This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 04 12 27.39 +20 58 55.5 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,7.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 7.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 11.99 03:40:32.64 +21:31:11.3
167.27492 -26.44503 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 2 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:32.64 +21:31:11.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:32.64 +21:31:11.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 40 32.64 +21 31 11.3 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 14.79 03:47:40.32 +24:36:24.0
166.33503 -23.05568 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe 0 1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:40.32 +24:36:24.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:40.32 +24:36:24.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 47 40.32 +24 36 24.0 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 04 12 27.40 +20 58 55.3 7.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,7.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 7.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 12.51 03:29:07.72 +17:27:13.6
168.06640 -31.27061 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 -0 0 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:07.72 +17:27:13.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:07.72 +17:27:13.6: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 29 07.72 +17 27 13.6 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 12.89 04:08:52.98 +17:50:18.4
175.37932 -24.33606 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:52.98 +17:50:18.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:52.98 +17:50:18.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 04 08 52.98 +17 50 18.4 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 13.00 04:10:59.09 +23:30:07.8
171.25609 -20.12156 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:59.09 +23:30:07.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:59.09 +23:30:07.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 04 10 59.09 +23 30 07.8 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,13.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 13.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 13.76 03:08:06.76 +21:56:48.1
160.28275 -30.83591 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.514 Armida -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:06.76 +21:56:48.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:06.76 +21:56:48.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 08 06.76 +21 56 48.1 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 13.90 03:49:03.72 +17:12:52.0
172.24944 -28.18871 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -0 -0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.72 +17:12:52.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.72 +17:12:52.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 49 03.72 +17 12 52.0 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 13.98 03:25:28.77 +18:59:23.8
166.13123 -30.67259 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -0 -0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:28.77 +18:59:23.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:28.77 +18:59:23.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 25 28.77 +18 59 23.8 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 13.97 03:25:41.03 +23:29:38.1
162.91169 -27.15817 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana 0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:41.03 +23:29:38.1: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:41.03 +23:29:38.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 25 41.03 +23 29 38.1 14.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 14.02 04:14:12.70 +23:21:34.0
171.90618 -19.68043 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -0 -0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:14:12.70 +23:21:34.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:14:12.70 +23:21:34.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 04 14 12.70 +23 21 34.0 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 14.40 03:14:23.39 +22:23:45.1
161.33392 -29.61574 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.640 Brambilla 0 -0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:23.39 +22:23:45.1: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:23.39 +22:23:45.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 14 23.39 +22 23 45.1 14.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 14.61 03:46:49.72 +23:07:45.1
167.26762 -24.27656 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:49.72 +23:07:45.1: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:49.72 +23:07:45.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 46 49.72 +23 07 45.1 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 14.92 03:15:16.97 +17:20:09.1
165.16458 -33.48891 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania -0 0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:15:16.97 +17:20:09.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:15:16.97 +17:20:09.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 15 16.97 +17 20 09.1 14.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,14.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 14.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 14.87 03:36:18.33 +19:46:17.1
167.75840 -28.40866 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita 0 -0 0 15.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:18.33 +19:46:17.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:18.33 +19:46:17.1: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 36 18.33 +19 46 17.1 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3404 2461320.8404 15.04 03:22:19.12 +20:24:22.4
164.42124 -30.05418 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1879 Broederstroom -1 -2 2 15.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:19.12 +20:24:22.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:19.12 +20:24:22.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.3404* 03 22 19.12 +20 24 22.4 15.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8404,15.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3404 15.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461320.84069828 07.10.2026 08:10:26.331 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11846
Objects passed selection criteria: 11837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11321.5
Average stars matched: 10951.8 (96.7341 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:38:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461320.84069828 07.10.2026 08:10:26.331 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 151
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 107 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 73048
Objects passed selection criteria: 72864
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 70000.5
Average stars matched: 66879.8 (95.5418 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 457580 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 10:42:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.84011480
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:18.849 +22:03:16.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:18.849 +22:03:16.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0795 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:18.880 +22:02:34.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:18.880 +22:02:34.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0716 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:18.849 +22:03:16.62
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:18.880 +22:02:34.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01169 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sFEGzBul2z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qjVMIF7xzN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9SDJKaxUeK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fh8PASkNUd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.sFEGzBul2z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qjVMIF7xzN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9SDJKaxUeK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, bad_region=0, passed=11475
Got 11475 stars (including 10673 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=12.254 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.039 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.039 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.056 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.056 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.377 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=1.343 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.395 worst_region_rms_after=0.377 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.166 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.377
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1052 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1521 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fh8PASkNUd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=801, bad_region=0, passed=11419
Got 11419 stars (including 10606 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=12.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.291 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.291 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.976 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.976 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.373 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=1.339 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.388 worst_region_rms_after=0.373 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.137 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.373
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec matched=4920
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1057 n_q3=1221 n_q4=1530 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.127
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398_astrometric_residuals.png (4919 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033002_TTUQ1b1x1_1090784_Ie80Olbg/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.92 +20:05:27.4: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:08.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:30.55 +25:19:56.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:32.64 +21:31:11.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.14 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.53 +19:39:33.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:44.85 +21:57:01.5: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.92 +20:05:27.4: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:08.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.03 +22:37:08.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4253 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.92 +20:05:27.4: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3523 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.94 +22:50:50.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:30.55 +25:19:56.0: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:30.55 +25:19:56.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3226 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.53 +19:39:33.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.53 +19:39:33.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1945 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:44.85 +21:57:01.5: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:44.85 +21:57:01.5: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4812 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4113 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:32.64 +21:31:11.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.14 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.94 +22:50:50.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.14 +22:06:37.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2866 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.94 +22:50:50.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3170 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:50.47 +24:05:21.6: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:34.19 +23:05:27.0: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:50.47 +24:05:21.6: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:50.47 +24:05:21.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4784 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4642 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:37.88 +21:30:45.6: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:34.19 +23:05:27.0: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.19 +23:05:27.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5136 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:08.97 +21:26:45.9: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4672 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:37.88 +21:30:45.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:37.88 +21:30:45.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4995 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:08.97 +21:26:45.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:08.97 +21:26:45.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4831 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 20580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 20705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20726_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20726_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20736_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20736_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20748_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20748_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.07 +18:01:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20776_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20776_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.86 +23:09:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20785_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20785_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20793_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 20793_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87008_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87008_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87015_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87015_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87021_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87021_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87023_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87023_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87027_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87027_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87028_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87028_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87031_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87032_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87032_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87039_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87039_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87040_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87040_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87046_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87047_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87047_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87057_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87057_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87058_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87058_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87066_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87066_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87069_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87069_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87070_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87070_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87075_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87089_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87089_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87090_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87090_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.74 +18:58:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87099_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87099_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87100_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87100_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:46.26 +17:48:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87244_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87244_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:32.65 +21:31:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87306_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87306_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87399_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87399_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87426_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87426_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87759_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87759_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87879_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87879_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87914_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87914_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 87934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 87998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 88044_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88098_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88098_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 88178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88224_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88224_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88252_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88252_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.07 +26:26:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88324_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88324_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88362_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 88362_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88367_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88367_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:18.02 +23:45:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88418_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88418_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88428_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88428_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.37 +24:18:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88439_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88439_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88445_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88445_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88474_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88515_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88515_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88524_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88524_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88533_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88556_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88556_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88557_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88557_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88563_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88563_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88565_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88565_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88567_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88567_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88568_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88574_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 88574_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88583_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88583_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88590_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88590_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88592_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88592_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88642_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88642_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88666_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88666_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88680_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88680_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 88697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88705_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88716_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88716_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88718_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88718_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88766_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88788_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88788_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88809_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88809_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88826_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 88826_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88832_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88832_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88841_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88841_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88849_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88849_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88854_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88854_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88856_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88856_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88861_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88861_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88870_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88870_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88875_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88875_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88882_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88882_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88884_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88884_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88886_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88886_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88888_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88888_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88889_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88889_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88901_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88901_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88933_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88933_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 88999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89013_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89013_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89053_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89066_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89066_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89077_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89077_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 89169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.38 +26:16:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 39990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-10-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
