NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-04-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    14.61    06:36:29.15 +78:59:09.9   2513 4649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.47    06:36:29.45 +78:59:18.7   2513 4649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 06.2997  2461319.7997  14.54  06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3
135.16390  25.88109 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3:  15.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 03 20.21968    2461119.71968    15.14    08:11:52.17 +78:48:26.6   4433 2400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 03 20.22019    2461119.72019    14.98    08:11:52.36 +78:48:27.1   4434 2399   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    13.73    08:11:55.11 +78:48:22.5   5193 3970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.75    08:11:56.03 +78:48:29.1   5192 3970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 06.2997  2461319.7997  13.74  08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8
135.13742  30.44711 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8:  15.25 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8:  15.25 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.25 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-04-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 73528 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 73528 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits_preview.png'
Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits

renamed 'Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits_preview.png'
Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.9569 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 576.8255 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1208.4013 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 491.8594 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1172.3065 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 491.3316 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.15803 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.1800003051758 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T02:11:03.2694841' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T07:11:03.2694841' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.2993433913 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T07:11:13.1707950' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.2994579859 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.995889461249 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4996084623674 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.7016666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 14.4413888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.95329481533591 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20674 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20674 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.1800003051758 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.1800003051758 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/d_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits :) Spent 0.853097 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/d_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-06T02:11:42.0897745' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-06T07:11:42.0897745' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61319.2997926967 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-06T07:11:51.9932017' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61319.2999073262 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.9958892321 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4996084742365 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.7347222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 14.4536111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.95141329487917 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20674 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20674 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/d_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits :) Spent 0.976644 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/d_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits


fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.79945913 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:40.365 +77:30:12.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 07:59:40.365 +77:30:12.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0202 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:41.869 +77:30:19.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 07:59:41.869 +77:30:19.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:59:40.365 +77:30:12.41 Second-epoch second image center 07:59:41.869 +77:30:19.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00247 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LtFCXozr2I Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qQO94GLjHw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wYfbrKsxXg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T8VbZR7PJY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6344 to +82.7618 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6344 to 82.7618 deg Loaded 13344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7041 out of 7354 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7354 out of 12435 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.873600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.873600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6344 to +82.7618 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6344 to 82.7618 deg Loaded 13344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7041 out of 7354 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7354 out of 12435 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1397 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6169 to +82.7615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1397 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6169 to 82.7615 deg Loaded 13373 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7038 out of 7341 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7341 out of 12488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.5 pix Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.LtFCXozr2I (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=3251, passed=12435 Got 12435 stars (including 8602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9839 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9839 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9839 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1533 n_q2=1062 n_q3=1351 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qQO94GLjHw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=749, bad_region=3238, passed=12488 Got 12488 stars (including 8683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1539 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1352 n_q4=970 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.wYfbrKsxXg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=1638, passed=6872 Got 6872 stars (including 4943 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6872 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5594 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5594 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5594 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5331) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=7.654 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.111 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.518 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.830 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.791 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.549 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4847 robust_rms_before=0.912 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.531 worst_region_rms_after=0.718 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.237 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.549 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.531 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.531 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec matched=4847 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits N_match=4847 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=2225 n_q2=367 n_q3=1318 n_q4=937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.T8VbZR7PJY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, bad_region=1626, passed=7530 Got 7530 stars (including 5570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7530 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6237 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6237 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6237 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=7.021 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.296 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.178 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.659 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.659 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.524 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.524 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.524 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.182 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.524 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.356 arcsec matched=4907 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1812 n_q2=582 n_q3=1657 n_q4=856 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.126 ref2=Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.126 new1=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.168 new2=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.127 reference average sigma_overall=0.2975 worst_q_ratio=1.126 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 367 -> 582, 36.942% > 20%; fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits vs fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 1318 -> 1657, 20.459% > 20%; fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits vs fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (4847 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:40.365 +77:30:12.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 07:59:40.365 +77:30:12.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0202 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:41.869 +77:30:19.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 07:59:41.869 +77:30:19.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:59:40.365 +77:30:12.41 Second-epoch second image center 07:59:41.869 +77:30:19.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00247 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oj83eoQOvX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zlzAPcs60g Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TUU4GMVyli Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fu9HLtlZ9j Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec +70.6173 to +82.7646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec 70.6173 to 82.7646 deg Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7411 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7411 out of 66718 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec +70.6173 to +82.7646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec 70.6173 to 82.7646 deg Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7411 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7411 out of 66718 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 65755 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9299 to 167.2067 deg, Dec +70.6169 to +82.7618 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9299 to 167.2067 deg, Dec 70.6169 to 82.7618 deg Loaded 13422 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6499 out of 7407 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7407 out of 65755 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 138 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.3 pix Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 15.7 mag. Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.oj83eoQOvX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4412, bad_region=14204, passed=66699 Got 66699 stars (including 49136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66699 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1549 n_q2=1058 n_q3=1315 n_q4=1002 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zlzAPcs60g (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4260, bad_region=14034, passed=65741 Got 65741 stars (including 48469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65741 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1554 n_q2=1049 n_q3=1314 n_q4=1007 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.TUU4GMVyli (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2060, bad_region=7014, passed=41186 Got 41186 stars (including 32604 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41186 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=7.628 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.682 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.760 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.869 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.795 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.728 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.547 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.911 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.540 worst_region_rms_after=0.728 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.238 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.547 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.540 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.540 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec matched=4908 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=2227 n_q2=348 n_q3=1363 n_q4=970 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fu9HLtlZ9j (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2369, bad_region=6790, passed=45308 Got 45308 stars (including 36607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45308 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40098 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40098 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40098 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=7.066 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.236 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.511 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.587 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.671 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.671 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.522 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.886 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.199 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.522 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.353 arcsec matched=4905 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1814 n_q2=581 n_q3=1638 n_q4=872 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:38:11.39 +81:34:37.9: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:05:11.77 +75:19:49.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:29:56.92 +74:19:18.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:32:37.94 +79:16:53.7: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:38:11.39 +81:34:37.9: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:32:37.94 +79:16:53.7: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:29:56.92 +74:19:18.8: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:05:11.77 +75:19:49.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:32:37.94 +79:16:53.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6639 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:11.39 +81:34:37.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2519 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:56.92 +74:19:18.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2832 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:11.77 +75:19:49.9: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8535 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:10:54.25 +79:22:22.0: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:27:45.54 +79:12:35.9: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:10:54.25 +79:22:22.0: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:01:01.98 +72:33:22.8: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:54.25 +79:22:22.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9364 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:27:45.54 +79:12:35.9: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:27:45.54 +79:12:35.9: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3057 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:01:01.98 +72:33:22.8: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:01.98 +72:33:22.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6467 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7382 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24704.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80104_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80104_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.51    07:17:14.97 +74:32:11.1   2994 1651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80105_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80105_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.97    07:38:29.83 +80:50:38.2   4397 5264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 07:38:29.93 +80:50:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80110_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80110_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.99    07:29:03.75 +75:26:37.0   3564 2092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 07:29:03.55 +75:26:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80116_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80116_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.21    07:16:01.37 +75:45:41.3   3125 2384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 07:16:01.47 +75:45:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80117_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80117_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    13.79    08:32:37.86 +79:16:53.7   5776 4281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.59    08:32:38.02 +79:16:53.7   5775 4280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80120_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80120_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.97    08:49:26.90 +80:37:17.0   6120 5139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80124_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80124_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    13.78    07:05:11.54 +75:19:48.4   2661 2240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.15    07:05:11.99 +75:19:51.4   2661 2239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80126_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80126_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    13.43    07:29:56.88 +74:19:18.9   3473 1418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.16    07:29:56.96 +74:19:18.7   3472 1417   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80127_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80127_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    13.16    07:38:11.26 +81:34:39.7   4457 5707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.54    07:38:11.52 +81:34:36.1   4456 5706   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80557_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80557_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    10.35    09:07:01.73 +75:01:50.6   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80608_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80608_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    10.52    07:41:04.66 +76:32:49.3   4105 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80695_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80695_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    10.71    07:31:51.99 +77:23:43.1   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80958_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 80958_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    11.09    07:17:59.48 +76:42:23.7   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81520_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 81520_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    11.64    08:51:22.25 +75:07:46.8   6706 1865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 08:51:22.27 +75:07:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81951_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 81951_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.18    09:27:38.97 +80:34:31.8   7047 5338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 09:27:38.92 +80:34:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82097_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82097_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    11.95    06:31:07.83 +80:34:35.8   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82279_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82279_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.01    09:24:22.33 +80:40:53.0   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82374_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82374_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.07    09:00:06.63 +74:29:31.6   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82765_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82765_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.31    07:40:33.14 +75:44:53.1   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82841_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82841_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.46    08:55:42.58 +73:54:59.1   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82983_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82983_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.39    08:53:21.32 +73:38:00.2   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82986_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 82986_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.71    08:09:41.86 +81:42:14.3   5153 5726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 08:09:41.76 +81:42:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83065_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83065_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.51    07:01:21.63 +72:55:16.2   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83126_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83126_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.40    07:24:20.69 +81:24:44.1   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83130_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83130_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.41    07:39:16.83 +81:23:43.8   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83318_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83318_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.62    06:42:44.86 +77:02:58.4   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83341_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83341_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.79    07:47:18.10 +74:40:00.7   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83490_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83490_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.67    07:03:32.37 +81:16:15.4   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83539_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83539_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.88    06:58:29.94 +74:48:37.9   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83606_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83606_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.79    07:25:46.88 +73:03:40.1   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83634_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83634_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.68    06:43:51.89 +77:45:25.7   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83662_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83662_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.65    07:33:42.34 +76:45:17.7   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83666_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83666_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.77    07:28:51.27 +73:28:00.3   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83673_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83673_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.72    08:43:57.20 +73:29:53.4   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83685_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83685_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.61    06:22:16.65 +79:21:25.1   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83723_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83723_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.71    09:18:17.17 +77:07:21.8   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83843_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83843_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.71    08:47:53.60 +78:22:40.0   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83857_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 83857_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.76    08:52:40.60 +77:53:10.0   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84076_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84076_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.81    09:08:16.53 +79:28:32.0   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84149_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84149_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.71    08:47:53.78 +77:05:32.1   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84164_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84164_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.80    08:18:35.72 +80:30:43.1   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84270_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84270_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.77    09:30:40.68 +79:22:30.7   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84291_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84291_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.83    08:22:18.00 +79:55:50.5   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84371_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84371_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.85    08:42:11.85 +77:08:02.7   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84481_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84481_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.91    07:24:21.58 +80:56:17.5   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84583_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84583_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.93    09:11:06.82 +79:37:12.5   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84662_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84662_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.90    07:51:59.47 +80:09:05.2   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84675_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84675_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.31    06:59:40.75 +74:50:57.4   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84726_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84726_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.92    08:44:29.20 +79:06:04.0   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84791_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84791_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.20    08:02:00.41 +76:58:11.8   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84808_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 84808_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.98    08:46:29.93 +75:29:23.9   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85175_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85175_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.48    07:00:26.32 +77:27:09.1   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85177_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85177_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.22    09:12:55.70 +75:29:36.2   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85207_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85207_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.53    07:03:48.83 +75:53:20.1   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85224_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85224_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.98    06:27:01.64 +78:37:53.5   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85251_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85251_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.44    06:55:59.55 +74:36:05.4   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85292_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85292_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.19    08:24:44.06 +74:31:01.8   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85404_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85404_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.13    09:10:54.41 +76:15:22.1   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85535_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85535_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.47    07:03:30.55 +76:28:43.6   2803 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85537_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85537_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.25    08:00:43.81 +80:25:15.5   4916 4954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85613_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85613_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.23    06:58:45.53 +79:06:32.6   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85809_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 85809_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.30    07:23:48.11 +74:11:17.9   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86071_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86071_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.69    07:35:00.39 +73:25:16.6   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86108_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86108_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.41    07:20:04.59 +74:04:25.6   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86170_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86170_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.37    08:39:09.44 +80:23:06.0   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86207_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86207_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.25    06:26:47.76 +79:07:28.4   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86220_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86220_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.59    06:56:31.35 +76:15:48.3   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86265_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86265_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.21    08:49:01.77 +78:30:40.1   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86434_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86434_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.54    07:05:06.46 +73:21:43.7   2314 1092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86682_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86682_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.31    08:41:44.47 +81:30:47.4   5866 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86763_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86763_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.61    07:18:59.48 +73:04:27.0   2858 0768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 07:18:59.22 +73:04:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86877_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86877_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.63    07:41:39.14 +80:30:15.0   4445 5049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86886_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86886_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.62    07:02:48.06 +73:19:11.5   2210 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86973_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86973_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.10    06:58:45.16 +74:05:35.3   2189 1597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86975_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86975_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.53    07:38:32.18 +75:17:28.8   3905 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86990_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 86990_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.60    08:46:32.14 +79:00:32.4   6187 4161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87007_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87007_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.64    07:41:53.00 +73:21:25.0   3876 0759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87243_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87243_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.81    07:00:28.30 +77:33:38.1   2900 3579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87303_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87303_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.96    07:25:52.31 +73:13:58.9   3175 0799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87337_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87337_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.50    09:01:24.11 +77:57:50.7   6739 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87344_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87344_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.37    06:35:56.31 +80:21:19.1   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87391_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87391_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.63    09:27:48.22 +79:39:42.0   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87492_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87492_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.04    07:03:44.36 +77:06:27.8   2922 3285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87509_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87509_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.59    07:20:18.60 +80:35:07.4   3932 5193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87559_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87559_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.69    09:17:55.26 +77:09:33.7   7380 3273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87739_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87739_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.56    08:51:02.78 +75:25:00.0   6666 2035   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 08:51:02.75 +75:24:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87780_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87780_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.66    07:55:56.89 +78:51:52.0   4727 4022   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87896_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87896_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.61    07:58:24.43 +75:36:23.4   4675 2052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87985_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87985_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.66    07:18:19.15 +75:27:59.1   3167 2190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87988_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87988_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.69    07:21:55.30 +76:16:14.2   3406 2635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87996_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 87996_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.87    08:10:42.12 +80:19:29.6   5166 4888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88139_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88139_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.87    09:11:18.64 +75:11:05.6   7460 2054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 09:11:18.70 +75:11:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88150_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88150_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.88    07:41:33.78 +80:20:50.4   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88182_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88182_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.00    08:03:10.49 +80:10:22.9   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88207_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88207_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.79    08:15:59.51 +79:58:39.9   5303 4678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88300_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88300_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.80    09:03:28.12 +73:08:37.1   7429 0770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88404_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88404_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.89    08:28:06.31 +73:55:38.5   5855 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88479_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88479_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.61    07:36:33.50 +81:08:25.0   4379 5449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88552_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88552_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.68    07:57:47.51 +78:23:40.9   4762 3735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88568_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88568_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.83    07:54:30.22 +77:02:51.8   4598 2931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88569_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88569_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.05    07:40:08.61 +76:16:08.1   4049 2518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88580_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88580_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.75    07:18:20.08 +75:18:12.6   3145 2094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits **** FOUND 07:18:20.34 +75:18:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88675_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88675_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.66    08:58:20.76 +76:13:39.2   6846 2566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88721_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88721_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.77    07:54:57.38 +74:13:28.3   4481 1226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88735_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88735_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.76    08:30:03.74 +74:00:56.7   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88801_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88801_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.50    07:01:44.55 +73:47:59.6   2254 1389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88806_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88806_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.92    08:27:49.18 +78:08:32.1   5683 3582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88875_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88875_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.86    07:34:37.51 +81:26:53.3   4365 5641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88880_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88880_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.76    07:25:10.63 +81:11:50.3   4125 5531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88883_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 88883_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.72    09:24:23.28 +79:27:52.2   7171 4669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89175_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89175_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.65    08:37:57.89 +81:00:42.5   5814 5337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89233_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89233_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.12    07:57:19.07 +74:59:22.5   4609 1682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89235_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89235_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.15    06:45:26.92 +77:12:32.2   2359 3545   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89334_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89334_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.94    07:46:29.91 +78:27:37.2   4425 3805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89385_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89385_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.16    09:17:21.47 +76:49:44.6   7416 3075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89398_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89398_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.91    07:17:19.11 +80:45:40.4   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89475_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89475_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.84    07:35:30.01 +81:38:59.7   4404 5759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89487_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89487_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.80    08:04:22.17 +77:39:46.3   4945 3283   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89942_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89942_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.07    06:56:58.35 +80:58:52.9   3452 5580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89971_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 89971_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    14.14    08:10:54.13 +79:22:22.1   5167 4313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    13.83    08:10:54.37 +79:22:21.8   5166 4312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90249_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 90249_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.10    07:11:18.03 +80:38:01.1   3723 5276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90327_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 90327_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.45    08:55:21.96 +74:11:14.4   6963 1328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90414_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 90414_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.42    07:49:13.08 +78:49:21.5   4529 4014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90594_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 90594_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.03    08:44:25.03 +77:58:50.4   6209 3536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90760_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 90760_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.21    08:49:25.84 +78:29:58.5   6317 3869   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91004_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91004_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.24    09:30:10.28 +80:35:58.9   7102 5372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91123_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91123_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.37    07:24:51.04 +75:26:51.0   3407 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91178_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91178_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    14.32    08:27:45.54 +79:12:36.0   5642 4227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.30    08:27:45.54 +79:12:35.8   5641 4226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91362_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91362_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 06.29946    2461319.79946    14.68    07:01:02.19 +72:33:22.3   1995 0675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.61    07:01:01.77 +72:33:23.3   1994 0674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91446_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91446_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.42    09:22:28.77 +77:58:21.4   7384 3788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91692_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91692_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.52    07:03:33.07 +72:40:40.2   2126 0711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91797_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91797_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.90    07:46:46.56 +75:10:50.3   4211 1834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91808_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91808_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.63    07:41:04.46 +76:44:32.9   4121 2797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91890_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 Preparing report for the candidate 91890_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91918_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91918_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.88    06:57:17.39 +73:49:17.9   2078 1459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91977_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 91977_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    14.67    09:08:47.00 +78:15:27.1   6925 3841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24704_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 Preparing report for the candidate 24704_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35577_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 The candidate 35577_fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 06.29991    2461319.79991    12.28    09:03:07.20 +76:48:15.2   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_022350_TTUQ2b1x1_1646274_SV6MqdlY/fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 24s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 Source monitoring: NOT measuring the monitored positions on the field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 - the transient search raised a processing error: ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 367 -> 582, 36.942% > 20%; fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0350.fits vs fd_Cam-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-06_02-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing Source monitoring: the monitored positions on the field Cam-04-Q2b1x1 are recorded as run_error (rejected by this run, never measured later) ########### Completed Cam-04-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 ################################################################################### 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 -- not a known variable star 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 -- not a known variable star Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 06:36:29.30 +78:59:14.3 08:11:55.57 +78:48:25.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.79945913 -observatory V36 14:15:27.67 -16:03:54.6 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:11:59.70 -21:10:41.8 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:27:56.78 +20:14:20.2 Mars (1.1mag) 09:30:59.94 +15:20:47.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:43:54.76 +01:46:13.2 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:34.02 +20:59:11.6 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:50.93 -00:22:22.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:15.55 -23:43:26.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:27:08.00 +15:35:40.4 Moon (-9.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 6 03:36 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.79945913: 09:30:54.98 +15:21:15.6 Io (6.1mag) 09:30:50.47 +15:21:40.0 Europa (6.2mag) 09:31:05.64 +15:20:16.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:30:55.45 +15:21:13.1 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:30:22.18 +15:42:19.9 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:31:04.08 +15:20:27.2 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:29:21.28 +15:41:10.9 Elara (17.5mag) 09:33:44.30 +14:43:31.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:29:58.14 +15:46:33.7 Carme (18.9mag) 00:44:03.51 +01:46:16.0 Titan (8.2mag) 00:43:59.17 +01:45:58.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:43:16.87 +01:43:42.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:43:51.38 +01:46:33.6 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:42:17.05 +01:34:02.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 6 03:37 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461319.79945913: 02:13:50.71 +21:03:37.9 JWST 17:28:52.17 +35:40:01.4 Chandra 06:33:22.04 +13:38:01.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 6 03:36 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461319.79945913 -observatory V36 03:47:14.91 +20:09:53.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:20:21.14 -33:36:56.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:37:35.34 -72:04:07.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:20.44 +34:30:10.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:02:50.53 +48:17:45.4 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:28:02.13 +25:30:52.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:46.76 -18:09:37.5 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:20.47 +35:09:07.6 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:59.31 +41:45:45.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:41.88 -13:31:06.2 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:07:42.33 +16:24:52.5 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:45:54.87 -02:17:37.8 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:21:49.78 +67:06:29.3 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:41:45.91 +43:58:12.2 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:40:45.90 +13:45:52.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:39:07.41 +19:38:04.8 17.8mag 2P/Encke 22:52:47.48 -32:44:56.6 14.3mag 10P/Tempel 02:03:36.65 +39:22:41.6 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:07:48.60 -07:44:55.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:25:45.73 -08:41:40.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 07:28:44.06 +16:33:04.4 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:04:50.53 +14:34:02.7 17.5mag 88P/Howell 07:20:21.18 +38:44:46.7 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:50:29.39 +15:56:25.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:30:29.48 +14:25:31.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:54:02.99 -30:44:20.4 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:47:00.49 +19:31:45.3 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:35:55.08 +00:28:15.3 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:28:03.12 -01:11:50.8 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:07:56.38 +35:43:13.5 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:05:56.13 +02:53:56.3 13.8mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:35.82 +05:14:52.2 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:55:04.35 +44:04:37.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:19:21.51 +25:46:05.3 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 15:47:28.12 -03:22:18.1 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:50:59.68 +31:56:57.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 6 03:36 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 6 03:36 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 6 03:36 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:37:30.470 -04:19:22.67 AT 2026acgg 2026-04-18.80 18.9 22:37:37.648 -05:44:38.93 AT 2026acgf 2026-04-18.79 18.97 21:35:35.054 -52:16:15.19 AT 2026acge 2026-09-17.46 19.94 03:07:14.346 -13:52:08.25 AT 2026acgd 2026-09-14.63 20.2 20:50:27.138 -28:50:01.17 AT 2026acgc 2026-09-11.46 20.22 01:07:11.321 -22:35:49.57 AT 2026acgb 2026-09-08.59 20.15 21:57:49.232 -47:01:59.67 AT 2026acga 2026-09-13.47 20.01 23:45:25.816 -53:33:25.78 AT 2026acfz 2026-09-13.56 20.29 03:26:48.462 -20:09:57.64 AT 2026acfy 2026-09-06.65 20.41 05:50:23.732 +31:54:28.07 AT 2026acfx 2026-09-17.19 19.29 20:23:48.311 -47:30:13.60 AT 2026acfw 2026-09-14.44 20.17 21:02:26.779 -25:04:19.23 AT 2026acfv 2026-09-08.48 20.35 22:24:29.868 -48:04:31.58 AT 2026acfu 2026-09-14.50 20.23 21:59:32.457 -58:04:38.65 AT 2026acft 2026-09-17.50 19.8 00:48:44.150 -12:05:15.03 AT 2026acfs 2026-09-16.58 20.09 20:34:06.261 -37:39:54.95 AT 2026acfr 2026-09-17.56 20.28 23:24:16.652 -29:09:40.81 AT 2026acfq 2026-09-17.61 20.45 02:10:14.980 -30:57:25.53 AT 2026acfp 2026-09-17.71 19.85 22:19:09.857 -13:04:12.52 AT 2026acfo 2026-09-10.44 19.95 20:43:01.070 -30:31:29.70 AT 2026acfn 2026-09-17.10 18.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 6 03:36 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C