This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 11.82 06:54:16.73 +26:22:06.8
189.39558 12.26340 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 1 1 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:54:16.73 +26:22:06.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:54:16.73 +26:22:06.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7898,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2898 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 10.96 06:33:58.12 +21:14:37.3
192.03423 5.85732 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CQ Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.800 pg 13.800 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:58.12 +21:14:37.3: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:33:58.12 +21:14:37.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CQ Gem,2461314.7898,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CQ Gem 20261001.2898 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 11.12 06:28:08.03 +22:54:28.2
189.92739 5.40963 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" CH Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.190 V Y 0.380 V 2452720.40000 74.000634000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:08.03 +22:54:28.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:08.03 +22:54:28.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CH Gem,2461314.7898,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CH Gem 20261001.2898 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 11.88 06:38:20.68 +21:18:51.4
192.43147 6.79983 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" DZ Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.890 V Y 0.890 V 2452904.90000 101.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:20.68 +21:18:51.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:20.68 +21:18:51.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DZ Gem,2461314.7898,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DZ Gem 20261001.2898 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 12.60 06:35:58.14 +17:05:37.4
195.96299 4.39641 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0635582+170538
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.183 g Y 0.894 g 2458385.15460 139.530901400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:58.14 +17:05:37.4: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:58.14 +17:05:37.4: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0635582+170538,2461314.7898,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0635582+170538 20261001.2898 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 11.83 06:20:34.84 +18:19:56.2
193.16590 1.72005 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J062034.87+181955.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.320 V 13.740 V 2457669.10000 68.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:34.84 +18:19:56.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:34.84 +18:19:56.2: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062034.87+181955.8,2461314.7898,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062034.87+181955.8 20261001.2898 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 11.54 06:53:24.46 +18:11:17.2
196.83905 8.60355 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" NSVS J0653240+181113
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.944 R1 Y 0.282 R1 138.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:53:24.46 +18:11:17.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:53:24.46 +18:11:17.2: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0653240+181113,2461314.7898,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0653240+181113 20261001.2898 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 11.24 06:36:41.68 +18:27:06.8
194.82705 5.16653 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CT Gem
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.790 V Y 0.370 V 2453010.40000 137.808254000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:36:41.68 +18:27:06.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:36:41.68 +18:27:06.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CT Gem,2461314.7898,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CT Gem 20261001.2898 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 10.90 06:49:03.31 +20:54:40.9
193.90696 8.86506 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J064903+2054.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.630 V Y 0.870 V 2452949.10000 99.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:49:03.31 +20:54:40.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:49:03.31 +20:54:40.9: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J064903+2054.6,2461314.7898,10.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J064903+2054.6 20261001.2898 10.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2898 2461314.7898 9.59 06:47:50.21 +17:06:29.4
197.22943 6.93683 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" FF Gem
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 pg 15.400 pg 2428017.00000 393.000000000000 C7,3e(N)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:50.21 +17:06:29.4: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:50.21 +17:06:29.4: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FF Gem,2461314.7898,9.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FF Gem 20261001.2898 9.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461314.79017924 01.10.2026 06:57:41.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27688
Objects passed selection criteria: 27628
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20747.5
Average stars matched: 19620.2 (94.5668 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253764 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 02:01:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461314.79017924 01.10.2026 06:57:41.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 53 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 176285
Objects passed selection criteria: 175878
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 129902
Average stars matched: 125751 (96.8043 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 577228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 02:03:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.78934308
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:31.221 +21:59:24.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:31.221 +21:59:24.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0387 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:28.381 +21:58:45.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:28.381 +21:58:45.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0537 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:31.221 +21:59:24.72
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:28.381 +21:58:45.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01541 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AqfbsBBbyV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.knrtg4hpT3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EHIh9BA1rp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ppc6HfjOKR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
3.5 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AqfbsBBbyV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.knrtg4hpT3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EHIh9BA1rp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=637, bad_region=0, passed=11263
Got 11263 stars (including 10619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=10.640 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.867 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.236 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.128 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.775 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.214 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.505 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.556 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.867 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.825 worst_region_rms_after=1.236 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.987 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.128
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.825 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.825 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.556 arcsec matched=4796
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.767 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=1342 n_q2=906 n_q3=1496 n_q4=1052 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.407
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ppc6HfjOKR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=620, bad_region=0, passed=11346
Got 11346 stars (including 10714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=10.581 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.197 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.197 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.768 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.108 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.108 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.684 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.091 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.248 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.582 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.768 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.862 worst_region_rms_after=1.108 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.881 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.108
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.862 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.582 arcsec matched=4790
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.799 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=1334 n_q2=915 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1056 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits sigma_overall=0.545 worst_q_ratio=1.407
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.556 worst_q_ratio=1.435
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144_astrometric_residuals.png (4796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4790 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:57.69 +21:14:37.3: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:33:57.69 +21:14:37.3: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:57.69 +21:14:37.3: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8631 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34346_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 34346_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.72 +20:02:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33107_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 33107_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.80 +18:15:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 12795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03180_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 03180_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:33.74 +17:50:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:31.221 +21:59:24.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:31.221 +21:59:24.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0387 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:28.381 +21:58:45.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:28.381 +21:58:45.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0537 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:31.221 +21:59:24.72
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:28.381 +21:58:45.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01541 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.upD6BzpBtE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jjSlxCMA8X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OLnmE4sdaI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.97VQtc6Dqy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.upD6BzpBtE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jjSlxCMA8X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OLnmE4sdaI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4172, bad_region=10, passed=63750
Got 63750 stars (including 59496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=10.872 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.995 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.995 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.869 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.254 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.100 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.781 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.219 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.871 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=1.502 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.589 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.869 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.844 worst_region_rms_after=1.254 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.956 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.100
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.844 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.844 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.589 arcsec matched=4799
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.788 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=1350 n_q2=862 n_q3=1505 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.97VQtc6Dqy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4308, bad_region=9, passed=64075
Got 64075 stars (including 59687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=10.721 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.371 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.769 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.102 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.075 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.091 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.895 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=1.243 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.598 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.769 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.865 worst_region_rms_after=1.102 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.876 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.075
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.865 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.598 arcsec matched=4789
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.784 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.637 n_q1=1328 n_q2=874 n_q3=1504 n_q4=1083 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.362
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-56-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
WARNING: the installed astorb.dat is only 24 bytes, far below the 30000000 bytes expected - it is incomplete and will be re-downloaded
######### Updating astorb.dat #########
### download command ###
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj
curl --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --retry-delay 30 --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 30 --max-time 3600 --insecure --continue-at - --output astorb_dat_new.gz https://kirx.net/~kirx/vast_catalogs/astorb.dat.gz
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 108.3M 0 398.3k 0 0 398.6k 0 04:38 04:38 398.7k
15 108.3M 15 17.10M 0 0 8.55M 0 00:12 00:01 00:11 8.55M
37 108.3M 37 40.46M 0 0 13.48M 0 00:08 00:03 00:05 13.48M
57 108.3M 57 62.40M 0 0 15.59M 0 00:06 00:04 00:02 15.59M
79 108.3M 79 85.70M 0 0 17.13M 0 00:06 00:05 00:01 17.13M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.10M 0 00:05 00:05 17.13M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.10M 0 00:05 00:05 17.13M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.10M 0 00:05 00:05 17.13M
TMP_OUTPUT=astorb_dat_new
### UNPACK_COMMAND ###
We are currently at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_015845_TTUQ1b1x1_3919859_dnt7d8lj
Will run the unpack command: gunzip astorb_dat_new.gz
Unpack complete
Moved astorb_dat_new to astorb.dat
Successfully updated astorb.dat
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:45.41 +23:46:05.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:36:57.19 +21:31:27.5: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:58:20.81 +16:53:25.5: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:56.42 +17:35:47.1: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:24.74 +22:08:51.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:41.53 +18:54:06.6: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.64 +20:16:16.8: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:45.41 +23:46:05.9: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:58:20.81 +16:53:25.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:56.42 +17:35:47.1: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:36:57.19 +21:31:27.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:41.53 +18:54:06.6: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:24.74 +22:08:51.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:45.41 +23:46:05.9: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0517 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:56.42 +17:35:47.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1114 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:20.81 +16:53:25.5: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8017 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:57.19 +21:31:27.5: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3624 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:41.53 +18:54:06.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4580 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:24.74 +22:08:51.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1727 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.64 +20:16:16.8: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.64 +20:16:16.8: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4522 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:54:16.73 +26:22:06.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.15 +20:11:38.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:54:16.73 +26:22:06.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.15 +20:11:38.1: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.15 +20:11:38.1: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7508 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:45.06 +25:04:17.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:16.72 +22:09:31.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:15.71 +26:58:11.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:45.06 +25:04:17.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:16.72 +22:09:31.4: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:45.06 +25:04:17.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7330 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:16.72 +22:09:31.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7764 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:15.71 +26:58:11.9: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:15.71 +26:58:11.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0221 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:03.94 +23:40:50.0: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:58.12 +21:14:37.3: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:03.94 +23:40:50.0: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:03.94 +23:40:50.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4879 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:08.03 +22:54:28.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:33:58.12 +21:14:37.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:33:58.12 +21:14:37.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9496 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:08.03 +22:54:28.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:28:08.03 +22:54:28.2: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1173 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:20.68 +21:18:51.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:58.14 +17:05:37.4: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:20.68 +21:18:51.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:38:20.68 +21:18:51.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8768 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:58.14 +17:05:37.4: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:35:58.14 +17:05:37.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5950 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:34.84 +18:19:56.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:34.84 +18:19:56.2: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:20:34.84 +18:19:56.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8235 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:53:24.46 +18:11:17.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:53:24.46 +18:11:17.2: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:53:24.46 +18:11:17.2: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5385 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:36:41.68 +18:27:06.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:36:41.68 +18:27:06.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:36:41.68 +18:27:06.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2484 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:49:03.31 +20:54:40.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:49:03.31 +20:54:40.9: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:49:03.31 +20:54:40.9: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8976 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:50.21 +17:06:29.4: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:50.21 +17:06:29.4: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:47:50.21 +17:06:29.4: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5861 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05733.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31143.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88407.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230768_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230768_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230787_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230787_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230788_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230788_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230789_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230789_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.00 +25:11:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230799_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230799_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:22.48 +25:34:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230987_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230987_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.54 +22:29:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230997_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 230997_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.83 +22:30:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231200_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231200_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231206_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231206_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231250_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231250_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.83 +23:18:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.69 +24:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.44 +20:10:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231271_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231271_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.29 +22:32:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231342_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231342_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.31 +23:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 231413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231472_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231472_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231492_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231492_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.50 +21:37:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231542_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231542_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.12 +22:53:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231589_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231589_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.20 +21:52:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231676_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231676_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.78 +22:33:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231679_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231679_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.96 +24:26:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231735_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231735_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.51 +23:15:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231804_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231804_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.22 +19:19:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231806_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231806_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.70 +23:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231822_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231822_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.92 +25:58:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231826_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231826_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:56.66 +25:01:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231856_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231856_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:31.26 +25:20:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231886_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231886_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.83 +24:26:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231891_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231891_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231924_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231924_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231956_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 231956_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.51 +24:36:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232010_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232010_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232028_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232028_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232054_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232054_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.98 +25:01:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232058_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232058_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.41 +16:57:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:09.72 +22:19:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232092_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232092_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.49 +18:11:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232110_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232110_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.88 +22:43:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232141_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232141_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.34 +20:26:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232146_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232146_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.71 +23:06:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.81 +21:10:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232217_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232217_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.79 +26:22:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232253_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232253_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.50 +22:44:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.65 +24:51:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232322_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232322_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:20.93 +18:34:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232362_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232362_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.63 +23:08:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232547_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 232547_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:54.38 +22:43:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87791_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 87791_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44719_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 44719_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:24.33 +19:07:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122607_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 122607_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:22.95 +22:04:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70118_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 70118_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:21.51 +20:19:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.21 +21:51:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:58.43 +19:53:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88407_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 88407_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.27 +18:43:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113701_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 113701_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:47.66 +22:25:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.81 +18:15:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05960_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 05960_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183592_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 183592_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:38.26 +25:32:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.50 +18:05:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.73 +20:02:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 127632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:47.12 +23:09:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.58 +21:22:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 43650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:25.21 +19:09:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31143_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 31143_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:26.09 +20:28:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42618_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 42618_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:42.94 +18:57:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:39.00 +18:11:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 05790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:21.87 +16:59:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24689_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 24689_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:33.81 +17:50:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 56915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:06.10 +19:46:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:33.57 +21:37:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126778_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 126778_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.25 +22:46:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31367_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 31367_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:39.31 +19:11:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:07.64 +25:02:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80596_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 80596_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147365_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 147365_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:27.14 +23:51:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37474_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 37474_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:27.09 +18:39:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05733_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 05733_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59538_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 59538_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_01-57-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
