This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 11.29 23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3
71.74554 -55.66518 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 0 0 11.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 12.35 23:32:42.66 -04:43:13.1
79.50827 -60.77095 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:42.66 -04:43:13.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:42.66 -04:43:13.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 13.29 23:21:11.48 -02:06:34.7
78.27514 -56.94038 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:11.48 -02:06:34.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:11.48 -02:06:34.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 13.33 23:16:58.94 -03:43:40.8
74.86364 -57.49963 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina 1 -0 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:16:58.94 -03:43:40.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:16:58.94 -03:43:40.8: 15.58 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.30
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 13.48 23:20:54.04 -01:55:21.7
78.38527 -56.74908 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:54.04 -01:55:21.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:54.04 -01:55:21.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 13.80 23:22:35.69 -06:07:56.1
73.75249 -60.22079 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula 0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:22:35.69 -06:07:56.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:22:35.69 -06:07:56.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 14.17 23:15:36.50 -01:11:48.7
77.36541 -55.35201 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -0 -1 1 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:36.50 -01:11:48.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:36.50 -01:11:48.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,14.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 14.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2917 2461318.7917 14.40 23:08:05.76 -00:24:00.1
75.77785 -53.53278 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia -0 0 0 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:08:05.76 -00:24:00.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:08:05.76 -00:24:00.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7917,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2917 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461318.79198611 05.10.2026 07:00:17.600 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5009
Objects passed selection criteria: 5009
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4865.25
Average stars matched: 4698.25 (96.5675 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 02:08:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461318.79198611 05.10.2026 07:00:17.600 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29220
Objects passed selection criteria: 29133
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28564.2
Average stars matched: 27108.5 (94.9036 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 02:11:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.79137395
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.664 -01:59:53.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.664 -01:59:53.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.055 -01:59:26.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.055 -01:59:26.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.664 -01:59:53.60
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:37.055 -01:59:26.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01240 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YtnB1fkbAS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P3gX4ISjrH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CCB6fJTK9I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QhilpUKcC0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.YtnB1fkbAS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1637, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 4478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4338 stars left (next iteration limit 4770)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4338 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P3gX4ISjrH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=1607, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4230 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4230 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CCB6fJTK9I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=377, bad_region=1733, passed=6852
Got 6852 stars (including 4809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4661 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4661 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4660 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4660 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4660 stars left (next iteration limit 5127)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4660 robust_rms=7.701 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.814 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4660 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.012 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4660 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.426 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4660 robust_rms_before=1.052 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.375 worst_region_rms_after=0.426 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.194 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.426
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.272 arcsec matched=4660
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4660 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1538 n_q2=845 n_q3=1407 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.028
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QhilpUKcC0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, bad_region=1758, passed=6812
Got 6812 stars (including 4733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4599 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4599 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4594 stars left (next iteration limit 5052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=7.708 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.049 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.049 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.017 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.017 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4594 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.381 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.139 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec matched=4594
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=4594 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1515 n_q2=839 n_q3=1395 n_q4=845 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.040
ref2=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.282 worst_q_ratio=1.028
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.048
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.051
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4338 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4230 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (4660 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (4594 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.67 -01:13:12.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:35.78 -02:04:12.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:28.73 -02:29:13.2: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:58.96 +00:24:25.0: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.53 -01:29:21.5: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.67 -01:13:12.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.67 -01:13:12.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1707 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:35.78 -02:04:12.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:58.96 +00:24:25.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:35.78 -02:04:12.8: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1893 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:58.96 +00:24:25.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9665 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:28.73 -02:29:13.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.53 -01:29:21.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.53 -01:29:21.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0870 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:28.73 -02:29:13.2: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1652 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 20222_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 20224_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20225_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 20225_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 20226_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20227_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 20227_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.664 -01:59:53.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.664 -01:59:53.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.055 -01:59:26.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.055 -01:59:26.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.664 -01:59:53.60
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:37.055 -01:59:26.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01240 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ewWa8xmwlc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4sxOn9xf5z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Du97dTt205
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o4KacdXyyV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.537600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.537600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ewWa8xmwlc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1717, bad_region=7702, passed=35853
Got 35853 stars (including 26731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4sxOn9xf5z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1465, bad_region=7825, passed=36110
Got 36110 stars (including 27137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Du97dTt205 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1514, bad_region=7049, passed=36187
Got 36187 stars (including 28006 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=7.535 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.261 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.261 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.432 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4834 robust_rms_before=1.073 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.395 worst_region_rms_after=0.432 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.246 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.432
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.268 arcsec matched=4834
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1585 n_q2=897 n_q3=1460 n_q4=892 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.o4KacdXyyV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1590, bad_region=7165, passed=36798
Got 36798 stars (including 28432 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5318)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=7.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.825 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.093 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.093 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.379 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4835 robust_rms_before=1.051 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.392 worst_region_rms_after=0.379 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.128 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.379
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.392 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.315 arcsec matched=4835
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1587 n_q2=891 n_q3=1465 n_q4=892 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-59-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_020210_TTUQ2b1x1_2457327_VNUjlrbH/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:42.66 -04:43:13.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:57:22.35 -06:11:45.0: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:48.03 -03:15:45.1: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:22:35.69 -06:07:56.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:02.64 +01:48:14.3: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:54.04 -01:55:21.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:26.34 +00:13:25.9: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:11.48 -02:06:34.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:16:58.94 -03:43:40.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:29.33 -00:58:11.4: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:57:22.35 -06:11:45.0: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:42.66 -04:43:13.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:48.03 -03:15:45.1: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:22:35.69 -06:07:56.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:22.35 -06:11:45.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3697 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:11.48 -02:06:34.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:48.03 -03:15:45.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1169 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:16:58.94 -03:43:40.8: 15.58 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:02.64 +01:48:14.3: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.30
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:54.04 -01:55:21.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:16:58.94 -03:43:40.8: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.30 new_mean_mag=13.3317 delta=2.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.64 +01:48:14.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5072 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:26.34 +00:13:25.9: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:26.34 +00:13:25.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7384 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:29.33 -00:58:11.4: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.33 -00:58:11.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1341 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:59.03 +00:39:24.7: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.13 -03:02:19.7: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:39.25 -02:16:31.6: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:36.50 -01:11:48.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.13 -03:02:19.7: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.13 -03:02:19.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4105 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:59.03 +00:39:24.7: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:45.95 -06:08:44.3: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:59.03 +00:39:24.7: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4088 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:39.25 -02:16:31.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:39.25 -02:16:31.6: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1895 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:36.50 -01:11:48.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:45.95 -06:08:44.3: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:45.95 -06:08:44.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5279 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:21.69 -01:06:21.6: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:02:11.33 -05:57:32.6: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:08:05.76 -00:24:00.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:23.08 -03:05:03.9: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:02:11.33 -05:57:32.6: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:11.33 -05:57:32.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4769 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:21.69 -01:06:21.6: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:08:05.76 -00:24:00.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:21.69 -01:06:21.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4841 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:23.08 -03:05:03.9: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:23.08 -03:05:03.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5293 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:28.26 +02:07:33.8: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.64 -03:42:37.2: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:44.86 +01:00:50.7: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:28.26 +02:07:33.8: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:28.26 +02:07:33.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7218 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.64 -03:42:37.2: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:44.86 +01:00:50.7: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.64 -03:42:37.2: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6757 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:44.86 +01:00:50.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6668 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.63 -00:31:11.2: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:05.59 -02:19:29.4: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:16.16 -05:56:47.9: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.63 -00:31:11.2: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.63 -00:31:11.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6435 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:05.59 -02:19:29.4: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:05.59 -02:19:29.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6964 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:16.16 -05:56:47.9: 15.02 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:16.16 -05:56:47.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6904 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.09 -05:55:28.8: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.09 -05:55:28.8: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.09 -05:55:28.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7284 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:32.53 -01:44:27.6: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:52.02 -05:33:52.4: 15.33 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:12.04 -03:17:10.2: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:45.23 +00:05:08.0: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:05.97 -04:54:09.3: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:32.53 -01:44:27.6: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.53 -01:44:27.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6817 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:52.96 -05:45:47.9: 15.08 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:52.02 -05:33:52.4: 15.27 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.02 -05:33:52.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7210 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:45.23 +00:05:08.0: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:05.97 -04:54:09.3: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:45.23 +00:05:08.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7445 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:05.97 -04:54:09.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6655 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:12.04 -03:17:10.2: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:04.95 -04:58:08.3: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:12.04 -03:17:10.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7471 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:52.96 -05:45:47.9: 15.29 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:52.96 -05:45:47.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8271 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:04.95 -04:58:08.3: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:04.95 -04:58:08.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7699 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:05.44 -03:08:50.3: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:45.44 +01:50:29.4: 15.53 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:02:50.57 -03:48:19.1: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:05.44 -03:08:50.3: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:14.49 -03:26:46.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:05.44 -03:08:50.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6709 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:15.00 +02:09:21.5: 15.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:20:35.73 -03:11:42.6: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:21.67 -05:27:13.1: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:45.44 +01:50:29.4: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:41.24 +00:30:42.9: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:45.44 +01:50:29.4: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8073 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:02:50.57 -03:48:19.1: 15.39 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:50.57 -03:48:19.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7099 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:14.49 -03:26:46.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:03.13 +00:17:35.5: 15.25 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:20:35.73 -03:11:42.6: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:15.00 +02:09:21.5: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:35.73 -03:11:42.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8592 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:22.52 -03:44:18.5: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:15.00 +02:09:21.5: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8451 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:21.67 -05:27:13.1: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:41.24 +00:30:42.9: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:21.67 -05:27:13.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7712 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:41.24 +00:30:42.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8300 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:03.13 +00:17:35.5: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:03.13 +00:17:35.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8287 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:22.52 -03:44:18.5: 15.49 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:22.52 -03:44:18.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6554 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:20.86 -04:22:31.2: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:33.02 -06:01:43.2: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:27.16 -04:57:57.5: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:20.86 -04:22:31.2: 15.25 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:20.86 -04:22:31.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8062 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:33.02 -06:01:43.2: 14.92 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:33.02 -06:01:43.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8415 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:27.16 -04:57:57.5: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:27.16 -04:57:57.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7759 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52969.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52549.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52639.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52660.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52518_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52518_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52520_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52521_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52532_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:56.31 -03:32:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52549_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52639_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52660_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52705_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52756_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52768_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52777_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52802_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52825_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52828_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52843_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 52848_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52857_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52865_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52868_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52874_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52876_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52889_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52890_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52907_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52909_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52914_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52914_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52917_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52922_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52929_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52935_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52936_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52939_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52949_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52954_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52956_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52961_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52963_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52967_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52967_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52969_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:26:14.49 -03:26:46.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.378 2634467213482463232 351.56025834827 -03.44669793885 15.1431 14.6392 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.378#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52974_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52975_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52976_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52976_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52985_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52986_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52992_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52993_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291
The candidate 52999_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_02-00-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0291 did not pass the final checks
