NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-11-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.47437    2461311.97437    13.37    11:31:22.42 +43:22:38.9   1600 1807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.39    11:31:22.32 +43:22:39.1   1600 1808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 28.4746  2461311.9746  13.38  11:31:22.37 +43:22:39.0
162.61614  67.06961 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 0.6 pix   This object is listed in tocp_transients_list.txt    2.9"  TCP J11312211+4322382  2016-11-04.8134  12.5mag
The object was found in VSX
 1"  MR UMa                        
Type: UGSU
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    12.500   V            18.600   G                                0.063370000000   pec(e)                       
The object was not found in astcheck.
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-11-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.47437    2461311.97437    13.49    12:21:24.83 +49:35:43.8   6951 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.47    12:21:24.62 +49:35:43.1   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 28.4746  2461311.9746  13.48  12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5
135.34583  66.80286 galactic  CVn  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 0.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5:  16.25 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-11-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.47437    2461311.97437    13.95    11:32:48.56 +47:37:11.9   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.97    11:32:49.03 +47:37:07.7   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 28.4746  2461311.9746  13.96  11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8
154.57209  64.39161 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8:  16.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8:  16.17 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-11-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.47437    2461311.97437    14.06    11:52:31.99 +50:03:50.2   4134 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    14.06    11:52:31.85 +50:03:47.8   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 28.4746  2461311.9746  14.06  11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0
145.16008  64.44579 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0:  16.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-11-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits
Field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-11-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-11-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 701332 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 701332 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits

renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.7819 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.5037 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5163.3046 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1215.1053 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5155.8512 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1210.7369 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 11.5567 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T06:22:55.7945969' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T11:22:55.7945969' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.474256875 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T11:23:05.6979249' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.4743714929 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998280418008 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997529774231 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.8538888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.3088888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.84605807404556 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20660 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20660 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 82.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 233.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits :) Spent 0.509584 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T06:23:32.0888902' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T11:23:32.0888902' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.4746769443 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T11:23:41.9925090' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.4747915743 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998280415312 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.99975300963 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9411111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.3686111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82477378497447 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20660 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20660 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 82.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 233.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits :) Spent 0.505892 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits


fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.97437262 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.621 +46:01:46.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.621 +46:01:46.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.797 +46:01:44.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.797 +46:01:44.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:59.621 +46:01:46.03 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:59.797 +46:01:44.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00067 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00067 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits &> /tmp/tmp.awFJdlNXDS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Daog7jGOvP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Ae732I1mo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4h92wPRxwp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.3978 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.3978 deg Loaded 3936 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2810 out of 2955 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2955 out of 6312 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.3978 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.3978 deg Loaded 3936 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2810 out of 2955 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2955 out of 6312 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9142 to 192.3677 deg, Dec +40.1383 to +51.2474 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9142 to 192.3677 deg, Dec 40.1383 to 51.2474 deg Loaded 3769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2802 out of 2907 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 6666 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 13.9 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 13.9 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.awFJdlNXDS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, bad_region=1421, passed=6312 Got 6312 stars (including 4565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4391 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4391 stars left (next iteration limit 4830) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits N_match=4391 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1355 n_q2=755 n_q3=1442 n_q4=839 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Daog7jGOvP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, bad_region=1468, passed=6666 Got 6666 stars (including 4913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4729 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4729 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4718 stars left (next iteration limit 5189) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1507 n_q2=842 n_q3=1535 n_q4=834 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3Ae732I1mo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=175, bad_region=279, passed=1763 Got 1763 stars (including 1325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1763 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1290 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1290 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1290 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1290 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1290 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 1290 stars left (next iteration limit 1419) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1290 robust_rms=6.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.154 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.154 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1290 robust_rms=0.634 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.875 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.565 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1290 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.600 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.480 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1290 robust_rms_before=1.644 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.473 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.559 worst_region_rms_after=0.600 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.474 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.480 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.559 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.559 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.473 arcsec matched=1290 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits N_match=1290 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=430 n_q2=208 n_q3=436 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4h92wPRxwp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=176, bad_region=286, passed=1771 Got 1771 stars (including 1328 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1771 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1288 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 1288 stars left (next iteration limit 1416) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1288 robust_rms=6.558 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.966 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.966 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1288 robust_rms=0.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.752 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.607 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1288 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.562 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.497 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1288 robust_rms_before=1.583 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.471 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.555 worst_region_rms_after=0.562 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.369 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.497 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.555 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.555 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec matched=1288 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits N_match=1288 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=435 n_q2=206 n_q3=435 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.171 ref2=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.097 new1=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.128 new2=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.076 reference average sigma_overall=0.3625 worst_q_ratio=1.134 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308_astrometric_residuals.png (4391 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4718 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542_astrometric_residuals.png (1290 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543_astrometric_residuals.png (1288 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.621 +46:01:46.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.621 +46:01:46.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.797 +46:01:44.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.797 +46:01:44.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:59.621 +46:01:46.03 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:59.797 +46:01:44.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00067 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00067 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nz4nG3uX8e Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZgI0RTvZHa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y1D0qjJPvl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMSj67NamJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30576 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.4126 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.4126 deg Loaded 3968 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2678 out of 2956 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2956 out of 30576 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.809300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.809300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30576 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.4126 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.4126 deg Loaded 3968 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2678 out of 2956 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2956 out of 30576 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8308 to 192.4263 deg, Dec +40.1383 to +51.2775 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8308 to 192.4263 deg, Dec 40.1383 to 51.2775 deg Loaded 3794 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2685 out of 2906 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2906 out of 29946 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 30 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 2.3 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 15.9 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Nz4nG3uX8e (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1202, bad_region=6046, passed=30559 Got 30559 stars (including 23540 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30559 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25840 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25840 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25840 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5281) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1507 n_q2=825 n_q3=1573 n_q4=896 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ZgI0RTvZHa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1201, bad_region=5914, passed=29932 Got 29932 stars (including 23037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29932 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25389 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25389 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25389 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5293) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1528 n_q2=884 n_q3=1509 n_q4=891 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Y1D0qjJPvl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=1277, passed=10657 Got 10657 stars (including 9068 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10657 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5247) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=6.410 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.952 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.952 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.706 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.973 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.682 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.582 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.607 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.661 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.550 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.582 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.695 worst_region_rms_after=0.777 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.420 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.607 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.695 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.695 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.550 arcsec matched=4771 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.537 n_q1=1563 n_q2=682 n_q3=1676 n_q4=850 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.AMSj67NamJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=395, bad_region=1451, passed=10536 Got 10536 stars (including 8847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10536 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9393 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9393 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9393 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5250) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=6.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.880 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.880 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.675 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.896 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.734 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.792 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.633 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=1.651 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.553 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.695 worst_region_rms_after=0.792 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.434 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.633 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.695 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.695 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.553 arcsec matched=4777 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=1557 n_q2=685 n_q3=1676 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:10:17.74 +48:31:32.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:10:17.74 +48:31:32.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:10:17.74 +48:31:32.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8810 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52780.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52783.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52515_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52515_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.98    11:56:55.87 +49:29:46.3   4547 5300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits **** FOUND 11:56:55.83 +49:29:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52519_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52519_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    10.36    12:23:34.55 +43:52:35.2   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52520_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52520_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    10.79    11:51:15.37 +46:02:08.0   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52521_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52521_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.14    11:24:54.71 +44:21:57.7   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52526_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52526_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.50    11:26:44.49 +41:34:21.1   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52527_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52527_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.53    11:46:16.81 +45:27:54.9   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52528_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52528_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.61    11:22:38.73 +43:28:31.8   0644 1987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52530_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52530_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.87    11:23:36.68 +43:01:33.9   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.73    12:19:34.42 +49:00:00.5   6781 5005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits **** FOUND 12:19:34.42 +49:00:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52534_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52534_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    11.80    11:45:45.00 +47:47:43.3   3376 4332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits **** FOUND 11:45:44.96 +47:47:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52535_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52535_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.05    11:23:48.56 +48:26:26.7   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52545_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52545_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.34    11:37:32.87 +44:41:52.9   2360 2536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52560_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52560_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.49    11:53:07.72 +44:20:34.3   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52565_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52565_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.53    11:21:47.85 +44:14:38.6   0620 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52594_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52594_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.79    11:38:44.11 +49:46:24.3   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52595_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52595_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.92    11:26:55.65 +49:24:33.3   1592 5505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52623_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52623_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.47437    2461311.97437    12.85    12:10:17.74 +48:31:31.9   5861 4694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-22-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0542.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.92    12:10:17.74 +48:31:33.3   5861 4694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52635_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52635_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.97    11:31:02.97 +48:46:53.8   1954 5072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits **** FOUND 11:31:02.94 +48:46:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52636_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52636_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.13    11:32:59.90 +47:32:54.1   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52637_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52637_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.24    11:28:46.07 +49:28:41.0   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52687_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52687_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.42    11:26:42.01 +43:06:38.2   1062 1707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52742_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 Preparing report for the candidate 52742_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52747_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52747_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.52    11:24:07.88 +46:47:25.9   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52774_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52774_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.55    11:34:35.49 +42:01:45.7   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52778_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52778_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.36    11:28:30.56 +49:52:42.8   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52780_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 Preparing report for the candidate 52780_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52781_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 52781_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    13.49    11:49:53.19 +42:03:43.9   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52782_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 Preparing report for the candidate 52782_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52783_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 Preparing report for the candidate 52783_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17345_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 The candidate 17345_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.47479    2461311.97479    12.01    12:15:51.32 +47:06:19.9   6435 3846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_071034_TTUQ2b1x1_3279177_WrniIy3d/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_06-23-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0543.fits **** FOUND 12:15:51.31 +47:06:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 32s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 ########### Completed UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:31:22.37 +43:22:39.0 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 ################################################################################### 11:31:22.37 +43:22:39.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 11:31:22.37 +43:22:39.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 11:31:22.37 +43:22:39.0 -- a known variable star 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 -- not a known variable star 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 -- not a known variable star 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 -- not a known variable star Found 3 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 11:31:22.37 +43:22:39.0 11:32:48.80 +47:37:09.8 11:52:31.92 +50:03:49.0 12:21:24.73 +49:35:43.5 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.97437262 -observatory V36 13:37:42.17 -11:42:30.1 Mercury (-0.1mag) 14:11:51.32 -20:30:33.7 Venus (-4.8mag) 08:08:54.88 +21:07:56.8 Mars (1.1mag) 09:25:30.73 +15:45:41.6 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:09.92 +02:00:48.3 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:09.19 +21:00:40.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:11:38.34 -00:17:13.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:28.55 -23:42:59.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:33:44.99 +14:24:25.0 Moon (-12.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 07:13 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.97437262: 09:25:35.41 +15:45:17.3 Io (9.4mag) 09:25:28.92 +15:45:52.9 Europa (6.3mag) 09:25:43.97 +15:44:31.0 Ganymede (7.9mag) 09:25:43.33 +15:44:36.3 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:24:20.75 +16:07:39.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:25:29.08 +15:45:50.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:23:33.24 +16:03:49.3 Elara (17.6mag) 09:28:39.49 +15:08:52.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:25:03.04 +16:09:21.2 Carme (18.9mag) 00:45:59.17 +02:00:29.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:46:08.88 +02:00:51.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:45:33.09 +01:59:28.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:46:23.94 +02:00:14.5 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:44:37.51 +01:48:58.3 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 07:13 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.97437262: 01:08:50.63 +18:37:02.1 JWST 17:47:15.00 +32:32:01.8 Chandra 07:10:23.81 -11:01:47.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 07:13 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.97437262 -observatory V36 03:47:34.56 +20:02:48.1 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:14:19.91 -33:47:17.2 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:33:32.96 -71:33:57.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:43.07 +34:16:41.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:06:14.22 +47:49:37.4 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 21:58:17.67 +25:49:13.8 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:24:07.25 +25:37:08.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:08:40.06 +26:35:19.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 10:01:30.54 +05:07:09.5 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:12.94 -17:29:20.2 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:54:39.45 +34:26:08.6 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:52.66 +15:07:53.6 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:25:58.66 +42:09:29.3 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:01:11.54 +47:35:41.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:44:07.86 -13:23:07.4 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:53:40.23 +17:03:42.4 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:38:22.20 -01:38:09.4 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:50:55.34 +69:32:02.2 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:49:52.15 +44:49:58.1 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:33:15.65 +13:03:04.3 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:44:50.42 -34:04:08.5 14.0mag 10P/Tempel 01:52:04.66 +39:38:03.4 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:02:30.46 -07:07:02.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:51:12.15 -11:36:48.7 17.9mag 63P/Wild 07:16:51.83 +17:21:27.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:10:51.75 +14:50:07.8 16.9mag 88P/Howell 06:51:52.97 +36:15:34.4 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:30:48.28 +18:35:13.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:14:02.41 +16:12:22.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:35:05.54 -28:21:32.5 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos 06:40:14.61 +19:51:40.0 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:54:53.02 -08:48:31.1 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:48:12.71 +04:59:55.5 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:33:06.63 +06:14:16.4 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:39:47.60 +42:13:03.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 09:42:28.56 +32:29:13.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 07:13 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 07:13 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 07:13 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:25:01.750 -44:36:46.75 AT 2026aayu 2026-09-08.20 19.017 17:52:00.165 -74:02:00.01 AT 2026aayt 2026-09-08.07 19.427 00:43:33.594 -46:07:55.38 AT 2026aays 2026-09-08.19 19.191 02:35:33.607 -82:45:40.57 AT 2026aayr 2026-09-08.30 18.737 21:20:34.008 -69:26:22.42 AT 2026aayq 2026-09-08.14 19.278 23:31:25.083 +50:11:28.08 AT 2026aayp 2026-09-08.03 18.91 15:33:30.416 +55:53:51.32 AT 2026aayo 2026-09-07.86 19.147 01:26:46.581 -53:40:22.70 AT 2026aayn 2026-09-08.18 18.623 23:20:37.556 -72:55:19.50 AT 2026aaym 2026-09-08.26 19.286 01:34:19.085 -73:36:50.07 AT 2026aayl 2026-09-08.24 18.806 20:58:26.639 -11:47:36.65 AT 2026aayk 2026-09-07.88 19.055 05:39:08.544 -26:08:36.47 AT 2026aayj 2026-09-08.77 19.74 04:04:28.836 -41:00:50.05 AT 2026aayi 2026-09-08.68 19.15 00:14:57.069 -42:30:24.15 AT 2026aayh 2026-09-08.56 19.71 21:17:59.994 -44:20:12.59 AT 2026aayg 2026-09-08.49 19.61 05:02:23.770 -53:02:16.78 AT 2026aayf 2026-09-08.79 19.88 00:20:27.819 -47:45:21.71 AT 2026aaye 2026-09-06.60 20.33 20:09:14.246 -31:36:02.01 AT 2026aayd 2026-09-01.43 20.28 20:55:12.341 -52:51:47.51 AT 2026aayc 2026-09-08.14 19.299 20:19:25.725 -32:15:17.38 AT 2026aayb 2026-08-20.52 19.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 07:13 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 58 C