This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.0648 2461310.5648 13.29 17:12:33.22 -09:27:25.1
12.46961 16.99057 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 0 0 0 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:12:33.22 -09:27:25.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:12:33.22 -09:27:25.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.5648,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.0648 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.0648 2461310.5648 14.07 16:54:38.13 -10:15:39.2
9.21061 20.24460 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.660 Crescentia -1 0 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:54:38.13 -10:15:39.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:54:38.13 -10:15:39.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.5648,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.0648 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.0648 2461310.5648 12.79 17:15:46.68 -10:37:04.6
11.88912 15.69922 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J1715466-103703
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.681 R1 Y 0.465 R1 157.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:15:46.68 -10:37:04.6: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:15:46.68 -10:37:04.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1715466-103703,2461310.5648,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1715466-103703 20260927.0648 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.0648 2461310.5648 13.13 16:59:12.98 -11:20:22.8
8.93044 18.70857 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V2515 Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.307 g Y 4.342 g 2458318.22290 174.064205300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:59:12.98 -11:20:22.8: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:59:12.98 -11:20:22.8: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2515 Oph,2461310.5648,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2515 Oph 20260927.0648 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
First image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Last image: 2461310.56514707 27.09.2026 01:33:38.707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7092
Objects passed selection criteria: 7075
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5528.25
Average stars matched: 5347.75 (96.735 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 01:31:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
First image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Last image: 2461310.56514707 27.09.2026 01:33:38.707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68052
Objects passed selection criteria: 67938
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58244.5
Average stars matched: 55650.8 (95.5468 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 288600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 01:32:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461310.56452451
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.598 -09:59:45.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.598 -09:59:45.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.297 -09:59:49.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:36.297 -09:59:49.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:38.598 -09:59:45.97
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:36.297 -09:59:49.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00950 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uGxBqv9NCT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KwkCN6mGbw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ebh5COZN65
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PMwnaCnGZe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Loaded 4092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3536 out of 7326 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Loaded 4092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3536 out of 7326 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2378 deg, Dec -15.2499 to -4.7061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2378 deg, Dec -15.2499 to -4.7061 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3396 out of 3529 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3529 out of 7427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
15.2 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uGxBqv9NCT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=7326
Got 7326 stars (including 6888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4749 stars left (next iteration limit 5225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=4749 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=934 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1731 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KwkCN6mGbw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=444, bad_region=0, passed=7427
Got 7427 stars (including 6977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4748 stars left (next iteration limit 5222)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4748 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.657 n_q1=940 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1731 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ebh5COZN65 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=3702
Got 3702 stars (including 3398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3265 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3231 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3231 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3266 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3232 stars left (next iteration limit 3554)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3232 robust_rms=14.471 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.007 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.007 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3232 robust_rms=0.561 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.741 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3232 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.459 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3232 robust_rms_before=0.786 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.413 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.520 worst_region_rms_after=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.901 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.459
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.589 -09:59:46.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3702 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3129547.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.786 -> 0.357 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 3232 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3089 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 3089 pairs (3232 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3089 robust_rms=14.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.731 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3089 robust_rms=0.550 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.725 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.725 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3089 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3089 robust_rms_before=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.455 worst_region_rms_after=0.454 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.455 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.454
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.588 -09:59:46.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3702 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3129740.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.352 -> 0.352 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=3089 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=536 n_q2=725 n_q3=1181 n_q4=647 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PMwnaCnGZe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=3820
Got 3820 stars (including 3505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3360 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3361 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3324 stars left (next iteration limit 3656)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3324 robust_rms=14.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.222 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.222 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3324 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.756 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.756 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3324 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.458 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3324 robust_rms_before=0.776 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.533 worst_region_rms_after=0.458 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.912 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.288 -09:59:50.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3820 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3129597.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.776 -> 0.348 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 3324 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3183 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 3183 pairs (3324 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3183 robust_rms=14.359 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.731 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3183 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.715 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3183 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.450 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3183 robust_rms_before=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.452 worst_region_rms_after=0.450 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.452 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.450
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.287 -09:59:50.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3820 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3129826.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.346 -> 0.346 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3183 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3183 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=3183 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=553 n_q2=752 n_q3=1215 n_q4=663 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.574 worst_q_ratio=1.107
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.159
reference average sigma_overall=0.5715 worst_q_ratio=1.1305
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (4749 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (4748 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (3089 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (3183 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.09 -06:23:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20547_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20547_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.46 -11:59:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20585_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:36.15 -05:27:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20667_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20667_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:20.90 -06:13:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20688_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20688_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.88 -06:04:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.57 -05:49:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 06265_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:00.93 -15:03:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.588 -09:59:46.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.588 -09:59:46.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:36.287 -09:59:50.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:36.287 -09:59:50.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:38.588 -09:59:46.38
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:36.287 -09:59:50.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00950 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YP9MxDduLT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X8hzk2jUXV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6QcceuRs2S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QhiIquDFaq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 74385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3164 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 74385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.498300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.498300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 74385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3164 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 74385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 74425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0774 to 265.2468 deg, Dec -15.2519 to -4.6849 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0774 to 265.2468 deg, Dec -15.2519 to -4.6849 deg
Loaded 4105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3188 out of 3620 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3620 out of 74425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.0 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
15.3 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YP9MxDduLT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4056, bad_region=1, passed=74370
Got 74370 stars (including 70164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=994 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1676 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X8hzk2jUXV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4093, bad_region=1, passed=74415
Got 74415 stars (including 70204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=982 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1696 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6QcceuRs2S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1292, bad_region=1, passed=42411
Got 42411 stars (including 41031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42411 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=13.875 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.619 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.579 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.838 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.838 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.491 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.491 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.365 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.494 worst_region_rms_after=0.491 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.494 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.491
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.494 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.365 arcsec matched=4769
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=941 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1792 n_q4=915 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QhiIquDFaq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1355, bad_region=1, passed=43494
Got 43494 stars (including 42052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=13.758 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.129 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.812 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.812 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.475 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.478 worst_region_rms_after=0.475 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.478 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.475
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec matched=4766
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=935 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1785 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-32-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223153_TTUQ1b1x1_3121686_jBKEwpBx/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:06:46.98 -07:33:30.3: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:20:30.45 -08:17:10.6: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:35:09.14 -15:05:39.8: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:21:39.03 -11:01:50.9: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:39:23.27 -08:36:47.5: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:03:50.90 -10:37:28.9: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:11:59.61 -10:46:44.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:13:15.94 -09:06:51.8: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:16:28.43 -13:20:38.2: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:03:50.90 -10:37:28.9: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:11:59.61 -10:46:44.6: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:35:09.14 -15:05:39.8: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:16:28.43 -13:20:38.2: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:06:46.98 -07:33:30.3: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:39:23.27 -08:36:47.5: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:20:30.45 -08:17:10.6: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:13:15.94 -09:06:51.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:21:39.03 -11:01:50.9: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:50.90 -10:37:28.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8418 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:59.61 -10:46:44.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4168 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:28.43 -13:20:38.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0633 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:09.14 -15:05:39.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7970 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:46.98 -07:33:30.3: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3757 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.03 -11:01:50.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7832 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:15.94 -09:06:51.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7987 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:30.45 -08:17:10.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9363 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:23.27 -08:36:47.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8211 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:06:28.72 -06:50:31.1: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:06:28.72 -06:50:31.1: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:28.72 -06:50:31.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7052 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:46:22.51 -05:35:55.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:37:54.66 -14:52:06.8: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:12.29 -08:46:02.6: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:55:16.28 -06:22:11.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:43:39.60 -05:13:25.8: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:44:19.09 -08:04:31.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:45:24.87 -07:56:22.2: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:26:15.28 -06:36:12.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:46:22.51 -05:35:55.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:22.51 -05:35:55.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2559 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:37:54.66 -14:52:06.8: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:45:24.87 -07:56:22.2: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:44:19.09 -08:04:31.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:55:16.28 -06:22:11.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:12.29 -08:46:02.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:43:39.60 -05:13:25.8: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:16.28 -06:22:11.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3998 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:19.09 -08:04:31.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4146 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:54.66 -14:52:06.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1808 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:24.87 -07:56:22.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1259 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:12.29 -08:46:02.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3716 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:39.60 -05:13:25.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4220 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:26:15.28 -06:36:12.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:15.28 -06:36:12.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0702 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:36:53.42 -14:47:10.9: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:23:37.95 -09:12:01.6: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:56.62 -06:07:10.8: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:02:58.69 -06:22:16.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:39:56.63 -06:46:21.6: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:12:33.22 -09:27:25.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:36:53.42 -14:47:10.9: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:53.42 -14:47:10.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7679 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:13:32.24 -10:10:50.9: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:23:37.95 -09:12:01.6: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:37.95 -09:12:01.6: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2158 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:56.62 -06:07:10.8: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:56.62 -06:07:10.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2352 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:02:58.69 -06:22:16.7: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:12:33.22 -09:27:25.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:39:56.63 -06:46:21.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.69 -06:22:16.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2227 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:56.63 -06:46:21.6: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3307 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:13:32.24 -10:10:50.9: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:32.24 -10:10:50.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2382 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:07:29.51 -12:43:41.6: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:32:54.82 -13:28:13.4: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:25:54.29 -07:59:35.6: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:07:29.51 -12:43:41.6: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:29.51 -12:43:41.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5014 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:32:54.82 -13:28:13.4: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:54.82 -13:28:13.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4825 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:57:37.34 -08:12:20.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:24:55.32 -06:01:54.9: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:25:54.29 -07:59:35.6: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:54.29 -07:59:35.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8385 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:54:38.13 -10:15:39.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:39:39.54 -11:03:45.0: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:06:08.86 -10:30:08.1: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:57:37.34 -08:12:20.0: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:37.34 -08:12:20.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7782 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:24:55.32 -06:01:54.9: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:55.32 -06:01:54.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9000 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:54:38.13 -10:15:39.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:39:39.54 -11:03:45.0: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:39.54 -11:03:45.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0201 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:15:46.68 -10:37:04.6: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:06:08.86 -10:30:08.1: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:08.86 -10:30:08.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0834 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:59:12.98 -11:20:22.8: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:15:46.68 -10:37:04.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:15:46.68 -10:37:04.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7936 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:59:12.98 -11:20:22.8: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:59:12.98 -11:20:22.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1285 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56005.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93421.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94260.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92412_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92412_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92415_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92415_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92418_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92418_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92428_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92428_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92430_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92430_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92433_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92433_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92435_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92435_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92436_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92436_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:47.17 -08:43:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92437_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92437_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92438_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92438_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:26.39 -05:25:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92439_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92439_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92445_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92445_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92446_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92446_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:20.75 -07:06:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92449_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92449_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92450_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92450_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92451_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92451_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92452_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92452_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92454_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92454_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:55.55 -13:09:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92455_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92455_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:45.15 -05:17:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92457_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92457_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:47.62 -04:47:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92460_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92460_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.09 -06:23:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92523_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92523_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:38.39 -15:11:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92693_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92693_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.80 -06:04:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.56 -14:20:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:15.87 -05:51:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92806_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92806_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:50.24 -15:00:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92811_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92811_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:33.48 -14:03:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92834_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92834_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:05.21 -10:41:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92839_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92839_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:17.64 -12:14:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92937_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92937_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.87 -07:06:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92977_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 92977_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:06.43 -14:25:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93000_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93000_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.91 -14:37:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93059_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93059_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:37.08 -12:47:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93066_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93066_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93095_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93095_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:32.63 -11:06:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93100_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93100_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:46.65 -14:40:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.52 -14:39:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93202_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93202_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:30.88 -11:26:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:05.73 -13:10:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93262_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93262_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:00.89 -07:59:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93278_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93278_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:45.97 -11:46:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93303_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93303_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:49.76 -05:14:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93315_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93315_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:18.82 -14:01:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93332_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93332_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93362_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93362_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:45.64 -08:23:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93397_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93397_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:11.68 -11:22:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93399_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93399_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93418_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93418_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93421_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 93421_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93493_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93493_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:14.86 -06:19:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93500_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93500_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93514_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93514_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:15.44 -13:14:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93560_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93560_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:05.47 -13:45:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93606_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93606_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.34 -11:26:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93633_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93633_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.64 -05:37:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93678_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93678_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:53.87 -14:37:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93679_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93679_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:25.73 -14:10:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93718_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93718_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:47.62 -08:10:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93733_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93733_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93818_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93818_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:57.26 -10:22:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:55.29 -13:02:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93853_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93853_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:16.12 -12:32:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93861_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93861_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.63 -06:59:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93983_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93983_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94005_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94005_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:23.94 -05:15:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94015_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94015_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:45.80 -07:44:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94017_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94017_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:37.85 -09:21:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94072_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94072_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94117_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94117_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:58.88 -10:58:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94122_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94122_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:21.84 -05:43:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94200_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94200_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:34.23 -05:40:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94260_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 94260_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94346_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94346_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:35.82 -08:00:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94347_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 94347_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39620_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 39620_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:00.93 -15:03:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 34938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 08448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:20.84 -06:13:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 09091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:35.93 -06:16:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56005_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 56005_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 33802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.47 -10:25:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 46293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.04 -14:05:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28276_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 28276_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.59 -09:33:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07681_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 07681_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69846_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 69846_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:29.58 -12:15:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 54778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.47 -11:59:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05876_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 05876_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.65 -05:49:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 33350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:19.88 -10:18:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60969_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 60969_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:22.79 -13:42:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03935_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 03935_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_20-33-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks