Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 01.2827  2461314.7827  11.56  23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7
 80.90594 -65.79916 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      0       0  11.6     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7:  15.25 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7:  15.33 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -crosshair 6737.65332 2191.32080 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -crosshair 6733.14502 2192.04419 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28271 23 47 01.54 -08 19 51.7          11.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28245 23 47 01.54 -08 19 51.7          11.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28298 23 47 01.54 -08 19 51.6          11.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 01.2827*  23 47 01.54 -08 19 51.7  11.6 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7827,11.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2827 11.56CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 01.2827  2461314.7827  12.40  00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2
 89.55139 -66.73705 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -0      0       0  12.3     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -crosshair 4669.44531 1505.15454 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -crosshair 4664.91846 1505.98364 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28271 00 00 49.78 -07 12 13.2          12.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28245 00 00 49.80 -07 12 13.0          12.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28298 00 00 49.77 -07 12 13.5          12.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 01.2827*  00 00 49.78 -07 12 13.2  12.4 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7827,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2827 12.40CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 01.2827  2461314.7827  13.97  23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8
 80.38566 -69.55581 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -0     -0       0  13.6    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -crosshair 5440.49316 4061.94849 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -crosshair 5435.96680 4062.62427 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28271 23 55 39.76 -11 26 01.8          14.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28245 23 55 39.75 -11 26 02.1          14.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 01.28298 23 55 39.78 -11 26 01.5          14.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 01.2827*  23 55 39.76 -11 26 01.8  14.0 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7827,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2827 13.97CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461314.78297745 01.10.2026 06:47:19.252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4431
Objects passed selection criteria:  4416
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3457.25
Average stars matched: 3121 (90.2741 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  1 02:24:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461314.78297745 01.10.2026 06:47:19.252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  22949
Objects passed selection criteria:  22878
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 18628
Average stars matched: 16491.8 (88.532 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   245456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Oct  1 02:25:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 656212 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 656212 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1717.6047
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 555.3150
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1718.4387
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 554.0409
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.24401
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 16.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T01:46:33.7531322' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T06:46:33.7531322' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61314.282335104 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T06:46:43.6546100' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61314.282449699 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999620322172 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99965871389829 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.4905555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     193.323611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.40092516028885 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20702 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20702 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 16.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                121.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            12.601008 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits :)

Spent 0.559047 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 16.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T01:47:19.2523836' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T06:47:19.2523836' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61314.2828617129 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T06:47:29.1569386' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61314.2829763424 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999620299078 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99965871561107 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.4533333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     193.588333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.40181750547923 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20702 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20702 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 16.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                121.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            12.601008 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits :)

Spent 0.595417 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.78245084
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.050 -09:59:55.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:03.050 -09:59:55.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.223 -09:59:50.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.223 -09:59:50.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:03.050 -09:59:55.41
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.223 -09:59:50.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00762 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xmqUNwsDs5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HeF2ImL708
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kr5QZDZGLZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.keKUBdgVpd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.92

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.92

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xmqUNwsDs5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HeF2ImL708 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kr5QZDZGLZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, bad_region=1168, passed=4676
Got 4676 stars (including 3258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9536 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9536
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3175 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9538 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9538
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3175 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3172 stars left (next iteration limit 3489)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3172 robust_rms=7.997 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.952 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.952 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3172 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.856 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.856 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3172 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.420 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3172 robust_rms_before=1.128 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.377 worst_region_rms_after=0.420 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.355 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.282 arcsec matched=3172
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits N_match=3172 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=980 n_q2=623 n_q3=995 n_q4=574 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.keKUBdgVpd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, bad_region=1151, passed=4622
Got 4622 stars (including 3207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4622 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9536 through 0 to 8.0771, gap 8.0771 to 351.9536
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3124 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3123 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3123 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3124 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3122 stars left (next iteration limit 3435)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3122 robust_rms=7.933 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.657 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.657 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3122 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.043 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3122 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.384 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3122 robust_rms_before=1.173 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.359 worst_region_rms_after=0.384 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.357 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.384
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.359 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.292 arcsec matched=3122
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=3122 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=969 n_q2=612 n_q3=978 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.036
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.091
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.036
reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228_astrometric_residuals.png (3172 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (3122 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7:  15.25 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7:  15.33 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20687.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20687_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
Preparing report for the candidate 20687_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.050 -09:59:55.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:03.050 -09:59:55.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.223 -09:59:50.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.223 -09:59:50.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:03.050 -09:59:55.41
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.223 -09:59:50.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00762 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Xh8LMgeey
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xVdM3AmRHa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CDXqytv5tT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E6ghmxpBMo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 60 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0Xh8LMgeey (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724
Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xVdM3AmRHa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CDXqytv5tT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=869, bad_region=5115, passed=24137
Got 24137 stars (including 18359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24137 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9472 through 0 to 8.0973, gap 8.0973 to 351.9472
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9474 through 0 to 8.0979, gap 8.0979 to 351.9474
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=7.843 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.878 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.034 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.034 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4819 robust_rms_before=1.141 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.426 worst_region_rms_after=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.327 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.426 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.303 arcsec matched=4819
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1507 n_q2=963 n_q3=1467 n_q4=882 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E6ghmxpBMo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=881, bad_region=5145, passed=24482
Got 24482 stars (including 18644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9468 through 0 to 8.0888, gap 8.0888 to 351.9468
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9470 through 0 to 8.0895, gap 8.0895 to 351.9470
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4814 stars left (next iteration limit 5295)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4814 robust_rms=7.867 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.776 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.776 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4814 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.126 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.126 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4814 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4814 robust_rms_before=1.182 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.416 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.365 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4814
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4814 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1498 n_q2=976 n_q3=1460 n_q4=880 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:28.94 -13:25:15.6:  13.76 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.8:  12.55 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.69 -05:59:49.7:  13.73 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:47.10 -09:24:30.8:  12.48 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.0:  12.81 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.0:  13.27 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:47.10 -09:24:30.8:  12.69 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:28.94 -13:25:15.6:  14.02 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.69 -05:59:49.7:  13.87 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:47.10 -09:24:30.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2110 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.8:  12.52 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:28.94 -13:25:15.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0916 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.69 -05:59:49.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2770 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6249 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.0:  13.03 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3168 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.0:  13.24 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4590 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.89 -06:55:20.9:  13.45 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:22.02 -10:46:14.6:  13.77 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.85 -09:31:10.9:  13.83 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.89 -06:55:20.9:  13.62 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.89 -06:55:20.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8172 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:11.1:  13.66 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:50:11.37 -13:49:46.2:  15.34 +/- 0.36  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:22.02 -10:46:14.6:  13.90 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:22.02 -10:46:14.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0272 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.85 -09:31:10.9:  13.78 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.85 -09:31:10.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1500 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:11.1:  13.84 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:11.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2131 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:50:11.37 -13:49:46.2:  15.36 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.34 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:50:11.37 -13:49:46.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=14.1116 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out35428.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35074.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32124_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    14.10    00:06:29.05 -13:25:15.6   3846 5270   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.09    00:06:28.84 -13:25:15.5   3842 5271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32125_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32125_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    14.29    00:13:02.68 -05:59:49.6   2824 0780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.26    00:13:02.71 -05:59:49.9   2819 0781   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32127_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    13.28    23:56:47.10 -09:24:30.5   5275 2838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.17    23:56:47.11 -09:24:31.2   5271 2839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32416_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32416_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    11.00    23:43:09.12 -07:52:57.2   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32532_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    11.20    00:06:10.06 -10:03:26.1   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32617_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32617_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    11.64    23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.5   6733 2192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

**** FOUND  23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32725_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 32725_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    11.94    23:45:44.25 -06:20:07.4   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33056_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
Preparing report for the candidate 33056_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33187_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33187_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    12.63    23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.6   4828 0699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    12.62    23:59:45.79 -05:52:35.0   4824 0700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33327_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33327_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    12.49    00:13:42.90 -13:55:05.7   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33435_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33435_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    12.87    23:44:30.36 -07:15:45.3   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33562_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33562_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    12.81    00:09:48.42 -09:32:02.8   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33602_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33602_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    12.83    23:45:23.38 -13:34:37.2   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33731_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33731_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.25    23:45:16.47 -06:38:31.2   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33872_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33872_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    13.31    23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.2   6578 1756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.32    23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.8   6574 1756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33944_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33944_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.04    00:04:30.97 -14:04:09.4   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 33988_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.29    23:45:35.62 -09:34:00.6   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34012_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34012_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    13.43    23:52:48.92 -06:31:07.8   5874 1089   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.49    23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.1   5870 1090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34045_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34045_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.16    00:05:09.20 -08:21:10.6   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34107_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34107_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.53    23:48:18.29 -06:06:21.7   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34167_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34167_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.26    00:02:15.75 -13:57:26.9   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34247_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34247_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.18    00:17:09.42 -10:26:49.2   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34277_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34277_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.47    00:03:56.85 -07:13:40.4   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34313_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34313_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.30    00:06:11.05 -09:24:30.7   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34392_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34392_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.34    00:07:47.27 -14:07:22.4   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34415_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34415_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.52    00:15:53.35 -11:05:07.8   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34492_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34492_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.67    23:49:13.66 -09:42:08.0   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34497_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34497_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.61    00:09:40.67 -06:13:12.6   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34520_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34520_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.55    00:10:51.24 -05:51:44.2   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34578_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    13.86    23:44:44.91 -06:55:20.8   7089 1338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.79    23:44:44.88 -06:55:21.0   7085 1339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34587_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34587_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.38    00:17:17.11 -12:58:43.7   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34649_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34649_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.56    00:18:05.62 -13:48:17.8   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34681_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34681_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.70    23:42:31.28 -10:04:33.4   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34754_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34754_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.51    23:56:08.58 -12:59:15.0   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34766_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34766_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.85    23:46:51.79 -12:14:00.4   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34790_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34790_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.84    23:55:25.64 -12:24:39.9   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34826_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34826_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.65    23:49:58.06 -10:58:30.3   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34835_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34835_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.70    23:42:42.28 -12:24:51.7   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34939_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34939_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.80    23:51:02.23 -11:40:09.8   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34949_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 34949_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.78    00:04:54.46 -13:36:17.4   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35005_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35005_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.73    23:50:31.63 -09:42:07.8   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35037_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35037_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.89    00:17:43.90 -12:13:35.0   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35072_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35072_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.03    00:10:55.79 -06:04:55.6   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35074_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
Preparing report for the candidate 35074_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35093_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35093_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    13.95    00:03:22.06 -10:46:14.2   4298 3663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.13    00:03:21.98 -10:46:14.9   4294 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35123_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35123_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.10    23:46:29.25 -12:24:13.6   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35170_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35170_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    14.07    23:56:18.83 -09:31:10.2   5345 2905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.26    23:56:18.88 -09:31:11.7   5341 2906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35180_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35180_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.82    00:11:11.50 -12:06:55.3   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35182_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35182_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.83    00:12:52.20 -10:30:29.1   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35183_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35183_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.90    23:48:39.91 -08:06:13.3   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35262_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35262_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.15    23:59:36.92 -09:27:22.3   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35370_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35370_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.32    23:53:57.77 -07:00:25.3   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35381_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35381_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 01.28245    2461314.78245    14.16    00:00:47.33 -09:01:11.4   4678 2604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-46-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.27    00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.8   4674 2605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35428_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35428_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.12    23:50:11.42 -13:49:46.5   6240 5519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

**** FOUND  23:50:11.37 -13:49:46.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.303 2420183632863472128 357.54733195045 -13.82942705354 13.7471 12.5902 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.303#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35535_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35535_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.77    00:07:08.49 -10:30:14.8   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35558_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35558_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.11    00:00:46.00 -12:39:49.2   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35602_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35602_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.18    00:07:58.24 -06:06:08.7   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35672_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35672_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.32    00:11:37.06 -06:56:08.6   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35901_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 35901_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    14.01    00:16:55.07 -12:40:40.3   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229
The candidate 31900_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 01.28298    2461314.78298    13.30    00:16:29.47 -08:01:05.8   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_022212_TTUQ2b1x1_856062_8B0bk1Qh/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_01-47-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7
00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2
23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8
########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7
00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2
23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8
###################################################################################
23:47:01.54 -08:19:51.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:00:49.78 -07:12:13.2  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:55:39.76 -11:26:01.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
23:50:11.37 -13:49:46.2
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.78245084 -observatory V36
13:51:40.33 -13:22:34.5 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:12:53.50 -20:52:42.0 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:15:49.69 +20:49:19.4 Mars (1.1mag)
09:27:31.35 +15:36:36.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:21.70 +01:55:33.3 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:57.97 +21:00:11.9 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:21.26 -00:19:05.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:23.11 -23:43:12.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:22:33.30 +26:19:32.4 Moon (-11.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Oct  1 02:24 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.78245084:
09:27:31.74 +15:36:35.8 Io (9.5mag)
09:27:41.02 +15:35:46.5 Europa (6.2mag)
09:27:16.10 +15:37:59.8 Ganymede (8.0mag)
09:28:00.73 +15:34:02.1 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:26:32.58 +15:58:35.3 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:27:28.93 +15:36:49.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:25:40.38 +15:55:35.5 Elara (17.5mag)
09:30:31.85 +14:59:32.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:26:51.40 +16:01:02.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:45:24.86 +01:54:57.7 Titan (8.2mag)
00:45:24.27 +01:55:13.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:44:42.78 +01:53:42.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:45:37.16 +01:55:21.5 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:43:47.27 +01:43:35.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct  1 02:24 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.78245084:
01:34:03.30 +19:49:08.9 JWST
17:54:20.12 +29:31:22.0 Chandra
11:22:55.10 -60:10:54.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct  1 02:24 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.78245084 -observatory V36
03:47:39.21 +20:05:53.0 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:16:23.46 -33:43:39.4 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:35:04.82 -71:44:40.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:37.91 +34:21:29.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:05:37.16 +48:01:22.4 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:25:36.50 +25:34:44.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
08:56:25.71 +34:40:56.6 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:48.74 +42:00:48.7 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:48.13 -13:26:06.3 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:58:39.03 +16:49:47.0 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:41:02.44 -01:52:19.2 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:01:48.41 +68:43:30.5 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:47:03.80 +44:32:55.2 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:35:56.90 +13:18:04.2 17.6mag A/2026 E1
00:50:03.10 +20:04:38.5 18.0mag 2P/Encke
22:47:38.06 -33:38:32.7 14.1mag 10P/Tempel
01:56:17.28 +39:38:10.9 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:04:24.77 -07:20:34.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:56:51.37 -12:26:41.8 18.0mag 63P/Wild
07:21:15.64 +17:04:21.1 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:08:54.49 +14:45:04.3 16.9mag 88P/Howell
07:02:03.52 +37:10:31.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:38:00.25 +17:39:15.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:19:58.74 +15:34:08.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:41:49.43 -29:13:39.7 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:42:47.28 +19:44:36.5 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:23:17.26 -06:11:31.8 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:54:12.17 +04:12:52.5 13.4mag 169P/NEAT
03:32:51.49 +05:53:13.0 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:45:34.73 +42:54:00.5 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.5K Oct  1 02:24 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct  1 02:24 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct  1 02:24 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:54:06.067 -30:54:18.16  AT 2026abgs  2026-09-01.59 19.74
23:36:50.507 -18:25:52.11  AT 2026abgr  2026-09-10.33 19.8377
21:02:51.216 -46:42:43.39  AT 2026abgq  2026-09-08.49 19.71
22:02:10.332 -48:36:38.02  AT 2026abgp  2026-09-08.53 19.87
21:52:21.472 -49:52:32.76  AT 2026abgo  2026-09-08.53 19.89
01:21:59.577 +27:39:37.17  AT 2026abgn  2026-09-10.04 19.81
01:47:29.118 +34:58:06.10  AT 2026abgm  2026-08-27.58 20.08
22:34:51.296 -21:55:21.23  AT 2026abgl  2026-08-13.43 20.49
23:10:06.537 -12:32:24.43  AT 2026abgk  2026-08-09.62 20.73
21:13:51.314 -27:54:54.88  AT 2026abgj  2026-08-11.42 20.46
00:39:35.670 -23:33:58.32  AT 2026abgi  2026-08-12.59 21.24
23:50:40.885 -22:21:27.13  AT 2026abgh  2026-09-03.46 21.32
00:50:17.770 -28:53:41.69  AT 2026abgg  2026-06-23.79 20.14
01:37:46.664 -44:11:29.14  AT 2026abgf  2026-09-10.59 20.23
17:26:13.489 -06:52:39.77  AT 2026abge  2026-09-11.38 20.61
03:31:01.749 -35:31:30.12  AT 2026abgd  2026-09-03.76 19.9
00:34:05.597 +43:45:16.15  AT 2026abgc  2026-09-10.37 19.7543
23:27:42.003 +23:35:16.96  SN 2026abgb  2026-09-10.30 18.9925
21:01:42.344 -50:55:01.74  AT 2026abga  2026-09-10.50 18.43
21:49:52.457 -54:10:13.02  AT 2026abfz  2026-09-10.53 20.07
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct  1 02:24 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Oct  1 02:24:09 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 25s (0.42 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 46s (0.77 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 11s (0.18 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 10s (0.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 11s (0.18 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 35s (0.58 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q2b1x1: 95s (1.58 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 107s (1.78 min)
Finished: Thu Oct  1 02:25:56 CDT 2026