This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.1009 2461320.6009 13.86 15:59:31.29 +00:15:44.4
10.18210 37.50383 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.148 Gallia 0 1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:59:31.29 +00:15:44.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:59:31.29 +00:15:44.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 07.1009* 15 59 31.29 +00 15 44.4 13.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461320.6009,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261007.1009 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 07.1009 2461320.6009 12.63 16:05:46.43 -06:42:28.0
4.48277 32.10380 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 10.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" BD Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 pg 15.600 pg 2438894.00000 340.440000000000 M6e:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:05:46.43 -06:42:28.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:05:46.43 -06:42:28.0: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BD Oph,2461320.6009,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BD Oph 20261007.1009 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
First image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Last image: 2461320.60125970 07.10.2026 02:25:38.838 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7547
Objects passed selection criteria: 7542
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6988
Average stars matched: 6871.5 (98.3329 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 05:24:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
First image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Last image: 2461320.60125970 07.10.2026 02:25:38.838 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59693
Objects passed selection criteria: 59530
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 56269.2
Average stars matched: 54311.2 (96.5203 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 279168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Oct 6 12:01:37 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-233-gd5bdb823
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 7 05:26:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461320.60061250
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:02.300 -02:01:50.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:02.300 -02:01:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:05.205 -02:02:29.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:05.205 -02:02:29.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0591 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:02.300 -02:01:50.00
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:05.205 -02:02:29.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01640 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A80T5bH3Ma
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JvnOjrdbEJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yBTBE9crV0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i71x05lKDb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg
Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg
Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to +3.7094 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to 3.7094 deg
Loaded 5817 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4240 out of 4426 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4426 out of 7891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.A80T5bH3Ma (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=514, bad_region=0, passed=7946
Got 7946 stars (including 7422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1570 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1005 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JvnOjrdbEJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=7891
Got 7891 stars (including 7359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1572 n_q2=1182 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1004 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yBTBE9crV0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, bad_region=0, passed=6165
Got 6165 stars (including 5752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=11.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.210 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.210 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.601 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.759 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.523 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4926 robust_rms_before=0.924 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.406 worst_region_rms_after=0.523 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.953 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.421
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.358 arcsec matched=4926
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1633 n_q2=1147 n_q3=1230 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.i71x05lKDb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, bad_region=0, passed=6137
Got 6137 stars (including 5711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6137 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=11.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.568 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.605 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4922 robust_rms_before=0.924 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.429 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.425 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.425 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.365 arcsec matched=4922
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1635 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1232 n_q4=926 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.165
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.1565
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (4924 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4924 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (4926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20416_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20416_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:53.44 -06:32:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20420_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20420_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:49.16 +00:36:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:02.300 -02:01:50.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:02.300 -02:01:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:05.205 -02:02:29.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:05.205 -02:02:29.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0591 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:02.300 -02:01:50.00
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:05.205 -02:02:29.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01640 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2GnQ8JeYAK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xXslsWdxLb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.An7KSmGzRX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U32hhzksO0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg
Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.529200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.529200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg
Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 63091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.7231 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.7231 deg
Loaded 5852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4036 out of 4593 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4593 out of 63091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
1.9 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
1.9 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
1.9 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
15.4 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2GnQ8JeYAK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=3091, bad_region=9, passed=62812
Got 62812 stars (including 59585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1555 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1168 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xXslsWdxLb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=3188, bad_region=15, passed=63058
Got 63058 stars (including 59755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4936 stars left (next iteration limit 5429)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1556 n_q2=1196 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.An7KSmGzRX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2022, bad_region=40, passed=50302
Got 50302 stars (including 48147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=11.862 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.574 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.602 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.769 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.769 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.525 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.407 worst_region_rms_after=0.525 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.951 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.429
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.407 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec matched=4927
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1623 n_q2=1177 n_q3=1213 n_q4=914 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.U32hhzksO0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2107, bad_region=36, passed=50568
Got 50568 stars (including 48322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=11.694 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.606 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.768 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.768 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=0.924 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.440 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.941 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4927
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1629 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1210 n_q4=918 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-24-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_214652_TTUQ1b1x1_2365240_L2jFSzFX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:19.57 +02:40:36.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:21:30.08 -01:33:51.4: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:34:58.76 -03:30:30.4: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:46:26.42 +00:04:57.8: 14.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:35:43.81 -01:13:18.3: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:57.76 -03:18:55.7: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:06.86 +00:43:07.8: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:27:32.14 -00:18:31.8: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:45:17.72 +02:35:33.3: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:27:32.14 -00:18:31.8: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:34:58.76 -03:30:30.4: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:19.57 +02:40:36.5: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:21:30.08 -01:33:51.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:35:43.81 -01:13:18.3: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:32.14 -00:18:31.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6689 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:58.76 -03:30:30.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1262 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:57.76 -03:18:55.7: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:06.86 +00:43:07.8: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:19.57 +02:40:36.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1170 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:46:26.42 +00:04:57.8: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:45:17.72 +02:35:33.3: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:30.08 -01:33:51.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1478 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:43.81 -01:13:18.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5961 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:57.76 -03:18:55.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8256 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:06.86 +00:43:07.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5420 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:17.72 +02:35:33.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4359 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:26.42 +00:04:57.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2900 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:32:02.28 -01:20:12.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:32:02.28 -01:20:12.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:02.28 -01:20:12.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9266 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:16:49.44 +00:51:12.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:47:08.90 -01:58:59.7: 13.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:16:22.24 -01:37:33.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:13:38.16 -02:55:07.9: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:38.76 -06:09:03.7: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:59:31.29 +00:15:44.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:30:46.32 -03:39:51.0: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:49.25 -02:00:57.6: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:55.20 -07:22:02.4: 14.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:16:49.44 +00:51:12.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:49.44 +00:51:12.9: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1617 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:47:08.90 -01:58:59.7: 13.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:08.90 -01:58:59.7: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2629 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:16:22.24 -01:37:33.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:13:38.16 -02:55:07.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:22.24 -01:37:33.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7377 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:38.16 -02:55:07.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2348 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:45:31.46 -00:40:44.0: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:59:31.29 +00:15:44.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:49.25 -02:00:57.6: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:30:46.32 -03:39:51.0: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:55.20 -07:22:02.4: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:38.76 -06:09:03.7: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:49.25 -02:00:57.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9336 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:46.32 -03:39:51.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2579 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:55.20 -07:22:02.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2935 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:38.76 -06:09:03.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6244 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:45:31.46 -00:40:44.0: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:31.46 -00:40:44.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4648 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:13:01.72 +00:39:38.8: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:46.38 -07:15:11.1: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:14:44.34 -00:23:49.9: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:23:20.24 +00:26:21.0: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:46:14.77 +01:27:05.5: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:41.58 +01:36:49.8: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:48:21.40 +01:01:34.7: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:35.01 +02:15:43.9: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:13:01.72 +00:39:38.8: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:01.72 +00:39:38.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1503 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:46.38 -07:15:11.1: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:46.38 -07:15:11.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3378 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:23:20.24 +00:26:21.0: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:20.24 +00:26:21.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3730 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:14:44.34 -00:23:49.9: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:44.34 -00:23:49.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2956 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:07.85 +00:30:49.7: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:46:14.77 +01:27:05.5: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:48:21.40 +01:01:34.7: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:35.01 +02:15:43.9: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:41.58 +01:36:49.8: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:14.77 +01:27:05.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5966 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:21.40 +01:01:34.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5704 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:35.01 +02:15:43.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6519 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:41.58 +01:36:49.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4489 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:07.85 +00:30:49.7: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:07.85 +00:30:49.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5883 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:16.30 -03:43:56.7: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:37.01 -01:29:26.5: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:58.46 +02:05:07.7: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:51.49 +01:15:22.5: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:38:37.70 -03:11:45.8: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:00.40 -03:57:04.0: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:40:52.35 -03:45:08.6: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:35:40.22 -05:19:38.8: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:16.30 -03:43:56.7: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:16.30 -03:43:56.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5506 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:37.01 -01:29:26.5: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:58.46 +02:05:07.7: 15.30 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:37.01 -01:29:26.5: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6365 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:58.46 +02:05:07.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7354 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:51.49 +01:15:22.5: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:51.49 +01:15:22.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5817 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:21:47.31 -06:28:23.3: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:40:52.35 -03:45:08.6: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:00.40 -03:57:04.0: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:38:37.70 -03:11:45.8: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:35:40.22 -05:19:38.8: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:52.35 -03:45:08.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6273 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:00.40 -03:57:04.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6744 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:37.70 -03:11:45.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6250 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:40.22 -05:19:38.8: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6808 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:21:47.31 -06:28:23.3: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:47.31 -06:28:23.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4996 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:47:40.84 +01:16:22.4: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:50.77 -02:32:11.6: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:50.24 +02:16:46.7: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:38:58.06 -02:34:09.4: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:44:10.21 +02:10:50.7: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:37:33.42 +00:26:29.9: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:39.02 -00:43:11.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:36:41.48 -00:03:06.8: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:47:40.84 +01:16:22.4: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:40.84 +01:16:22.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5149 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:50.77 -02:32:11.6: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:50.24 +02:16:46.7: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:50.77 -02:32:11.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5826 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:50.24 +02:16:46.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6904 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:38:58.06 -02:34:09.4: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:58.06 -02:34:09.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6985 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:39.02 -00:43:11.1: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:44:10.21 +02:10:50.7: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:37:33.42 +00:26:29.9: 15.57 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:39.02 -00:43:11.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8102 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:10.21 +02:10:50.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8198 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:33.42 +00:26:29.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6920 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:36:41.48 -00:03:06.8: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:41.48 -00:03:06.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8098 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:15:23.27 +01:31:52.7: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:33.47 -04:53:23.5: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:38:11.49 -00:28:00.8: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:21:37.63 -01:04:22.1: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:26:04.49 +02:36:07.3: 15.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:14.43 -01:51:54.2: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:47.76 -03:48:03.7: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:04:03.98 -01:46:49.8: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:15:23.27 +01:31:52.7: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:23.27 +01:31:52.7: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4837 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:33.47 -04:53:23.5: 15.52 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:33.47 -04:53:23.5: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7285 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:21:37.63 -01:04:22.1: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:38:11.49 -00:28:00.8: 15.69 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:26:04.49 +02:36:07.3: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:37.63 -01:04:22.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7035 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:11.49 -00:28:00.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8838 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:04.49 +02:36:07.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7448 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:47.76 -03:48:03.7: 15.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:14.43 -01:51:54.2: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:04:03.98 -01:46:49.8: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:47.76 -03:48:03.7: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7297 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:03.98 -01:46:49.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7205 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:14.43 -01:51:54.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7972 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:05:46.43 -06:42:28.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:05:46.43 -06:42:28.0: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:05:46.43 -06:42:28.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6308 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78570_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78570_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78573_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78573_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78581_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78581_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78586_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78586_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78587_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78587_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78603_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78603_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78606_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78606_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78611_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78611_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78618_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78618_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78619_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78619_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:02.20 +00:21:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78620_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78620_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:00.30 -03:14:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78623_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78623_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78625_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78625_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78643_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78643_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:53.44 -06:32:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78650_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78650_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:49.18 +00:36:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78675_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78675_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:19.70 -01:24:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78683_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78683_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.53 -07:06:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78713_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78713_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78764_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78764_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78772_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78772_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.51 +02:13:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78776_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78776_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78856_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78856_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78896_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 78896_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78920_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78920_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78972_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78972_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78986_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78986_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78999_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 78999_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79003_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79003_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79034_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79034_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79042_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79042_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79070_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79070_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79095_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79095_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79104_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79104_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79120_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79120_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79126_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79126_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79168_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79168_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79179_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79179_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79192_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79192_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79203_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79203_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79208_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79208_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79211_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79211_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79213_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79213_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79221_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79221_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79232_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79232_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79236_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79236_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79237_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79237_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79246_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79246_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79250_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79250_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79255_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79255_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79264_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79264_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79276_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79276_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79281_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79281_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79284_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79284_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:45.18 -05:35:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79287_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79287_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79289_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79289_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79305_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79305_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79308_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79308_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79311_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79311_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79326_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79326_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79354_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79354_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79363_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 79363_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25841_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 25841_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_21-25-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks