This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2711 2461318.7711 12.33 23:09:54.66 -12:03:33.3
60.29441 -61.83604 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -0 0 0 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:09:54.66 -12:03:33.3: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:09:54.66 -12:03:33.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7711,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2711 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2711 2461318.7711 13.55 22:54:03.82 -13:21:40.4
53.72581 -59.33612 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -1 -0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:54:03.82 -13:21:40.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:54:03.82 -13:21:40.4: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7711,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2711 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2711 2461318.7711 13.57 23:22:36.41 -06:07:48.7
73.75971 -60.22130 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -1 -0 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:22:36.41 -06:07:48.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:22:36.41 -06:07:48.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7711,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2711 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2711 2461318.7711 14.54 23:18:50.75 -07:09:12.0
70.97251 -60.31360 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina 0 0 0 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:18:50.75 -07:09:12.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:18:50.75 -07:09:12.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7711,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2711 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461318.77149653 05.10.2026 06:30:47.300 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4804
Objects passed selection criteria: 4803
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4540
Average stars matched: 4329.25 (95.3579 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 03:52:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461318.77149653 05.10.2026 06:30:47.300 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27892
Objects passed selection criteria: 27808
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26761.5
Average stars matched: 25405.2 (94.9321 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 03:52:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.77077064
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.384 -09:59:59.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.384 -09:59:59.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:38.723 -09:59:24.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:38.723 -09:59:24.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:35.384 -09:59:59.51
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:38.723 -09:59:24.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01685 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QE2eeTOfge
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vfebViYu43
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LQ28fHH0YE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TQLYMxjYwE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.688000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.688000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Loaded 5057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3864 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3864 out of 5775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.QE2eeTOfge (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=1406, passed=5808
Got 5808 stars (including 4078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3966 stars left (next iteration limit 4362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=3966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1178 n_q2=695 n_q3=1342 n_q4=751 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vfebViYu43 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, bad_region=1389, passed=5775
Got 5775 stars (including 4053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3936 stars left (next iteration limit 4330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=3936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1176 n_q2=688 n_q3=1322 n_q4=750 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.397
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LQ28fHH0YE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=455, bad_region=1581, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 4425 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4313 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4313 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4309 stars left (next iteration limit 4739)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4309 robust_rms=7.808 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.047 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.047 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4309 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.750 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.750 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4309 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4309 robust_rms_before=1.045 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.419 worst_region_rms_after=0.416 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.132 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.356 arcsec matched=4309
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4309 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1340 n_q2=838 n_q3=1322 n_q4=809 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TQLYMxjYwE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=1588, passed=6352
Got 6352 stars (including 4387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4274 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4270 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4270 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4275 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4271 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4271 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4271 stars left (next iteration limit 4697)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4271 robust_rms=7.627 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.909 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.909 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4271 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.716 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4271 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4271 robust_rms_before=1.055 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.391 worst_region_rms_after=0.369 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.092 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.369
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec matched=4271
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=4271 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1322 n_q2=829 n_q3=1323 n_q4=797 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.319
ref2=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.397
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.043
reference average sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.358
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865_astrometric_residuals.png (3966 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866_astrometric_residuals.png (3936 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (4309 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (4271 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:20.78 -14:00:02.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:12.96 -06:09:37.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:11.52 -09:30:16.8: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:50.90 -08:54:59.4: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:11.52 -09:30:16.8: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:20.78 -14:00:02.5: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:50.90 -08:54:59.4: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:12.96 -06:09:37.6: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:20.78 -14:00:02.5: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7882 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:11.52 -09:30:16.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9902 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:50.90 -08:54:59.4: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7476 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:12.96 -06:09:37.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9838 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20243_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:58.16 -07:18:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20278_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20278_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20288_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20298_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20298_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20301_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 20301_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.384 -09:59:59.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.384 -09:59:59.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:38.723 -09:59:24.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:38.723 -09:59:24.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:35.384 -09:59:59.51
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:38.723 -09:59:24.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01685 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MM5BZfVaf8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jPD6qvqS3l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.214IYibOfC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uG6qwKBqEl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Loaded 5099 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4056 out of 34068 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Loaded 5099 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4056 out of 34068 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 33982 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6760 to 355.2847 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2199 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6760 to 355.2847 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2199 deg
Loaded 5102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3745 out of 4059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4059 out of 33982 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
1.9 pix Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.4 mag. Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MM5BZfVaf8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1262, bad_region=7441, passed=34061
Got 34061 stars (including 25636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1515 n_q2=936 n_q3=1542 n_q4=869 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jPD6qvqS3l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1275, bad_region=7380, passed=33973
Got 33973 stars (including 25572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33973 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1508 n_q2=925 n_q3=1562 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.214IYibOfC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1375, bad_region=6812, passed=34041
Got 34041 stars (including 26116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5331)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=7.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.876 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.817 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.817 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4847 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.423 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4847 robust_rms_before=1.047 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.428 worst_region_rms_after=0.423 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.121 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.423
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.428 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec matched=4847
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4847 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1508 n_q2=960 n_q3=1486 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uG6qwKBqEl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1431, bad_region=6863, passed=34258
Got 34258 stars (including 26257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=7.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.242 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.242 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.743 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4848 robust_rms_before=1.060 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.384 worst_region_rms_after=0.369 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.064 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.369
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec matched=4848
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1499 n_q2=968 n_q3=1479 n_q4=902 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.019
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_013213_TTUQ2b1x1_1081031_NxGJfYe1/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:22:29.07 -08:57:00.0: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:30:03.70 -11:30:39.3: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:01:21.57 -12:31:37.0: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:00:10.99 -10:57:52.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:26:46.18 -14:12:21.6: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:20.79 -14:00:02.7: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:09:54.66 -12:03:33.3: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:03.48 -08:54:27.0: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:54:03.82 -13:21:40.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:03.90 -12:38:57.4: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:22:29.07 -08:57:00.0: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:09:54.66 -12:03:33.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:01:21.57 -12:31:37.0: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:00:10.99 -10:57:52.7: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:54:03.82 -13:21:40.4: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:30:03.70 -11:30:39.3: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:03.48 -08:54:27.0: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:20.79 -14:00:02.7: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:03.90 -12:38:57.4: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:26:46.18 -14:12:21.6: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:03.70 -11:30:39.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5794 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:10.99 -10:57:52.7: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7360 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:29.07 -08:57:00.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2833 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:21.57 -12:31:37.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0989 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:03.48 -08:54:27.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5999 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:46.18 -14:12:21.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3929 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:20.79 -14:00:02.7: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8694 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:03.90 -12:38:57.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4795 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:22:36.41 -06:07:48.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:18:50.75 -07:09:12.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:28:45.86 -13:47:35.9: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:04:07.54 -06:18:27.9: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:33:31.96 -13:47:42.0: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:55:21.26 -13:43:17.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:10:17.33 -11:28:30.5: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:35:52.41 -09:11:22.8: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:10:17.33 -11:28:30.5: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:33:31.96 -13:47:42.0: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:22:36.41 -06:07:48.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:28:45.86 -13:47:35.9: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:04:07.54 -06:18:27.9: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:18:50.75 -07:09:12.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:17.33 -11:28:30.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2200 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:31.96 -13:47:42.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3725 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:55:21.26 -13:43:17.9: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:35:52.41 -09:11:22.8: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:07.54 -06:18:27.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4931 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.86 -13:47:35.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2265 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:55:21.26 -13:43:17.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4539 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:52.41 -09:11:22.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4818 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:36:01.38 -10:28:26.4: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:07.86 -13:45:44.3: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:04.66 -12:21:04.7: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:28:50.53 -07:10:18.5: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:33:20.95 -11:58:31.4: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:12.39 -14:07:59.5: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:04.66 -12:21:04.7: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:07.86 -13:45:44.3: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:28:50.53 -07:10:18.5: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:12.39 -14:07:59.5: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:33:20.95 -11:58:31.4: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:36:01.38 -10:28:26.4: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:04.66 -12:21:04.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4782 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:07.86 -13:45:44.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5385 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:50.53 -07:10:18.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5592 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:12.39 -14:07:59.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5919 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:01.38 -10:28:26.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5120 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:20.95 -11:58:31.4: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4232 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:02:46.70 -13:51:48.0: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:30:30.82 -13:58:42.8: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:00:30.58 -14:02:06.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:32:51.33 -13:22:12.2: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:02:02.99 -13:06:15.9: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:55:58.35 -14:01:57.4: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:32:51.33 -13:22:12.2: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:02:46.70 -13:51:48.0: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:00:30.58 -14:02:06.2: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:30:30.82 -13:58:42.8: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:51.33 -13:22:12.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5180 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:46.70 -13:51:48.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6331 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:02:02.99 -13:06:15.9: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:55:58.35 -14:01:57.4: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:30.58 -14:02:06.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6481 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:30.82 -13:58:42.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5747 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:02.99 -13:06:15.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5994 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:55:58.35 -14:01:57.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6749 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:29:41.15 -13:22:38.5: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:28.71 -08:26:59.4: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:52:33.82 -14:10:13.6: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:56:14.88 -13:47:00.8: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:45.13 -14:03:54.2: 14.89 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:58:29.47 -14:00:59.5: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:29:41.15 -13:22:38.5: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:58:29.47 -14:00:59.5: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:52:33.82 -14:10:13.6: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:45.13 -14:03:54.2: 14.87 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:41.15 -13:22:38.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6438 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:28.71 -08:26:59.4: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:29.47 -14:00:59.5: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7417 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:56:14.88 -13:47:00.8: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:33.82 -14:10:13.6: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.7068 delta=-1.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:28.71 -08:26:59.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6665 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:56:14.88 -13:47:00.8: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7261 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:45.13 -14:03:54.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5586 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:35:23.08 -13:31:40.1: 15.17 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:33:45.55 -11:36:53.3: 15.38 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:29:49.61 -07:08:22.7: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:23.45 -13:27:23.8: 15.22 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:36:39.42 -12:52:41.8: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:09:53.55 -10:30:15.5: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:23.45 -13:27:23.8: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:33:45.55 -11:36:53.3: 15.28 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:29:49.61 -07:08:22.7: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:36:39.42 -12:52:41.8: 15.13 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:35:23.08 -13:31:40.1: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:23.45 -13:27:23.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7407 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:45.55 -11:36:53.3: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.6823 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:09:53.55 -10:30:15.5: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:39.42 -12:52:41.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7598 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:49.61 -07:08:22.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7056 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:23.08 -13:31:40.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6999 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:53.55 -10:30:15.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6484 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:23:15.23 -13:53:45.5: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:32:48.05 -12:06:37.8: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:12:50.86 -11:29:23.7: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:29:58.25 -13:36:36.0: 14.96 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:32.04 -13:47:58.7: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:26:38.73 -07:46:14.4: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:32:48.05 -12:06:37.8: 15.43 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:29:58.25 -13:36:36.0: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:12:50.86 -11:29:23.7: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:23:15.23 -13:53:45.5: 15.45 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:32.04 -13:47:58.7: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:26:38.73 -07:46:14.4: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:48.05 -12:06:37.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7749 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:58.25 -13:36:36.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7127 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:15.23 -13:53:45.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7398 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:12:50.86 -11:29:23.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7221 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:32.04 -13:47:58.7: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7618 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.73 -07:46:14.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7145 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:22.64 -12:56:24.5: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:22.64 -12:56:24.5: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:22.64 -12:56:24.5: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7343 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52296.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52377.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51902_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 51902_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51906_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 51906_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51909_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 51909_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51910_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 51910_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51912_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 51912_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51924_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 51924_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52016_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52016_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52041_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 52041_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52100_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52100_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 52296_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 52377_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52496_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52496_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52563_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52603_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52641_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 52659_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52671_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52672_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52675_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52685_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52687_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52689_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52696_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52697_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52716_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52729_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52734_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52746_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52746_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52752_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52753_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52758_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52760_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52771_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52786_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52789_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52796_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52797_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52800_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52804_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52827_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52830_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52843_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52850_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52852_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52858_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52874_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52878_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52887_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52887_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 52918_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:58.16 -07:18:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18494_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259
The candidate 18494_fd_Aqr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_01-30-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks