This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3600 2461311.8600 11.99 06:50:51.29 +26:12:59.4
189.21083 11.50222 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 -0 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:51.29 +26:12:59.4: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:51.29 +26:12:59.4: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8600,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3600 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3600 2461311.8600 13.67 07:22:28.21 +31:04:00.5
187.33735 19.76799 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.152 Atala 1 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:28.21 +31:04:00.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:28.21 +31:04:00.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8600,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3600 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3600 2461311.8600 13.34 06:59:37.74 +31:51:59.9
184.68279 15.52997 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:59:37.74 +31:51:59.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:59:37.74 +31:51:59.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8600,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3600 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461311.86027508 28.09.2026 08:38:37.767 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22998
Objects passed selection criteria: 22912
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17438.8
Average stars matched: 16956 (97.2317 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247244 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:43:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461311.86027508 28.09.2026 08:38:37.767 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 154775
Objects passed selection criteria: 154425
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 119788
Average stars matched: 115317 (96.2678 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 617416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:45:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.85966934
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.484 +30:00:32.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:00.484 +30:00:32.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.978 +30:01:03.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:01.978 +30:01:03.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:00.484 +30:00:32.45
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:01.978 +30:01:03.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01024 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.txaHpZC4VY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DszoLYabSp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zZKnPp5VYq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rZ4Cz2K3Jf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.txaHpZC4VY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DszoLYabSp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1411 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zZKnPp5VYq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=708, bad_region=0, passed=10920
Got 10920 stars (including 10199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10920 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=12.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.504 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.899 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.899 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=0.914 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.630 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.481 +30:00:31.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10920 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1894993.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.914 -> 0.321 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4772 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4592 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4592 pairs (4772 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=12.151 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.406 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.869 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.869 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.455 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4592 robust_rms_before=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.456 worst_region_rms_after=0.455 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.455
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.481 +30:00:31.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10920 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1902916.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.319 -> 0.320 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4592 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4592 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits N_match=4592 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1443 n_q2=973 n_q3=1213 n_q4=963 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rZ4Cz2K3Jf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=711, bad_region=0, passed=10985
Got 10985 stars (including 10261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=12.355 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.612 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.831 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.831 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.455 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=0.904 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.616 worst_region_rms_after=0.455 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.982 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.455
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.975 +30:01:02.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10985 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1895010.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.904 -> 0.319 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4770 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4592 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4592 pairs (4770 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=11.998 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.607 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.803 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.803 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4592 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4592 robust_rms_before=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.451 worst_region_rms_after=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.451
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.451 vs 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4592 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4592 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits N_match=4592 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1445 n_q2=970 n_q3=1215 n_q4=962 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.071
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360_astrometric_residuals.png (4592 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361_astrometric_residuals.png (4592 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
WARNING: the installed astorb.dat is only 24 bytes, far below the 30000000 bytes expected - it is incomplete and will be re-downloaded
######### Updating astorb.dat #########
### download command ###
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc
curl --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --retry-delay 30 --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 30 --max-time 3600 --insecure --continue-at - --output astorb_dat_new.gz https://kirx.net/~kirx/vast_catalogs/astorb.dat.gz
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 108.3M 0 421.8k 0 0 422.0k 0 04:22 04:22 422.1k
15 108.3M 15 16.76M 0 0 8.37M 0 00:12 00:02 00:10 8.37M
36 108.3M 36 39.94M 0 0 13.23M 0 00:08 00:03 00:05 13.23M
58 108.3M 58 63.74M 0 0 15.86M 0 00:06 00:04 00:02 15.86M
79 108.3M 79 86.60M 0 0 17.22M 0 00:06 00:05 00:01 17.22M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.14M 0 00:05 00:05 17.22M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.14M 0 00:05 00:05 17.22M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 18.14M 0 00:05 00:05 17.22M
TMP_OUTPUT=astorb_dat_new
### UNPACK_COMMAND ###
We are currently at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc
Will run the unpack command: gunzip astorb_dat_new.gz
Unpack complete
Moved astorb_dat_new to astorb.dat
Successfully updated astorb.dat
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:21.48 +26:10:29.6: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:21.48 +26:10:29.6: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:21.48 +26:10:29.6: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0792 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31381_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 31381_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 31430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.58 +25:21:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31646_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 31646_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:51.76 +31:52:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31796_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 31796_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.55 +31:35:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 11915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:05.85 +29:37:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.25 +27:57:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.32 +33:22:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.03 +25:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.481 +30:00:31.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:00.481 +30:00:31.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0134 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.975 +30:01:02.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:01.975 +30:01:02.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:00.481 +30:00:31.57
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:01.975 +30:01:02.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01025 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kqmDIP0wGY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VcPjFjlUVy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wIxxjkcFTC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FgqQDD0oNf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 114 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kqmDIP0wGY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VcPjFjlUVy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wIxxjkcFTC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=3, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3968, bad_region=11, passed=73466
Got 73466 stars (including 69380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73466 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=12.091 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.964 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.964 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.897 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.454 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.454
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec matched=4771
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1514 n_q2=977 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FgqQDD0oNf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4017, bad_region=13, passed=73887
Got 73887 stars (including 69747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73887 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=11.991 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.401 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.818 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.818 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.319 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.459 worst_region_rms_after=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.457
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.459 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec matched=4772
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1526 n_q2=977 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-37-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033943_TTUQ1b1x1_1852860_hzMEjFjc/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:51.29 +26:12:59.4: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:51.29 +26:12:59.4: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:51.29 +26:12:59.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=11.9892 delta=3.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:25.47 +26:07:06.4: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:03.60 +32:44:38.5: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:23.13 +32:12:18.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:25.47 +26:07:06.4: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:25.47 +26:07:06.4: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9984 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:03.60 +32:44:38.5: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:03.60 +32:44:38.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0096 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:54.27 +32:38:10.4: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:23.13 +32:12:18.8: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:23.13 +32:12:18.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8331 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:54.27 +32:38:10.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:54.27 +32:38:10.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3309 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:35.01 +30:39:15.1: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:35.01 +30:39:15.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:35.01 +30:39:15.1: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4580 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:05.69 +30:55:11.2: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:00.92 +28:35:54.6: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:05.69 +30:55:11.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:05.69 +30:55:11.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3768 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:00.92 +28:35:54.6: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:00.92 +28:35:54.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6146 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:07.39 +27:05:54.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:31.62 +31:13:06.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:07.39 +27:05:54.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:07.39 +27:05:54.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:28.21 +31:04:00.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:55.71 +32:07:54.8: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:44:35.58 +30:30:01.7: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:31.62 +31:13:06.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:31.62 +31:13:06.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5494 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:28.21 +31:04:00.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:55.71 +32:07:54.8: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:55.71 +32:07:54.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1066 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:44:35.58 +30:30:01.7: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:35.58 +30:30:01.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2845 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:05.11 +27:46:07.0: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:59:37.74 +31:51:59.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:05.11 +27:46:07.0: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:05.11 +27:46:07.0: ref_mag=9.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7275 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:59:37.74 +31:51:59.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148454.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191942.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.73 +29:45:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191922_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191922_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.97 +32:40:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191926_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191926_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.90 +31:14:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191930_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:34.21 +28:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.45 +26:15:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191938_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191938_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:31.17 +29:26:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191940_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191940_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:29.83 +26:58:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191941_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191941_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.88 +29:29:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
Preparing report for the candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191943_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191943_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.45 +26:33:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191994_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 191994_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.59 +25:21:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192045_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192045_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.62 +24:47:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192294_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192294_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.13 +27:55:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192413_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192413_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.66 +33:41:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192625_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192625_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.53 +27:49:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192708_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192708_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:59.73 +31:46:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192724_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192724_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.93 +28:00:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192794_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192794_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.09 +28:18:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.19 +27:38:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192821_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192821_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.40 +28:00:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192879_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192879_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.78 +27:48:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.51 +29:47:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192963_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192963_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.10 +32:48:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192969_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 192969_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.01 +29:45:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193019_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193019_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.52 +32:29:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193028_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193028_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.11 +29:43:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:05.33 +34:09:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193145_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193145_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.32 +26:03:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193175_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193175_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.59 +27:12:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193191_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193191_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.78 +33:40:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193215_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193215_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193314_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193314_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:00.44 +27:03:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193330_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193330_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193336_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193336_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.71 +27:12:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.39 +26:22:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193364_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193364_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.85 +25:27:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193374_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193374_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:17.63 +35:04:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193397_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193397_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:32.48 +29:39:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:22.73 +26:58:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:53.63 +32:48:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193473_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193473_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.22 +27:14:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193474_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193474_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193508_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193508_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:23.57 +25:04:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193510_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193510_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.54 +25:29:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193520_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193520_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.18 +27:58:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193555_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193555_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.50 +26:08:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193571_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193571_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.30 +26:25:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193603_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193603_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.42 +28:23:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193619_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193619_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193620_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193620_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:03.81 +25:33:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193625_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193625_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:06.70 +29:16:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.73 +33:53:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193639_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193639_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.63 +26:59:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193711_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193711_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.03 +30:18:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193731_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193731_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.65 +25:33:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193745_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193745_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.47 +26:54:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193750_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193750_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:21.44 +26:58:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193779_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193779_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:46.18 +27:46:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193810_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193810_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.11 +32:21:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193819_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193819_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.56 +30:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193828_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193828_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.28 +32:38:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193868_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193868_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.24 +26:58:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193892_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193892_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.36 +30:38:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193977_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193977_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.10 +32:38:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 193991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.93 +25:18:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194000_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194000_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.59 +28:32:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194004_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194004_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.94 +30:56:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194005_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194005_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:17.86 +25:23:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:01.32 +26:03:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.07 +34:14:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194061_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194061_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.16 +31:07:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194069_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194069_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.17 +27:02:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194086_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194086_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.32 +27:44:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194100_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194100_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194103_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194103_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:17.98 +26:59:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194127_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194127_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.61 +29:44:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194144_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194144_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.25 +33:08:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.87 +29:43:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194155_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194155_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.26 +27:46:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194161_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194161_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.93 +31:22:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:25.70 +26:23:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194217_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194217_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:05.23 +34:14:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194219_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194219_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194251_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194251_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.82 +33:20:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194252_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194252_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.55 +33:13:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194263_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194263_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194318_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194318_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.70 +32:24:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194355_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194355_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:48.99 +25:18:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194361_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194361_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.55 +26:47:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194365_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194365_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.22 +32:46:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194374_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194374_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:07.77 +34:17:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.49 +26:19:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194420_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194420_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.95 +33:15:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194426_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194426_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.91 +26:58:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194522_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194522_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.07 +32:38:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194571_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194571_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.67 +26:58:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194672_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194672_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:08.55 +30:33:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194743_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
Preparing report for the candidate 194743_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194834_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194834_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:15.63 +29:56:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 194966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.73 +27:15:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 188702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.62 +28:38:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.68 +31:35:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148454_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
Preparing report for the candidate 148454_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81982_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 81982_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:05.85 +29:37:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.26 +33:22:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85133_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 85133_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.02 +25:59:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0361 did not pass the final checks