This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.2478 2461304.7478 13.86 20:36:10.90 -09:10:06.2
36.60306 -27.41139 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia -1 -1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:10.90 -09:10:06.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:10.90 -09:10:06.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 21.2478* 20 36 10.90 -09 10 06.2 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.7478,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.2478 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.2478 2461304.7478 12.05 20:50:17.01 -09:09:15.9
38.36325 -30.53289 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:17.01 -09:09:15.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:17.01 -09:09:15.9: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.7478,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.2478 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.2478 2461304.7478 13.38 20:47:32.97 -13:08:05.5
33.82182 -31.61272 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 -1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:47:32.97 -13:08:05.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:47:32.97 -13:08:05.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.7478,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.2478 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.2478 2461304.7478 13.56 20:09:47.81 -12:20:49.6
30.38346 -22.89231 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos -1 -1 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:09:47.81 -12:20:49.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:09:47.81 -12:20:49.6: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 21.2478* 20 09 47.81 -12 20 49.6 13.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.7478,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.2478 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.2478 2461304.7478 13.74 20:31:26.87 -11:26:55.3
33.72115 -27.33446 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -1 -0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:31:26.87 -11:26:55.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:31:26.87 -11:26:55.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 21.2478* 20 31 26.87 -11 26 55.3 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.7478,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.2478 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 21.2478 2461304.7478 14.53 20:53:33.83 -05:31:11.7
42.52870 -29.59656 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.803 Picka 1 0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:33.83 -05:31:11.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:33.83 -05:31:11.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461304.7478,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260921.2478 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461304.74812929 21.09.2026 05:57:08.371 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13569
Objects passed selection criteria: 13513
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10410.8
Average stars matched: 10173.2 (97.7187 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 21 00:59:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461304.74812929 21.09.2026 05:57:08.371 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 88179
Objects passed selection criteria: 88042
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76979.5
Average stars matched: 74530 (96.818 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 580456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 21 01:01:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.74738627
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.054 -10:00:25.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.054 -10:00:25.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:21.163 -10:00:57.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:21.163 -10:00:57.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:18.054 -10:00:25.76
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:21.163 -10:00:57.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01552 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fEC0Icsf5t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VU4jZPFjT9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wmzSxqjxif
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kGC1YqQRIi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fEC0Icsf5t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VU4jZPFjT9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wmzSxqjxif (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=640, bad_region=0, passed=6666
Got 6666 stars (including 6014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=11.197 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.013 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.895 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.382 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.376
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.382 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1242 n_q2=1301 n_q3=1110 n_q4=1220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kGC1YqQRIi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=689, bad_region=0, passed=6547
Got 6547 stars (including 5849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6547 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=10.702 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.955 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.416 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.411
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.416 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1387 n_q3=1129 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.019
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.073
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.019
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-56-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_005748_TTUQ1b1x1_2796016_HWWLDqKR/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.92 -07:47:32.2: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:20.72 -09:40:08.1: 9.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.92 -07:47:32.2: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:20.72 -09:40:08.1: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.92 -07:47:32.2: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4076 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.93 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.72 -09:40:08.1: ref_mag=9.93 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2953 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20866_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20866_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20874_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20874_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.05 -06:09:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20879_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20879_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.50 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20890_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20890_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.18 -05:17:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20902_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20902_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.67 -07:32:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20903_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20903_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.56 -14:47:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.60 -06:36:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113590_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113590_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113592_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113592_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113593_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113593_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113616_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113616_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113624_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 113624_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113625_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113625_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113631_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113631_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113632_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113632_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113650_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113650_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113654_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113654_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113656_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113656_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113658_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113658_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113668_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113668_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:21.43 -05:49:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113671_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113671_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:42.09 -05:24:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113675_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113675_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113677_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113677_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113680_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113680_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113682_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113682_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113683_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113683_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113688_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113688_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113691_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113691_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113693_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113693_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113699_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113699_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113700_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113700_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113701_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113701_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113702_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113702_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113703_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113703_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113704_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113704_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113708_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113708_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113716_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113716_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113718_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113718_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113720_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113720_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113721_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113721_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113722_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113722_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113726_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113726_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113728_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113728_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:46.27 -11:16:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113732_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113732_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113735_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113735_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:51.06 -08:29:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113739_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113739_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113742_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113742_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:57.82 -10:22:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113743_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113743_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113744_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113744_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113749_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113749_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113755_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113755_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113757_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113757_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113758_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113758_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113788_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113788_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.60 -08:56:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113796_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 113796_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113815_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113815_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113830_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113830_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:19.96 -12:37:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113856_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113856_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113864_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113864_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.34 -09:28:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113872_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113872_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.23 -07:01:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113921_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113921_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:15.43 -05:43:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113924_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 113924_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113935_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113935_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:54.01 -07:43:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113981_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113981_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113992_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 113992_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.14 -06:01:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114025_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 114025_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114114_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 114114_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:24.87 -07:54:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114117_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 114117_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114170_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 114170_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114308_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 114308_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114346_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 114346_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114349_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 114349_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.08 -06:09:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.51 -13:15:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.67 -07:32:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.18 -05:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.82 -12:46:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.21 -13:18:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.56 -14:47:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.60 -06:36:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_00-57-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
