This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2952 2461311.7952 11.52 06:50:46.58 +26:12:47.3
189.20642 11.48483 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -1 0 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:50:46.58 +26:12:47.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:50:46.58 +26:12:47.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7952,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2952 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2952 2461311.7952 12.79 05:55:24.64 +24:40:07.4
184.78364 -0.31150 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:24.64 +24:40:07.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:24.64 +24:40:07.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.2952* 05 55 24.64 +24 40 07.4 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7952,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2952 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2952 2461311.7952 13.32 06:44:04.35 +21:52:53.2
192.51252 8.24477 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra -1 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:04.35 +21:52:53.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:04.35 +21:52:53.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7952,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2952 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2952 2461311.7952 14.02 06:17:58.10 +22:59:53.2
188.75776 3.37874 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.566 Stereoskopia -2 -1 2 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:58.10 +22:59:53.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:58.10 +22:59:53.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.7952,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.2952 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461311.79548587 28.09.2026 07:05:19.979 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27546
Objects passed selection criteria: 27471
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19525.5
Average stars matched: 18422 (94.3484 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 02:09:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461311.79548587 28.09.2026 07:05:19.979 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 117
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 176279
Objects passed selection criteria: 175888
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 131052
Average stars matched: 126938 (96.8602 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 642756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 02:11:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.79487174
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:44.927 +21:59:17.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:44.927 +21:59:17.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.375 +21:58:45.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:45.375 +21:58:45.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0355 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:44.927 +21:59:17.11
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:45.375 +21:58:45.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00903 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QKHI2ppThc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZZjpS8kxwk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cJGLZnuDhj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZT9pcOt8pO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.QKHI2ppThc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZZjpS8kxwk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cJGLZnuDhj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=642, bad_region=0, passed=8777
Got 8777 stars (including 8124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4785 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=9.921 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.425 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.734 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.221 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.961 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.648 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4785 robust_rms_before=1.552 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.684 worst_region_rms_after=0.648 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.777 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.648
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.684 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.684 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.495 arcsec matched=4785
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits N_match=4785 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=1344 n_q2=909 n_q3=1478 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZT9pcOt8pO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=625, bad_region=1, passed=8918
Got 8918 stars (including 8287 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=10.110 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.232 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.232 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.758 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.043 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.943 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.636 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4795 robust_rms_before=1.467 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.505 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.517 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.720 worst_region_rms_after=0.636 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.712 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.636
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.475 +21:58:43.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8918 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2156213.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.467 -> 0.517 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4795 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4594 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4594 pairs (4795 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=9.907 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.869 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.869 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=0.746 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.022 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.929 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4594 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.631 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.631 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4594 robust_rms_before=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.629 worst_region_rms_after=0.631 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.629 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.631
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.631 vs 0.629 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits N_match=4594 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=1285 n_q2=889 n_q3=1403 n_q4=1017 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.226
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits sigma_overall=0.511 worst_q_ratio=1.155
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4785 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275_astrometric_residuals.png (4594 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.63 +25:14:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34360_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 34360_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.79 +20:02:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:44.927 +21:59:17.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:44.927 +21:59:17.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.475 +21:58:43.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:45.475 +21:58:43.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0360 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:44.927 +21:59:17.11
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:45.475 +21:58:43.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00949 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jJainaDdAP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MKS4o8FBWw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WXQUzjUU5F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GuvLzTxL7n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 111 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jJainaDdAP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MKS4o8FBWw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WXQUzjUU5F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3457, bad_region=1, passed=66202
Got 66202 stars (including 62653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=9.983 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.626 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.626 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.744 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.204 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.962 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.640 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.537 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.679 worst_region_rms_after=0.640 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.771 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.640
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.679 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.679 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.499 arcsec matched=4796
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=1361 n_q2=879 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1071 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GuvLzTxL7n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3397, bad_region=1, passed=65887
Got 65887 stars (including 62374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65887 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=10.160 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.771 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.051 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.943 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.645 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.645 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.519 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.646 worst_region_rms_after=0.645 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.646 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.645
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.646 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.646 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.501 arcsec matched=4799
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=1345 n_q2=898 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1071 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_020613_TTUQ1b1x1_2112526_e0bg6yxC/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:53:52.55 +18:09:01.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:58.39 +25:30:20.7: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:43.17 +19:05:55.7: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:49.65 +23:20:54.9: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.42 +23:55:55.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:53:52.55 +18:09:01.3: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:58.39 +25:30:20.7: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:43.17 +19:05:55.7: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:52.55 +18:09:01.3: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5740 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:58.39 +25:30:20.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9288 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:43.17 +19:05:55.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1203 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:27.58 +24:05:48.2: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.42 +23:55:55.8: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:49.65 +23:20:54.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.42 +23:55:55.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2156 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:49.65 +23:20:54.9: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8383 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:27.58 +24:05:48.2: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:27.58 +24:05:48.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4355 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:50:46.58 +26:12:47.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.9: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.9: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3993 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:24.64 +24:40:07.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:50.08 +20:48:25.7: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:50:46.58 +26:12:47.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.14 +20:11:40.6: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:51.31 +20:48:17.3: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:50.08 +20:48:25.7: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:50.08 +20:48:25.7: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2631 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:24.64 +24:40:07.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:26.50 +20:55:16.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:49.48 +21:52:44.9: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.14 +20:11:40.6: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.14 +20:11:40.6: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9638 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:51.31 +20:48:17.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:51.31 +20:48:17.3: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3587 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:35.57 +20:29:32.6: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:26.50 +20:55:16.6: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:26.50 +20:55:16.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7326 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:49.48 +21:52:44.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:49.48 +21:52:44.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3508 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:26.15 +20:55:46.2: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:48:23.33 +22:20:13.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:35.57 +20:29:32.6: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:35.57 +20:29:32.6: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7371 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:26.15 +20:55:46.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:48:23.33 +22:20:13.8: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:23.33 +22:20:13.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3696 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:26.15 +20:55:46.2: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7857 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:16.89 +22:09:30.7: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:45.01 +25:04:18.8: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:44.72 +22:53:57.1: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:43.95 +24:45:46.1: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:16.89 +22:09:30.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:16.89 +22:09:30.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8667 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:15.07 +17:30:15.8: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:45.01 +25:04:18.8: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:45.01 +25:04:18.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8780 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:44.72 +22:53:57.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:44.72 +22:53:57.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7897 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:43.95 +24:45:46.1: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:43.95 +24:45:46.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3157 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:15.70 +26:58:11.4: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:48.39 +21:26:56.5: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:15.07 +17:30:15.8: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:15.07 +17:30:15.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6077 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:15.70 +26:58:11.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:15.70 +26:58:11.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0881 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:48.39 +21:26:56.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:48.39 +21:26:56.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7644 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:14.76 +22:51:03.1: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:38.91 +25:07:05.3: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:04.35 +21:52:53.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:58.10 +22:59:53.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:14.76 +22:51:03.1: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:14.76 +22:51:03.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9803 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:38.91 +25:07:05.3: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:38.91 +25:07:05.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2169 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:04.35 +21:52:53.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:58.10 +22:59:53.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230765_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230765_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:17.85 +25:01:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230770_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230770_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230782_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230782_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.86 +23:55:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.54 +18:39:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230791_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230791_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.70 +18:21:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230802_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230802_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.49 +23:24:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230805_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230805_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.60 +22:16:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.08 +25:11:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:59.26 +17:48:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.06 +23:55:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230814_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230814_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:29.56 +24:04:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230818_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230818_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.68 +22:42:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230819_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230819_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230820_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230820_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:17.80 +18:59:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230821_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230821_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.45 +26:33:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:51.52 +18:25:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230962_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 230962_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.56 +23:20:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231002_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231002_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.53 +22:29:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231010_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231010_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.82 +22:30:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231113_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231113_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.20 +22:21:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231155_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231155_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231217_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 231217_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231221_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231221_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.49 +20:10:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231250_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231250_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.84 +25:55:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231276_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231276_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.89 +23:18:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231299_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231299_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.34 +23:18:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231300_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231300_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.29 +22:32:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231356_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231356_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.76 +24:02:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231387_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231387_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.51 +21:37:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231400_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231400_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.80 +17:37:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231499_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231499_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:04.55 +16:56:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231553_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231553_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.21 +21:52:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231557_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 231557_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231581_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231581_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.23 +25:00:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231594_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231594_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231619_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231619_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.12 +22:53:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231621_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231621_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231626_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231626_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.98 +24:26:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231711_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231711_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:45.95 +21:04:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231723_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231723_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.63 +22:33:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231737_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231737_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231738_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231738_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.14 +23:15:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231753_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231753_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231775_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231775_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.61 +20:27:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231798_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231798_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.70 +23:13:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.55 +22:41:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231839_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231839_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.77 +25:58:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:20.23 +24:04:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231880_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231880_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:10.30 +25:05:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231908_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231908_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:56.74 +25:01:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:36.47 +25:30:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231911_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231911_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:07.01 +22:04:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231914_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231914_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.43 +19:19:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231939_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231939_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231962_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 231962_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232001_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232001_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.00 +25:01:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232035_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232035_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.87 +18:02:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232051_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232051_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232055_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232055_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.36 +16:57:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232056_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232056_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.91 +21:10:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232057_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232057_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.49 +18:11:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:31.46 +25:20:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232093_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232093_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232102_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232102_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:21.44 +24:30:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232137_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232137_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.64 +24:26:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232138_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232138_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232149_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232149_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:09.62 +22:19:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232162_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232162_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.30 +20:26:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232177_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232177_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.67 +23:08:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.51 +24:36:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232185_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232185_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:46.00 +22:43:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232223_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232223_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.68 +24:51:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232232_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232232_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:29.03 +23:10:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232244_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232244_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.85 +22:43:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232268_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232268_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.51 +22:44:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232275_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232275_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.09 +23:37:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232280_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232280_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.50 +20:55:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232286_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232286_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.26 +22:57:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232306_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232306_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232345_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232345_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.17 +23:17:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232346_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232346_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.36 +19:25:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232420_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232420_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232456_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232456_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.40 +21:34:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232462_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232462_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.81 +18:55:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 232494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232506_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 232506_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.41 +22:12:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232522_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 232522_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49847_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 49847_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.79 +20:02:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.73 +18:15:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.27 +18:43:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:58.42 +19:53:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.17 +21:51:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:26.16 +20:28:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 05790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:21.86 +16:59:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 20425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:33.79 +17:50:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:54.35 +22:43:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147365_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 147365_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_02-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks