fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.24722 | 2461311.74722 | 11.78 | 23:34:13.92 -14:14:11.1 | 0884 5197 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.24795 | 2461311.74795 | 11.78 | 23:34:13.89 -14:14:10.2 | 0884 5191 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2476 2461311.7476 11.78 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7
64.68287 -67.86586 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
118 Peitho -1 -1 1 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7: 14.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.24722 | 2461311.74722 | 12.47 | 23:31:47.37 -19:54:21.0 | 0854 1734 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.24795 | 2461311.74795 | 12.40 | 23:31:47.30 -19:54:19.8 | 0855 1729 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.2476 2461311.7476 12.44 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4
50.28910 -70.39640 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
259 Aletheia -1 1 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-09-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 899218 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 899218 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5462.6106 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1206.8174 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5450.8147 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1191.8888 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.37449 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.013 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T00:55:49.9148119' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T05:55:49.9148119' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.2471054862 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T05:55:59.8186500' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.2472201157 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.949180974283 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9906334514426 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.0772222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 172.518055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.61894450878943 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 292.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.300344 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits :) Spent 0.537349 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T00:56:52.8491122' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T05:56:52.8491122' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.2478339006 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T05:57:02.7500722' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.2479484952 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.949180976546 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9906334304864 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.105 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 172.833888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6179484087102 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 292.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.300344 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits :) Spent 0.537625 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.74722123 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.103 -18:00:21.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.103 -18:00:21.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.063 -17:59:51.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.063 -17:59:51.09 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:57.103 -18:00:21.80 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.063 -17:59:51.09 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00853 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r5V9qi25zn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ozYC8FV8OD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rBjirqLHjk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y0a1LImznQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.382900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.382900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.2) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 3.6 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 3.6 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.3 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.3 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.r5V9qi25zn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=0, passed=2460 Got 2460 stars (including 2249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4415, gap 8.4415 to 351.5853 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 2170 stars left (next iteration limit 2387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=2170 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=568 n_q2=534 n_q3=534 n_q4=534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ozYC8FV8OD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=2454 Got 2454 stars (including 2246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2168 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2164 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5952 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2170 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 2166 stars left (next iteration limit 2380) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=2166 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=569 n_q2=535 n_q3=549 n_q4=513 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rBjirqLHjk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=217, bad_region=0, passed=2731 Got 2731 stars (including 2510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2731 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2435 through 0 to 8.3080, gap 8.3080 to 351.2435 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2433 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2731 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2426 through 0 to 8.3084, gap 8.3084 to 351.2426 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2433 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2731 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2731 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 2427 stars left (next iteration limit 2669) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2427 robust_rms=13.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.857 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.857 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2427 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.680 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.680 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2427 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.468 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.468 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2427 robust_rms_before=0.945 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.478 worst_region_rms_after=0.468 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.468 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec matched=2427 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=2427 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=607 n_q2=557 n_q3=691 n_q4=572 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Y0a1LImznQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=218, bad_region=0, passed=2742 Got 2742 stars (including 2518 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2742 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2436 through 0 to 8.3080, gap 8.3080 to 351.2436 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2442 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2439 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2439 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2439 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2742 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2426 through 0 to 8.3083, gap 8.3083 to 351.2426 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2444 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2439 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2742 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2439 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2742 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 2439 stars left (next iteration limit 2682) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2439 robust_rms=13.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.504 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.504 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2439 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.629 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.629 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2439 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.459 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.459 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2439 robust_rms_before=0.919 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.470 worst_region_rms_after=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.021 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.459 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.470 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.470 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=2439 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=2439 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=614 n_q2=558 n_q3=706 n_q4=561 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.194 ref2=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.237 new1=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.213 new2=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.224 reference average sigma_overall=0.3715 worst_q_ratio=1.2155 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (2170 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (2166 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (2427 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (2439 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20122_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 20122_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 00:02:07.36 -14:40:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 9.49 00:02:07.35 -14:40:33.8 4989 5211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 23:43:49.67 -15:17:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.103 -18:00:21.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.103 -18:00:21.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.063 -17:59:51.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.063 -17:59:51.09 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:57.103 -18:00:21.80 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.063 -17:59:51.09 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00853 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bo4712OUPD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BJMJwShVbD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XS5qMb2l8H Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MvKYI9Brbe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 7.23 23:43:49.67 -15:17:07.1 2351 4669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.255300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.255300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.9) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 3.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 3.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.4 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.4 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Bo4712OUPD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=477, bad_region=0, passed=14962 Got 14962 stars (including 14469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14962 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4413, gap 8.4413 to 351.5844 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.BJMJwShVbD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=621, bad_region=0, passed=15161 Got 15161 stars (including 14519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15161 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4408, gap 8.4408 to 351.5846 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5341) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.XS5qMb2l8H (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=446, bad_region=1, passed=12798 Got 12798 stars (including 12340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12798 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2435 through 0 to 8.3216, gap 8.3216 to 351.2435 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2425 through 0 to 8.3222, gap 8.3222 to 351.2425 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5342) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=13.308 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.492 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.819 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.612 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.612 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4859 robust_rms_before=0.998 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.438 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.618 worst_region_rms_after=0.612 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.183 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.612 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.618 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.618 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.438 arcsec matched=4859 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1132 n_q3=1381 n_q4=1154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MvKYI9Brbe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=461, bad_region=1, passed=12779 Got 12779 stars (including 12300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2436 through 0 to 8.3209, gap 8.3209 to 351.2436 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2426 through 0 to 8.3214, gap 8.3214 to 351.2426 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5344) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=13.353 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.404 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.404 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.553 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.764 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.764 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.565 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.564 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=0.976 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.445 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.574 worst_region_rms_after=0.565 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.128 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.564 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.574 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.574 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.434 arcsec matched=4858 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1379 n_q4=1151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:55.61 -22:44:39.8: 13.29 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:55.23 -21:26:34.7: 13.41 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:29.76 -22:33:34.2: 13.41 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7: 14.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:30.58 -20:08:40.0: 12.86 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:16.07 -14:24:03.7: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:58.64 -13:18:33.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:28.52 -22:46:38.4: 13.53 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:48.38 -22:47:00.2: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:16.07 -14:24:03.7: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:55.61 -22:44:39.8: 12.90 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:29.76 -22:33:34.2: 13.40 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:16.07 -14:24:03.7: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0263 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:58.64 -13:18:33.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:58.64 -13:18:33.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:55.23 -21:26:34.7: 13.43 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:30.58 -20:08:40.0: 12.92 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:55.61 -22:44:39.8: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8417 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:29.76 -22:33:34.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9690 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:55.23 -21:26:34.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8932 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.58 -20:08:40.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0029 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:28.52 -22:46:38.4: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:48.38 -22:47:00.2: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:28.52 -22:46:38.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9800 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:48.38 -22:47:00.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0463 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:57.92 -21:46:29.4: 13.52 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:03.73 -21:06:18.8: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:23:45.47 -22:23:56.9: 13.39 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:36.14 -22:26:01.6: 13.42 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:04.33 -21:40:09.8: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:46.19 -21:01:36.9: 13.61 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:54.64 -22:03:28.2: 13.53 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:13.87 -22:39:21.0: 13.20 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:46.19 -21:01:36.9: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:23:45.47 -22:23:56.9: 13.91 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:36.14 -22:26:01.6: 13.28 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:57.92 -21:46:29.4: 13.34 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:04.33 -21:40:09.8: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:03.73 -21:06:18.8: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:46.19 -21:01:36.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0949 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:36.14 -22:26:01.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1069 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:45.47 -22:23:56.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1998 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:57.92 -21:46:29.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2689 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:04.33 -21:40:09.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1614 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:03.73 -21:06:18.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1309 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:54.64 -22:03:28.2: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:13.87 -22:39:21.0: 13.23 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:54.64 -22:03:28.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1832 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:13.87 -22:39:21.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1041 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:27:22.92 -21:44:57.6: 13.53 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:54.03 -22:17:25.1: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:20.92 -19:00:51.5: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:44.43 -21:52:12.2: 13.63 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:17.13 -20:58:52.2: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:17.14 -22:46:38.4: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:35.00 -19:08:01.6: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:42.47 -21:49:11.0: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:27:22.92 -21:44:57.6: 13.32 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:22.92 -21:44:57.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2658 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:54.03 -22:17:25.1: 13.60 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:20.92 -19:00:51.5: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:17.13 -20:58:52.2: 13.38 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:44.43 -21:52:12.2: 13.38 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:54.03 -22:17:25.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2295 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:17.14 -22:46:38.4: 13.81 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:35.00 -19:08:01.6: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:20.92 -19:00:51.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4324 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:17.13 -20:58:52.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3640 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:44.43 -21:52:12.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1619 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:17.14 -22:46:38.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1687 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:35.00 -19:08:01.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3773 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:42.47 -21:49:11.0: 13.28 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:42.47 -21:49:11.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1671 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:46.43 -19:19:02.1: 13.52 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:56.83 -14:41:14.2: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:59.60 -19:37:59.1: 14.12 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:34.22 -19:33:44.9: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:04.39 -20:09:36.8: 13.53 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:22:45.97 -20:42:29.4: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:01.92 -22:04:48.3: 13.60 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:11.85 -19:04:13.1: 13.82 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:59.60 -19:37:59.1: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:59.60 -19:37:59.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4451 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:04.39 -20:09:36.8: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:34.22 -19:33:44.9: 13.63 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:01.92 -22:04:48.3: 13.31 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:04.39 -20:09:36.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3929 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:46.43 -19:19:02.1: 13.66 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.22 -19:33:44.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3290 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:22:45.97 -20:42:29.4: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:56.83 -14:41:14.2: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:01.92 -22:04:48.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1028 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:46.43 -19:19:02.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3570 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:45.97 -20:42:29.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4159 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:56.83 -14:41:14.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4466 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:11.85 -19:04:13.1: 14.00 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:11.85 -19:04:13.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4376 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:17.29 -20:37:58.8: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:02.04 -15:05:29.7: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:32.68 -22:12:28.3: 13.76 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:48.90 -14:57:03.7: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:00.23 -14:55:12.5: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:17.57 -17:32:34.8: 13.72 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:19.79 -22:38:10.5: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:29.77 -22:03:50.0: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:17.29 -20:37:58.8: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:02.04 -15:05:29.7: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:17.29 -20:37:58.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3913 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:48.90 -14:57:03.7: 13.56 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:02.04 -15:05:29.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6292 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:19.79 -22:38:10.5: 13.64 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:00.23 -14:55:12.5: 13.54 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:48.90 -14:57:03.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5196 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:17.57 -17:32:34.8: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:19.79 -22:38:10.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3217 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.23 -14:55:12.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5893 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:17.57 -17:32:34.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4521 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:32.68 -22:12:28.3: 13.93 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:32.68 -22:12:28.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.1882 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:29.77 -22:03:50.0: 13.62 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:29.77 -22:03:50.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3216 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:21.25 -20:31:23.4: 13.43 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:30:58.39 -13:05:43.4: 13.58 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:11.75 -16:31:09.1: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:46.44 -16:57:51.7: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:43.19 -16:49:58.2: 13.50 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:12.71 -22:03:44.7: 13.87 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:47.25 -16:46:31.1: 14.00 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:27.08 -17:41:33.1: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:21.25 -20:31:23.4: 13.94 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:30:58.39 -13:05:43.4: 14.13 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:11.75 -16:31:09.1: 14.08 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:21.25 -20:31:23.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3715 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:58.39 -13:05:43.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5123 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:11.75 -16:31:09.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5815 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:43.19 -16:49:58.2: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:46.44 -16:57:51.7: 13.61 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:43.19 -16:49:58.2: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5825 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:46.44 -16:57:51.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6140 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:47.25 -16:46:31.1: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:47.25 -16:46:31.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5738 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:12.71 -22:03:44.7: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:12.71 -22:03:44.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4862 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:27.08 -17:41:33.1: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:27.08 -17:41:33.1: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5693 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:56.52 -22:37:12.9: 13.67 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:04.91 -20:03:51.6: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:30.80 -14:14:47.8: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:04.43 -23:10:44.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:10.74 -19:03:40.1: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:11.48 -16:11:36.7: 13.90 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:21.39 -19:14:22.7: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:24:22.28 -18:29:28.1: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:56.52 -22:37:12.9: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:04.43 -23:10:44.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:04.43 -23:10:44.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:56.52 -22:37:12.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4444 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:10.74 -19:03:40.1: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:04.91 -20:03:51.6: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:30.80 -14:14:47.8: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:10.74 -19:03:40.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6135 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:04.91 -20:03:51.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3433 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:11.48 -16:11:36.7: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:30.80 -14:14:47.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6914 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:11.48 -16:11:36.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5948 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:21.39 -19:14:22.7: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:21.39 -19:14:22.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4494 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:24:22.28 -18:29:28.1: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:22.28 -18:29:28.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6809 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:01.11 -18:37:37.1: 14.08 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:04.69 -15:47:23.6: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:24:00.72 -20:29:41.5: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:20.48 -18:40:15.2: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:24:30.65 -18:42:09.6: 13.74 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:29:55.38 -12:48:46.9: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:33.17 -21:23:28.5: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:04.69 -15:47:23.6: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:04.69 -15:47:23.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6834 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:01.11 -18:37:37.1: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:01.11 -18:37:37.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7671 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:20.48 -18:40:15.2: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:29:55.38 -12:48:46.9: 13.70 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:24:30.65 -18:42:09.6: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:33.17 -21:23:28.5: 14.28 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:24:00.72 -20:29:41.5: 14.09 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:20.48 -18:40:15.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6104 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:55.38 -12:48:46.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7803 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:30.65 -18:42:09.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6779 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:33.17 -21:23:28.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6773 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:00.72 -20:29:41.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5845 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.18 00:28:30.58 -20:08:43.7 8926 2056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21277_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21277_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.91 00:28:30.58 -20:08:36.3 8927 2052 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 12.84 00:29:55.56 -22:44:39.3 9162 0472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21278_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21278_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.84 00:29:55.65 -22:44:40.4 9162 0466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.02 00:31:16.01 -14:24:03.4 9272 5560 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21292_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21292_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.03 00:31:16.14 -14:24:03.9 9273 5554 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 9.13 00:31:58.64 -13:18:33.6 9371 6232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21409_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 Preparing report for the candidate 21409_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21509_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 Preparing report for the candidate 21509_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21514_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21514_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 9.15 00:31:58.64 -13:18:34.0 9371 6227 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 23:34:55.61 -15:14:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21520_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21520_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.47 23:34:55.66 -15:14:48.6 1045 4587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 00:12:34.21 -22:55:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21551_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21551_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.59 00:12:34.23 -22:55:16.9 6719 0309 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 12.85 00:31:55.17 -21:26:35.1 9432 1270 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21599_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21599_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.96 00:31:55.29 -21:26:34.3 9433 1264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 12.98 00:31:29.75 -22:33:33.9 9384 0586 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21603_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21603_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.96 00:31:29.76 -22:33:34.4 9384 0581 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.02 00:31:48.42 -22:47:01.4 9431 0448 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21609_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21609_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.08 00:31:48.33 -22:46:59.1 9431 0443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.03 00:31:28.59 -22:46:39.0 9383 0452 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21615_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21615_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 12.93 00:31:28.45 -22:46:37.8 9383 0447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.10 00:30:03.73 -21:06:21.4 9161 1473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21627_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21627_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.18 00:30:03.73 -21:06:16.2 9162 1469 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.13 00:32:04.27 -21:40:10.3 9457 1131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21629_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21629_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.22 00:32:04.40 -21:40:09.2 9457 1126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.10 00:30:36.18 -22:26:02.2 9255 0662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21645_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21645_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.12 00:30:36.10 -22:26:00.9 9255 0657 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.21 00:23:45.47 -22:23:55.2 8281 0674 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21646_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21646_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.18 00:23:45.46 -22:23:58.7 8281 0668 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.17 00:29:57.98 -21:46:28.1 9156 1065 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21647_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21647_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.45 00:29:57.86 -21:46:30.8 9156 1060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.16 00:28:46.18 -21:01:36.0 8975 1520 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21648_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21648_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.05 00:28:46.21 -21:01:37.7 8975 1514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.18 00:30:54.53 -22:03:29.4 9294 0892 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21649_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21649_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.19 00:30:54.75 -22:03:27.0 9295 0888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.10 00:28:13.78 -22:39:21.2 8919 0524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21652_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21652_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.11 00:28:13.95 -22:39:20.8 8920 0519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.17 00:31:44.47 -21:52:13.1 9411 1008 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21670_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21670_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.15 00:31:44.39 -21:52:11.3 9412 1003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.23 00:29:54.01 -22:17:25.6 9152 0750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21676_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21676_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.23 00:29:54.04 -22:17:24.6 9153 0745 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.25 00:27:22.96 -21:44:56.3 8786 1077 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21682_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21682_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.28 00:27:22.88 -21:44:59.0 8786 1072 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.35 00:32:20.81 -19:00:52.4 9471 2751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21683_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21683_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.63 00:32:21.03 -19:00:50.6 9472 2746 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.36 00:30:17.15 -20:58:52.2 9192 1550 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21684_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21684_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.37 00:30:17.11 -20:58:52.2 9192 1545 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 00:28:42.18 -22:26:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21685_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21685_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.38 00:28:42.27 -22:26:39.4 8984 0649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.22 00:29:17.17 -22:46:35.1 9071 0451 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21686_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21686_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.13 00:29:17.10 -22:46:41.7 9071 0445 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.34 00:28:34.99 -19:08:02.4 8924 2670 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21688_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21688_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.43 00:28:35.02 -19:08:00.8 8925 2666 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.26 00:26:42.45 -21:49:11.1 8690 1033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21690_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21690_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.10 00:26:42.49 -21:49:10.8 8691 1028 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.33 00:29:34.18 -19:33:44.4 9072 2412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21696_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21696_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.33 00:29:34.26 -19:33:45.3 9073 2407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.36 00:30:46.41 -19:19:02.3 9244 2564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21702_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21702_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.36 00:30:46.45 -19:19:01.9 9245 2559 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.27 00:32:02.01 -22:04:48.3 9455 0880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21703_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21703_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.03 00:32:01.84 -22:04:48.4 9456 0875 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.38 00:31:59.69 -19:37:57.3 9425 2374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21705_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21705_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.56 00:31:59.51 -19:38:00.9 9425 2368 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.44 00:29:56.84 -14:41:13.6 9077 5379 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21706_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21706_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.45 00:29:56.82 -14:41:14.8 9078 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.39 00:32:04.36 -20:09:35.5 9442 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21720_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21720_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.40 00:32:04.42 -20:09:38.0 9442 2047 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.41 00:22:45.86 -20:42:30.4 8110 1699 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21723_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21723_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.42 00:22:46.09 -20:42:28.5 8111 1694 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.43 00:30:11.84 -19:04:13.5 9158 2713 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21725_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21725_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.45 00:30:11.87 -19:04:12.6 9159 2708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.36 00:30:32.64 -22:12:26.7 9243 0801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21726_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21726_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.09 00:30:32.71 -22:12:29.8 9244 0795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.50 00:30:00.21 -14:55:12.7 9088 5237 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21735_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21735_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.76 00:30:00.24 -14:55:12.3 9088 5232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.54 00:30:01.98 -15:05:27.7 9094 5133 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21740_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21740_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.87 00:30:02.09 -15:05:31.7 9095 5127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.39 00:28:19.81 -22:38:08.5 8933 0537 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21741_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21741_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.27 00:28:19.76 -22:38:12.5 8933 0531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.46 00:31:17.59 -17:32:35.8 9303 3644 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21742_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21742_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.45 00:31:17.54 -17:32:33.8 9303 3639 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.38 00:30:17.22 -20:37:59.1 9188 1762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21746_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21746_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.40 00:30:17.35 -20:37:58.6 9189 1757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.52 00:31:48.86 -14:57:01.3 9358 5226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21748_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21748_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.52 00:31:48.95 -14:57:06.0 9359 5220 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.40 00:28:29.83 -22:03:48.4 8949 0887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21750_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21750_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.27 00:28:29.71 -22:03:51.6 8949 0881 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.51 23:30:58.29 -13:05:43.7 0330 5851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21753_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21753_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.51 23:30:58.50 -13:05:43.1 0331 5846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.60 00:30:11.77 -16:31:09.1 9132 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21758_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21758_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.55 00:30:11.74 -16:31:09.1 9132 4259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.45 00:30:21.22 -20:31:23.7 9197 1829 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21760_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21760_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.33 00:30:21.28 -20:31:23.2 9197 1824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.47 00:26:12.74 -22:03:44.7 8623 0884 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21762_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21762_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.50 00:26:12.68 -22:03:44.7 8624 0879 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.61 00:28:46.47 -16:57:52.9 8927 3988 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21763_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21763_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.63 00:28:46.42 -16:57:50.4 8927 3984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.55 00:26:43.16 -16:49:59.5 8624 4061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21765_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21765_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.62 00:26:43.21 -16:49:56.9 8624 4056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.56 00:31:47.28 -16:46:31.8 9369 4112 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21766_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21766_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.59 00:31:47.22 -16:46:30.5 9369 4108 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.55 00:30:27.13 -17:41:32.4 9181 3551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21767_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21767_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.60 00:30:27.02 -17:41:33.9 9181 3546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.44 00:26:56.56 -22:37:12.4 8736 0544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21769_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21769_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.45 00:26:56.48 -22:37:13.3 8736 0539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.63 00:31:30.76 -14:14:47.0 9308 5655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21770_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21770_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.78 00:31:30.84 -14:14:48.6 9308 5650 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.46 00:28:04.90 -20:03:52.2 8863 2104 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21772_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21772_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.28 00:28:04.91 -20:03:51.0 8864 2099 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.54 23:31:11.47 -16:11:38.2 0550 3970 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21779_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21779_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.69 23:31:11.50 -16:11:35.2 0550 3965 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.47 00:15:04.40 -23:10:43.0 7075 0169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21783_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21783_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.45 00:15:04.47 -23:10:46.1 7076 0164 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.60 00:29:10.76 -19:03:41.1 9010 2716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21795_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21795_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.63 00:29:10.72 -19:03:39.1 9010 2711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.59 00:26:21.44 -19:14:22.5 8603 2600 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21800_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21800_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.37 00:26:21.35 -19:14:22.8 8603 2595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.68 00:24:22.40 -18:29:25.4 8305 3048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21804_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21804_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.69 00:24:22.16 -18:29:30.8 8305 3042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.74 00:32:01.14 -18:37:37.0 9419 2986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21806_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21806_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.83 00:32:01.08 -18:37:37.3 9420 2981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.68 00:31:04.68 -15:47:22.1 9256 4711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21807_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21807_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.68 00:31:04.70 -15:47:25.0 9256 4705 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.66 00:29:20.50 -18:40:15.7 9029 2953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21809_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21809_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.57 00:29:20.46 -18:40:14.7 9029 2949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.60 00:24:00.69 -20:29:43.0 8285 1832 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21813_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21813_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.57 00:24:00.75 -20:29:40.1 8285 1828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.77 23:29:55.41 -12:48:46.3 0155 6010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21815_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21815_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.80 23:29:55.34 -12:48:47.5 0156 6005 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.67 00:24:30.64 -18:42:09.5 8328 2920 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21834_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 21834_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.68 00:24:30.67 -18:42:09.8 8329 2915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 28.24722 2461311.74722 13.68 00:15:33.15 -21:23:28.2 7100 1258 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-55-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 13.68 00:15:33.19 -21:23:28.8 7101 1252 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.35 -14:40:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 05714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 9.68 00:02:07.35 -14:40:33.8 4989 5211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 00:22:30.87 -18:32:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 11.33 00:22:30.84 -18:32:45.7 8038 3003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits **** FOUND 23:43:49.68 -15:17:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4 ########### Completed Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4 ################################################################################### 23:34:13.90 -14:14:10.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:31:47.33 -19:54:20.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.74722123 -observatory V36 13:36:32.72 -11:34:07.7 Mercury (-0.1mag) 14:11:41.44 -20:28:26.0 Venus (-4.8mag) 08:08:21.07 +21:09:22.9 Mars (1.1mag) 09:25:20.79 +15:46:25.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:13.88 +02:01:13.8 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:10.05 +21:00:42.2 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:11:39.76 -00:17:04.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:29.06 -23:42:58.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:26:09.13 +13:07:28.5 Moon (-12.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 01:00 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.74722123: 09:25:28.05 +15:45:47.9 Io (9.3mag) 09:25:23.01 +15:46:15.6 Europa (6.3mag) 09:25:35.86 +15:45:05.5 Ganymede (7.9mag) 09:25:31.20 +15:45:32.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:24:09.96 +16:08:23.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:25:24.89 +15:46:05.7 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:23:22.82 +16:04:29.1 Elara (17.6mag) 09:28:30.22 +15:09:37.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:24:54.12 +16:10:01.4 Carme (18.9mag) 00:46:02.33 +02:00:57.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:46:14.61 +02:01:14.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:45:37.29 +01:59:56.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:46:27.39 +02:00:38.7 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:44:41.64 +01:49:24.5 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 01:00 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.74722123: 01:08:08.40 +18:32:03.1 JWST 17:16:21.84 +38:36:18.8 Chandra 05:59:37.55 +29:40:52.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 01:00 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.74722123 -observatory V36 03:47:33.97 +20:02:30.8 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:14:10.11 -33:47:36.0 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:33:25.33 -71:33:04.8 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:43.38 +34:16:17.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:06:16.73 +47:48:27.1 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 21:58:26.18 +25:51:11.8 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:23:59.82 +25:37:19.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:08:27.95 +26:35:37.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 10:01:22.71 +05:07:12.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:12.39 -17:28:10.0 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:54:30.56 +34:24:57.2 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:48.88 +15:07:57.9 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:25:59.85 +42:10:13.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:01:24.68 +47:37:06.3 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:44:04.41 -13:22:52.2 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:53:16.05 +17:04:49.4 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:38:09.23 -01:37:00.6 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:50:02.65 +69:35:51.9 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:50:05.76 +44:51:15.9 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:33:02.47 +13:01:52.1 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:44:37.87 -34:06:11.0 14.0mag 10P/Tempel 01:51:45.68 +39:37:48.4 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:02:21.12 -07:05:56.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:50:44.50 -11:32:45.0 17.9mag 63P/Wild 07:16:30.18 +17:22:48.6 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:11:01.07 +14:50:29.8 16.9mag 88P/Howell 06:51:04.00 +36:10:58.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:30:12.91 +18:39:40.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:13:33.31 +16:15:27.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:34:32.78 -28:17:16.8 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos 06:40:02.03 +19:52:12.8 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:57:25.18 -09:00:28.4 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:47:44.74 +05:03:49.3 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:33:07.63 +06:15:57.0 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:39:19.26 +42:09:36.2 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 09:42:13.19 +32:30:11.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 01:00 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 01:00 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 01:00 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:57:55.362 -22:31:24.48 AT 2026aaxw 2026-08-31.66 19.65 01:52:55.402 -09:12:08.29 AT 2026aaxv 2026-09-04.64 20.08 05:04:14.730 -42:14:07.54 AT 2026aaxu 2026-09-03.80 19.73 00:02:28.077 -23:32:16.72 AT 2026aaxt 2026-09-04.59 20.16 01:03:33.302 -33:27:15.30 AT 2026aaxs 2026-08-22.73 20.13 02:42:04.255 -11:07:39.46 AT 2026aaxr 2026-09-03.17 19.67 02:31:19.833 -25:27:29.88 SN 2026aaxq 2026-09-06.65 20.16 00:52:57.241 -59:43:14.89 AT 2026aaxp 2026-09-06.70 19.51 01:20:22.758 -62:39:05.68 AT 2026aaxo 2026-09-06.70 20.13 00:14:01.541 -00:00:55.27 AT 2026aaxn 2026-09-08.53 19.62 04:14:33.098 -37:43:12.21 AT 2026aaxm 2026-08-22.80 20.49 19:48:31.105 -23:12:17.17 AT 2026aaxl 2026-09-04.43 20.19 00:38:15.294 -37:17:09.43 AT 2026aaxk 2026-09-04.60 20.02 21:01:01.181 -13:41:08.56 SN 2026aaxj 2026-09-08.41 19.99 22:54:22.028 -56:22:37.05 AT 2026aaxi 2026-09-08.58 20.16 01:42:07.146 -40:01:01.18 AT 2026aaxh 2026-09-04.64 20.37 21:44:13.978 -09:13:15.35 AT 2026aaxg 2026-09-08.45 20.21 02:32:42.330 -42:59:32.85 AT 2026aaxf 2026-09-04.67 20.08 23:28:33.837 -17:12:39.07 AT 2026aaxe 2026-09-04.48 20.3 23:27:55.166 -08:22:08.81 AT 2026aaxd 2026-09-04.50 20.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 01:00 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 09 28.24795 2461311.74795 7.48 23:43:49.68 -15:17:07.1 2351 4669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_005758_TTUQ1b1x1_2775338_LIQl4Hqt/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_00-56-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
