Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7119,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2119 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Aur-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aur-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Aur-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 717498 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 717498 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits

renamed 'Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 565.0960
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 645.3049
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 11437.4649
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 7463.8385
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 11420.2022
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 7516.3425
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 20.2399
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.007
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T00:04:26.1799679' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T05:04:26.1799679' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61314.211414109 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T05:04:36.0858557' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61314.2115287618 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 74.9984915632468 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9994590442514 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2202777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.7586111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.75824047935771 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.62 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 97.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits :)
Spent 0.740876 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T00:05:26.9218760' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T05:05:26.9218760' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61314.2121171411 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T05:05:36.8232047' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61314.2122317478 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 74.9984914400692 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9994590395784 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.4069444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.8725 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.71505834828788 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.62 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 97.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits :)
Spent 0.728605 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits

fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.71152985
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:51.278 +29:59:37.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:51.278 +29:59:37.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:50.461 +30:00:17.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:50.461 +30:00:17.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:51.278 +29:59:37.13
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:50.461 +30:00:17.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01165 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7nLUvT8Sol
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QkUecz0PnR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j3EecpKyNl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GJB5PCXkmM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.7nLUvT8Sol (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QkUecz0PnR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j3EecpKyNl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=3410
Got 3410 stars (including 3150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3049 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3023 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3023 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3047 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3025 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 3024 stars left (next iteration limit 3325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3024 robust_rms=10.080 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3024 robust_rms=0.681 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.856 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.856 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3024 robust_rms=0.614 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.806 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.806 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3024 robust_rms_before=1.540 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.614 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.782 worst_region_rms_after=0.806 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.994 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.806
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.782 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.782 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.504 arcsec matched=3024
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits N_match=3024 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.710 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=450 n_q2=548 n_q3=695 n_q4=1331 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GJB5PCXkmM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, bad_region=0, passed=3433
Got 3433 stars (including 3159 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3062 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3036 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3036 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3064 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3039 stars left (next iteration limit 3339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3039 robust_rms=10.211 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.603 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3039 robust_rms=0.752 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.122 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.019 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3039 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.873 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.873 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3039 robust_rms_before=1.559 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.596 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.720 worst_region_rms_after=0.873 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.861 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.873
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.720 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.720 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.468 arcsec matched=3039
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=3039 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=446 n_q2=550 n_q3=690 n_q4=1353 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.402
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.462
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068_astrometric_residuals.png (3024 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (3039 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 9.68 | 04:38:11.36 +35:13:59.4 | 1938 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:38:11.37 +35:13:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 8.78 | 05:16:21.65 +30:42:38.0 | 6894 3781 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:16:21.65 +30:42:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 8.30 | 05:27:07.41 +34:08:57.9 | 8054 6004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:27:07.40 +34:08:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:51.278 +29:59:37.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:51.278 +29:59:37.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:50.461 +30:00:17.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:50.461 +30:00:17.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:51.278 +29:59:37.13
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:50.461 +30:00:17.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01165 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ipzVSih5Ea
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4vYRaN77fQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dkiiy1mQPE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l0RtL9rdRj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
16.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ipzVSih5Ea (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4vYRaN77fQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dkiiy1mQPE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=835, bad_region=1, passed=24540
Got 24540 stars (including 23672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=10.220 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.494 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.718 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.946 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.946 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.631 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.832 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.542 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.631 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.753 worst_region_rms_after=0.832 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.092 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.832
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.753 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.753 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.510 arcsec matched=4781
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=710 n_q2=856 n_q3=1184 n_q4=2031 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.l0RtL9rdRj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=865, bad_region=1, passed=25038
Got 25038 stars (including 24132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25038 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=10.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.765 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.080 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.922 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.922 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=1.560 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.624 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.757 worst_region_rms_after=0.922 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.031 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.922
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.757 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.757 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.504 arcsec matched=4782
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=717 n_q2=857 n_q3=1182 n_q4=2026 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:09.02 +25:58:10.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:09.02 +25:58:10.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.49 | 04:33:04.55 +29:46:45.6 | 1292 2962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:33:04.49 +29:46:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 9.75 | 04:38:11.36 +35:13:59.6 | 1938 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:38:11.37 +35:13:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.59 | 04:26:11.24 +31:27:24.8 | 0396 3990 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:26:11.23 +31:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.90 | 04:41:14.26 +28:37:41.0 | 2378 2275 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:41:14.21 +28:37:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151222_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151222_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.82 | 04:56:57.87 +33:05:59.2 | 4325 5037 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:56:57.87 +33:05:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151230_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151230_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.68 | 05:36:07.83 +34:09:24.6 | 9187 6167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:36:07.76 +34:09:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.74 | 05:27:41.38 +34:26:44.9 | 8105 6193 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:27:41.44 +34:26:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.85 | 05:18:18.13 +33:47:31.8 | 6971 5660 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:18:18.12 +33:47:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151252_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151252_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.81 | 05:36:28.25 +34:07:22.6 | 9233 6153 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:36:28.28 +34:07:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.82 | 05:36:27.96 +34:07:50.3 | 9232 6158 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:36:28.09 +34:07:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151285_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151285_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.34 | 04:56:56.92 +33:06:50.8 | 4322 5045 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:56:56.90 +33:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151300_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
Preparing report for the candidate 151300_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.32 | 05:06:25.52 +34:49:30.1 | 5443 6153 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:06:25.49 +34:49:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151316_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151316_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.33 | 05:15:29.76 +32:42:36.0 | 6677 4972 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:15:29.79 +32:42:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151347_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.63 | 05:18:58.79 +34:23:51.9 | 7021 6035 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:18:58.87 +34:23:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151351_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151351_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.54 | 04:57:04.28 +33:12:23.8 | 4335 5102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:57:04.30 +33:12:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151358_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151358_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.30 | 05:26:33.09 +28:37:18.3 | 8354 2667 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:26:33.09 +28:37:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151360_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151360_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 13.06 | 04:24:36.16 +34:06:48.6 | 0221 5615 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:24:36.11 +34:06:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151371_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151371_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.44 | 05:26:40.63 +34:23:16.0 | 7982 6142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:26:40.71 +34:23:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.36 | 05:14:46.59 +31:23:49.8 | 6654 4174 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:14:46.56 +31:23:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.97 | 04:59:17.82 +32:33:36.6 | 4636 4727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:17.84 +32:33:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.44 | 05:23:18.40 +28:56:37.3 | 7904 2813 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:23:18.38 +28:56:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151422_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 151422_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.94 | 05:18:28.33 +33:11:29.7 | 7027 5300 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:18:28.45 +33:11:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.00 | 05:26:52.98 +30:33:45.8 | 8266 3839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:26:52.99 +30:33:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.13 | 05:10:32.27 +32:10:42.4 | 6075 4596 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.71 | 05:05:51.15 +26:46:28.9 | 5700 1304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:05:50.99 +26:46:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 13.00 | 05:01:21.16 +30:48:07.8 | 4957 3685 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:01:21.18 +30:48:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.14 | 05:15:47.72 +26:45:14.4 | 7033 1397 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:15:47.62 +26:45:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.90 | 05:06:14.28 +32:02:13.4 | 5535 4469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:06:14.31 +32:02:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.71 | 04:59:57.74 +27:26:58.3 | 4889 1661 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:57.72 +27:26:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.59 | 05:05:08.89 +25:22:09.3 | 5662 0449 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:05:08.90 +25:22:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.13 | 05:04:49.35 +25:24:53.5 | 5615 0473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:04:49.29 +25:24:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 12.10 | 05:09:38.62 +28:39:28.2 | 6122 2474 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:09:38.57 +28:39:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.49 | 05:03:15.46 +28:42:51.4 | 5280 2448 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:03:15.46 +28:42:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.92 | 05:22:53.64 +27:26:44.2 | 7944 1906 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:22:53.69 +27:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.97 | 04:59:24.93 +31:53:58.0 | 4672 4330 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:24.95 +31:53:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.85 | 04:59:47.40 +35:03:02.4 | 4616 6236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:47.36 +35:03:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.39 | 05:09:07.45 +26:08:20.1 | 6167 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:09:07.42 +26:08:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 70065_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.58 | 05:07:49.58 +30:24:04.2 | 5808 3502 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:07:49.55 +30:24:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.52 | 05:06:16.48 +27:22:16.1 | 5732 1667 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:06:16.50 +27:22:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 11.48 | 05:33:23.14 +29:29:46.8 | 9196 3304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:33:23.15 +29:29:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 8.31 | 05:27:07.40 +34:08:57.3 | 8054 6004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:27:07.39 +34:08:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 01.21223 | 2461314.71223 | 8.84 | 05:16:21.63 +30:42:38.0 | 6894 3781 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_000631_TTUQ1b1x1_3722012_4P6S9Evi/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-05-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits |
**** FOUND 05:16:21.63 +30:42:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:01:09.02 +25:58:10.9
########### Completed Aur-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
05:01:09.02 +25:58:10.9
###################################################################################
05:01:09.02 +25:58:10.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.71152985 -observatory V36
13:51:19.31 -13:20:08.1 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:12:52.18 -20:52:16.6 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:15:39.19 +20:49:47.6 Mars (1.1mag)
09:27:28.30 +15:36:50.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:22.95 +01:55:41.3 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:58.27 +21:00:12.6 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:21.70 -00:19:02.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:23.25 -23:43:11.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:18:36.91 +26:00:49.1 Moon (-11.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Oct 1 00:11 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.71152985:
09:27:27.13 +15:36:57.8 Io (9.5mag)
09:27:38.52 +15:35:57.0 Europa (6.2mag)
09:27:13.06 +15:38:13.3 Ganymede (8.0mag)
09:27:57.59 +15:34:16.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:26:29.24 +15:58:49.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:27:26.00 +15:37:02.6 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:25:37.17 +15:55:47.8 Elara (17.5mag)
09:30:29.02 +14:59:46.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:26:48.66 +16:01:14.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:45:25.75 +01:55:05.7 Titan (8.2mag)
00:45:25.08 +01:55:21.2 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:44:44.06 +01:53:51.3 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:45:38.49 +01:55:28.9 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:43:48.56 +01:43:43.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 1 00:11 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.71152985:
01:33:50.93 +19:46:35.4 JWST
17:47:53.57 +31:51:07.7 Chandra
10:35:10.50 -57:55:16.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 1 00:11 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.71152985 -observatory V36
03:47:39.31 +20:05:48.3 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:16:20.27 -33:43:45.5 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:35:02.54 -71:44:24.1 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:38.08 +34:21:22.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:05:38.67 +48:01:01.8 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:25:34.29 +25:34:48.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
08:56:23.05 +34:40:33.3 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:48.87 +42:01:02.3 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:47.20 -13:26:01.6 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:58:31.38 +16:50:08.2 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:40:58.33 -01:51:57.8 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:01:31.75 +68:44:48.5 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:47:08.22 +44:33:21.7 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:35:52.77 +13:17:41.2 17.6mag A/2026 E1
00:50:12.06 +20:04:56.1 18.0mag 2P/Encke
22:47:34.18 -33:39:14.6 14.1mag 10P/Tempel
01:56:11.40 +39:38:13.0 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:04:21.85 -07:20:13.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:56:42.73 -12:25:26.7 18.0mag 63P/Wild
07:21:09.04 +17:04:46.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:08:57.73 +14:45:12.1 16.9mag 88P/Howell
07:01:47.98 +37:09:07.7 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:37:49.37 +17:40:41.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:19:49.69 +15:35:06.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:41:39.09 -29:12:21.8 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:42:43.49 +19:44:46.9 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:24:05.87 -06:15:40.4 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:54:02.47 +04:14:01.9 13.4mag 169P/NEAT
03:32:52.24 +05:53:44.9 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:45:26.19 +42:52:57.0 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.5K Oct 1 00:11 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 1 00:11 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 1 00:11 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:02:51.216 -46:42:43.39 AT 2026abgq 2026-09-08.49 19.71
22:02:10.332 -48:36:38.02 AT 2026abgp 2026-09-08.53 19.87
21:52:21.472 -49:52:32.76 AT 2026abgo 2026-09-08.53 19.89
01:21:59.577 +27:39:37.17 AT 2026abgn 2026-09-10.04 19.81
01:47:29.118 +34:58:06.10 AT 2026abgm 2026-08-27.58 20.08
22:34:51.296 -21:55:21.23 AT 2026abgl 2026-08-13.43 20.49
23:10:06.537 -12:32:24.43 AT 2026abgk 2026-08-09.62 20.73
21:13:51.314 -27:54:54.88 AT 2026abgj 2026-08-11.42 20.46
00:39:35.670 -23:33:58.32 AT 2026abgi 2026-08-12.59 21.24
23:50:40.885 -22:21:27.13 AT 2026abgh 2026-09-03.46 21.32
00:50:17.770 -28:53:41.69 AT 2026abgg 2026-06-23.79 20.14
01:37:46.664 -44:11:29.14 AT 2026abgf 2026-09-10.59 20.23
17:26:13.489 -06:52:39.77 AT 2026abge 2026-09-11.38 20.61
03:31:01.749 -35:31:30.12 AT 2026abgd 2026-09-03.76 19.9
00:34:05.597 +43:45:16.15 AT 2026abgc 2026-09-10.37 19.7543
23:27:42.003 +23:35:16.96 SN 2026abgb 2026-09-10.30 18.9925
21:01:42.344 -50:55:01.74 AT 2026abga 2026-09-10.50 18.43
21:49:52.457 -54:10:13.02 AT 2026abfz 2026-09-10.53 20.07
00:05:33.143 -44:02:42.70 AT 2026abfy 2026-09-10.55 19.68
19:20:16.446 +34:29:14.93 AT 2026abfx 2026-09-09.86 19.41
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 1 00:11 tns_transients_list.txt