This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 10.84 21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5
90.30136 2.27585 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J210259.11+500520.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.190 V 13.320 V 2457568.93600 42.290000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J210259.11+500520.5,2461317.6570,10.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J210259.11+500520.5 20261004.1570 10.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.70 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1
90.73560 1.80592 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.91 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6
90.08984 2.67056 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J315.0669+50.1933 | 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.044+/-0.025 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J315.0669+50.1933,2461317.6570,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J315.0669+50.1933 20261004.1570 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.98 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6
83.16395 10.73335 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.7278+49.2005 | 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.802+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.7278+49.2005,2461317.6570,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.7278+49.2005 20261004.1570 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.43 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9
90.14530 2.02876 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.63 21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3
90.32412 2.13611 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 2168736902835544832
Type: YSO
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.100 G 18.800 G
ATTENTION: measured mag 12.63 is 5.5 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.10 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2168736902835544832,2461317.6570,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2168736902835544832 20261004.1570 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.51 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4
90.14112 2.69499 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.149+/-0.025 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.54 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8
90.10637 2.60103 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J315.1612+50.1537 | 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.218+/-0.026 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J315.1612+50.1537,2461317.6570,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J315.1612+50.1537 20261004.1570 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.35 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3
90.49751 2.31328 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J315.9144+50.2646 | 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3 (user input) | IRR (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=11.682+/- (unrealisitic color!)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J315.9144+50.2646,2461317.6570,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J315.9144+50.2646 20261004.1570 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 13.14 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5
83.19973 10.97227 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J298.4277+49.3488 | 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J298.4277+49.3488,2461317.6570,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J298.4277+49.3488 20261004.1570 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 13.11 19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0
83.88269 11.77355 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX18" Gaia DR3 2087357133809525120
Type: RRC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
20.300 G 20.910 G 0.303196000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 13.11 is 7.2 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 20.30 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2087357133809525120,2461317.6570,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2087357133809525120 20261004.1570 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 13.09 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9
84.00744 12.27182 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J297.2486+50.6694 | 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J297.2486+50.6694,2461317.6570,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J297.2486+50.6694 20261004.1570 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.85 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5
90.33962 2.16140 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J315.9327+50.0415 | 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.657+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J315.9327+50.0415,2461317.6570,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J315.9327+50.0415 20261004.1570 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.76 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0
90.25260 2.55746 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.667+/-0.033 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.72 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5
84.08840 11.82751 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 13.12 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1
90.37551 2.38137 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.80 19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9
84.04383 12.17061 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" Gaia DR3 2087379330206218496
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.420 G 13.600 G F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2087379330206218496,2461317.6570,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2087379330206218496 20261004.1570 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.66 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8
90.12634 2.47621 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.642+/-0.036 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461317.6570,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261004.1570 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.94 19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2
83.76240 10.88170 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J195552.46+494724.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.880 V 14.400 V 2457265.90000 402.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195552.46+494724.5,2461317.6570,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195552.46+494724.5 20261004.1570 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.1570 2461317.6570 12.62 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6
83.91242 12.07383 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J297.4525+50.5000 | 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J297.4525+50.5000,2461317.6570,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J297.4525+50.5000 20261004.1570 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.79643095 13.07.2026 07:06:41.634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
First image: 2461234.79643095 13.07.2026 07:06:41.634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Last image: 2461317.65730904 04.10.2026 03:46:21.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31129
Objects passed selection criteria: 31048
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21472.5
Average stars matched: 20864.2 (97.1673 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Oct 3 04:56:41 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-231-g50972ca5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 3 22:51:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 1859 -> 1168, 37.171% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 1095 -> 2241, 51.138% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 961 -> 648, 32.570% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 753 -> 592, 21.381% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.79643095 13.07.2026 07:06:41.634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
First image: 2461234.79643095 13.07.2026 07:06:41.634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Last image: 2461317.65730904 04.10.2026 03:46:21.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 176 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 206460
Objects passed selection criteria: 205801
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 147404
Average stars matched: 140636 (95.4084 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 602568 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Oct 3 04:56:41 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-231-g50972ca5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 3 22:56:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461317.65662052
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:00.714 +46:00:47.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:17.847 +45:58:52.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:00.714 +46:00:47.35
Second-epoch image center 20:24:17.847 +45:58:52.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0589 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:18.634 +45:59:32.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:00.714 +46:00:47.35
Second-epoch image center 20:24:18.634 +45:59:32.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0559 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:24:17.847 +45:58:52.79
Second-epoch second image center 20:24:18.634 +45:59:32.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01121 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZICZEjqRLX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V1IGxDnjqV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QUxCAqQ1FF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1jIEwW92uk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34950 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6869 to 318.2780 deg, Dec +40.3373 to +51.2765 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6869 to 318.2780 deg, Dec 40.3373 to 51.2765 deg
Loaded 23388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15752 out of 17614 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17614 out of 34950 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.662450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.662450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34950 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6869 to 318.2780 deg, Dec +40.3373 to +51.2765 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6869 to 318.2780 deg, Dec 40.3373 to 51.2765 deg
Loaded 23388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15752 out of 17614 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17614 out of 34950 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 32659 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6887 to 318.2868 deg, Dec +40.2710 to +51.2608 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6887 to 318.2868 deg, Dec 40.2710 to 51.2608 deg
Loaded 23539 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15620 out of 17285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17285 out of 32659 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.3 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
15.3 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ZICZEjqRLX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4106, bad_region=0, passed=34950
Got 34950 stars (including 30805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1132 n_q4=1303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.V1IGxDnjqV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3708, bad_region=0, passed=32659
Got 32659 stars (including 28911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.630 n_q1=1242 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QUxCAqQ1FF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=507, bad_region=0, passed=10855
Got 10855 stars (including 10342 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=12.830 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.982 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.982 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.037 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.037 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.682 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=0.657 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.832 worst_region_rms_after=0.682 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.078 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.682
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:17.849 +45:58:52.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10855 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3568119.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.657 -> 0.373 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4860 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4668 pairs (4860 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=12.697 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.553 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.954 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.954 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.638 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4668 robust_rms_before=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.637 worst_region_rms_after=0.638 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.637 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.638
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.638 vs 0.637 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=4668 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1859 n_q2=1095 n_q3=961 n_q4=753 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1jIEwW92uk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=350, bad_region=0, passed=8127
Got 8127 stars (including 7765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=14.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.405 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.838 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.838 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.716 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=0.783 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.526 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.443 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.847 worst_region_rms_after=0.716 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.116 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.716
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:18.645 +45:59:32.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8127 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3566007.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.783 -> 0.443 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4865 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4649 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4649 pairs (4865 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4649 robust_rms=14.024 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.833 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4649 robust_rms=0.583 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.814 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4649 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.691 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4649 robust_rms_before=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.693 worst_region_rms_after=0.691 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.693 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.691
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:18.645 +45:59:32.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8127 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3584233.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.435 -> 0.434 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=4649 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1168 n_q2=2241 n_q3=648 n_q4=592 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.548 worst_q_ratio=1.069
ref2=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits sigma_overall=0.578 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new1=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.221
new2=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.1025
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 1859 -> 1168, 37.171% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 1095 -> 2241, 51.138% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 961 -> 648, 32.570% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 753 -> 592, 21.381% > 20%; fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits vs fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (4668 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (4649 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8341 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51756_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 51756_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:45.85 +46:31:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52132_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 52132_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:39.80 +50:42:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28624_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 28624_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:37.84 +48:46:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34518_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 34518_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:00.714 +46:00:47.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:17.849 +45:58:52.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:00.714 +46:00:47.35
Second-epoch image center 20:24:17.849 +45:58:52.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0589 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:18.645 +45:59:32.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:00.714 +46:00:47.35
Second-epoch image center 20:24:18.645 +45:59:32.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0559 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:24:17.849 +45:58:52.80
Second-epoch second image center 20:24:18.645 +45:59:32.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01123 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JNKeFltslN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bTR8WW5HV7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aqVMY6TeSt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c8lmCHSVV0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 231778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6407 to 318.3139 deg, Dec +40.3068 to +51.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6407 to 318.3139 deg, Dec 40.3068 to 51.2778 deg
Loaded 23545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11460 out of 18286 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18286 out of 231778 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.518500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.518500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 231778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6407 to 318.3139 deg, Dec +40.3068 to +51.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6407 to 318.3139 deg, Dec 40.3068 to 51.2778 deg
Loaded 23545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11460 out of 18286 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18286 out of 231778 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 227164 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6887 to 318.3794 deg, Dec +40.2712 to +51.2646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6887 to 318.3794 deg, Dec 40.2712 to 51.2646 deg
Loaded 23630 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12004 out of 18258 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18258 out of 227164 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.1 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
15.4 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JNKeFltslN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=108, blended=43017, bad_region=2, passed=231670
Got 231670 stars (including 188353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 231670 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.611 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1099 n_q4=1288 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bTR8WW5HV7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=105, blended=38858, bad_region=2, passed=227059
Got 227059 stars (including 187946 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 227059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 227059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 227059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 227059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1295 n_q3=1094 n_q4=1304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aqVMY6TeSt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=5186, bad_region=48, passed=76506
Got 76506 stars (including 71191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=13.165 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.181 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.181 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.971 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.666 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.672 worst_region_rms_after=0.666 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.672 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.666
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.672 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.672 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.374 arcsec matched=4865
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=1877 n_q2=1116 n_q3=1041 n_q4=831 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.c8lmCHSVV0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3618, bad_region=47, passed=57874
Got 57874 stars (including 54116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57874 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=14.851 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.910 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.910 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.833 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.696 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.696 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.693 worst_region_rms_after=0.696 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.693 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.696
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.693 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.693 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.435 arcsec matched=4861
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=1289 n_q2=2175 n_q3=734 n_q4=663 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-45-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-03_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_224724_TTUQ1b1x1_3220140_eQQsXO8m/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:46:56.57 +49:56:28.5: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:55:36.36 +49:15:43.6: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:59:17.01 +45:36:12.6: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:47:37.43 +50:05:21.3: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:08:04.48 +47:10:04.2: 10.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:47:22.15 +41:22:50.6: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:16:17.95 +48:53:22.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:08:04.48 +47:10:04.2: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:46:56.57 +49:56:28.5: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:59:17.01 +45:36:12.6: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:04.48 +47:10:04.2: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9385 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:56.57 +49:56:28.5: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1990 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:17.01 +45:36:12.6: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8910 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:55:36.36 +49:15:43.6: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:47:37.43 +50:05:21.3: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:36.36 +49:15:43.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2485 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:37.43 +50:05:21.3: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6057 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:47:22.15 +41:22:50.6: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:16:17.95 +48:53:22.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:22.15 +41:22:50.6: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8433 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:17.95 +48:53:22.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2450 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:01:21.00 +50:01:50.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:06:08.29 +47:12:41.1: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:56:03.42 +44:21:57.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:43:27.67 +48:34:58.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:01:21.00 +50:01:50.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:19:45.06 +47:52:26.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:21.00 +50:01:50.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2224 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:06:08.29 +47:12:41.1: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:56:03.42 +44:21:57.3: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:08.29 +47:12:41.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2545 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:23:13.24 +50:10:00.5: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:03.42 +44:21:57.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1038 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:43:27.67 +48:34:58.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:27.67 +48:34:58.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1424 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:19:45.06 +47:52:26.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:23:13.24 +50:10:00.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:45.06 +47:52:26.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6246 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:13.24 +50:10:00.5: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4305 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:35:12.88 +41:55:09.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:35:12.88 +41:55:09.3: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:12.88 +41:55:09.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9215 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8845 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6710 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:09:38.31 +49:53:59.6: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:04:14.99 +50:46:43.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:34.62 +50:25:51.0: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:09:38.31 +49:53:59.6: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:38.31 +49:53:59.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8643 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:04:14.99 +50:46:43.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9784 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:14.99 +50:46:43.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9606 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:34.62 +50:25:51.0: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4005 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:34.62 +50:25:51.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6474 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6160 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:50:39.38 +50:23:39.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4657 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:50:39.38 +50:23:39.3: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:39.38 +50:23:39.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7710 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:32.85 +50:26:50.1: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4919 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:32.85 +50:26:50.1: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:32.85 +50:26:50.1: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6446 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:57:51.96 +50:21:47.3: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3349 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:57:51.96 +50:21:47.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:51.96 +50:21:47.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3737 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1438 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:52:03.97 +50:30:16.0: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:52:03.97 +50:30:16.0: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:03.97 +50:30:16.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2276 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1486 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1164 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:54:11.00 +50:25:28.0: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:54:11.00 +50:25:28.0: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:11.00 +50:25:28.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1005 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:48:37.27 +50:33:13.0: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:48:37.27 +50:33:13.0: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:37.27 +50:33:13.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0829 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8397 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:56:13.93 +49:03:41.6: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7589 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 20:01:16.83 +50:54:30.5: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:56:13.93 +49:03:41.6: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:13.93 +49:03:41.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0685 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7510 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 20:01:16.83 +50:54:30.5: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:16.83 +50:54:30.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8938 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:53:40.95 +50:40:23.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1019 delta=1.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:52:38.76 +50:18:16.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:53:40.95 +50:40:23.7: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:40.95 +50:40:23.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8961 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:52:38.76 +50:18:16.0: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:38.76 +50:18:16.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8915 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:12.80 +50:43:05.6: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:12.80 +50:43:05.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:12.80 +50:43:05.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0226 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8183 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:50:01.54 +50:38:21.6: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:48:52.39 +50:31:16.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:50:01.54 +50:38:21.6: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:01.54 +50:38:21.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8610 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:47:57.95 +50:34:11.6: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:48:52.39 +50:31:16.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:52.39 +50:31:16.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9973 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:47:57.95 +50:34:11.6: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:57.95 +50:34:11.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8415 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:03:51.21 +49:57:55.0: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:03:51.21 +49:57:55.0: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:51.21 +49:57:55.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7341 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6552 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_02-06-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6520 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-44-09_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0127.fits at 19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9520 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183117.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out205202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207183.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out208699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out208907.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out211208.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out212445.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out212451.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out212552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out212612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213452.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213708.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out215601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out215648.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out215782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out219895.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 24s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264296_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264296_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264313_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264313_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264364_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264364_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264383_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264383_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:09.43 +48:56:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264400_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264400_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264407_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264407_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264416_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264416_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:24.80 +50:19:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264417_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264417_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264420_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264420_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264768_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 264768_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:33.85 +47:15:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265278_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265278_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:21.37 +47:41:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265383_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265383_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:23.54 +50:02:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265396_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265396_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:30.49 +49:11:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265448_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265448_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265459_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265459_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265717_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265717_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265769_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265769_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:56:39.30 +44:54:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265967_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 265967_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:13.38 +47:57:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266101_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 266101_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266365_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 266365_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266461_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 266461_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266611_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 266611_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:23.21 +41:00:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267081_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 267081_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:01.10 +43:58:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267381_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 267381_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183876_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 183876_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:54.66 +49:20:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212445_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 212445_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213708_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 213708_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207458_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 207458_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216040_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 216040_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187018_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 187018_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162468_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 162468_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219895_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 219895_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215782_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 215782_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210517_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 210517_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213452_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 213452_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211044_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 211044_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213865_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 213865_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209918_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 209918_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257950_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 257950_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155223_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 155223_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98329_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 98329_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211208_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 211208_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251696_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 251696_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214554_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 214554_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75896_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 75896_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130622_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 130622_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66560_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 66560_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177111_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 177111_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41741_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 41741_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120099_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 120099_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51114_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 51114_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183117_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 183117_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209173_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 209173_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212552_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 212552_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130677_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 130677_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:58.28 +46:30:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228341_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 228341_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205202_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 205202_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222748_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 222748_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173114_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 173114_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176915_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 176915_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:44.21 +48:32:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213118_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 213118_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207327_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 207327_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50712_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 50712_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135207_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 135207_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215601_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 215601_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212451_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 212451_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190523_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 190523_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208699_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 208699_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214823_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 214823_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:58.79 +50:05:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204960_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 204960_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212612_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 212612_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207152_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 207152_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213336_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 213336_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204236_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 204236_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207183_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 207183_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206315_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 206315_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207755_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 207755_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207341_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 207341_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216745_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 216745_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80690_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80690_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190887_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 190887_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:37.83 +48:46:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215648_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 215648_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224422_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 224422_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:55.00 +49:49:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210726_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 210726_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:20.50 +50:20:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168628_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 168628_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:00.32 +47:55:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224801_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 224801_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208907_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 208907_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-03_22-46-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 4s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 82s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5
19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5
19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6
19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9
19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9
19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5
19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6
21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3
21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1
21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0
19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0
21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1
21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4
21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6
21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8
21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5
21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8
21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3
21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9
19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2
########### Completed Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5
21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1
21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6
19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6
21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9
21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3
21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4
21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8
21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3
19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5
19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0
19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9
21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5
21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0
19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5
21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1
19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9
21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8
19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2
19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6
###################################################################################
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9 -- not a known variable star
19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9 -- a known variable star
19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6 -- not a known variable star
19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0 -- a known variable star
19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5 -- not a known variable star
19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5 -- not a known variable star
19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6 -- not a known variable star
19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2 -- a known variable star
21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6 -- not a known variable star
21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4 -- not a known variable star
21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8 -- not a known variable star
21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8 -- not a known variable star
21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0 -- not a known variable star
21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1 -- not a known variable star
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5 -- a known variable star
21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9 -- not a known variable star
21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3 -- not a known variable star
21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5 -- not a known variable star
21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3 -- a known variable star
21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1 -- not a known variable star
Found 15 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
20 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
19:48:58.88 +50:40:04.9
19:49:39.02 +50:39:05.9
19:49:48.27 +50:29:33.6
19:51:22.51 +50:19:27.0
19:51:40.95 +50:31:36.5
19:53:43.35 +49:21:03.5
19:54:53.70 +49:12:12.6
19:55:52.66 +49:47:18.2
21:00:15.55 +50:11:24.6
21:00:21.27 +50:14:41.4
21:00:39.25 +50:09:24.8
21:01:19.32 +50:05:22.8
21:01:27.63 +50:14:17.0
21:02:47.64 +50:12:49.1
21:02:58.80 +50:05:17.5
21:03:29.03 +49:48:26.9
21:03:37.12 +50:15:34.3
21:03:40.27 +50:02:26.5
21:03:43.47 +50:00:44.3
21:06:58.07 +50:05:48.1
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461317.65662052 -observatory V36
14:05:30.41 -14:57:58.5 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:12:48.71 -21:06:43.1 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:22:48.27 +20:29:31.6 Mars (1.1mag)
09:29:31.92 +15:27:29.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:44:31.99 +01:50:11.6 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:44.84 +20:59:38.8 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:11:03.84 -00:20:58.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:18.45 -23:43:21.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:23:51.01 +24:43:01.0 Moon (-10.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Oct 3 22:51 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461317.65662052:
09:29:28.73 +15:27:46.9 Io (9.6mag)
09:29:40.46 +15:26:43.2 Europa (6.2mag)
09:29:46.14 +15:26:13.2 Ganymede (8.0mag)
09:29:49.40 +15:25:56.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:28:45.04 +15:49:16.6 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:29:33.78 +15:27:20.2 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:27:47.89 +15:47:17.2 Elara (17.5mag)
09:32:23.39 +14:50:15.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:28:39.43 +15:52:40.9 Carme (18.9mag)
00:44:44.10 +01:49:52.1 Titan (8.2mag)
00:44:24.98 +01:50:08.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:43:52.90 +01:47:55.3 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:44:39.13 +01:50:23.5 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:42:55.62 +01:38:05.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 3 22:51 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461317.65662052:
01:58:03.22 +20:36:53.2 JWST
18:19:31.95 +23:16:29.5 Chandra
04:37:52.31 +50:58:33.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 3 22:51 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461317.65662052 -observatory V36
03:47:30.42 +20:08:23.9 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:18:37.07 -33:39:51.3 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:36:33.21 -71:55:46.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:29.17 +34:26:26.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:04:17.28 +48:11:27.4 16.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:27:02.06 +25:32:27.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:33.74 -17:58:37.2 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:58:08.16 +34:56:48.4 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:50.49 +41:52:06.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:21.76 -13:29:02.2 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:15:42.12 +12:45:39.8 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:03:48.70 +16:35:31.1 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:43:48.97 -02:06:49.4 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:13:12.35 +67:49:39.7 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:44:04.10 +44:13:41.3 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:38:42.28 +13:33:49.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:43:55.89 +19:50:43.4 17.8mag 2P/Encke
22:50:34.26 -33:08:58.8 14.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:00:31.36 +39:31:47.9 16.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:06:21.58 -07:34:29.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
13:02:38.88 -13:17:13.3 18.0mag 63P/Wild
00:27:12.66 -08:36:24.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
07:25:36.08 +16:46:31.3 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:06:39.97 +14:39:02.6 17.5mag 88P/Howell
07:12:31.32 +38:05:07.2 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:45:12.82 +16:40:46.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:26:00.90 +14:54:52.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:48:47.71 -30:06:00.8 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:45:15.40 +19:37:16.1 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:37:02.56 +00:36:39.7 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:51:05.53 -03:19:52.9 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:02:59.66 +35:52:19.6 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:00:47.81 +03:26:56.9 13.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:32:15.64 +05:31:18.6 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:51:09.25 +43:34:47.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
15:45:36.69 -03:09:12.8 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski
09:48:42.79 +32:05:29.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 3 22:51 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 3 22:51 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 3 22:51 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:19:10.207 -42:10:18.70 AT 2026acad 2026-09-17.49 20.14
22:45:42.369 -32:03:13.11 AT 2026acac 2026-09-17.57 20.42
21:06:10.283 -26:29:48.88 AT 2026acab 2026-09-17.42 20.14
02:59:42.870 -32:10:51.62 AT 2026acaa 2026-09-17.71 19.79
03:12:48.598 -25:41:36.30 AT 2026abzz 2026-08-07.77 20.11
03:27:04.244 -02:48:44.64 AT 2026abzy 2026-09-16.21 19.9
01:33:35.787 -29:12:14.34 AT 2026abzx 2026-09-14.75 20.32
05:25:39.066 -07:33:55.88 AT 2026abzw 2026-09-12.24 19.63
01:48:46.374 +07:27:55.45 AT 2026abzv 2026-09-11.68 19.9
04:01:35.497 -03:50:58.41 AT 2026abzu 2026-09-17.17 20.26
02:10:03.461 +06:00:29.47 AT 2026abzt 2026-09-18.06 20.09
23:56:05.061 +07:13:14.64 AT 2026abzs 2026-09-18.02 19.953
03:09:38.698 -79:15:01.74 AT 2026abzr 2026-09-17.29 19.444
03:13:00.122 -45:33:01.75 AT 2026abzq 2026-09-15.27 19.756
06:56:27.724 -50:51:56.56 AT 2026abzp 2026-09-14.38 19.123
23:53:31.889 -42:14:13.65 AT 2026abzo 2026-09-17.28 19.319
03:15:14.089 -57:25:33.41 AT 2026abzn 2026-09-12.24 18.872
20:11:27.062 -53:25:44.28 AT 2026abzm 2026-09-15.10 19.046
06:53:56.652 +51:04:24.00 AT 2026abzl 2026-09-17.20 19.508
07:15:59.715 +61:07:09.00 AT 2026abzk 2026-09-17.21 19.245
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 3 22:51 tns_transients_list.txt
