This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 10.87 23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4
76.53108 -55.44122 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -1 0 1 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4: 15.32 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.8945,10.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.3945 10.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 13.12 23:32:29.39 -01:42:03.8
82.95335 -58.30643 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun 0 0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:29.39 -01:42:03.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:29.39 -01:42:03.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.8945,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.3945 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 13.15 23:29:53.85 -01:02:23.6
82.66887 -57.39320 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:53.85 -01:02:23.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:53.85 -01:02:23.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.8945,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.3945 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 13.25 23:25:15.89 -02:00:22.8
79.87187 -57.48710 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina 0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:15.89 -02:00:22.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:15.89 -02:00:22.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.8945,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.3945 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 13.40 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7
79.76433 -60.64018 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
ERROR: astcheck failed to run -- asteroid status UNKNOWN; please check manually (e.g. with the online MPChecker).
online_id | target | 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7: 15.52 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461304.8945,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260921.3945 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 14.07 23:25:19.35 +00:05:21.3
82.15983 -55.81063 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
ERROR: astcheck failed to run -- asteroid status UNKNOWN; please check manually (e.g. with the online MPChecker).
online_id | target | 23:25:19.35 +00:05:21.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:19.35 +00:05:21.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:19.35 +00:05:21.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461304.8945,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260921.3945 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 13.96 23:27:56.10 -06:26:38.2
75.34475 -61.34070 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
ERROR: astcheck failed to run -- asteroid status UNKNOWN; please check manually (e.g. with the online MPChecker).
online_id | target | 23:27:56.10 -06:26:38.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:56.10 -06:26:38.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:56.10 -06:26:38.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461304.8945,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260921.3945 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 14.05 23:18:01.35 +00:05:47.3
79.59565 -54.71672 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia 0 1 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:01.35 +00:05:47.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:01.35 +00:05:47.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.8945,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.3945 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 14.21 23:31:20.80 -00:19:56.7
83.96087 -57.01629 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
ERROR: astcheck failed to run -- asteroid status UNKNOWN; please check manually (e.g. with the online MPChecker).
online_id | target | 23:31:20.80 -00:19:56.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:20.80 -00:19:56.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:20.80 -00:19:56.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461304.8945,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260921.3945 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.3945 2461304.8945 14.64 22:50:02.72 -01:38:39.9
68.99592 -51.33416 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1746 Brouwer -1 0 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:50:02.72 -01:38:39.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:50:02.72 -01:38:39.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.8945,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.3945 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461304.89479600 21.09.2026 09:28:20.374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6434
Objects passed selection criteria: 6428
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6039.25
Average stars matched: 5871.5 (97.2223 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233004 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 21 04:36:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461304.89479600 21.09.2026 09:28:20.374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 168 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37142
Objects passed selection criteria: 37030
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35420.8
Average stars matched: 33645.5 (94.9881 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 21 04:50:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.89417981
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.854 -01:59:54.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.854 -01:59:54.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:38.915 -02:00:27.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:38.915 -02:00:27.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0181 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:37.854 -01:59:54.52
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:38.915 -02:00:27.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01007 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h0sCoRx1EF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qLGH854LkA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JsfKz0hW1s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1dtevD7mb3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
15.2 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.h0sCoRx1EF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 6023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4755 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4745 stars left (next iteration limit 5219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1149 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qLGH854LkA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 5889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JsfKz0hW1s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, bad_region=0, passed=5829
Got 5829 stars (including 5464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5215)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=11.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.605 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.764 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=1.067 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.388 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.507
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1104 n_q3=1204 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1dtevD7mb3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, bad_region=0, passed=5849
Got 5849 stars (including 5474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4746 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=11.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.465 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.725 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=1.062 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.479
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1101 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.133
ref2=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.122
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.144
reference average sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.1275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4745 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4739 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4741 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275_astrometric_residuals.png (4741 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:26.71 -03:04:02.8: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.55 -01:29:21.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4: 15.32 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.72 -01:13:12.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:35.51 -06:36:08.8: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.72 -01:13:12.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.55 -01:29:21.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:26.71 -03:04:02.8: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:35.51 -06:36:08.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:35.51 -06:36:08.8: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1810 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=10.8675 delta=4.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.55 -01:29:21.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0905 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:26.71 -03:04:02.8: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7014 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.72 -01:13:12.9: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1896 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 39s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 13s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20305_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 20305_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.95 +01:01:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 20374_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20457_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 20457_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 20491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20503_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 20503_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20506_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 20506_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 7s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 59s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:14:22.83 -01:34:07.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.854 -01:59:54.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.854 -01:59:54.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:38.915 -02:00:27.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:38.915 -02:00:27.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0181 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:37.854 -01:59:54.52
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:38.915 -02:00:27.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01007 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cmKG4V74Q0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pCXqX8bvGC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uYa2k5OJUM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2aV9dC5lV2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.548500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.548500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.0 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
2.0 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cmKG4V74Q0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1717, bad_region=0, passed=35846
Got 35846 stars (including 34084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35846 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4756 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4756 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4745 stars left (next iteration limit 5219)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1197 n_q2=1146 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pCXqX8bvGC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1465, bad_region=0, passed=36108
Got 36108 stars (including 34588 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4746 stars left (next iteration limit 5220)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4746 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1137 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uYa2k5OJUM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1283, bad_region=41, passed=35641
Got 35641 stars (including 34265 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4744 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4744 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4736 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=10.871 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.866 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.602 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.761 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4736 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4736 robust_rms_before=1.074 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.374 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.505
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.374 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits N_match=4736 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1115 n_q3=1190 n_q4=1170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2aV9dC5lV2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1296, bad_region=41, passed=35374
Got 35374 stars (including 33979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4737 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=11.006 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=0.617 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.730 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4737 robust_rms_before=1.070 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.362 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits N_match=4737 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1117 n_q3=1201 n_q4=1165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_042936_TTUQ1b1x1_2866191_H7ibdQJE/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:00:59.13 -06:31:41.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:29.39 -01:42:03.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:26.36 +00:13:24.1: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:46.27 +01:35:00.7: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:53.85 -01:02:23.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:57:22.21 -06:11:43.0: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:44.79 +03:08:18.3: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:46.11 -00:31:00.6: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:37:50.09 -02:09:12.6: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:15.89 -02:00:22.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:46.11 -00:31:00.6: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:57:22.21 -06:11:43.0: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:29.39 -01:42:03.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:44.79 +03:08:18.3: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:46.27 +01:35:00.7: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:00:59.13 -06:31:41.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:53.85 -01:02:23.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:37:50.09 -02:09:12.6: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:26.36 +00:13:24.1: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:15.89 -02:00:22.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:44.79 +03:08:18.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9673 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:59.13 -06:31:41.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1245 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:46.27 +01:35:00.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0956 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:22.21 -06:11:43.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5131 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:26.36 +00:13:24.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7109 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:46.11 -00:31:00.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3049 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:37:50.09 -02:09:12.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6245 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:56.10 -06:26:38.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.21 +00:02:54.7: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:19.35 +00:05:21.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:01.35 +00:05:47.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:50.83 +00:27:20.5: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:17.18 -06:14:04.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7: 15.52 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.21 +00:02:54.7: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:01.35 +00:05:47.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:17.18 -06:14:04.2: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:19.35 +00:05:21.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:32:47.23 -04:32:24.7: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.3920 delta=2.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:50.83 +00:27:20.5: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.21 +00:02:54.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8825 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:17.18 -06:14:04.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5201 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:56.10 -06:26:38.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:50.83 +00:27:20.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0165 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.19 -03:02:19.9: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:20.80 -00:19:56.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:29.33 -00:58:12.2: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.19 -03:02:19.9: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:20.80 -00:19:56.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.19 -03:02:19.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3121 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:29.33 -00:58:12.2: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.33 -00:58:12.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1729 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:34.25 +02:10:31.2: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:37:37.12 -05:41:42.7: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:34.25 +02:10:31.2: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:37:37.12 -05:41:42.7: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:34.25 +02:10:31.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4457 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:37:37.12 -05:41:42.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1524 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:39.42 -02:06:51.0: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:55.97 +00:18:37.5: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
ERROR: astcheck failed to run (exit code 139) on test.mpc__out53974.dat -- asteroid status is UNKNOWN
ERROR: astcheck failed to run (exit code 139) on test.mpc__out53973.dat -- asteroid status is UNKNOWN
ERROR: astcheck failed to run (exit code 139) on test.mpc__out53752.dat -- asteroid status is UNKNOWN
ERROR: astcheck failed to run (exit code 139) on test.mpc__out54120.dat -- asteroid status is UNKNOWN
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:55.97 +00:18:37.5: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:39.42 -02:06:51.0: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:55.97 +00:18:37.5: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5582 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:39.42 -02:06:51.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5613 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:50.82 -06:15:53.9: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:39:42.00 +01:34:06.3: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:50.82 -06:15:53.9: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:39:42.00 +01:34:06.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:42.00 +01:34:06.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:50.82 -06:15:53.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2667 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:38:07.76 -02:54:16.6: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:51.17 +00:43:09.3: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:00.61 +02:26:08.8: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:07.46 -03:34:37.4: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:51.17 +00:43:09.3: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:07.46 -03:34:37.4: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:38:07.76 -02:54:16.6: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:00.61 +02:26:08.8: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:17.86 -00:43:17.9: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:42.89 +02:34:19.8: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:00.61 +02:26:08.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4529 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:51.17 +00:43:09.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3872 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:07.46 -03:34:37.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4108 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:07.76 -02:54:16.6: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5026 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:17.86 -00:43:17.9: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:42.89 +02:34:19.8: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:17.86 -00:43:17.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6812 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:42.89 +02:34:19.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4482 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:14.16 -00:00:45.3: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:23.08 -03:05:03.5: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:43:50.08 -06:17:08.1: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:37:30.79 +00:25:49.1: 15.14 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:37.05 +01:21:01.8: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:05.40 -03:08:50.1: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:37.05 +01:21:01.8: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:37:30.79 +00:25:49.1: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:43:50.08 -06:17:08.1: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:14.16 -00:00:45.3: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:05.40 -03:08:50.1: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:23.08 -03:05:03.5: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:05.40 -03:08:50.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6393 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:50.08 -06:17:08.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4078 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:14.16 -00:00:45.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7206 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:23.08 -03:05:03.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5094 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:37.05 +01:21:01.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6945 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:30.79 +00:25:49.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6982 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:39:47.75 +01:26:14.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:08.73 -07:05:25.6: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:38.09 -07:03:42.8: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:38:33.42 +02:02:03.5: 14.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:42:47.59 +03:11:30.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:39:34.48 +01:09:05.2: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:27.93 +00:59:44.1: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.48 -00:31:11.7: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:40:35.84 +02:15:37.9: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:25.55 -05:14:29.4: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:08.73 -07:05:25.6: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:39:47.75 +01:26:14.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:47.75 +01:26:14.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:08.73 -07:05:25.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6021 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:38.09 -07:03:42.8: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:38:33.42 +02:02:03.5: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:38.09 -07:03:42.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6724 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:33.42 +02:02:03.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5644 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:42:47.59 +03:11:30.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:47.59 +03:11:30.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:39:34.48 +01:09:05.2: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:25.55 -05:14:29.4: 15.02 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:27.93 +00:59:44.1: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:40:35.84 +02:15:37.9: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:34.48 +01:09:05.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6863 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:25.55 -05:14:29.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5848 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.93 +00:59:44.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6680 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:35.84 +02:15:37.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5559 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.48 -00:31:11.7: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.48 -00:31:11.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5632 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:16.02 -01:20:40.8: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:43.09 -05:34:32.5: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:42:01.39 +02:52:48.4: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:48.53 +01:48:23.9: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:47.90 +02:16:34.7: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:18.70 -00:27:01.0: 15.37 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:50:02.72 -01:38:39.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:38:21.54 +01:11:09.7: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:56.90 +00:22:55.9: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:35.03 -01:39:03.6: 15.21 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:16.02 -01:20:40.8: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:43.09 -05:34:32.5: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:16.02 -01:20:40.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2771 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:43.09 -05:34:32.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6913 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:48.53 +01:48:23.9: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:48.53 +01:48:23.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4019 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:42:01.39 +02:52:48.4: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:01.39 +02:52:48.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4940 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:18.70 -00:27:01.0: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:18.70 -00:27:01.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8015 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:47.90 +02:16:34.7: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:38:21.54 +01:11:09.7: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:50:02.72 -01:38:39.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:35.03 -01:39:03.6: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:21.54 +01:11:09.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6325 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:47.90 +02:16:34.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8229 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:56.90 +00:22:55.9: 15.14 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:35.03 -01:39:03.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6326 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:56.90 +00:22:55.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8441 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:39:09.94 -03:10:47.8: 15.11 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:43:59.94 +01:26:31.9: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:42.46 +02:24:36.3: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:37:34.32 -06:30:56.5: 14.81 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:10.96 -03:29:17.4: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:44.85 +01:00:50.5: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:20.77 -03:27:52.5: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:40:56.99 +01:59:30.7: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:13.28 -06:49:53.8: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:42.46 +02:24:36.3: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:39:09.94 -03:10:47.8: 15.32 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:43:59.94 +01:26:31.9: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:37:34.32 -06:30:56.5: 15.11 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:42.46 +02:24:36.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6068 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:09.94 -03:10:47.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.8286 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:59.94 +01:26:31.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5489 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:34.32 -06:30:56.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7497 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:10.96 -03:29:17.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.96 -03:29:17.4: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=14.7701 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:40:56.99 +01:59:30.7: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:20.77 -03:27:52.5: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:56.99 +01:59:30.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5606 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:20.77 -03:27:52.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6464 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:44.85 +01:00:50.5: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:13.28 -06:49:53.8: 14.98 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:44.85 +01:00:50.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7390 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:13.28 -06:49:53.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6856 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:43.57 -02:57:43.6: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:15.47 -02:46:41.8: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:38.24 -00:25:38.8: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:49.64 -02:55:25.4: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:49.32 -06:49:48.2: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:15.68 +00:15:40.9: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:48.93 +01:29:11.5: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:27.4: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:37:38.97 -05:25:09.9: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:43.57 -02:57:43.6: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:43.57 -02:57:43.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6690 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:15.47 -02:46:41.8: 15.55 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:15.47 -02:46:41.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8222 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:49.64 -02:55:25.4: 15.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:38.24 -00:25:38.8: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:49.64 -02:55:25.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6476 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:38.24 -00:25:38.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3864 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:15.68 +00:15:40.9: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:18:15.68 +00:15:40.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7277 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:49.32 -06:49:48.2: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:49.32 -06:49:48.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7258 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:48.93 +01:29:11.5: 15.54 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:48.93 +01:29:11.5: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8333 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:37:38.97 -05:25:09.9: 14.95 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:27.4: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:27.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6402 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:38.97 -05:25:09.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7406 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:53.88 -06:06:30.5: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:32.71 +01:40:56.5: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:43:43.41 -06:41:51.6: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:40:26.15 +02:20:42.0: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:31.09 +00:59:21.4: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:53.88 -06:06:30.5: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:53.88 -06:06:30.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6605 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:39:27.66 -04:13:13.6: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:19:44.21 -06:59:20.5: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:32.71 +01:40:56.5: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:43:30.29 +03:11:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:32.71 +01:40:56.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4975 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:40:51.22 -05:48:20.0: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:43:43.41 -06:41:51.6: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:43.41 -06:41:51.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5528 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:31.09 +00:59:21.4: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:31.09 +00:59:21.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7254 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:40:26.15 +02:20:42.0: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:26.15 +02:20:42.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5768 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:39:27.66 -04:13:13.6: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:27.66 -04:13:13.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4978 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:43:30.29 +03:11:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:30.29 +03:11:17.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:40:51.22 -05:48:20.0: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:51.22 -05:48:20.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5473 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:19:44.21 -06:59:20.5: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:19:44.21 -06:59:20.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7369 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:37.81 -05:41:35.0: 15.47 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:47:06.70 -01:17:13.7: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:32.51 -07:03:50.2: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:40.93 +01:21:47.8: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:46:25.68 +02:59:16.1: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:43:30.00 +01:43:03.3: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:50:01.64 -01:08:33.4: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:37.81 -05:41:35.0: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:37.81 -05:41:35.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8993 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:38:18.34 -02:20:33.4: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:37:51.45 -06:15:02.2: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:47:06.70 -01:17:13.7: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:32.51 -07:03:50.2: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:32.51 -07:03:50.2: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7062 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:06.70 -01:17:13.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6892 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:40.93 +01:21:47.8: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:46:25.68 +02:59:16.1: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:40.93 +01:21:47.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7057 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:25.68 +02:59:16.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7602 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:43:30.00 +01:43:03.3: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:30.00 +01:43:03.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6634 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:50:01.64 -01:08:33.4: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:50:01.64 -01:08:33.4: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8032 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:37:51.45 -06:15:02.2: 15.07 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:37:51.45 -06:15:02.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6267 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:38:18.34 -02:20:33.4: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:18.34 -02:20:33.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6494 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:40:38.80 +01:44:52.4: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:40:38.80 +01:44:52.4: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:38.80 +01:44:52.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8113 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53649.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53703.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53752.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53973.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53974.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53212_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53212_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53215_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53216_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53229_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53231_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53231_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53232_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53232_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53233_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53244_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:58.97 +01:01:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53635_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53649_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53649_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53703_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53703_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53752_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53768_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53946_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53973_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53974_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 53974_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54031_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 54052_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54108_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54108_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54109_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 54120_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54213_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54213_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54219_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54219_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54226_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54226_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54261_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54268_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54268_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54311_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54311_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54322_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54322_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54326_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54326_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54352_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54352_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54364_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54364_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54375_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54375_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54387_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54387_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54389_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54389_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54404_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54404_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54405_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54415_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54415_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54418_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54418_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54419_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54430_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54430_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54432_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54432_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54437_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54437_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54440_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54440_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54445_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54451_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54451_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54454_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54454_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54455_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54455_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54463_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54463_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54465_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54465_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54466_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54466_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54469_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54469_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54474_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54474_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54475_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54475_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54489_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54489_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
Preparing report for the candidate 54491_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54497_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54497_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54512_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54512_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54517_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54517_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54518_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54520_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54520_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54524_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54524_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54525_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54525_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54527_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54527_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54533_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54533_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54534_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54534_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54536_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54536_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54540_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54540_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54548_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54548_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54549_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54549_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54551_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54551_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54552_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54552_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54556_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54556_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54564_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54564_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54570_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54570_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54573_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54573_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54576_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54576_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54582_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54584_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54584_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54607_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54607_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54614_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54614_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54645_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54645_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54650_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54651_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54651_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54653_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54653_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54658_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54658_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54664_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54664_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54666_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54666_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54681_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54702_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54702_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54709_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54709_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54734_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54734_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54768_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54785_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54785_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54786_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54786_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54792_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54792_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54797_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 54797_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275
The candidate 53113_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-28-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0275 did not pass the final checks
