45:30.8: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:14.85 +14:45:30.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0077 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:07.39 +11:45:20.1: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:22:25.27 +17:43:15.9: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:07.39 +11:45:20.1: 15.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:07.39 +11:45:20.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1362 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:43.89 +15:31:06.6: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:22:25.27 +17:43:15.9: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:25.27 +17:43:15.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0618 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:43.89 +15:31:06.6: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:43.89 +15:31:06.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8154 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:06.92 +10:09:51.3: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:04:02.51 +17:24:47.7: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:06.92 +10:09:51.3: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:06.92 +10:09:51.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0977 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:51:03.16 +11:07:06.1: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:30.84 +09:56:31.3: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:44.59 +09:49:21.8: 15.70 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:04:02.51 +17:24:47.7: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:02.51 +17:24:47.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1280 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:30.84 +09:56:31.3: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:30.84 +09:56:31.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1162 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:44.59 +09:49:21.8: 15.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:51:03.16 +11:07:06.1: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:44.59 +09:49:21.8: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1537 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:03.16 +11:07:06.1: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0238 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:38.26 +09:37:08.1: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:32.12 +09:59:13.3: 15.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:59:14.03 +18:37:51.7: 15.68 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:38.26 +09:37:08.1: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:38.26 +09:37:08.1: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9010 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:45.67 +15:49:23.3: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:21.15 +11:38:18.1: 15.69 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:32.12 +09:59:13.3: 15.48 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:32.12 +09:59:13.3: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0158 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:06.01 +08:57:50.5: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:04:21.80 +17:44:34.4: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:57.46 +19:07:15.4: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:59:14.03 +18:37:51.7: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:45.67 +15:49:23.3: 14.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:59.79 +10:50:09.4: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:45.67 +15:49:23.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9865 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:14.03 +18:37:51.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9946 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:21.15 +11:38:18.1: 15.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:06.01 +08:57:50.5: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:21.15 +11:38:18.1: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9635 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:15.27 +08:50:27.3: 15.56 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:06.01 +08:57:50.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8862 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:04:21.80 +17:44:34.4: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:21.80 +17:44:34.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0501 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:57.46 +19:07:15.4: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:57.46 +19:07:15.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9967 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:59.79 +10:50:09.4: 15.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:59.79 +10:50:09.4: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1263 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:15.27 +08:50:27.3: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:15.27 +08:50:27.3: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8838 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:48.65 +10:56:56.2: 15.51 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:55.24 +15:15:04.7: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:48.65 +10:56:56.2: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:20:37.48 +09:24:51.0: 15.63 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:48.65 +10:56:56.2: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1426 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:11.28 +18:50:15.5: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:16.23 +09:31:27.2: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:55.24 +15:15:04.7: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:01.71 +09:14:52.5: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:06:19.56 +15:43:03.1: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:55.24 +15:15:04.7: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1317 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:17:48.61 +17:50:35.4: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:03:31.91 +11:02:42.6: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:20:37.48 +09:24:51.0: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:37.48 +09:24:51.0: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2193 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:08.56 +08:54:39.7: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:11.28 +18:50:15.5: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:01.71 +09:14:52.5: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:16.23 +09:31:27.2: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:11.28 +18:50:15.5: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0030 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:01.71 +09:14:52.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9850 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:06:19.56 +15:43:03.1: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:16.23 +09:31:27.2: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9752 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:19.56 +15:43:03.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1626 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:17:48.61 +17:50:35.4: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:48.61 +17:50:35.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1588 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:03:31.91 +11:02:42.6: 15.54 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:31.91 +11:02:42.6: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9509 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:08.56 +08:54:39.7: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:08.56 +08:54:39.7: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1402 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:52.55 +11:59:22.5: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:05:41.95 +16:54:46.7: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:40.97 +18:27:53.3: 15.83 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:02:46.58 +15:37:47.0: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:52.55 +11:59:22.5: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:52.55 +11:59:22.5: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1124 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:05:41.95 +16:54:46.7: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:41.95 +16:54:46.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2061 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:40.97 +18:27:53.3: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:40.97 +18:27:53.3: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0006 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:02:46.58 +15:37:47.0: 15.63 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:46.58 +15:37:47.0: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0861 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53999.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54440.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54448.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54527.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54953.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53576_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53579_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53579_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53581_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53581_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53593_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53607_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53608_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53609_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53611_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53614_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53624_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53627_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53851_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 53851_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53884_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53999_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 53999_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54020_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54020_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.28 +09:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54405_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:55.05 +16:03:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54440_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 54440_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54448_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 54448_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54527_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 54527_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54655_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54655_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54659_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54659_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54682_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54682_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54839_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54839_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54875_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54875_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54881_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54881_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54918_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54918_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54922_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54922_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54953_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 54953_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
Preparing report for the candidate 54982_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54986_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54986_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54991_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 54991_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55003_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55006_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55006_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55019_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55019_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55027_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55027_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55040_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55040_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55049_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55049_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55074_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55074_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55112_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55112_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55115_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55115_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55135_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55135_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55163_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55163_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55164_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55164_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55167_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55167_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55170_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55170_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55174_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55174_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55179_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55179_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55180_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55180_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55183_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55183_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55186_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55186_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55189_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55189_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55193_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55193_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55194_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55194_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55197_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55197_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55198_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55198_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55203_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55203_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55208_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55208_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55213_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55213_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55225_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55225_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55226_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55226_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55231_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55231_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55248_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55248_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55254_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55254_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55255_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55255_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55262_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55262_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55271_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55271_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55292_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55292_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55312_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55312_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55320_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55320_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55482_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55482_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55502_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55502_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55515_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55515_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55548_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 55548_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.67 +11:24:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 17153_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-28-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
