This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2139 2461318.7139 12.04 23:27:55.10 -14:23:21.3
61.94982 -66.74725 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -0 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:55.10 -14:23:21.3: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:55.10 -14:23:21.3: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7139,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2139 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2139 2461318.7139 12.43 23:09:57.00 -12:03:20.7
60.31230 -61.84168 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -0 -0 0 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:09:57.00 -12:03:20.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:09:57.00 -12:03:20.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7139,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2139 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2139 2461318.7139 13.59 22:54:05.76 -13:21:27.4
53.73986 -59.34097 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -1 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:54:05.76 -13:21:27.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:54:05.76 -13:21:27.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7139,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2139 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2139 2461318.7139 14.44 23:18:52.74 -07:09:04.6
70.98720 -60.31796 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina 0 0 0 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:18:52.74 -07:09:04.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:18:52.74 -07:09:04.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7139,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2139 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2139 2461318.7139 13.49 23:22:38.84 -06:07:29.0
73.78209 -60.22409 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula 0 -1 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:22:38.84 -06:07:29.0: 15.57 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:22:38.84 -06:07:29.0: 15.35 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7139,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2139 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461318.71418416 05.10.2026 05:08:15.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6410
Objects passed selection criteria: 6406
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6166.5
Average stars matched: 5859.75 (95.0255 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 02:01:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461318.71418416 05.10.2026 05:08:15.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 51 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36229
Objects passed selection criteria: 36131
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35304
Average stars matched: 33435.8 (94.7081 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 02:04:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.71357600
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:29.353 -09:57:48.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:29.353 -09:57:48.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0354 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.903 -09:57:23.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:26.903 -09:57:23.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:29.353 -09:57:48.62
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:26.903 -09:57:23.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01231 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lujafsFyDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.osjvEL3lGT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fOsPddJ9Wh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DSjrtPdfdF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.688000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.688000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Loaded 5057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3864 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3864 out of 5775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.lujafsFyDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=0, passed=5808
Got 5808 stars (including 5379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.osjvEL3lGT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, bad_region=0, passed=5775
Got 5775 stars (including 5335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1213 n_q3=1229 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fOsPddJ9Wh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, bad_region=0, passed=6681
Got 6681 stars (including 6146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=13.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.248 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.248 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.649 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.649 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.339 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4819 robust_rms_before=0.977 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.363 worst_region_rms_after=0.339 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.011 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.297
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec matched=4819
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1157 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1232 n_q4=1202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DSjrtPdfdF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=533, bad_region=1, passed=6690
Got 6690 stars (including 6147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6690 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=13.654 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.784 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.784 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.655 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.353 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4818 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.379 worst_region_rms_after=0.353 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.021 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.379 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec matched=4818
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1217 n_q3=1235 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.182
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.159
reference average sigma_overall=0.3305 worst_q_ratio=1.1675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866_astrometric_residuals.png (4812 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-07-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0212.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_644819_Kn0pFWbB/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:37.74 -07:49:30.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:12.98 -06:09:37.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:50.89 -08:54:58.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:11.55 -09:30:17.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:11:05.08 -10:21:57.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:55.10 -14:23:21.3: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:50.43 -08:35:35.5: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:06:43.64 -14:58:34.3: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:12.98 -06:09:37.6: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:50.43 -08:35:35.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:37.74 -07:49:30.9: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:11:05.08 -10:21:57.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:50.89 -08:54:58.8: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:55.10 -14:23:21.3: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:11.55 -09:30:17.6: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:12.98 -06:09:37.6: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9769 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:06:43.64 -14:58:34.3: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:50.43 -08:35:35.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0509 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:11.55 -09:30:17.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0322 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:50.89 -08:54:58.8: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7785 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:37.74 -07:49:30.9: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0407 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:05.08 -10:21:57.2: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0471 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:43.64 -14:58:34.3: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2801 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20250_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20250_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20256_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:18:58.18 -07:18:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20266_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20266_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20269_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20269_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20270_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20271_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20272_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 20273_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52427_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52427_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52428_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52429_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52430_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52435_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52438_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52439_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52441_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52443_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52446_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52469_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:27:55.11 -14:23:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 52487_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52515_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 52625_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52797_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52801_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52807_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52826_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52830_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52836_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52839_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52845_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52846_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52847_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52854_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52860_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52863_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 52866_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52868_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52869_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52872_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52875_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52888_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52889_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52894_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52894_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52895_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52896_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52898_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52899_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52907_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52912_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52912_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52916_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52916_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52920_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52920_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52922_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52923_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52925_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52926_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52926_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52929_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52940_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52942_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52944_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52946_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52949_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52950_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52950_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52954_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52955_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52955_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52956_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52957_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52958_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52962_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52963_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52965_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52966_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52968_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52971_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52972_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52973_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52974_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52977_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52982_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52983_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52984_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52984_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52987_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52989_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52991_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52993_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52994_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 52995_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53000_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53005_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53009_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53010_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53015_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53016_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53019_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53020_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53024_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53026_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53030_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53034_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53035_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53039_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53041_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53046_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53052_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53056_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53058_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53060_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 53068_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04185_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
Preparing report for the candidate 04185_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213
The candidate 08554_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-08-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0213 did not pass the final checks