This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.4975* 05 21 07.68 +23 38 20.1 10.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461314.9975,10.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20261001.4975 10.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.4975* 05 21 07.67 +23 38 20.0 10.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461314.9975,10.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20261001.4975 10.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4975 2461314.9975 11.47 05:14:37.80 +24:06:29.4
180.24819 -8.44032 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:14:37.80 +24:06:29.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:14:37.80 +24:06:29.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.4975* 05 14 37.80 +24 06 29.4 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.9975,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.4975 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4975 2461314.9975 12.88 05:57:45.18 +24:46:35.0
184.95780 0.20249 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:57:45.18 +24:46:35.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:57:45.18 +24:46:35.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.4975* 05 57 45.18 +24 46 35.0 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.9975,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.4975 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4975 2461314.9975 13.86 05:41:08.90 +19:50:39.7
187.22945 -5.62114 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla -0 0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:08.90 +19:50:39.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:08.90 +19:50:39.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.4975* 05 41 08.90 +19 50 39.7 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.9975,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.4975 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4975 2461314.9975 12.66 05:56:11.00 +21:51:41.4
187.29887 -1.57149 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0556106+215128
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.266 g Y 2.688 g 2458371.00590 381.448484800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:56:11.00 +21:51:41.4: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:11.00 +21:51:41.4: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.4975* 05 56 11.00 +21 51 41.4 12.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0556106+215128,2461314.9975,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0556106+215128 20261001.4975 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461314.99789126 01.10.2026 11:56:47.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16903
Objects passed selection criteria: 16818
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12513
Average stars matched: 12359 (98.7693 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243544 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 07:18:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461314.99789126 01.10.2026 11:56:47.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 129361
Objects passed selection criteria: 129026
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97029.2
Average stars matched: 94156 (97.0388 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 603828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 07:20:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.99710645
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.149 +21:59:43.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.149 +21:59:43.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.491 +22:00:17.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.491 +22:00:17.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.149 +21:59:43.48
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:20.491 +22:00:17.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00942 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3RRTFDecXF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dt48Gsy84r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iILZfDrBsb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8rF417hEEN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.3RRTFDecXF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Dt48Gsy84r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iILZfDrBsb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=706, bad_region=1090, passed=8124
Got 8124 stars (including 6397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4692 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4692 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 4695 stars left (next iteration limit 5161)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4695 robust_rms=6.834 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.212 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.206 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4695 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.935 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.935 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4695 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.950 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.950 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4695 robust_rms_before=0.840 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.618 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.116 worst_region_rms_after=0.935 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.233 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.935
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.163 +21:59:42.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8124 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3653949.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.840 -> 0.543 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4695 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4429 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4429 pairs (4695 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4429 robust_rms=6.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4429 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.844 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.844 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4429 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.885 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4429 robust_rms_before=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.845 worst_region_rms_after=0.844 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.845 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.844
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.163 +21:59:42.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8124 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3654177.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.529 -> 0.527 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits N_match=4429 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=1748 n_q2=325 n_q3=1734 n_q4=622 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8rF417hEEN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=832, bad_region=1072, passed=7535
Got 7535 stars (including 5719 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4696 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4696 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4696 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4696 stars left (next iteration limit 5165)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4696 robust_rms=6.889 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.474 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.343 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4696 robust_rms=0.530 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.835 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.835 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4696 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.873 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.873 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4696 robust_rms_before=0.824 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.606 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.530 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.031 worst_region_rms_after=0.835 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.222 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.835
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.505 +22:00:16.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7540 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3653935.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.824 -> 0.530 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4696 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4448 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4448 pairs (4696 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4448 robust_rms=6.586 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.592 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.241 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4448 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.775 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4448 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.784 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.784 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4448 robust_rms_before=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.776 worst_region_rms_after=0.775 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.776 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.775
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.505 +22:00:16.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7540 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3654127.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.517 -> 0.518 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4448 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4448 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits N_match=4448 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1763 n_q2=333 n_q3=1721 n_q4=631 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits sigma_overall=0.528 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=1.132
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536_astrometric_residuals.png (4429 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537_astrometric_residuals.png (4448 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30593_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 30593_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.73 +20:10:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.44 +17:54:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.163 +21:59:42.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.163 +21:59:42.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.505 +22:00:16.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.505 +22:00:16.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:20.163 +21:59:42.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:20.505 +22:00:16.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00946 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ulc7ynWzj5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dL6M5usUiy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3BZexJtYG0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SNXs5G6H7c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ulc7ynWzj5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1719 n_q2=437 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dL6M5usUiy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3BZexJtYG0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3099, bad_region=5554, passed=56952
Got 56952 stars (including 48536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56952 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4699 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4699 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4701 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4700 stars left (next iteration limit 5168)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4700 robust_rms=6.839 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.218 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.090 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4700 robust_rms=0.549 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.929 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.929 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4700 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.937 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4700 robust_rms_before=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.608 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.549 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.936 worst_region_rms_after=0.929 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.936 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.929
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.936 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.936 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.548 arcsec matched=4700
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits N_match=4700 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.645 n_q1=1861 n_q2=353 n_q3=1835 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SNXs5G6H7c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3344, bad_region=5626, passed=58907
Got 58907 stars (including 50285 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58907 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4702 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4702 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4702 stars left (next iteration limit 5170)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4702 robust_rms=6.805 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.019 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.102 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4702 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.817 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.817 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4702 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.867 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4702 robust_rms_before=0.532 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.531 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.817 worst_region_rms_after=0.817 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.817 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.817
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.817 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.817 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.532 arcsec matched=4702
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits N_match=4702 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.668 n_q1=1870 n_q2=349 n_q3=1829 n_q4=654 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-55-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0536.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_071542_TTUQ2b1x1_3643250_yhzH7u49/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:03.06 +23:18:02.3: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:28.40 +23:17:52.9: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:24.15 +20:11:58.3: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:14:37.80 +24:06:29.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:28.40 +23:17:52.9: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:24.15 +20:11:58.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:03.06 +23:18:02.3: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:14:37.80 +24:06:29.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:03.06 +23:18:02.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9318 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:24.15 +20:11:58.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7376 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:28.40 +23:17:52.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6049 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:32.72 +23:41:44.1: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:57:45.18 +24:46:35.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:32.72 +23:41:44.1: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:32.72 +23:41:44.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9534 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:57:45.18 +24:46:35.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:56:02.05 +19:21:48.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:02.05 +19:21:48.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:54:22.25 +18:54:54.5: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:02.05 +19:21:48.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2188 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:54:22.25 +18:54:54.5: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:22.25 +18:54:54.5: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3059 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.59 +25:20:29.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.09 +22:58:28.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:54:36.45 +18:27:56.2: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.59 +25:20:29.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.59 +25:20:29.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5172 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:08.90 +19:50:39.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:54:01.13 +22:08:39.3: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.09 +22:58:28.6: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.09 +22:58:28.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5857 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:54:36.45 +18:27:56.2: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:08.90 +19:50:39.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:36.45 +18:27:56.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6889 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:54:01.13 +22:08:39.3: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:01.13 +22:08:39.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7989 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:56:11.00 +21:51:41.4: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:11.00 +21:51:41.4: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:11.00 +21:51:41.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6562 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189043_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189043_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189046_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189046_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:25.20 +25:17:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189056_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189056_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.65 +19:17:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189057_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189057_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.12 +18:20:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.61 +17:48:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189082_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 189082_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189114_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189114_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189116_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189116_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189131_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189131_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.54 +21:37:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.70 +22:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189141_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189141_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.22 +18:59:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189143_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189143_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.97 +25:05:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189147_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189147_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.91 +18:33:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189149_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189149_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.63 +20:46:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189155_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189155_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.09 +18:13:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.05 +24:36:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.86 +18:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189159_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189159_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.93 +20:10:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189160_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189160_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.65 +19:34:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189161_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189161_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.87 +23:40:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.81 +22:40:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189165_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189165_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 189170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189172_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189172_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:34.96 +20:27:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189174_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189174_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.42 +18:52:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:12.80 +24:31:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189176_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189176_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:57.47 +19:43:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189177_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189177_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.38 +18:33:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.69 +21:51:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189196_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189196_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:35.61 +20:26:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.56 +22:27:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189201_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189201_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.26 +23:00:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189202_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.30 +25:47:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189206_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:59.70 +22:34:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:28.80 +21:19:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189211_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189211_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.36 +24:18:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189212_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189212_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.14 +18:33:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.24 +18:40:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:02.33 +22:58:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189224_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.77 +20:05:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189226_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189226_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.16 +20:53:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.81 +19:32:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189233_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189233_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.98 +18:33:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189234_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189234_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.15 +18:44:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.17 +25:25:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189239_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189239_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189241_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189241_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.83 +19:09:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189244_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189244_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:53.55 +21:56:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189245_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189245_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:48.48 +19:03:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:41.26 +22:21:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.44 +20:56:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189253_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189253_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.22 +22:45:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:18.07 +23:13:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.28 +20:45:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189267_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189267_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.64 +25:22:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.75 +23:11:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189275_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189275_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189276_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189276_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.07 +24:22:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.52 +21:46:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189280_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189280_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.89 +19:35:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189283_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189283_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.88 +26:10:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189286_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189286_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.45 +21:47:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189287_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189287_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.58 +21:24:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189290_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189290_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.73 +19:23:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189294_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189294_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189295_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189295_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189298_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 189298_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189302_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189302_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:26.54 +22:27:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 189303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.34 +25:08:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.11 +24:10:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.45 +26:13:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.08 +20:22:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.42 +17:54:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.51 +19:25:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
Preparing report for the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_06-56-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0537 did not pass the final checks
