This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,8.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 8.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 11.99 23:44:00.85 -03:17:55.4
85.95327 -61.23231 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:00.85 -03:17:55.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:00.85 -03:17:55.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 12.11 00:06:47.23 -05:26:18.6
94.83540 -65.84436 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora 0 0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:06:47.23 -05:26:18.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:06:47.23 -05:26:18.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,8.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 8.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 13.04 23:29:53.27 -01:02:28.1
82.66386 -57.39283 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 -0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:53.27 -01:02:28.1: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:53.27 -01:02:28.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 13.07 23:32:28.62 -01:42:05.1
82.94795 -58.30489 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:28.62 -01:42:05.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:28.62 -01:42:05.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 13.45 00:11:45.06 +01:13:23.1
102.72638 -60.08252 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud 0 0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:11:45.06 +01:13:23.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:11:45.06 +01:13:23.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 13.39 23:32:46.63 -04:32:30.0
79.75847 -60.63982 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula 1 2 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:46.63 -04:32:30.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:46.63 -04:32:30.0: 15.10 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 13.87 23:53:19.97 -04:06:55.5
89.32150 -63.13074 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.864 Aase 0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:53:19.97 -04:06:55.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:53:19.97 -04:06:55.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 13.95 23:31:19.90 -00:20:02.5
83.95351 -57.01553 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.440 Theodora -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:19.90 -00:20:02.5: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:19.90 -00:20:02.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 14.17 00:28:26.91 +00:40:27.9
110.75722 -61.65271 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA 1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:26.91 +00:40:27.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:26.91 +00:40:27.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 21.4084* 00 28 26.91 +00 40 27.9 14.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,14.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 14.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4084 2461304.9084 14.20 23:49:36.46 -03:28:58.2
88.26069 -62.11793 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa -0 -0 0 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:49:36.46 -03:28:58.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:49:36.46 -03:28:58.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9084,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4084 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461304.90869149 21.09.2026 09:48:20.945 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5812
Objects passed selection criteria: 5808
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5507.25
Average stars matched: 5307.75 (96.3775 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 01:11:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461304.90869149 21.09.2026 09:48:20.945 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32036
Objects passed selection criteria: 31930
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30616.8
Average stars matched: 28608.8 (93.4415 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 258556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 01:12:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.90806793
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:08.198 -01:59:48.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:08.198 -01:59:48.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0334 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:10.862 -02:00:21.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:10.862 -02:00:21.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:08.198 -01:59:48.05
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:10.862 -02:00:21.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01447 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w4b9mF2U3i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.www6zAWEPq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LwBOnqpiiC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Crg3i3k2cv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.w4b9mF2U3i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.www6zAWEPq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LwBOnqpiiC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, bad_region=0, passed=5627
Got 5627 stars (including 5221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8567 through 0 to 8.1697, gap 8.1697 to 351.8567
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8563 through 0 to 8.1703, gap 8.1703 to 351.8563
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=13.898 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.888 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.888 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.405 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=1.027 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.386 worst_region_rms_after=0.405 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.173 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.352
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.317 arcsec matched=4883
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1201 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Crg3i3k2cv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=5591
Got 5591 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8569 through 0 to 8.1766, gap 8.1766 to 351.8569
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8565 through 0 to 8.1772, gap 8.1772 to 351.8565
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=13.875 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.719 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.719 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.643 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=1.024 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.388 worst_region_rms_after=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.134 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.361
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4882
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1210 n_q2=1218 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.155
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.192
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-47-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_222940_TTUQ1b1x1_2350272_kgQCN2o0/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:53.02 -05:30:59.0: 9.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:06:47.23 -05:26:18.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:00.85 -03:17:55.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:06:47.23 -05:26:18.6: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:00.85 -03:17:55.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:53.02 -05:30:59.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:53.02 -05:30:59.0: ref_mag=10.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1053 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20434.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.96 +00:47:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 20272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20279_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 20279_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 20434_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 20449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.44 -01:12:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 20456_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 20459_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32820_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32820_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32825_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32825_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32835_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32835_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32836_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32836_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32838_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32838_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32839_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32839_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32840_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32840_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32841_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32843_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32843_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 32844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 32851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33007_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33007_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:44:00.85 -03:17:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:47.23 -05:26:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33125_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33125_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33130_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33130_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33167_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33167_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:52.11 +00:04:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33278_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33278_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33292_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33292_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33412_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33412_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33485_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33485_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33523_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33523_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33537_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33537_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33556_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33556_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33570_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33570_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33598_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33598_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33622_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33622_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33645_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33645_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33666_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33666_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33673_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33673_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33678_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33678_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33699_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33699_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33704_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33704_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33717_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33717_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33736_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33736_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33739_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33739_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:26.67 -05:32:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33760_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 33760_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33789_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33789_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33815_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33815_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:45.25 +02:34:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33839_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33839_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33860_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33860_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33866_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33866_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33881_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33881_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33886_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33886_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33889_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33889_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33895_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33895_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33912_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33912_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33939_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33939_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33971_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33971_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:02.86 -04:31:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33972_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33972_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33981_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33981_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33985_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33985_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33998_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 33998_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34005_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34005_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34008_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34008_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34016_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34016_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34019_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34019_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34027_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34027_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34030_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34030_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34041_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34041_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34042_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34042_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34044_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34044_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34047_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34047_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34054_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34054_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34065_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34065_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34068_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34068_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34069_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34069_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34071_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34071_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34074_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34074_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34075_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34075_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34077_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34077_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34080_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34080_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34081_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34081_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34091_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34091_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34096_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34096_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34097_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34097_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34098_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34098_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34109_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34109_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34115_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34115_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34123_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34123_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34125_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34125_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34133_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34133_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34147_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34147_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34152_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34152_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34154_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34154_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34158_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34158_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34177_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34181_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34181_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34188_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34188_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34189_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34189_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34192_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34192_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34198_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34198_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34206_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34206_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34213_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34218_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34218_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34227_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34233_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34233_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34240_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34240_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34263_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34263_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34288_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34288_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34304_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34304_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34308_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34308_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34329_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 34329_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
