This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4904 2461320.9904 11.80 07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.8
192.38102 26.45597 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 -1 1 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.9904,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.4904 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4904 2461320.9904 11.87 08:08:30.83 +30:00:28.8
191.87034 28.84079 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -0 0 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:30.83 +30:00:28.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:30.83 +30:00:28.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.9904,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.4904 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4904 2461320.9904 12.29 07:57:09.01 +32:57:48.7
187.88622 27.34082 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:57:09.01 +32:57:48.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:57:09.01 +32:57:48.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.9904,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.4904 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4904 2461320.9904 13.51 08:10:36.80 +28:18:09.9
193.88470 28.78667 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:36.80 +28:18:09.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:36.80 +28:18:09.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.9904,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.4904 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.4904 2461320.9904 14.53 08:06:50.45 +31:24:16.5
190.22438 28.88393 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.597 Bandusia 0 1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:06:50.45 +31:24:16.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:06:50.45 +31:24:16.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.9904,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.4904 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461320.99073809 07.10.2026 11:46:29.771 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12538
Objects passed selection criteria: 12485
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9500.75
Average stars matched: 8562.5 (90.1245 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 08:42:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461320.99073809 07.10.2026 11:46:29.771 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 143 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 73845
Objects passed selection criteria: 73627
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58905
Average stars matched: 52807.8 (89.649 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 290792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 08:46:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.99008561
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.088 +30:00:01.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:01.088 +30:00:01.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.389 +30:00:52.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:02.389 +30:00:52.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0264 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:01.088 +30:00:01.91
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:02.389 +30:00:52.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01478 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3RxiqnsCG8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P535WNd2Ud
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4z2QCCxggL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kMd3LPNLdF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg
Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg
Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3042 deg
Loaded 9472 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7195 out of 7687 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7687 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.3RxiqnsCG8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, bad_region=4309, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 9556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1419 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1415 n_q4=1035 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P535WNd2Ud (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, bad_region=4298, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 9609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1429 n_q2=1049 n_q3=1407 n_q4=1033 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4z2QCCxggL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=684, bad_region=1912, passed=11013
Got 11013 stars (including 8493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=7.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.086 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.086 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.846 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.846 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.531 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.871 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.572 worst_region_rms_after=0.531 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.057 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.531
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.572 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.572 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.334 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1699 n_q2=806 n_q3=1609 n_q4=767 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kMd3LPNLdF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, bad_region=1841, passed=10368
Got 10368 stars (including 7921 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=7.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.795 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.795 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.504 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.791 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.791 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.507 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.574 worst_region_rms_after=0.507 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.040 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.507
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.352 +30:00:51.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10368 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3065869.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.902 -> 0.378 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4879 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4787 pairs (4879 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=7.399 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.767 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.767 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.505 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.503 worst_region_rms_after=0.505 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.503 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.505
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.505 vs 0.503 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1678 n_q2=803 n_q3=1557 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.135
ref2=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.121
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.037
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.114
reference average sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.128
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:30.83 +30:00:28.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:30.83 +30:00:28.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22438.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21110_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 21110_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.62 +30:46:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22336_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
Preparing report for the candidate 22336_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22438_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
Preparing report for the candidate 22438_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22771_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 22771_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.00 +31:10:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.8
08:08:30.83 +30:00:28.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.088 +30:00:01.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:01.088 +30:00:01.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.352 +30:00:51.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89
Second-epoch image center 08:00:02.352 +30:00:51.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0266 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:01.088 +30:00:01.91
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:02.352 +30:00:51.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01454 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xzzXmO8Qq1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R6cbYl0Ftz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oyS8w4PYMX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits &> /tmp/tmp.In1I1bSvmd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg
Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg
Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3111 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3111 deg
Loaded 9490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6470 out of 7805 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7805 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.8 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xzzXmO8Qq1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=6475, bad_region=21994, passed=84020
Got 84020 stars (including 57346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1467 n_q2=1076 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R6cbYl0Ftz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6514, bad_region=21982, passed=84110
Got 84110 stars (including 57428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1468 n_q2=1084 n_q3=1364 n_q4=1007 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oyS8w4PYMX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3471, bad_region=7718, passed=64466
Got 64466 stars (including 53634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64466 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=7.514 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.029 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.029 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.856 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.856 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.531 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.564 worst_region_rms_after=0.531 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.066 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.531
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.564 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1704 n_q2=815 n_q3=1573 n_q4=782 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.025
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.In1I1bSvmd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3379, bad_region=7607, passed=63943
Got 63943 stars (including 53378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63943 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=7.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.791 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.791 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.513 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.372 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.521 worst_region_rms_after=0.513 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.521 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.513
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.521 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec matched=4877
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1721 n_q2=817 n_q3=1564 n_q4=775 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-45-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0554.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-07_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_081607_TTUQ2b1x1_2268794_7ch5OFNa/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:18.68 +26:23:05.9: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:47:03.98 +32:04:48.7: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:52:40.36 +25:53:20.3: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:49:12.98 +26:08:18.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:43.76 +29:52:58.3: 14.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:57:09.01 +32:57:48.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:49:12.98 +26:08:18.3: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:43.76 +29:52:58.3: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:52:40.36 +25:53:20.3: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:43.76 +29:52:58.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7518 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:12.98 +26:08:18.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2961 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:18.68 +26:23:05.9: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:52:40.36 +25:53:20.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3739 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:18:18.68 +26:23:05.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5875 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:47:03.98 +32:04:48.7: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:03.98 +32:04:48.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8417 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:57:09.01 +32:57:48.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:51:49.36 +27:30:35.6: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:36.80 +28:18:09.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:36.80 +28:18:09.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:51:49.36 +27:30:35.6: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:49.36 +27:30:35.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3178 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:07:46.19 +26:54:54.5: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:26.73 +30:13:15.3: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:07:46.19 +26:54:54.5: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:46.19 +26:54:54.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1932 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:50:32.81 +26:49:16.5: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:26.73 +30:13:15.3: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:26.73 +30:13:15.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0858 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:50:32.81 +26:49:16.5: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:32.81 +26:49:16.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2295 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:00:43.97 +26:32:14.8: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:12.42 +33:23:11.9: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:36.37 +29:15:45.3: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:12.42 +33:23:11.9: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:58:12.42 +33:23:11.9: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3513 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:00:43.97 +26:32:14.8: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:00:43.97 +26:32:14.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4609 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:36.37 +29:15:45.3: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:36.37 +29:15:45.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3513 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:06:50.45 +31:24:16.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:56:20.74 +28:03:48.4: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:06:50.45 +31:24:16.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:39.42 +27:10:46.2: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:57:39.48 +32:38:31.4: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:56:20.74 +28:03:48.4: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:56:20.74 +28:03:48.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7687 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:04:29.12 +28:06:32.3: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:03:05.10 +31:06:10.3: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:26.16 +31:12:53.7: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:39.42 +27:10:46.2: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:57:39.48 +32:38:31.4: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:58:39.42 +27:10:46.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8969 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:39.48 +32:38:31.4: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8190 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:04:29.12 +28:06:32.3: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:03:05.10 +31:06:10.3: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:26.16 +31:12:53.7: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:04:29.12 +28:06:32.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8696 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:03:05.10 +31:06:10.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9478 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:26.16 +31:12:53.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9462 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105837.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113677.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98816_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98816_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98818_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98818_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98823_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98823_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98829_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98829_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:42.60 +27:43:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98837_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98837_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98842_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98842_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:16.93 +28:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98843_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98843_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:11.99 +31:29:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98846_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 98846_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.71 +27:17:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100613_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 100613_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:39.70 +28:52:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100703_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 100703_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:30.82 +30:00:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101132_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 101132_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.70 +25:46:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101345_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 101345_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.02 +31:10:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101767_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
Preparing report for the candidate 101767_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101925_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 101925_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:06.40 +28:21:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102039_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 102039_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:15.62 +26:14:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102663_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 102663_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:34.94 +26:43:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104311_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 104311_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.79 +30:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104579_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 104579_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:54.76 +27:26:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104623_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 104623_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:05.90 +27:04:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104977_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 104977_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105024_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 105024_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:02.32 +28:27:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105549_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 105549_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.58 +27:14:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105689_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 105689_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:32.60 +33:27:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105837_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
Preparing report for the candidate 105837_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106013_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 106013_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.11 +27:54:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106899_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 106899_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.81 +27:56:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107125_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107125_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:53.65 +28:30:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107309_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107309_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:48.64 +28:07:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107390_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107390_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:50.59 +30:10:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107447_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107447_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:48.55 +26:19:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107497_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107497_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:26.92 +29:02:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107644_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107644_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:55.07 +28:00:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107736_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107736_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:40.68 +27:30:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107948_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 107948_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:43.58 +26:07:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108843_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 108843_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.51 +32:29:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109041_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109041_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.64 +30:13:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109053_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109053_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:40.81 +30:25:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109250_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109250_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:54.17 +29:37:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109307_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109307_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.64 +32:11:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109384_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109384_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.70 +30:36:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109499_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109499_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:38.17 +32:25:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109687_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109687_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109733_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 109733_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:21.97 +27:05:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110275_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 110275_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110352_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 110352_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110571_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 110571_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:36.68 +34:05:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110582_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 110582_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:34.65 +27:44:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110796_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 110796_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:53.50 +30:47:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111031_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 111031_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:40.33 +29:33:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111034_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 111034_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111561_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 111561_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112102_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 112102_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112280_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 112280_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:34.42 +26:10:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112749_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 112749_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:05.71 +31:43:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112932_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 112932_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:46.08 +30:39:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113317_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 113317_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:23.41 +25:49:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113677_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
Preparing report for the candidate 113677_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114573_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 114573_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115453_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 115453_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115919_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 115919_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115941_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 115941_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116221_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 116221_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116320_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 116320_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-07_06-46-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0555 did not pass the final checks
