This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3328 2461320.8328 11.81 08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6
191.84565 28.80263 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -0 0 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8328,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3328 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3328 2461320.8328 11.68 07:58:22.82 +28:53:09.1
192.34473 26.40175 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra -0 -0 0 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:22.82 +28:53:09.1: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:22.82 +28:53:09.1: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8328,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3328 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3328 2461320.8328 12.32 07:56:55.92 +32:57:38.4
187.87507 27.29605 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:56:55.92 +32:57:38.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:56:55.92 +32:57:38.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8328,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3328 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3328 2461320.8328 13.63 07:33:17.29 +31:21:54.4
187.87694 22.04491 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.152 Atala 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:33:17.29 +31:21:54.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:33:17.29 +31:21:54.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8328,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3328 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.3328 2461320.8328 13.38 08:10:23.99 +28:18:45.2
193.85819 28.74466 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -0 -1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:23.99 +28:18:45.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:23.99 +28:18:45.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.8328,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.3328 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461320.83418500 07.10.2026 08:01:03.584 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14018
Objects passed selection criteria: 13994
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11817.8
Average stars matched: 11545.2 (97.6941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 09:24:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461320.83418500 07.10.2026 08:01:03.584 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 95 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78758
Objects passed selection criteria: 78581
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 68360.8
Average stars matched: 66138.2 (96.7489 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 479152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 09:26:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.83136530
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 943.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.585 +30:01:18.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:01.585 +30:01:18.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:04.384 +30:02:04.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:04.384 +30:02:04.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:01.585 +30:01:18.86
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:04.384 +30:02:04.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01628 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DyVKbxyYQg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Mu8uGNNpGV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7unNH6kbTg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3J1ByvDikD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg
Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg
Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3042 deg
Loaded 9472 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7195 out of 7687 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7687 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.DyVKbxyYQg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, bad_region=0, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1401 n_q3=1039 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Mu8uGNNpGV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, bad_region=1, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1074 n_q2=1399 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1386 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7unNH6kbTg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=0, passed=9329
Got 9329 stars (including 8867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=10.741 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.243 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.243 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.725 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.725 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.497 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.004 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.424 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.475 worst_region_rms_after=0.497 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.202 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.470
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.475 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1487 n_q2=928 n_q3=1489 n_q4=969 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3J1ByvDikD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=514, bad_region=1, passed=9055
Got 9055 stars (including 8521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9055 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=11.216 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.755 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.631 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.957 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.957 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.540 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.469 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.979 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.452 worst_region_rms_after=0.540 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.079 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.469
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.452 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.452 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=1475 n_q2=967 n_q3=1454 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.290
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.130
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.229
reference average sigma_overall=0.4255 worst_q_ratio=1.3055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:47.66 +27:35:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20821_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20821_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.53 +30:46:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20966_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20966_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.06 +31:10:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21010_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 21010_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01020_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 01020_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:11.75 +34:28:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 943.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.585 +30:01:18.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:01.585 +30:01:18.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:04.384 +30:02:04.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:04.384 +30:02:04.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:01.585 +30:01:18.86
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:04.384 +30:02:04.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01628 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gfXFVevo0l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b37IGQpX5i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0sCfnD5Xxg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZVxFUh84nk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg
Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg
Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3111 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3111 deg
Loaded 9490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6470 out of 7805 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7805 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 99 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gfXFVevo0l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6475, bad_region=0, passed=84011
Got 84011 stars (including 77428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1104 n_q2=1426 n_q3=997 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b37IGQpX5i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6514, bad_region=3, passed=84099
Got 84099 stars (including 77494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1424 n_q3=996 n_q4=1357 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0sCfnD5Xxg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2237, bad_region=47, passed=51680
Got 51680 stars (including 49310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=10.735 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.830 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.724 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.499 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.002 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.454 worst_region_rms_after=0.499 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.201 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.467
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.454 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.367 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1482 n_q2=917 n_q3=1503 n_q4=969 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZVxFUh84nk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2397, bad_region=46, passed=55725
Got 55725 stars (including 53199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=11.130 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.408 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.948 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.948 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.538 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.970 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.465 worst_region_rms_after=0.538 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.069 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.471
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.465 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.465 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1472 n_q2=968 n_q3=1437 n_q4=997 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_02-56-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_031758_TTUQ1b1x1_2904952_DKZcffvg/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:34.10 +28:40:55.1: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:48:11.20 +26:12:49.4: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:46.39 +33:10:20.0: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:27:17.30 +29:11:21.6: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:35:11.41 +32:36:45.7: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:37.92 +33:30:54.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:55:44.03 +30:54:38.6: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:12.73 +33:12:33.2: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:34.23 +28:14:47.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:27:17.30 +29:11:21.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:34.10 +28:40:55.1: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:37.92 +33:30:54.9: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:35:11.41 +32:36:45.7: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:55:44.03 +30:54:38.6: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:17.30 +29:11:21.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7798 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:34.10 +28:40:55.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9900 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:37.92 +33:30:54.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7919 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:11.41 +32:36:45.7: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2286 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:55:44.03 +30:54:38.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1310 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:46.39 +33:10:20.0: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:48:11.20 +26:12:49.4: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:46.39 +33:10:20.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5482 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:11.20 +26:12:49.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9013 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:12.73 +33:12:33.2: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:12.73 +33:12:33.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1708 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:34.23 +28:14:47.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:34.23 +28:14:47.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4981 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:38:04.04 +32:54:06.0: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:25.95 +26:46:29.9: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:52.19 +26:41:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:38:04.04 +32:54:06.0: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:04.04 +32:54:06.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6889 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:38:30.53 +33:23:04.8: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:25.95 +26:46:29.9: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:52.19 +26:41:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:52.19 +26:41:25.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:25.95 +26:46:29.9: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1872 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:38:30.53 +33:23:04.8: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:30.53 +33:23:04.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3740 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:25.45 +30:14:08.0: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:25.45 +30:14:08.0: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:25.45 +30:14:08.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2830 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:22.82 +28:53:09.1: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:56:55.92 +32:57:38.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:22.82 +28:53:09.1: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:58:22.82 +28:53:09.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.6792 delta=2.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:47.13 +26:13:15.8: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:56:55.92 +32:57:38.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:12.43 +33:29:29.6: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:26:19.61 +33:17:36.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:47.13 +26:13:15.8: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:47.13 +26:13:15.8: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2125 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:33:17.29 +31:21:54.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:12.43 +33:29:29.6: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:26:19.61 +33:17:36.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:40.91 +28:18:39.5: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:12.43 +33:29:29.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5941 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:19.61 +33:17:36.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5555 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:33:17.29 +31:21:54.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:37.55 +34:12:15.9: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:23.99 +28:18:45.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:40.91 +28:18:39.5: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:40.91 +28:18:39.5: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1821 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:37.55 +34:12:15.9: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:37.55 +34:12:15.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6579 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:23.99 +28:18:45.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:50.21 +27:00:50.1: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:14.55 +26:30:34.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:43:11.31 +31:15:01.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:50.21 +27:00:50.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:50.21 +27:00:50.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5845 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:14.55 +26:30:34.6: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:14.55 +26:30:34.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8986 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:43:11.31 +31:15:01.6: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:11.31 +31:15:01.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0246 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:29.76 +34:55:11.6: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:29.76 +34:55:11.6: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:23:51.95 +34:57:28.7: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:29.76 +34:55:11.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1428 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:23:51.95 +34:57:28.7: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:51.95 +34:57:28.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9104 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:39:24.09 +34:33:35.2: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:49:34.77 +25:06:26.5: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:39:24.09 +34:33:35.2: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:24.09 +34:33:35.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2100 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:49:34.77 +25:06:26.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:34.77 +25:06:26.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9996 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:04.32 +34:56:11.9: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:36.30 +34:45:49.5: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:19.96 +27:34:41.5: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:26.90 +29:31:18.2: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:36.30 +34:45:49.5: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:36.30 +34:45:49.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3205 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:04.32 +34:56:11.9: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:04.32 +34:56:11.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4760 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:26.90 +29:31:18.2: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:19.96 +27:34:41.5: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:26.90 +29:31:18.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0457 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:19.96 +27:34:41.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2449 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:27:11.79 +35:06:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:05.25 +33:23:00.0: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:05.25 +33:23:00.0: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:27:11.79 +35:06:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:11.79 +35:06:00.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:05.25 +33:23:00.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3069 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:43:14.13 +31:22:29.4: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:30:11.56 +33:33:52.9: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:33:46.83 +34:33:29.3: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:43:14.13 +31:22:29.4: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:30:11.56 +33:33:52.9: 15.37 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:14.13 +31:22:29.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4942 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:11.56 +33:33:52.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6033 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:33:46.83 +34:33:29.3: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:46.83 +34:33:29.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6860 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100772.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101470.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100500_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100500_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100506_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100506_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:48.19 +34:27:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100510_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100510_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100514_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100514_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100523_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100523_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:06.31 +26:29:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100534_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100534_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:48.34 +34:02:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100546_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100546_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:33.83 +34:37:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100549_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100549_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100551_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100551_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:05.87 +34:53:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100552_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100552_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:29.94 +34:51:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100554_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100554_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100555_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100555_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:12.05 +31:29:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:10.20 +34:24:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100558_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100558_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:11.26 +25:40:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100559_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100559_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:13.60 +34:16:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100561_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100561_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100563_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100563_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:49.26 +31:33:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100564_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100564_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:00.34 +34:23:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100565_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100565_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:47.66 +27:35:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100566_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100566_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:00.28 +26:26:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100567_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100567_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.82 +27:17:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.10 +27:36:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100624_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100624_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:39.72 +27:22:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100667_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100667_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.09 +31:52:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100726_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100726_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.09 +34:13:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100772_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 100772_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100785_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100785_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.05 +31:10:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100812_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100812_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:18.99 +30:01:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100861_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100861_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.72 +25:46:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100913_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 100913_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100942_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100942_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.34 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100955_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100955_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:06.46 +28:21:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100986_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 100986_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.24 +33:29:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101087_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101087_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:52.50 +27:05:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101134_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101134_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.77 +34:00:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101210_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101210_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:32.57 +33:27:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101256_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101256_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101301_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101301_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.92 +34:08:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101336_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101336_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.34 +25:02:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101340_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101340_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.84 +30:20:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101373_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101373_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101432_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101432_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101441_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101441_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:10.50 +29:28:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101442_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101442_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.33 +25:10:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101447_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101447_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.91 +30:53:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101470_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101470_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101486_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101486_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:33.77 +27:11:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101496_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101496_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101500_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101500_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.12 +27:54:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:26.95 +29:02:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:58.58 +28:34:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101556_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101556_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:27.89 +25:27:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101574_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 101574_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101575_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101575_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.65 +25:44:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101598_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101598_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.77 +27:56:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101641_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101641_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:10.00 +25:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101642_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101642_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:29.14 +25:13:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101645_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101645_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.58 +27:14:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101656_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101656_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:01.31 +28:11:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101707_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101707_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101708_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101708_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:33.53 +30:37:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101766_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101766_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101770_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101770_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101772_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101772_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:43.58 +26:07:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101779_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101779_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:53.55 +28:30:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101802_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101802_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.67 +30:13:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101804_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101804_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:21.71 +32:04:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101808_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101808_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:38.20 +32:25:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101817_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101817_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101830_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101830_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101833_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101833_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.61 +32:29:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101855_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101855_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:40.66 +27:30:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101898_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101898_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101907_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101907_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.68 +32:11:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101943_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101943_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101962_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101962_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:21.81 +27:05:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101990_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 101990_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102090_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102090_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102111_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102111_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102204_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102204_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102271_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 102271_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.75 +26:47:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75290_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 75290_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:23.97 +27:19:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59274_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 59274_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.53 +30:46:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 04889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-07_03-01-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
