This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2132 2461319.7132 12.08 23:27:04.69 -14:23:48.0
61.62981 -66.58793 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -0 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:04.69 -14:23:48.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:04.69 -14:23:48.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7132,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2132 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2132 2461319.7132 12.30 23:09:18.69 -12:06:58.8
60.01455 -61.75095 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -1 0 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:09:18.69 -12:06:58.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:09:18.69 -12:06:58.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7132,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2132 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2132 2461319.7132 13.64 22:53:34.19 -13:25:00.5
53.51097 -59.26208 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -0 0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:53:34.19 -13:25:00.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:53:34.19 -13:25:00.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7132,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2132 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2132 2461319.7132 13.93 23:22:01.06 -06:13:24.1
73.41605 -60.19024 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -0 0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:22:01.06 -06:13:24.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:22:01.06 -06:13:24.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7132,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2132 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 06.2132 2461319.7132 14.58 23:18:20.24 -07:11:14.4
70.74419 -60.24838 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina 0 0 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:18:20.24 -07:11:14.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:18:20.24 -07:11:14.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461319.7132,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261006.2132 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461319.71353817 06.10.2026 05:07:19.698 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6270
Objects passed selection criteria: 6268
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6077
Average stars matched: 5805.75 (95.5364 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233012 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 03:15:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461319.71353817 06.10.2026 05:07:19.698 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 102
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 56 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35535
Objects passed selection criteria: 35435
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34734
Average stars matched: 33102.2 (95.3022 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 6 03:18:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461319.71290329
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.023 -09:59:03.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.023 -09:59:03.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0444 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.740 -09:59:40.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.740 -09:59:40.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:37.023 -09:59:03.22
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:34.740 -09:59:40.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01397 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XRnbNGOXuN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Koy2MMAf8J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qLyUlNC8Pv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Cdohy03tw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.688000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.688000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Loaded 5057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3864 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3864 out of 5775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XRnbNGOXuN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=0, passed=5808
Got 5808 stars (including 5379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Koy2MMAf8J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, bad_region=0, passed=5775
Got 5775 stars (including 5335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1213 n_q3=1229 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qLyUlNC8Pv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, bad_region=0, passed=6499
Got 6499 stars (including 5987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6499 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5304)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=13.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.257 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.257 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.687 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.318 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.285 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4821 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.344 worst_region_rms_after=0.318 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.002 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.285
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.344 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=4821
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1149 n_q2=1232 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9Cdohy03tw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, bad_region=0, passed=6492
Got 6492 stars (including 5974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=13.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.253 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.253 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.323 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4821 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.354 worst_region_rms_after=0.323 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.008 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4821
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1155 n_q2=1232 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.158
reference average sigma_overall=0.3305 worst_q_ratio=1.1675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866_astrometric_residuals.png (4812 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (4821 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4821 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-06-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-06_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000808_TTUQ1b1x1_1455940_lZ8zfF2D/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:37.72 -07:49:30.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:11:05.08 -10:21:57.3: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:12.97 -06:09:37.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:41:53.88 -12:24:22.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:06:43.65 -14:58:34.4: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:11.53 -09:30:17.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:37.72 -07:49:30.8: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:12.97 -06:09:37.6: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:11:05.08 -10:21:57.3: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:11.53 -09:30:17.6: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:41:53.88 -12:24:22.7: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:06:43.65 -14:58:34.4: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:12.97 -06:09:37.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9665 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:05.08 -10:21:57.3: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0425 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:11.53 -09:30:17.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0337 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:37.72 -07:49:30.8: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0324 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:43.65 -14:58:34.4: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2685 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:53.88 -12:24:22.7: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6357 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20251_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20258_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:58.18 -07:18:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20262_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20262_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20270_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20272_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20273_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20274_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20274_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52414_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52415_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52417_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52417_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52420_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52422_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52423_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52423_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52424_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52425_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52429_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52431_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52435_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52436_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52436_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52439_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52440_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52467_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 52467_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 52478_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52504_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52539_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 52605_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 52689_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52745_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52749_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52777_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52783_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52797_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52804_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52812_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52813_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52814_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52816_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52821_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52822_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52825_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52830_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52836_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52839_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52841_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52843_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52849_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52850_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52852_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52854_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52856_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52856_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52858_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52859_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52863_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52864_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52866_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52868_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52869_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52870_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52877_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52882_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52883_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52885_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52890_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52898_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52901_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52902_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52906_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52908_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52909_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52910_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52920_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52920_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52925_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52931_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52934_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52935_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52937_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 52942_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52946_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52949_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52951_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52955_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52955_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52957_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52960_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52963_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52965_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52966_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52971_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52972_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 52987_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 53003_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 53005_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 53015_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 53021_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10002_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 10002_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10877_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 10877_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:23:34.05 -08:00:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:58.20 -07:18:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18067_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 18067_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-06_00-07-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
