This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 11.71 22:06:08.81 -14:22:27.1
42.75788 -49.52229 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5 Astraea 0 -0 0 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:06:08.81 -14:22:27.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:06:08.81 -14:22:27.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 12.75 22:19:47.34 -11:55:38.3
48.54907 -51.37406 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.117 Lomia -0 -1 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:19:47.34 -11:55:38.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:19:47.34 -11:55:38.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,12.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 12.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 13.22 21:55:08.81 -11:04:37.0
45.36622 -45.65243 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.78 Diana 0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:55:08.81 -11:04:37.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:55:08.81 -11:04:37.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.1990* 21 55 08.81 -11 04 37.0 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 13.83 22:09:52.74 -11:28:23.1
47.35626 -49.02687 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.303 Josephina 0 0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:09:52.74 -11:28:23.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:09:52.74 -11:28:23.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 13.95 22:25:35.65 -10:39:48.2
51.45905 -51.98018 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.208 Lacrimosa -0 -0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:25:35.65 -10:39:48.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:25:35.65 -10:39:48.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 14.47 21:45:31.25 -14:07:08.7
40.01747 -44.87631 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1082 Pirola -1 1 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 21:45:31.25 -14:07:08.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 21:45:31.25 -14:07:08.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.1990* 21 45 31.25 -14 07 08.7 14.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.1990 2461318.6990 14.63 22:19:09.17 -10:02:58.8
51.00645 -50.30525 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.846 Lipperta 0 0 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:19:09.17 -10:02:58.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:19:09.17 -10:02:58.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.6990,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.1990 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
First image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Last image: 2461318.69941403 05.10.2026 04:46:59.372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7817
Objects passed selection criteria: 7816
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7495.75
Average stars matched: 7038 (93.8932 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234996 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 01:02:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
First image: 2461242.93279922 21.07.2026 10:23:03.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Last image: 2461318.69941403 05.10.2026 04:46:59.372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 71 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46074
Objects passed selection criteria: 45945
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44900
Average stars matched: 42715.5 (95.1347 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 265876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 01:05:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.69857356
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:01.257 -09:57:23.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:17:01.257 -09:57:23.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0385 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:04.059 -09:56:53.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:16:59.412 -09:59:39.54
Second-epoch image center 22:17:04.059 -09:56:53.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:01.257 -09:57:23.61
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:04.059 -09:56:53.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01425 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BAXMlZIJkZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits &> /tmp/tmp.63QoBZQgud
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t0U4Sf7cRO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OZXc5OXScI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits and wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Loaded 5569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4112 out of 4275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4275 out of 6925 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.673200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.673200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8536 to 342.4026 deg, Dec -15.6017 to -4.2140 deg
Loaded 5569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4112 out of 4275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4275 out of 6925 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 325.8535 to 342.3813 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2885 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 325.8535 to 342.3813 deg, Dec -15.6029 to -4.2885 deg
Loaded 5525 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4139 out of 4302 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4302 out of 6918 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
15.3 mag. Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.BAXMlZIJkZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=496, bad_region=0, passed=6925
Got 6925 stars (including 6418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6925 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4318 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits N_match=4318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1030 n_q2=1223 n_q3=924 n_q4=1141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.63QoBZQgud (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, bad_region=0, passed=6918
Got 6918 stars (including 6429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4316 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4316 stars left (next iteration limit 4749)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits N_match=4316 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1033 n_q2=1228 n_q3=924 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits -region wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t0U4Sf7cRO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=570, bad_region=0, passed=8218
Got 8218 stars (including 7637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4325 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4325 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4324 stars left (next iteration limit 4757)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4324 robust_rms=14.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.828 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4324 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.581 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.581 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4324 robust_rms=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.304 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4324 robust_rms_before=0.940 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.334 worst_region_rms_after=0.304 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.954 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec matched=4324
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=4324 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1216 n_q3=934 n_q4=1134 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OZXc5OXScI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=563, bad_region=0, passed=8222
Got 8222 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4320 stars left (next iteration limit 4752)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4320 robust_rms=14.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.108 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.108 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4320 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.622 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4320 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.299 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4320 robust_rms_before=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.328 worst_region_rms_after=0.299 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.952 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.328 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.285 arcsec matched=4320
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=4320 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1038 n_q2=1216 n_q3=939 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new1=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.102
new2=fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.106
reference average sigma_overall=0.3415 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859_astrometric_residuals.png (4318 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860_astrometric_residuals.png (4316 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (4324 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (4320 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-45-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_234808_TTUQ1b1x1_2872171_fgFZtJra/wcs_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:26.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:22:11.90 -09:21:06.3: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:04:05.88 -08:06:08.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:06:08.81 -14:22:27.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:15:23.53 -08:39:06.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0859.fits at 22:17:21.96 -09:35:11.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:15:23.53 -08:39:06.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:04:05.88 -08:06:08.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:26.8: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:06:08.81 -14:22:27.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:17:21.96 -09:35:11.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:22:11.90 -09:21:06.3: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0860.fits at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.6: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:23:46.98 -08:09:26.8: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0356 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:15:23.53 -08:39:06.5: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0930 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:22:11.90 -09:21:06.3: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9922 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:13.53 -06:27:18.6: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9883 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:17:21.96 -09:35:11.5: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0541 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:04:05.88 -08:06:08.2: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0918 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20410_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20410_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:39.84 -07:11:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20413_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 20413_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20417_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20418_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20418_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20419_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:27:48.78 -07:29:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20420_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20420_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20421_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20421_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20424_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20425_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53423_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53423_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53428_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53428_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53430_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53431_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53431_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53432_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53432_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53434_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53435_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53435_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53436_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53440_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53440_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53442_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53442_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53459_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53459_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:06:08.81 -14:22:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53507_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 53507_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53567_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 53567_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53683_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 53683_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 53706_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53809_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53809_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53823_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53835_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53840_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53840_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53847_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53847_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53850_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53850_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53859_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53859_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53865_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53874_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53874_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53881_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 53888_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53890_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53895_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53898_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53898_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53904_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53909_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53910_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53910_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53911_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53915_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53915_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53920_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53920_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53927_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53927_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53928_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53931_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53933_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53933_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53934_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53936_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53937_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53939_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53939_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53942_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53942_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53945_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 53946_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53948_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53958_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53960_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:14:17.82 -12:38:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53965_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53965_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53967_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53968_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53968_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53969_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53969_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53970_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53970_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53977_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53984_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53988_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53988_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53989_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53989_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53992_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53993_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53993_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53997_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54001_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54001_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54011_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54011_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54014_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54020_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54020_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54022_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54024_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54024_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54029_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54029_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54031_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54032_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54032_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54034_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54034_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54037_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54037_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54042_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54044_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54044_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54047_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54047_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54048_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54048_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54053_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54054_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54056_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:12:32.62 -14:12:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54058_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54063_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54063_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54064_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54064_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54066_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54068_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54068_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54073_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54074_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54075_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54077_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54077_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54081_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54085_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54086_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54090_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54090_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54092_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:48:47.22 -06:20:52.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.712 2611825417208081664 342.19702636910 -06.34819364564 15.1173 14.5239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.712#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54094_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54094_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54096_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54099_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54099_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54102_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54102_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54103_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54103_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54104_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54104_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54106_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54106_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54108_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54108_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54110_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54110_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54115_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54116_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54116_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54126_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54129_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54130_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54130_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54142_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54143_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54143_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54145_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54145_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54167_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54167_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54170_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 54170_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11889_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 11889_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:27:48.77 -07:29:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12218_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 12218_fd_Aqr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-46-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
