Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.9322,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.4322 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Lep-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lep-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Lep-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 751503 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 751503 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.png' -> 'transient_report/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits_preview.png'
Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits

renamed 'Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.png' -> 'transient_report/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits_preview.png'
Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1078.5795
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 664.3714
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4230.6393
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1056.0283
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4218.4909
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1052.4707
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.92242
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T05:21:41.4736394' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T10:21:41.4736394' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.4317300115 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T10:21:51.3764144' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.4318446298 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 79.9973292629483 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9999331467105 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.0319444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 157.143055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.73867817671756 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lep-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 20 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 204.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits :)
Spent 0.525492 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T05:22:49.1115650' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T10:22:49.1115650' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.4325128589 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T10:22:59.0120294' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.4326274539 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 79.9973291777452 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.999933126482 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.1230555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 157.454166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.73476798321398 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lep-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 20 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 23.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.5002 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits :)
Spent 0.522623 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/d_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits

fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.93184575
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:08.687 -18:02:26.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:08.687 -18:02:26.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0529 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:11.479 -18:02:57.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:11.479 -18:02:57.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:08.687 -18:02:26.35
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:11.479 -18:02:57.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01396 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ts6XFgrBiX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NSnGmKr6th
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WNkbJKzevG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GD2gCcD9oP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6437 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3430 to -12.4414 deg
Loaded 9864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7030 out of 7375 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7375 out of 9993 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6438 to 88.6318 deg, Dec -23.3334 to -12.4408 deg
Loaded 9860 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6881 out of 7251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7251 out of 9607 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.0 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.6 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.6 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.1 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ts6XFgrBiX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=819, bad_region=0, passed=9993
Got 9993 stars (including 9160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9993 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1398 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NSnGmKr6th (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=851, bad_region=0, passed=9607
Got 9607 stars (including 8741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1417 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WNkbJKzevG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=527, bad_region=0, passed=6447
Got 6447 stars (including 5906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6447 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=13.028 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.083 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.083 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.682 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.400 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=0.788 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.413 worst_region_rms_after=0.400 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.790 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.400
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.413 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.413 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4917
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1092 n_q2=1360 n_q3=1100 n_q4=1365 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GD2gCcD9oP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, bad_region=0, passed=6430
Got 6430 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6430 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=13.112 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.757 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.757 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.749 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.398 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.767 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.423 worst_region_rms_after=0.398 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.803 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.398
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4918
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1089 n_q2=1360 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.317
ref2=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.356
new1=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new2=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.092
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.3365
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
WARNING: the installed astorb.dat is only 24 bytes, far below the 30000000 bytes expected - it is incomplete and will be re-downloaded
######### Updating astorb.dat #########
### download command ###
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n
curl --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --retry-delay 30 --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 30 --max-time 3600 --insecure --continue-at - --output astorb_dat_new.gz https://kirx.net/~kirx/vast_catalogs/astorb.dat.gz
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 108.3M 0 484.3k 0 0 483.7k 0 03:49 00:01 03:48 483.8k
17 108.3M 17 18.66M 0 0 9.17M 0 00:11 00:02 00:09 9.18M
39 108.3M 39 43.25M 0 0 14.26M 0 00:07 00:03 00:04 14.26M
61 108.3M 61 66.81M 0 0 16.56M 0 00:06 00:04 00:02 16.57M
84 108.3M 84 91.04M 0 0 17.90M 0 00:06 00:05 00:01 17.90M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.71M 0 00:05 00:05 17.90M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.71M 0 00:05 00:05 17.90M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.71M 0 00:05 00:05 17.90M
TMP_OUTPUT=astorb_dat_new
### UNPACK_COMMAND ###
We are currently at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n
Will run the unpack command: gunzip astorb_dat_new.gz
Unpack complete
Moved astorb_dat_new to astorb.dat
Successfully updated astorb.dat
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:27.40 -23:02:49.8: 10.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:27.40 -23:02:49.8: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:27.40 -23:02:49.8: ref_mag=10.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7208 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20377_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 11.70 | 04:56:01.65 -19:50:35.5 | 1421 1863 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:56:01.65 -19:50:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20430_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 9.96 | 05:21:44.63 -15:55:33.8 | 4943 4483 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:21:44.63 -15:55:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20437_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 10.04 | 04:59:04.34 -16:22:02.6 | 1679 3997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:04.33 -16:22:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20502_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 10.74 | 05:16:27.41 -23:02:49.5 | 4444 0147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 10.71 | 05:16:27.39 -23:02:50.1 | 4437 0152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20593_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20593_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 11.50 | 05:39:22.45 -17:51:18.9 | 7535 3429 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:39:22.45 -17:51:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 01807_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 7.61 | 04:59:36.49 -14:48:23.7 | 1678 4946 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:36.48 -14:48:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:08.687 -18:02:26.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:08.687 -18:02:26.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0529 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:11.479 -18:02:57.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:19:57.738 -18:00:37.54
Second-epoch image center 05:20:11.479 -18:02:57.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:08.687 -18:02:26.35
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:11.479 -18:02:57.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01396 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ovnLOqok0p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gOuEbR40eU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SR2h5XSXJh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wczaNCaOTQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits and wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Loaded 9904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7112 out of 8122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8122 out of 64337 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.682750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.682750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 64337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6229 to 88.6320 deg, Dec -23.3479 to -12.4200 deg
Loaded 9904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7112 out of 8122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8122 out of 64337 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 64139 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.6237 to 88.6352 deg, Dec -23.3362 to -12.4074 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.6237 to 88.6352 deg, Dec -23.3362 to -12.4074 deg
Loaded 9907 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7100 out of 8133 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8133 out of 64139 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
1.9 pix Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.3 mag. Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ovnLOqok0p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3724, bad_region=1, passed=64313
Got 64313 stars (including 60489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1323 n_q2=1109 n_q3=1414 n_q4=1080 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gOuEbR40eU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3682, bad_region=1, passed=64117
Got 64117 stars (including 60325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1431 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SR2h5XSXJh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1533, bad_region=6, passed=39182
Got 39182 stars (including 37588 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39182 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=13.036 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.277 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.386 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.776 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.406 worst_region_rms_after=0.386 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.784 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.386
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1078 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1130 n_q4=1371 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wczaNCaOTQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1474, bad_region=9, passed=39078
Got 39078 stars (including 37554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39078 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=13.063 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.234 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.234 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.782 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.782 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.391 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.762 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.423 worst_region_rms_after=0.391 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.793 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.391
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4918
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1076 n_q2=1337 n_q3=1144 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/wcs_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:59:02.64 -20:40:54.3: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:35:55.42 -22:00:56.1: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.7: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:27.41 -23:02:49.9: 10.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:57:02.65 -21:24:49.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:13:27.77 -17:06:02.8: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:17:38.14 -15:14:22.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:35.39 -15:09:28.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.7: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:27.41 -23:02:49.9: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:59:02.64 -20:40:54.3: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:35:55.42 -22:00:56.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:57:02.65 -21:24:49.9: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:27.41 -23:02:49.9: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7796 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1955 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:02.64 -20:40:54.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0806 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:55.42 -22:00:56.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6419 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:02.65 -21:24:49.9: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9328 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:35.39 -15:09:28.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:17:38.14 -15:14:22.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:38.14 -15:14:22.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5537 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:13:27.77 -17:06:02.8: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:27.77 -17:06:02.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9474 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:00:29.78 -18:58:08.6: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:07:37.72 -18:01:18.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:12:34.42 -14:58:19.5: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:23:14.21 -14:50:55.7: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:00:29.78 -18:58:08.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:29.78 -18:58:08.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2598 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:30:47.05 -19:24:08.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 04:57:34.04 -18:16:54.1: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-42-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits at 05:16:18.60 -15:20:19.6: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:07:37.72 -18:01:18.3: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:12:34.42 -14:58:19.5: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:23:14.21 -14:50:55.7: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:37.72 -18:01:18.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5908 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:14.21 -14:50:55.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5823 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:34.42 -14:58:19.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5016 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:16:18.60 -15:20:19.6: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 04:57:34.04 -18:16:54.1: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-33-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 05:30:47.05 -19:24:08.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:34.04 -18:16:54.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4050 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:18.60 -15:20:19.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7128 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:47.05 -19:24:08.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5097 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79334_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79334_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.25 | 04:59:02.60 -20:40:55.4 | 1900 1391 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.01 | 04:59:02.69 -20:40:53.2 | 1894 1396 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79336_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79336_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.18 | 05:27:35.51 -15:16:17.0 | 5778 4916 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.21 | 05:27:35.51 -15:16:16.5 | 5771 4921 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79338_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79338_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 12.66 | 05:35:55.42 -22:00:56.0 | 7131 0896 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.63 | 05:35:55.43 -22:00:56.3 | 7124 0900 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79339_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79339_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 11.85 | 04:57:02.68 -21:24:50.9 | 1654 0922 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.07 | 04:57:02.62 -21:24:48.9 | 1647 0927 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79340_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79340_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 7.98 | 05:19:18.31 -18:30:37.8 | 4678 2911 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:19:18.32 -18:30:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79405_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79405_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 10.14 | 04:59:04.34 -16:22:02.5 | 1679 3997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:04.33 -16:22:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79474_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79474_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 10.79 | 05:16:27.40 -23:02:49.6 | 4444 0147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 10.77 | 05:16:27.42 -23:02:50.2 | 4437 0152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79552_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79552_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 11.60 | 04:55:05.33 -16:43:11.2 | 1118 3736 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:55:05.32 -16:43:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79558_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79558_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 11.49 | 05:39:22.46 -17:51:18.9 | 7535 3429 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:39:22.46 -17:51:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79778_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79778_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.43 | 05:17:27.33 -17:45:56.6 | 4388 3343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:17:27.32 -17:45:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79823_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79823_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 12.57 | 05:17:38.16 -15:14:22.0 | 4332 4859 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.54 | 05:17:38.13 -15:14:22.2 | 4325 4863 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79869_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79869_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.59 | 05:05:19.19 -22:24:11.9 | 2859 0430 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:05:19.12 -22:24:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79896_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 79896_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79949_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79949_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.93 | 04:50:45.37 -15:35:30.7 | 0418 4363 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:50:45.31 -15:35:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79997_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 79997_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 12.95 | 05:13:27.74 -17:06:02.6 | 3798 3702 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 12.95 | 05:13:27.81 -17:06:03.0 | 3792 3707 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80045_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80045_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.11 | 04:50:07.43 -15:47:01.6 | 0336 4238 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:50:07.40 -15:47:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80147_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80147_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.15 | 05:24:27.75 -17:00:02.8 | 5368 3857 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:24:27.76 -17:00:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80148_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80148_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.22 | 05:00:29.83 -18:58:08.4 | 2022 2442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.31 | 05:00:29.73 -18:58:08.8 | 2015 2447 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80191_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80191_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.06 | 05:42:46.24 -18:21:37.8 | 8034 3137 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:42:46.23 -18:21:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80276_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.49 | 05:32:33.64 -17:50:32.7 | 6553 3403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:32:33.87 -17:50:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80297_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80297_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.47 | 05:12:34.42 -14:58:18.7 | 3586 4975 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.54 | 05:12:34.42 -14:58:20.4 | 3579 4979 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80366_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80366_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.31 | 05:45:57.10 -15:46:56.5 | 8464 4711 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:45:57.09 -15:46:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80369_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80369_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.56 | 05:03:58.15 -14:22:40.4 | 2297 5253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:03:58.14 -14:22:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80386_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80386_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.55 | 05:07:37.68 -18:01:18.0 | 2999 3092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.63 | 05:07:37.76 -18:01:18.6 | 2993 3096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80418_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80418_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.58 | 05:23:14.24 -14:50:55.6 | 5133 5139 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.58 | 05:23:14.18 -14:50:55.8 | 5126 5144 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80435_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80435_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.51 | 05:30:47.03 -19:24:07.6 | 6344 2449 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.51 | 05:30:47.06 -19:24:08.9 | 6337 2454 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.62 | 04:57:34.02 -18:16:54.7 | 1567 2820 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.29 | 04:57:34.07 -18:16:53.5 | 1560 2825 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80519_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80519_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.43185 | 2461311.93185 | 13.71 | 05:16:18.61 -15:20:20.3 | 4143 4787 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-21-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.71 | 05:16:18.59 -15:20:18.8 | 4136 4792 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80729_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 80729_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 13.81 | 05:37:50.01 -15:48:12.1 | 7274 4661 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:37:50.16 -15:48:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19424_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 19424_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 10.10 | 05:21:44.62 -15:55:33.8 | 4943 4483 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 05:21:44.62 -15:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 11444_fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.43263 | 2461311.93263 | 7.88 | 04:59:36.48 -14:48:23.7 | 1678 4946 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_052343_TTUQ1b1x1_1038354_S1gVIi0n/fd_Lep-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_05-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 04:59:36.48 -14:48:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lep-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:16:35.39 -15:09:28.3
########### Completed Lep-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
05:16:35.39 -15:09:28.3
###################################################################################
05:16:35.39 -15:09:28.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.93184575 -observatory V36
13:37:29.20 -11:40:56.0 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:11:49.53 -20:30:09.0 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:08:48.60 +21:08:12.9 Mars (1.1mag)
09:25:28.88 +15:45:49.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:10.66 +02:00:53.1 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:09.35 +21:00:40.7 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:38.61 -00:17:11.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.64 -23:42:58.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:32:09.92 +14:11:50.8 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 05:24 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.93184575:
09:25:34.30 +15:45:21.6 Io (9.4mag)
09:25:27.81 +15:45:57.2 Europa (6.3mag)
09:25:42.50 +15:44:37.2 Ganymede (7.9mag)
09:25:41.08 +15:44:46.7 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:24:18.75 +16:07:47.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:25:28.28 +15:45:53.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:23:31.30 +16:03:56.8 Elara (17.6mag)
09:28:37.77 +15:09:00.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:25:01.38 +16:09:28.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:45:59.75 +02:00:34.5 Titan (8.2mag)
00:46:09.95 +02:00:55.8 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:33.87 +01:59:33.4 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:24.59 +02:00:19.0 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:44:38.28 +01:49:03.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 05:25 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.93184575:
01:08:39.08 +18:36:44.5 JWST
17:40:44.21 +33:35:21.0 Chandra
07:02:57.68 -05:13:49.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 05:24 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.93184575 -observatory V36
03:47:34.46 +20:02:45.1 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:18.05 -33:47:20.6 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:33:31.55 -71:33:47.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:43.14 +34:16:36.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:14.81 +47:49:25.3 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:58:19.25 +25:49:35.9 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:24:05.87 +25:37:10.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:08:37.80 +26:35:22.7 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:01:29.08 +05:07:10.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:12.83 -17:29:07.0 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:54:37.81 +34:25:55.3 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:51.95 +15:07:54.4 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:25:58.85 +42:09:37.5 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:01:13.98 +47:35:57.3 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:44:07.23 -13:23:04.6 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:53:35.71 +17:03:54.8 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:38:19.78 -01:37:56.5 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:50:45.39 +69:32:45.0 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:49:54.70 +44:50:13.0 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:33:13.20 +13:02:50.7 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:44:47.95 -34:04:32.0 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:52:01.07 +39:38:02.0 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:02:28.72 -07:06:50.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:51:06.98 -11:36:03.0 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:16:47.82 +17:21:43.0 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:10:53.51 +14:50:12.2 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:51:43.87 +36:14:43.1 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:30:41.70 +18:36:03.7 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:13:56.99 +16:12:57.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:34:59.42 -28:20:44.5 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:40:12.28 +19:51:46.2 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:55:21.45 -08:50:46.2 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:48:07.54 +05:00:39.2 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:06.85 +06:14:35.3 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:39:42.37 +42:12:25.1 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
09:42:25.70 +32:29:24.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 05:24 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 05:24 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 05:24 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:20:34.008 -69:26:22.42 AT 2026aayq 2026-09-08.14 19.278
23:31:25.083 +50:11:28.08 AT 2026aayp 2026-09-08.03 18.91
15:33:30.416 +55:53:51.32 AT 2026aayo 2026-09-07.86 19.147
01:26:46.581 -53:40:22.70 AT 2026aayn 2026-09-08.18 18.623
23:20:37.556 -72:55:19.50 AT 2026aaym 2026-09-08.26 19.286
01:34:19.085 -73:36:50.07 AT 2026aayl 2026-09-08.24 18.806
20:58:26.639 -11:47:36.65 AT 2026aayk 2026-09-07.88 19.055
05:39:08.544 -26:08:36.47 AT 2026aayj 2026-09-08.77 19.74
04:04:28.836 -41:00:50.05 AT 2026aayi 2026-09-08.68 19.15
00:14:57.069 -42:30:24.15 AT 2026aayh 2026-09-08.56 19.71
21:17:59.994 -44:20:12.59 AT 2026aayg 2026-09-08.49 19.61
05:02:23.770 -53:02:16.78 AT 2026aayf 2026-09-08.79 19.88
00:20:27.819 -47:45:21.71 AT 2026aaye 2026-09-06.60 20.33
20:09:14.246 -31:36:02.01 AT 2026aayd 2026-09-01.43 20.28
20:55:12.341 -52:51:47.51 AT 2026aayc 2026-09-08.14 19.299
20:19:25.725 -32:15:17.38 AT 2026aayb 2026-08-20.52 19.12
23:05:53.383 -45:39:19.79 AT 2026aaya 2026-09-04.58 20.06
00:14:31.763 -49:54:27.22 AT 2026aaxz 2026-09-04.61 20.03
01:12:19.993 -37:57:49.91 AT 2026aaxy 2026-09-04.62 20.15
22:04:50.285 -46:53:46.94 AT 2026aaxx 2026-09-06.57 19.67
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 05:24 tns_transients_list.txt