NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.62    04:30:57.23 +25:25:40.8   9170 0792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.81    04:30:57.19 +25:25:40.1   9166 0791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 28.3573  2461311.8573  13.71  04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4
172.96780 -15.46367 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
112 Iphigenia               -0      0       0  13.8     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4:  15.98 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.01    03:33:14.68 +33:29:14.2   1286 5217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.05    03:33:14.55 +33:29:13.0   1282 5216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 28.3573  2461311.8573  14.03  03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6
157.66698 -18.25448 galactic  Per  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
683 Lanzia                   1     -1       1  14.3    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6:  16.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 812112 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 812112 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits

renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 500.8057 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3678.6927 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 895.2216 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3673.2935 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 893.6795 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.34555 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T03:34:01.0522214' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T08:34:01.0522214' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.3569566202 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T08:34:10.9550797' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.3570712386 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9980466983854 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0001183287563 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 67.1461111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 91.9125 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.08492441827167 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 208.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits :) Spent 0.539172 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T03:34:48.3170587' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T08:34:48.3170587' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.3575036689 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T08:34:58.2192861' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.3576182756 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9980466369566 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0001183214602 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 67.3122222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 92.0372222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.08360788018289 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 208.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits :) Spent 0.573340 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits


fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.85707236 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:03.449 +30:00:07.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 Second-epoch image center 04:00:03.449 +30:00:07.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0140 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:05.012 +30:00:13.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 Second-epoch image center 04:00:05.012 +30:00:13.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:03.449 +30:00:07.41 Second-epoch second image center 04:00:05.012 +30:00:13.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00593 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IiJwXxyqRK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vrbPYbMNUN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oHmxO0b4QD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L3n5mdvbg8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.IiJwXxyqRK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390 Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vrbPYbMNUN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513 Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.oHmxO0b4QD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, bad_region=0, passed=6478 Got 6478 stars (including 5940 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6478 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5370) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=11.824 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.090 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.090 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.001 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.001 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.377 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.377 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.015 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.445 worst_region_rms_after=0.377 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.997 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.377 verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:03.472 +30:00:06.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6478 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1720068.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.015 -> 0.269 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4881 pairs from the initial matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4771 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4771 pairs (4881 from the initial matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=11.804 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.064 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.064 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.001 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.001 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.375 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.375 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.373 worst_region_rms_after=0.375 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.373 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.375 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.375 vs 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1333 n_q2=841 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.L3n5mdvbg8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6489 Got 6489 stars (including 5962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6489 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=11.866 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.383 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.383 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.105 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.105 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.388 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.388 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.022 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.443 worst_region_rms_after=0.388 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.015 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.388 verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:05.037 +30:00:13.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6489 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1719973.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.022 -> 0.269 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4879 pairs from the initial matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4779 pairs (4879 from the initial matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=11.840 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.330 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.330 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.079 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.079 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.389 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.389 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.389 worst_region_rms_after=0.389 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.389 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.389 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.389 vs 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1332 n_q2=840 n_q3=1153 n_q4=1454 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233 ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288 new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.154 new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.193 reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356_astrometric_residuals.png (4771 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.0: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.0: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.0: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2687 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 20879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    11.35    03:43:52.38 +25:16:25.7   2735 0254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.21    03:43:52.28 +25:16:24.2   2731 0253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 20935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.24    03:44:56.03 +30:22:24.4   2809 3341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:44:56.03 +30:22:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20970_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 20970_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.87    04:37:15.25 +33:48:48.0   9338 5969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:37:15.25 +33:48:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    10.99    04:10:38.02 +34:15:54.8   5960 5853   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:10:38.01 +34:15:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.49    03:44:44.72 +33:15:14.7   2745 5079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:44:44.72 +33:15:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:03.472 +30:00:06.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 Second-epoch image center 04:00:03.472 +30:00:06.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0140 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:05.037 +30:00:13.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 Second-epoch image center 04:00:05.037 +30:00:13.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:03.472 +30:00:06.45 Second-epoch second image center 04:00:05.037 +30:00:13.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00594 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lGZQmma2qd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rKtAkjZTbq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J41zaEh7vZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SzIVjIh108 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.9 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lGZQmma2qd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158 Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1120 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rKtAkjZTbq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800 Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.J41zaEh7vZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1885, bad_region=9, passed=46603 Got 46603 stars (including 44637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46603 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46601 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46601 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46601 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=11.684 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.892 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.892 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.032 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.032 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.379 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.379 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.381 worst_region_rms_after=0.379 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.379 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.266 arcsec matched=4893 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1374 n_q2=865 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1479 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.SzIVjIh108 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1831, bad_region=9, passed=46456 Got 46456 stars (including 44551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46456 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=11.746 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.910 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.910 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.061 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.061 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.387 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.387 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.388 worst_region_rms_after=0.387 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.388 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.387 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.269 arcsec matched=4897 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1381 n_q2=856 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1485 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:00.61 +30:39:55.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:38:21.92 +34:00:30.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:49:18.59 +28:09:30.9: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:03:18.23 +31:41:58.4: 14.27 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.6: 11.24 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:00.61 +30:39:55.7: 12.84 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:03:18.23 +31:41:58.4: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.6: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:38:21.92 +34:00:30.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.92 +34:00:30.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:00.61 +30:39:55.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1473 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.85 +28:26:36.2: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:18.23 +31:41:58.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5568 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.6: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4328 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:26:44.44 +35:03:24.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:49:18.59 +28:09:30.9: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:18.59 +28:09:30.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9233 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.85 +28:26:36.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.85 +28:26:36.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4897 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:26:44.44 +35:03:24.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:44.44 +35:03:24.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6051 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.35 +30:51:26.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:54.68 +25:11:47.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:01:55.84 +31:58:48.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.35 +30:51:26.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:54.68 +25:11:47.0: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.35 +30:51:26.5: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7327 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.68 +25:11:47.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8799 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.6: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:01:55.84 +31:58:48.6: 12.75 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:55.84 +31:58:48.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8944 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:35.53 +27:52:30.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:03.99 +25:06:43.8: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.09 +32:10:15.0: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:28:40.93 +30:22:48.5: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.6: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.96 +32:10:59.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2828 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:14:13.53 +28:12:48.0: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:35.53 +27:52:30.6: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:35.53 +27:52:30.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2915 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:03.99 +25:06:43.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:03.99 +25:06:43.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2795 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.09 +32:10:15.0: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:28:40.93 +30:22:48.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.09 +32:10:15.0: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3021 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:54.66 +29:40:03.1: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:40.93 +30:22:48.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4890 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:14:13.53 +28:12:48.0: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:13.53 +28:12:48.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3322 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:27.44 +32:03:55.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:41:13.43 +28:42:38.4: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:54.66 +29:40:03.1: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:54.66 +29:40:03.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5062 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:03.24 +28:51:33.6: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:27.44 +32:03:55.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:27.44 +32:03:55.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4256 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:41:13.43 +28:42:38.4: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:13.43 +28:42:38.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5152 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.79 +33:39:12.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:04.47 +25:20:57.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:03.24 +28:51:33.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:03.24 +28:51:33.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6257 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:11.53 +30:56:19.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:38.87 +29:48:35.9: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:24.93 +35:07:02.6: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.79 +33:39:12.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.79 +33:39:12.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5028 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:04.47 +25:20:57.6: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:04.47 +25:20:57.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6688 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:11.53 +30:56:19.7: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:11.53 +30:56:19.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5600 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:24.93 +35:07:02.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:38.87 +29:48:35.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.21 +33:41:32.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.87 +29:48:35.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6064 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:24.93 +35:07:02.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6671 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:17.81 +27:01:13.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.21 +33:41:32.0: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.21 +33:41:32.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6069 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:17.81 +27:01:13.2: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:17.81 +27:01:13.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6655 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:16.82 +29:54:12.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:04.01 +25:07:00.8: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:30.83 +31:30:24.5: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:28.98 +32:53:00.7: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:55.59 +28:04:47.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:16.82 +29:54:12.5: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:04.01 +25:07:00.8: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:19.72 +26:53:23.8: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:16.82 +29:54:12.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6513 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:04.01 +25:07:00.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6807 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:30.83 +31:30:24.5: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:30.83 +31:30:24.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8820 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:28.98 +32:53:00.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:55.14 +27:52:19.6: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:28.98 +32:53:00.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7881 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:55.59 +28:04:47.5: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:35.81 +28:11:31.1: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:55.59 +28:04:47.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8437 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:53:04.48 +25:31:39.7: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:19.72 +26:53:23.8: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:19.72 +26:53:23.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8263 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:55.14 +27:52:19.6: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:55.14 +27:52:19.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9243 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:35.81 +28:11:31.1: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:35.81 +28:11:31.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9072 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:53:04.48 +25:31:39.7: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:04.48 +25:31:39.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8360 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:17:41.45 +31:26:05.5: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:59:36.61 +31:21:51.2: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:17:41.45 +31:26:05.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:41.45 +31:26:05.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7679 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:03:03.29 +28:26:47.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:59:36.61 +31:21:51.2: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:36.61 +31:21:51.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9951 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:46.92 +32:48:53.6: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:58:59.91 +32:00:39.4: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:03:03.29 +28:26:47.2: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:03.29 +28:26:47.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0718 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:46.92 +32:48:53.6: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:46.92 +32:48:53.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0284 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:49.16 +30:49:21.1: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:58:59.91 +32:00:39.4: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:59.91 +32:00:39.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3736 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:49.16 +30:49:21.1: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:49.16 +30:49:21.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2486 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:18.71 +33:14:20.4: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:26.89 +31:28:22.4: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:18.71 +33:14:20.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:26.89 +31:28:22.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:18.71 +33:14:20.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7657 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:26.89 +31:28:22.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9842 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118090.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117528_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117528_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.54    04:03:18.24 +31:41:58.2   5147 4240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.57    04:03:18.22 +31:41:58.5   5144 4239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.91    03:49:18.66 +28:09:31.1   3425 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.94    03:49:18.51 +28:09:30.8   3421 2022   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117542_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117542_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.53    03:43:24.66 +28:20:45.5   2634 2113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:43:24.67 +28:20:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117543_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117543_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.73    03:36:33.94 +26:34:33.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117546_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117546_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.10    03:45:00.57 +30:39:55.5   2818 3518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.21    03:45:00.65 +30:39:55.8   2815 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117549_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117549_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    11.44    03:43:52.37 +25:16:25.8   2735 0254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.43    03:43:52.35 +25:16:25.4   2731 0253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117589_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117589_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    10.98    03:28:14.54 +33:17:23.5   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117591_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117591_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    10.98    03:24:32.44 +30:13:00.3   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.20    03:54:33.97 +31:22:47.6   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    11.61    04:38:21.92 +34:00:30.5   9466 6110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.57    04:38:21.92 +34:00:30.4   9463 6108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117639_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117639_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.86    03:55:33.98 +27:47:56.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117645_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117645_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.98    04:10:49.09 +33:34:35.9   6016 5439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:10:49.10 +33:34:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117663_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117663_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.13    04:20:24.97 +27:22:49.3   7596 1823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:20:24.96 +27:22:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117666_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117666_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.19    04:01:04.57 +25:38:59.2   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117701_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117701_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.38    04:16:22.04 +25:55:47.2   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117703_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117703_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    12.52    03:37:35.87 +28:26:36.4   1861 2161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.47    03:37:35.84 +28:26:36.1   1858 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117705_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117705_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.53    03:38:47.30 +26:31:59.1   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117706_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117706_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.42    04:06:28.27 +27:26:33.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117708_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117708_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.57    03:27:35.64 +25:06:17.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117716_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117716_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    12.65    03:26:44.41 +35:03:24.2   0467 6193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.57    03:26:44.46 +35:03:24.2   0464 6192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117720_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117720_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.30    04:30:42.53 +25:37:08.2   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117724_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117724_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.52    03:57:08.73 +34:30:04.1   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117737_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.63    04:00:38.02 +27:11:05.1   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.69    03:56:26.78 +35:06:47.7   4168 6254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:56:26.82 +35:06:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117753_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117753_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.84    03:34:52.48 +31:50:29.6   1492 4215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.78    04:05:28.00 +33:38:01.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117761_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.10    04:04:13.01 +25:03:34.6   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.75    03:55:42.85 +26:50:56.0   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117767_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117767_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    12.74    04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.2   7268 3904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.73    04:19:29.35 +30:51:26.8   7265 3903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117768_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117768_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    12.85    03:39:54.68 +25:11:46.7   2190 0194   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.92    03:39:54.68 +25:11:47.3   2187 0193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.57    04:24:29.13 +26:42:52.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117776_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117776_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.98    04:15:31.52 +33:49:31.5   6594 5641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:15:31.59 +33:49:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    12.93    04:01:55.85 +31:58:48.2   4961 4398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.86    04:01:55.82 +31:58:49.0   4958 4397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117805_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117805_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.81    04:31:49.08 +24:23:58.0   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117810_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117810_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.16    03:32:41.20 +27:25:15.5   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117811_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117811_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.99    04:24:33.15 +34:09:18.2   7706 5961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:24:33.14 +34:09:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.02    03:58:53.85 +24:54:14.1   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117818_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117818_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.30    03:30:44.47 +29:01:09.1   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117831_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117831_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    12.99    04:24:36.09 +34:06:49.1   7715 5937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:24:36.08 +34:06:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117846_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117846_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.34    03:50:39.33 +26:04:13.6   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117852_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117852_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.28    03:44:23.94 +32:11:00.0   2719 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.28    03:44:23.98 +32:10:59.2   2716 4431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117853_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117853_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.20    04:24:35.51 +34:07:12.4   7714 5940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:24:35.55 +34:07:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.16    03:53:03.72 +33:02:43.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117857_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117857_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.22    04:08:24.89 +32:27:44.7   5763 4743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:08:24.90 +32:27:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117862_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117862_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.29    03:44:35.52 +27:52:31.3   2801 1834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.30    03:44:35.54 +27:52:29.8   2797 1833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117863_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117863_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.20    04:18:23.28 +33:51:35.3   6951 5697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:18:23.22 +33:51:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.27    03:54:44.20 +32:57:05.8   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117868_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117868_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.28    03:55:04.09 +25:06:43.7   4271 0212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.28    03:55:03.88 +25:06:43.9   4267 0211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117895_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117895_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.37    03:55:53.09 +32:10:14.8   4185 4472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.26    03:55:53.10 +32:10:15.1   4182 4471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.49    03:28:41.06 +30:22:47.5   0680 3336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.49    03:28:40.81 +30:22:49.6   0676 3336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117910_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117910_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.35    03:25:15.53 +32:42:41.1   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.35    04:14:13.58 +28:12:48.3   6726 2252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.31    04:14:13.48 +28:12:47.7   6722 2250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.45    04:11:06.77 +33:36:14.6   6051 5458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:11:06.72 +33:36:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117923_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117923_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.26    03:51:45.56 +34:21:50.2   3606 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:51:45.53 +34:21:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117929_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117929_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.44    04:28:35.75 +25:58:04.2   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117931_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117931_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.51    03:50:54.78 +29:40:01.7   3606 2939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.51    03:50:54.54 +29:40:04.5   3602 2938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117934_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117934_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.42    04:22:27.46 +32:03:55.5   7577 4671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.43    04:22:27.43 +32:03:55.5   7574 4669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117935_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.51    04:13:29.80 +33:27:04.3   6358 5392   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:13:29.79 +33:27:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117936_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117936_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.53    03:41:13.45 +28:42:37.9   2343 2329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.50    03:41:13.40 +28:42:39.0   2339 2328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.67    03:53:04.60 +25:32:40.4   3985 0462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:53:04.51 +25:32:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117948_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117948_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.89    03:25:32.73 +34:08:24.9   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117950_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117950_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.63    03:46:03.20 +28:51:34.1   2981 2433   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.62    03:46:03.28 +28:51:33.0   2978 2432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117953_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117953_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.62    03:44:11.29 +25:53:39.7   2767 0632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:44:11.44 +25:53:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117957_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117957_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.78    03:37:57.04 +34:56:45.7   1873 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:37:57.00 +34:56:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117959_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117959_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.70    03:25:59.91 +32:14:52.9   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117961_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117961_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.73    03:30:26.15 +26:32:10.7   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117964_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117964_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.58    04:07:46.73 +33:39:13.0   5634 5456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.45    04:07:46.86 +33:39:11.8   5631 5455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117966_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117966_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.60    03:48:04.42 +25:20:57.3   3310 0318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.76    03:48:04.51 +25:20:58.0   3306 0317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117968_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117968_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.54    04:21:11.55 +30:56:20.7   7484 3976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.58    04:21:11.51 +30:56:18.7   7481 3974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117970_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117970_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.64    03:56:24.95 +35:07:02.9   4167 6257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.71    03:56:24.90 +35:07:02.3   4164 6256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117971_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117971_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.58    04:11:38.86 +29:48:36.1   6306 3183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.64    04:11:38.88 +29:48:35.8   6302 3182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117981_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117981_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.69    04:33:13.85 +29:50:21.5   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117986_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117986_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.77    04:03:17.04 +25:20:37.8   5382 0413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:03:16.99 +25:20:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117992_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117992_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.70    03:24:43.79 +31:53:22.8   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117997_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117997_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.69    04:13:18.02 +33:49:46.7   6315 5618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:13:18.03 +33:49:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117998_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117998_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.65    04:07:46.19 +33:41:31.8   5631 5480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.57    04:07:46.22 +33:41:32.2   5628 5478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117999_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117999_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.66    04:08:17.77 +27:01:12.7   5993 1472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.67    04:08:17.85 +27:01:13.8   5990 1471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118003_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 Preparing report for the candidate 118003_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118010_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118010_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.75    03:52:15.03 +31:54:52.2   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118012_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118012_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.96    03:29:06.68 +30:16:29.8   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118017_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118017_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.71    03:55:04.11 +25:07:00.7   4271 0215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.66    03:55:03.90 +25:07:00.9   4267 0214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118018_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118018_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.70    04:19:39.96 +34:18:47.9   7084 5988   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:19:40.04 +34:18:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118023_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118023_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.70    04:15:16.79 +29:54:11.1   6775 3279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.62    04:15:16.86 +29:54:13.8   6772 3278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118028_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118028_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.07    03:51:06.10 +32:33:57.8   3564 4685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:51:06.10 +32:33:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118030_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118030_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.72    04:25:29.00 +32:53:01.1   7911 5208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.89    04:25:28.96 +32:53:00.3   7908 5206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118043_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118043_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.88    04:02:30.83 +31:30:23.6   5053 4118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.88    04:02:30.84 +31:30:25.4   5050 4117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118044_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118044_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.74    04:00:28.06 +33:18:47.7   4726 5189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:00:28.07 +33:18:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118048_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118048_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.84    03:48:55.61 +28:04:47.3   3376 1974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.85    03:48:55.57 +28:04:47.7   3372 1973   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118051_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118051_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.82    03:45:19.77 +26:53:23.2   2913 1241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.83    03:45:19.66 +26:53:24.4   2909 1240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118064_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118064_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.77    03:29:15.09 +33:50:41.9   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118070_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118070_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.92    03:51:55.18 +27:52:20.3   3778 1864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.92    03:51:55.09 +27:52:19.0   3775 1862   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118071_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118071_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.90    03:45:35.77 +28:11:31.8   2930 2029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.92    03:45:35.84 +28:11:30.3   2927 2027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118076_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118076_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.84    03:53:04.40 +25:31:38.7   3988 0452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.84    03:53:04.56 +25:31:40.8   3985 0451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118078_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118078_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.79    04:17:41.48 +31:26:05.6   7003 4228   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.75    04:17:41.41 +31:26:05.4   7000 4227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118080_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118080_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.77    04:13:21.35 +33:28:52.9   6339 5408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:13:21.34 +33:28:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118090_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 Preparing report for the candidate 118090_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118099_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118099_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.95    03:59:36.57 +31:21:50.7   4686 4010   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.06    03:59:36.65 +31:21:51.8   4683 4009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.08    03:40:56.35 +31:52:16.2   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118119_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118119_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.15    03:31:40.78 +28:13:33.4   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.03    04:34:01.32 +31:20:09.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118131_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118131_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.89    04:00:08.83 +29:17:36.8   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118148_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118148_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.04    04:19:08.71 +26:56:54.6   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118149_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118149_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.07    04:03:03.26 +28:26:48.2   5237 2284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.08    04:03:03.31 +28:26:46.3   5234 2282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118150_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118150_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.06    04:01:50.84 +32:12:59.4   4939 4538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:01:50.73 +32:12:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118152_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118152_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.85    03:26:09.51 +31:03:51.3   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118155_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118155_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.86    04:25:10.49 +30:34:06.1   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118164_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118164_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.07    04:09:46.92 +32:48:54.7   5924 4970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.00    04:09:46.92 +32:48:52.4   5921 4968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118166_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118166_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.98    04:34:16.36 +34:07:20.5   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118178_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118178_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.00    03:25:54.30 +28:26:16.2   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118183_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118183_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.01    04:32:18.42 +27:54:07.2   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118194_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118194_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.07    04:05:27.10 +27:20:40.9   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118207_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118207_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.33    03:59:00.04 +32:00:39.0   4587 4395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.43    03:58:59.77 +32:00:39.8   4583 4394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118210_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118210_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.39    03:37:55.84 +25:21:33.1   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.41    03:25:02.90 +30:18:22.2   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118218_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118218_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.36    03:48:08.87 +34:09:12.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118222_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118222_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.36    03:46:49.15 +30:49:21.3   3051 3618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.19    03:46:49.18 +30:49:20.8   3048 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118225_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118225_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.09    04:33:25.64 +30:50:22.9   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118229_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118229_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.29    04:23:41.90 +27:07:42.7   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118230_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118230_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.25    04:09:23.10 +32:37:33.6   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118238_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118238_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.60    04:19:05.17 +27:20:09.9   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118240_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 118240_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.85    03:59:31.68 +31:38:42.3   4663 4178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 110352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    13.68    04:12:18.68 +33:14:20.4   6223 5252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.89    04:12:18.74 +33:14:20.5   6220 5251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117168_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 117168_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 28.35707    2461311.85707    14.09    04:02:26.88 +31:28:21.7   5046 4097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.91    04:02:26.89 +31:28:23.2   5043 4096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26218_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 26218_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.31    04:25:07.74 +32:47:10.1   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    13.42    03:47:34.49 +26:16:54.0   3222 0880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:47:34.43 +26:16:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87586_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 87586_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    14.02    04:02:14.53 +27:34:26.4   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.32    03:44:56.03 +30:22:24.3   2809 3341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:44:56.03 +30:22:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.87    04:37:15.26 +33:48:47.9   9338 5969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:37:15.26 +33:48:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.01    04:10:38.02 +34:15:54.7   5960 5853   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 04:10:38.02 +34:15:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 The candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 28.35762    2461311.85762    11.61    03:44:44.73 +33:15:14.6   2745 5079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033543_TTUQ1b1x1_1696436_x5NtBXvf/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-34-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits **** FOUND 03:44:44.73 +33:15:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6 ########### Completed Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6 ################################################################################### 04:30:57.21 +25:25:40.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:33:14.61 +33:29:13.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.85707236 -observatory V36 13:37:06.34 -11:38:10.6 Mercury (-0.1mag) 14:11:46.26 -20:29:26.4 Venus (-4.8mag) 08:08:37.50 +21:08:41.3 Mars (1.1mag) 09:25:25.62 +15:46:04.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:11.96 +02:01:01.5 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:09.64 +21:00:41.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:11:39.07 -00:17:08.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:28.81 -23:42:58.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:29:40.87 +13:47:44.5 Moon (-12.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 03:37 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.85707236: 09:25:32.07 +15:45:30.7 Io (9.4mag) 09:25:25.87 +15:46:04.7 Europa (6.3mag) 09:25:39.87 +15:44:48.4 Ganymede (7.9mag) 09:25:37.10 +15:45:05.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:24:15.20 +16:08:02.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:25:27.30 +15:45:56.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:23:27.88 +16:04:09.8 Elara (17.6mag) 09:28:34.72 +15:09:15.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:24:58.46 +16:09:41.9 Carme (18.9mag) 00:46:00.78 +02:00:43.7 Titan (8.2mag) 00:46:11.85 +02:01:03.5 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:45:35.25 +01:59:42.7 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:46:25.72 +02:00:27.0 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:44:39.64 +01:49:11.9 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 03:37 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.85707236: 01:08:25.05 +18:35:34.6 JWST 17:29:53.96 +35:32:47.1 Chandra 06:45:42.83 +06:39:22.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 03:37 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.85707236 -observatory V36 03:47:34.29 +20:02:39.5 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:14:14.81 -33:47:26.8 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:33:29.05 -71:33:30.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:43.24 +34:16:28.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:06:15.76 +47:49:02.7 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 21:58:22.04 +25:50:14.8 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:24:03.44 +25:37:14.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:08:33.82 +26:35:28.8 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 10:01:26.51 +05:07:11.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:12.64 -17:28:43.8 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:54:34.90 +34:25:31.7 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:50.70 +15:07:55.7 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:25:59.22 +42:09:51.9 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:01:18.28 +47:36:25.3 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:44:06.11 -13:22:59.6 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:53:27.76 +17:04:16.8 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:38:15.50 -01:37:33.9 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:50:27.97 +69:34:00.5 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:49:59.19 +44:50:38.8 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:33:08.86 +13:02:26.9 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:44:43.76 -34:05:12.9 14.0mag 10P/Tempel 01:51:54.85 +39:37:58.0 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:02:25.65 -07:06:28.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:50:57.88 -11:34:42.7 17.9mag 63P/Wild 07:16:40.72 +17:22:09.6 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:10:56.60 +14:50:19.5 16.9mag 88P/Howell 06:51:27.80 +36:13:12.3 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:30:30.09 +18:37:31.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:13:47.42 +16:13:58.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:34:48.63 -28:19:20.2 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos 06:40:08.16 +19:51:57.0 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:56:11.53 -08:54:42.9 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:47:58.38 +05:01:56.0 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:33:07.21 +06:15:08.6 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:39:33.10 +42:11:17.2 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 09:42:20.66 +32:29:43.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 03:37 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 03:37 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 03:37 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:12:19.993 -37:57:49.91 AT 2026aaxy 2026-09-04.62 20.15 22:04:50.285 -46:53:46.94 AT 2026aaxx 2026-09-06.57 19.67 01:57:55.362 -22:31:24.48 AT 2026aaxw 2026-08-31.66 19.65 01:52:55.402 -09:12:08.29 AT 2026aaxv 2026-09-04.64 20.08 05:04:14.730 -42:14:07.54 AT 2026aaxu 2026-09-03.80 19.73 00:02:28.077 -23:32:16.72 AT 2026aaxt 2026-09-04.59 20.16 01:03:33.302 -33:27:15.30 AT 2026aaxs 2026-08-22.73 20.13 02:42:04.255 -11:07:39.46 AT 2026aaxr 2026-09-03.17 19.67 02:31:19.833 -25:27:29.88 SN 2026aaxq 2026-09-06.65 20.16 00:52:57.241 -59:43:14.89 AT 2026aaxp 2026-09-06.70 19.51 01:20:22.758 -62:39:05.68 AT 2026aaxo 2026-09-06.70 20.13 00:14:01.541 -00:00:55.27 AT 2026aaxn 2026-09-08.53 19.62 04:14:33.098 -37:43:12.21 AT 2026aaxm 2026-08-22.80 20.49 19:48:31.105 -23:12:17.17 AT 2026aaxl 2026-09-04.43 20.19 00:38:15.294 -37:17:09.43 AT 2026aaxk 2026-09-04.60 20.02 21:01:01.181 -13:41:08.56 SN 2026aaxj 2026-09-08.41 19.99 22:54:22.028 -56:22:37.05 AT 2026aaxi 2026-09-08.58 20.16 01:42:07.146 -40:01:01.18 AT 2026aaxh 2026-09-04.64 20.37 21:44:13.978 -09:13:15.35 AT 2026aaxg 2026-09-08.45 20.21 02:32:42.330 -42:59:32.85 AT 2026aaxf 2026-09-04.67 20.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 03:37 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 101 C - WARNING