This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2006 2461311.7006 12.24 20:49:25.54 -09:19:05.7
38.08443 -30.41498 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:25.54 -09:19:05.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:25.54 -09:19:05.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7006,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2006 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2006 2461311.7006 13.41 20:46:11.20 -13:12:25.3
33.58663 -31.33881 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 1 -0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:11.20 -13:12:25.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:11.20 -13:12:25.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7006,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2006 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2006 2461311.7006 13.76 20:31:47.05 -11:54:57.9
33.28115 -27.60433 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -0 -1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:31:47.05 -11:54:57.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:31:47.05 -11:54:57.9: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.2006* 20 31 47.05 -11 54 57.9 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7006,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2006 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2006 2461311.7006 14.19 20:35:18.25 -10:18:43.8
35.33421 -27.71086 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia 1 -1 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:18.25 -10:18:43.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:18.25 -10:18:43.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.2006* 20 35 18.25 -10 18 43.8 14.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7006,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2006 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461311.70092752 28.09.2026 04:49:10.138 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10407
Objects passed selection criteria: 10387
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8663
Average stars matched: 8442.25 (97.4518 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 02:38:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461311.70092752 28.09.2026 04:49:10.138 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68226
Objects passed selection criteria: 68119
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59516.2
Average stars matched: 57618.5 (96.8114 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 293708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 02:40:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.70034992
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.452 -10:00:05.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.452 -10:00:05.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0266 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:21.212 -10:00:30.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:21.212 -10:00:30.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:18.452 -10:00:05.06
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:21.212 -10:00:30.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01328 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dOehV3Xboi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lAZ5Mr9dDq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3QABEGZyIO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n9HJD5IPxY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dOehV3Xboi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=3560, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 10329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1501 n_q2=996 n_q3=1414 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lAZ5Mr9dDq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=3538, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 10373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1511 n_q2=992 n_q3=1419 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3QABEGZyIO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=586, bad_region=1754, passed=8267
Got 8267 stars (including 6073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=7.409 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.978 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.978 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.633 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.633 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.539 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.539 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.724 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.584 worst_region_rms_after=0.539 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.921 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.539
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.584 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.584 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec matched=4875
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=1526 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1437 n_q4=902 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.n9HJD5IPxY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=596, bad_region=1752, passed=8236
Got 8236 stars (including 6043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=7.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.186 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.186 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.619 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.529 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.727 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.573 worst_region_rms_after=0.529 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.960 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.529
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.573 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.573 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.393 arcsec matched=4875
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1004 n_q3=1448 n_q4=899 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.156
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.106
reference average sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.1505
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.6: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.6: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.6: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4030 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20676_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20676_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20695_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.73 -12:31:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20831_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20831_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.63 -07:32:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.452 -10:00:05.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.452 -10:00:05.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0266 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:21.212 -10:00:30.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:21.212 -10:00:30.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:18.452 -10:00:05.06
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:21.212 -10:00:30.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01328 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dg5r2vkC1e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GtXRS5Xviw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0BPuw502iN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACFRBt8qVM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 50 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dg5r2vkC1e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6181, bad_region=22296, passed=95415
Got 95415 stars (including 68383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1535 n_q2=964 n_q3=1443 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GtXRS5Xviw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6280, bad_region=22525, passed=95786
Got 95786 stars (including 68372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1544 n_q2=948 n_q3=1446 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0BPuw502iN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3640, bad_region=8864, passed=55469
Got 55469 stars (including 44422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=7.281 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.615 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.530 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.727 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.570 worst_region_rms_after=0.530 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.930 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.530
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.570 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.570 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.379 arcsec matched=4876
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=1568 n_q2=961 n_q3=1479 n_q4=868 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ACFRBt8qVM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3650, bad_region=8767, passed=55309
Got 55309 stars (including 44332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=7.349 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.900 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.530 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.733 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.569 worst_region_rms_after=0.530 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.959 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.530
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.569 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.569 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.385 arcsec matched=4876
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=1569 n_q2=946 n_q3=1487 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_023431_TTUQ2b1x1_3259881_ErI1dynJ/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:28.43 -11:40:45.4: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:00.44 -09:23:42.6: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:11.89 -13:16:09.8: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:45.57 -07:16:27.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:03.71 -08:19:22.9: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:52.13 -11:52:16.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:37.17 -13:03:37.5: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:26.16 -10:20:22.5: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:51.06 -14:10:43.9: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:50.35 -10:31:31.7: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:45.57 -07:16:27.7: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:11.89 -13:16:09.8: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:37.17 -13:03:37.5: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:26.16 -10:20:22.5: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:50.35 -10:31:31.7: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:51.06 -14:10:43.9: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.57 -07:16:27.7: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9984 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:11.89 -13:16:09.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9384 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:37.17 -13:03:37.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8757 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:03.71 -08:19:22.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:26.16 -10:20:22.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0057 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:50.35 -10:31:31.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3126 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:52.13 -11:52:16.0: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:28.43 -11:40:45.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:00.44 -09:23:42.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:51.06 -14:10:43.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5373 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:03.71 -08:19:22.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9556 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:52.13 -11:52:16.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9907 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:28.43 -11:40:45.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0352 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:00.44 -09:23:42.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3616 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:20.73 -08:10:12.6: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.7: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:44.22 -08:13:09.1: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:19.49 -13:09:37.0: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:25.54 -09:19:05.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:17.3: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:40.12 -06:42:38.6: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:42.03 -13:27:11.6: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:28.17 -12:56:38.7: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:11.20 -13:12:25.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:20.73 -08:10:12.6: 11.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.7: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:20.73 -08:10:12.6: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4092 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.7: ref_mag=10.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5084 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:19.49 -13:09:37.0: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:44.22 -08:13:09.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:19.49 -13:09:37.0: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9474 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:44.22 -08:13:09.1: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9009 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:25.54 -09:19:05.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:42.03 -13:27:11.6: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:42.03 -13:27:11.6: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3468 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:40.12 -06:42:38.6: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:28.17 -12:56:38.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:11.20 -13:12:25.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:40.12 -06:42:38.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4344 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:17.3: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.17 -12:56:38.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2805 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:17.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3053 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:48.80 -08:38:12.5: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:34.75 -11:01:17.4: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:29.17 -05:51:00.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:19.97 -11:35:06.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:28.68 -06:46:19.7: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:57.83 -11:00:49.7: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:03.19 -08:11:46.7: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.75 -08:15:05.3: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:48.80 -08:38:12.5: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:48.80 -08:38:12.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5023 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:34.75 -11:01:17.4: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:34.75 -11:01:17.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4942 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:29.17 -05:51:00.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.17 -05:51:00.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4499 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:19.97 -11:35:06.3: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:19.97 -11:35:06.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3706 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:28.68 -06:46:19.7: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.68 -06:46:19.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6167 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:57.83 -11:00:49.7: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:03.19 -08:11:46.7: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.75 -08:15:05.3: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:57.83 -11:00:49.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5885 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.19 -08:11:46.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4894 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.75 -08:15:05.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7042 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:39.74 -12:20:30.9: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:31:47.05 -11:54:57.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:31.47 -08:49:29.3: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:14.54 -09:06:49.2: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.34 -10:57:27.5: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:11.06 -10:41:33.1: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:39.48 -07:53:33.1: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:39.74 -12:20:30.9: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:39.74 -12:20:30.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6389 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:31:47.05 -11:54:57.9: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:31.47 -08:49:29.3: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:31.47 -08:49:29.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7333 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:18.25 -10:18:43.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:14.54 -09:06:49.2: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:14.54 -09:06:49.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9000 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.34 -10:57:27.5: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.34 -10:57:27.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8120 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:39.48 -07:53:33.1: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:11.06 -10:41:33.1: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:39.48 -07:53:33.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:11.06 -10:41:33.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0696 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:18.25 -10:18:43.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:51.15 -08:44:18.3: 15.08 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:38.58 -10:57:23.5: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:51.15 -08:44:18.3: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:51.15 -08:44:18.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3315 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:38.58 -10:57:23.5: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:38.58 -10:57:23.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3161 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111559_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111559_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111570_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111570_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111576_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111576_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111579_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111579_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111581_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111581_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111582_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111582_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111587_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111587_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111589_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111589_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111602_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111602_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111605_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111605_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111607_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111607_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111613_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111613_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111614_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111614_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111616_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111616_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111772_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111772_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.65 -08:56:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111851_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 111851_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111890_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 111890_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.65 -12:35:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112044_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112044_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:53.96 -07:43:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112059_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112059_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.47 -09:28:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112095_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112095_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:05.88 -12:35:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112165_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112165_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112189_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112189_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112209_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 112209_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112220_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112220_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112251_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112251_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112262_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112262_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:46.59 -12:45:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112285_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112285_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112286_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112286_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112288_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112288_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112296_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112296_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112322_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112322_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112362_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112362_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112370_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112370_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112373_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112373_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112382_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112382_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112401_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 112401_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112411_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112411_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112439_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112439_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112552_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112552_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112613_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112613_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112615_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112615_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:40.86 -09:18:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112628_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112628_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112665_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 112665_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112682_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 112682_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60352_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 60352_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.63 -07:32:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:58.73 -10:43:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89295_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 89295_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:09.14 -12:20:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-27_23-49-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks