This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.4013 2461304.9013 13.22 00:49:15.29 -13:22:40.7
120.69905 -76.24026 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.893 Leopoldina -0 0 0 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:49:15.29 -13:22:40.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:15.29 -13:22:40.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 21.4013* 00 49 15.29 -13 22 40.7 13.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9013,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4013 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 21.4013* 01 06 21.55 -13 47 01.9 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.9013,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.4013 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
First image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Last image: 2461304.90159934 21.09.2026 09:38:08.183 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4509
Objects passed selection criteria: 4504
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4223.75
Average stars matched: 4105.75 (97.2063 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 21 04:57:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
First image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Last image: 2461304.90159934 21.09.2026 09:38:08.183 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 54
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24566
Objects passed selection criteria: 24508
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23240
Average stars matched: 22277.8 (95.8595 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 21 04:58:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.90094068
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:28.826 -18:00:09.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:28.826 -18:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:26.460 -17:59:37.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:26.460 -17:59:37.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0347 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:53:28.826 -18:00:09.86
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:26.460 -17:59:37.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01308 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xmuwX3JyOZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jJoGQqAzZl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LFp8p8PXmn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q9fAnD5ue4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.1 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
14.9 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xmuwX3JyOZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4470
Got 4470 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4473)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jJoGQqAzZl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=1, passed=4144
Got 4144 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 3803 stars left (next iteration limit 4180)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=3803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LFp8p8PXmn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=275, bad_region=0, passed=4205
Got 4205 stars (including 3922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3844 stars left (next iteration limit 4225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3844 robust_rms=11.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.164 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3844 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3844 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3844 robust_rms_before=1.088 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.390
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=3844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=958 n_q2=934 n_q3=996 n_q4=956 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q9fAnD5ue4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=274, bad_region=0, passed=4169
Got 4169 stars (including 3889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4169 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3817 stars left (next iteration limit 4194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3817 robust_rms=11.117 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.898 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3817 robust_rms=0.506 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.542 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3817 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3817 robust_rms_before=1.075 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.399
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=3817 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=962 n_q2=908 n_q3=997 n_q4=950 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.242
ref2=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.079
new1=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new2=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.076
reference average sigma_overall=0.2825 worst_q_ratio=1.1605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3803 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (3844 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (3817 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.88 -16:02:33.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.8: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.88 -16:02:33.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0471 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.88 -16:02:33.4: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9471 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20261_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20261_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 20272_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:28.826 -18:00:09.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:28.826 -18:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:26.460 -17:59:37.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:26.460 -17:59:37.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0347 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:53:28.826 -18:00:09.86
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:26.460 -17:59:37.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01308 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a6ZGCsgdf1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Te1P7KeoDJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q8UODzCRRL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SUKjA4o8WI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
15.0 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.a6ZGCsgdf1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=893, bad_region=1, passed=24280
Got 24280 stars (including 23344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Te1P7KeoDJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=669, bad_region=24, passed=21674
Got 21674 stars (including 20941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q8UODzCRRL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=791, bad_region=33, passed=23894
Got 23894 stars (including 23027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=10.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.997 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.575 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.092 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1264 n_q2=1249 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SUKjA4o8WI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=777, bad_region=35, passed=23819
Got 23819 stars (including 22960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=10.234 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.132 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=1.076 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.375 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-37-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_044024_TTUQ1b1x1_3046641_ZGO0RaF5/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:26.79 -17:01:35.7: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:23.95 -15:20:38.0: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:45.91 -14:19:22.3: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:20.84 -15:21:55.6: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:57:33.80 -14:51:19.5: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:08.78 -22:24:09.8: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:49:15.29 -13:22:40.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:18.25 -16:23:48.3: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:34:31.80 -22:31:41.8: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:46:26.79 -17:01:35.7: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:23.95 -15:20:38.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:18.25 -16:23:48.3: 14.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:05:20.84 -15:21:55.6: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:12:45.91 -14:19:22.3: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:31.80 -22:31:41.8: 14.81 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:57:33.80 -14:51:19.5: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:15.29 -13:22:40.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:08.78 -22:24:09.8: 14.98 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:26.79 -17:01:35.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0764 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:23.95 -15:20:38.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9978 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:20.84 -15:21:55.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3588 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:18.25 -16:23:48.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2423 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:45.91 -14:19:22.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5951 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:31.80 -22:31:41.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3418 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:33.80 -14:51:19.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8423 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:08.78 -22:24:09.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2613 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:17:02.30 -21:13:30.1: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:35.27 -17:53:24.3: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:26:08.61 -14:17:09.7: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:52.15 -13:57:58.9: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:29.24 -22:41:09.1: 15.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:23:47.82 -17:03:02.4: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:36.22 -22:59:40.7: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:05.70 -18:34:25.4: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:35.27 -17:53:24.3: 15.00 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:05:36.22 -22:59:40.7: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:17:02.30 -21:13:30.1: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:23:47.82 -17:03:02.4: 15.33 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:52.15 -13:57:58.9: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:29.24 -22:41:09.1: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:26:08.61 -14:17:09.7: 14.73 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:05.70 -18:34:25.4: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.27 -17:53:24.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3610 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:36.22 -22:59:40.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4891 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:52.15 -13:57:58.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5371 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:47.82 -17:03:02.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5786 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:02.30 -21:13:30.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4388 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:29.24 -22:41:09.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3732 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:08.61 -14:17:09.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4179 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:05.70 -18:34:25.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5105 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:30:33.08 -21:29:15.0: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:25.34 -16:35:34.1: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:30.86 -19:21:00.0: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:55.16 -13:36:50.6: 14.73 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:44:09.54 -21:54:15.8: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:29.04 -17:08:51.8: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.2: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:15.33 -13:06:53.2: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:30:42.13 -19:13:52.4: 15.17 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:30:33.08 -21:29:15.0: 14.91 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:33.08 -21:29:15.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5218 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:25.34 -16:35:34.1: 14.73 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.2: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4927 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:25.34 -16:35:34.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5901 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:29.04 -17:08:51.8: 14.86 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:30.86 -19:21:00.0: 14.66 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:55.16 -13:36:50.6: 14.75 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:44:09.54 -21:54:15.8: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:29.04 -17:08:51.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5496 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:30:42.13 -19:13:52.4: 14.90 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:30.86 -19:21:00.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3962 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:55.16 -13:36:50.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5637 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:15.33 -13:06:53.2: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:09.54 -21:54:15.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5767 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.13 -19:13:52.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5454 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:15.33 -13:06:53.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5501 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:57.32 -22:18:55.0: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:32:41.76 -21:45:18.6: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:12.30 -17:26:36.1: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:32:48.37 -13:04:12.1: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:36:19.52 -15:33:13.9: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:32.85 -15:04:50.8: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:36:23.24 -22:41:34.3: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:44.17 -19:36:15.9: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:40:36.77 -13:36:08.6: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:57.32 -22:18:55.0: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:57.32 -22:18:55.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3734 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:12.30 -17:26:36.1: 14.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:41.76 -21:45:18.6: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:48.37 -13:04:12.1: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:12.30 -17:26:36.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5443 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:41.76 -21:45:18.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5748 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:32.85 -15:04:50.8: 15.00 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:19.52 -15:33:13.9: 15.21 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:44.17 -19:36:15.9: 14.85 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:40:36.77 -13:36:08.6: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:23.24 -22:41:34.3: 14.94 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:48.37 -13:04:12.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5547 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:19.52 -15:33:13.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6515 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:32.85 -15:04:50.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6643 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:36.77 -13:36:08.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6212 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:44.17 -19:36:15.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5371 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:23.24 -22:41:34.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6343 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:47.05 -22:46:54.9: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:39.64 -21:22:12.4: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:30:56.55 -20:22:26.9: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:44.46 -15:46:05.5: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:30.04 -14:00:00.2: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:38.74 -20:19:49.4: 15.07 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:08.55 -20:29:41.0: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:33:03.98 -21:26:54.5: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:33.83 -17:14:32.2: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:46:47.05 -22:46:54.9: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:47.05 -22:46:54.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5318 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:30:56.55 -20:22:26.9: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:39.64 -21:22:12.4: 14.63 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:03.98 -21:26:54.5: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:38.74 -20:19:49.4: 15.32 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:56.55 -20:22:26.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6205 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:08.55 -20:29:41.0: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:39.64 -21:22:12.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3785 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:30.04 -14:00:00.2: 15.13 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:03.98 -21:26:54.5: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4754 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:33.83 -17:14:32.2: 14.85 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:38.74 -20:19:49.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.5809 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:44.46 -15:46:05.5: 14.84 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:30.04 -14:00:00.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5676 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:08.55 -20:29:41.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5394 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:33.83 -17:14:32.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6156 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:44.46 -15:46:05.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5567 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:16.22 -14:38:21.9: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:42:21.02 -20:14:01.3: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:29:57.63 -16:51:51.6: 15.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:02.50 -19:30:36.7: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:34:22.90 -20:56:42.4: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:15.69 -20:22:40.8: 15.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:16.22 -14:38:21.9: 14.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:16.22 -14:38:21.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5045 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:29:57.63 -16:51:51.6: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:15.69 -20:22:40.8: 15.13 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:02.50 -19:30:36.7: 14.96 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:42:21.02 -20:14:01.3: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:22.90 -20:56:42.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:57.63 -16:51:51.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6360 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:22.90 -20:56:42.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.6651 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:21.02 -20:14:01.3: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5768 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:02.50 -19:30:36.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5403 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:15.69 -20:22:40.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.5118 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31233.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30824_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30824_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30825_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30825_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30827_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30827_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30830_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30830_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30837_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30837_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31233_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 31233_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31586_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31586_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31686_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 31686_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31710_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31710_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31719_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31719_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31720_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31720_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31736_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31736_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31742_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31742_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31760_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31760_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31766_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31766_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31785_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31785_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31803_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31803_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31811_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31811_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31813_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31813_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31816_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31816_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31822_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31822_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31823_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31823_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31830_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31830_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31834_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31834_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31842_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31842_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31845_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31845_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31851_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31851_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31855_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31855_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31860_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31860_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31865_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31865_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31871_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31871_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31875_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31875_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31877_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31877_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31884_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31884_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31887_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31887_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31889_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31889_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31892_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31892_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31896_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31896_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31899_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31899_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31903_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31903_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31917_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31917_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31921_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31921_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31935_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31935_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31936_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31944_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31944_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31946_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31946_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31948_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31948_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31949_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31949_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31959_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31959_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31973_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 31973_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-38-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks