This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3701 2461310.8701 8.79 07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4
193.33975 12.99682 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 -1 1 8.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8701,8.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3701 8.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3701 2461310.8701 11.18 07:55:19.15 +20:38:02.7
200.62908 22.94518 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:55:19.15 +20:38:02.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:55:19.15 +20:38:02.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8701,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3701 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3701 2461310.8701 11.70 06:49:40.15 +26:09:57.2
189.14390 11.23954 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 -1 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:49:40.15 +26:09:57.2: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:49:40.15 +26:09:57.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8701,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3701 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3701 2461310.8701 12.01 07:48:38.37 +22:19:12.7
198.31324 22.11927 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:48:38.37 +22:19:12.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:48:38.37 +22:19:12.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8701,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3701 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3701 2461310.8701 13.53 07:28:48.91 +17:39:04.4
200.96392 16.01957 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo -1 -1 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:48.91 +17:39:04.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:48.91 +17:39:04.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8701,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3701 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461310.87052293 27.09.2026 08:53:23.181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22047
Objects passed selection criteria: 21908
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14735.2
Average stars matched: 14353 (97.4059 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 07:33:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461310.87052293 27.09.2026 08:53:23.181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139991
Objects passed selection criteria: 139554
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 103051
Average stars matched: 99160 (96.2244 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 07:34:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461310.86977714
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:52.764 +22:01:40.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:52.764 +22:01:40.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0512 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:50.321 +22:01:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:50.321 +22:01:00.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:52.764 +22:01:40.22
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:50.321 +22:01:00.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01460 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Opib7t15aT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y8N7aHW1SY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YGz0XDPkno
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qvIvJnjW42
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Opib7t15aT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.y8N7aHW1SY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YGz0XDPkno (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=614, bad_region=0, passed=6177
Got 6177 stars (including 5556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6177 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=11.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.432 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=0.678 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.868 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.868 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.494 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4815 robust_rms_before=1.001 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.509 worst_region_rms_after=0.494 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.109 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.494
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.509 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.509 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.422 arcsec matched=4815
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1525 n_q2=1015 n_q3=1384 n_q4=891 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qvIvJnjW42 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=588, bad_region=0, passed=6101
Got 6101 stars (including 5505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=11.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.892 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.892 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4822 robust_rms_before=1.022 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.424 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.478 worst_region_rms_after=0.492 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.116 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.492
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.424 arcsec matched=4822
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=1502 n_q2=1028 n_q3=1404 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.030
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.053
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.79 +22:54:43.3: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:55:19.15 +20:38:02.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:55:19.15 +20:38:02.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.79 +22:54:43.3: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:39.9: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.79 +22:54:43.3: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5839 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=8.7847 delta=6.48 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31365_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 31365_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31367_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 31367_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 31376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31436_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 31436_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 31511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:04:12.01 +23:09:44.4
07:55:19.15 +20:38:02.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:52.764 +22:01:40.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:52.764 +22:01:40.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0512 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:50.321 +22:01:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:50.321 +22:01:00.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:52.764 +22:01:40.22
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:50.321 +22:01:00.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01460 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Qighu35Ff
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.se0f61U5wp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gRgdYzSLTN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v7HRHtWRql
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 140 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7Qighu35Ff (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.se0f61U5wp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gRgdYzSLTN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2288, bad_region=2, passed=55060
Got 55060 stars (including 52688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55060 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=11.206 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=0.673 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.903 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.903 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.499 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.499 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4815 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.527 worst_region_rms_after=0.499 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.112 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.499
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.527 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.527 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.411 arcsec matched=4815
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1543 n_q2=1031 n_q3=1338 n_q4=903 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.v7HRHtWRql (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2237, bad_region=2, passed=54697
Got 54697 stars (including 52370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5293)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=11.277 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.225 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.225 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=0.689 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.907 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.498 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4811 robust_rms_before=1.002 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.491 worst_region_rms_after=0.498 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.105 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.498
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.491 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.421 arcsec matched=4811
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1516 n_q2=1042 n_q3=1352 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-52-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_040735_TTUQ1b1x1_1995552_pkLPw6Lk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:17.94 +21:55:11.2: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:41.39 +19:46:44.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.61 +23:40:17.7: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.90 +20:54:37.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:21.76 +24:30:24.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:41.39 +19:46:44.6: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.61 +23:40:17.7: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:17.94 +21:55:11.2: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.90 +20:54:37.9: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.61 +23:40:17.7: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5495 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:41.39 +19:46:44.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7474 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:17.94 +21:55:11.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1190 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.90 +20:54:37.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2282 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:21.76 +24:30:24.7: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:21.76 +24:30:24.7: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1762 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.32 +19:41:49.0: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:02.60 +19:22:26.8: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:49:40.15 +26:09:57.2: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.32 +19:41:49.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.32 +19:41:49.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6690 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:02.60 +19:22:26.8: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:02.60 +19:22:26.8: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4645 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:48:38.37 +22:19:12.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:49:40.15 +26:09:57.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:48:38.37 +22:19:12.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.2: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:43.08 +18:04:12.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.87 +22:50:50.4: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.13 +19:24:26.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.20 +26:25:32.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.2: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4327 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.57 +20:25:09.0: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:43.08 +18:04:12.0: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.87 +22:50:50.4: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:43.08 +18:04:12.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3590 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.87 +22:50:50.4: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5398 delta=-1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.13 +19:24:26.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.13 +19:24:26.6: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4815 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.20 +26:25:32.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.20 +26:25:32.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5540 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:13.57 +20:25:09.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:13.57 +20:25:09.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5536 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:00.40 +17:52:29.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.07 +21:10:52.9: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:21.76 +18:38:31.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:00.40 +17:52:29.8: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:00.40 +17:52:29.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0556 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.07 +21:10:52.9: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.07 +21:10:52.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9960 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:21.76 +18:38:31.3: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.32 +21:43:08.8: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.14 +17:46:45.0: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:21.76 +18:38:31.3: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9882 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:25.58 +18:04:20.7: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.32 +21:43:08.8: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.32 +21:43:08.8: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1288 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:51.14 +17:46:45.0: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.14 +17:46:45.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0375 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:25.58 +18:04:20.7: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:25.58 +18:04:20.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2347 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:41.66 +24:40:37.4: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.30 +24:26:17.3: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:59.73 +18:34:18.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:41.66 +24:40:37.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:41.66 +24:40:37.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1557 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.30 +24:26:17.3: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.30 +24:26:17.3: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2306 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:59.73 +18:34:18.2: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:59.73 +18:34:18.2: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1956 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.99 +20:13:25.0: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:43.4: 12.85 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.99 +20:13:25.0: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:48.91 +17:39:04.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.99 +20:13:25.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5165 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:35.10 +20:52:28.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:43.4: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.59 +22:49:43.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.6538 delta=-0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:48.91 +17:39:04.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:35.10 +20:52:28.5: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:35.10 +20:52:28.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9228 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175742.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176735.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:32.87 +23:44:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.35 +19:58:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.39 +19:59:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.52 +24:00:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:44.83 +21:03:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:53.90 +20:45:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.68 +17:49:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:08.38 +18:48:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:39.13 +18:49:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.44 +17:19:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:13.11 +23:34:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:16.27 +18:59:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:43.19 +22:36:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:25.84 +25:46:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:43.13 +20:31:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.45 +21:02:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:44.23 +19:19:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.47 +17:59:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.25 +27:06:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.02 +20:09:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.81 +20:04:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.24 +19:25:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.05 +19:40:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.20 +25:15:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:39.60 +24:35:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.68 +21:35:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.54 +22:11:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.32 +22:46:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:21.34 +27:08:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:44.46 +25:12:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.80 +19:32:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:59.60 +26:50:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175692_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175692_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:19.16 +20:38:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175714_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175714_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.60 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175742_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 175742_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175827_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175827_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.66 +19:12:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175830_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175830_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.20 +24:07:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175837_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175837_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.52 +22:52:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175851_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 175851_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175875_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175875_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.39 +19:28:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175917_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175917_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:15.12 +18:30:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175928_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175928_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.91 +19:13:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175947_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175947_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.11 +17:59:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175948_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175948_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.71 +25:46:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 175978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176014_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176014_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176038_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176038_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.68 +22:27:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.88 +19:42:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176055_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176055_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.47 +22:23:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.93 +23:02:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176094_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176094_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176109_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176109_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.91 +20:58:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.04 +17:45:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.03 +23:37:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.79 +25:23:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176164_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176164_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.32 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176166_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176166_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.17 +18:03:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:31.09 +20:04:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.31 +26:03:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.04 +22:42:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.39 +26:22:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.19 +22:10:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176213_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176213_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.79 +19:51:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:18.99 +25:55:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176229_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176229_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.48 +21:18:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176238_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176238_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.94 +22:42:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.16 +26:51:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:57.67 +20:28:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176255_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176255_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:26.81 +20:36:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.96 +23:25:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.35 +21:47:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176282_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176282_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176283_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176283_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.74 +23:56:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176291_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176291_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.38 +18:39:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176301_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176301_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176302_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176302_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.86 +18:51:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176306_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176306_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.54 +25:29:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176311_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176311_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.10 +22:57:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176316_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176316_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:45.35 +19:50:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176330_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176330_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.89 +25:33:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176358_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176358_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176382_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176382_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.15 +22:43:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176389_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176389_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176396_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176396_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.76 +22:49:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.81 +23:15:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.14 +22:52:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.33 +18:07:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176441_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176441_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.43 +20:30:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.21 +22:50:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.14 +22:57:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.43 +19:28:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:18.07 +24:27:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.41 +21:31:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176566_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176566_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.34 +26:48:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176577_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176577_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.77 +23:26:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.65 +19:56:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.64 +19:19:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176594_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176594_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.41 +24:54:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176602_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176602_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.47 +20:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176612_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176612_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.66 +20:31:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176650_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176650_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.15 +24:39:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.82 +22:49:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176705_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176705_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:11.75 +22:12:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176724_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176724_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.49 +21:44:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176735_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
Preparing report for the candidate 176735_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176743_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176743_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.09 +22:39:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176744_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176744_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.55 +20:16:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176749_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176749_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.62 +20:00:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176756_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176756_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.00 +22:08:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176775_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 176775_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.71 +22:51:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.07 +20:02:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.73 +26:47:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.43 +24:13:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53702_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 53702_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:12.00 +23:09:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-53-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336 did not pass the final checks