Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.4453  2461302.9453  13.41  11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4
154.37801  62.45004 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -crosshair 5675.58057 274.04510 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits -crosshair 5676.03857 273.98190 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44533 11 24 59.95 +49 03 56.4          13.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44508 11 24 59.51 +49 03 57.5          13.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44557 11 25 00.39 +49 03 55.3          13.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 19.4453*  11 24 59.95 +49 03 56.4  13.4 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461302.9453,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260919.4453 13.41CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.4453  2461302.9453  13.58  11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1
139.23362  60.83423 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)  SpType: G8 (LAMOST DR5)                         
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1:  16.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -crosshair 8170.67432 3956.85742 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits -crosshair 8170.98975 3956.47852 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44533 11 56 53.52 +54 32 02.1          13.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44508 11 56 53.13 +54 32 04.0          13.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44557 11 56 53.90 +54 32 00.3          13.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 19.4453*  11 56 53.52 +54 32 02.1  13.6 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461302.9453,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260919.4453 13.58CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.4453  2461302.9453  14.02  11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2
158.82578  59.82027 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2:  16.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2:  16.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -crosshair 3629.91455 233.19920 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits -crosshair 3629.97876 233.66090 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44533 11 04 15.97 +49 10 03.2          14.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44508 11 04 15.58 +49 10 02.9          13.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44557 11 04 16.35 +49 10 03.4          14.1 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 19.4453*  11 04 15.97 +49 10 03.2  14.0 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461302.9453,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260919.4453 14.02CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.4453  2461302.9453  14.10  11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2
145.86147  53.87593 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 1.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2:  16.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -crosshair 3837.40088 5796.92578 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits -crosshair 3836.04102 5797.00879 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44533 11 07 30.69 +58 22 46.2          14.1 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44508 11 07 30.87 +58 22 46.8          14.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 09 19.44557 11 07 30.52 +58 22 45.5          14.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 09 19.4453*  11 07 30.69 +58 22 46.2  14.1 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461302.9453,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260919.4453 14.10CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
First image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Last  image: 2461302.94557184 19.09.2026 10:41:27.407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6786
Objects passed selection criteria:  6750
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4891
Average stars matched: 4761.5 (97.3523 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   239516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Sep 19 05:43:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
First image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Last  image: 2461302.94557184 19.09.2026 10:41:27.407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 132
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  33421
Objects passed selection criteria:  33313
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 26023
Average stars matched: 25062.2 (96.3081 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   258136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Sep 19 05:44:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-07-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-07-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 193031 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 193031 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits_preview.png'

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits


renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits_preview.png'

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.9961
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 504.2603
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1801.7373
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 531.7968
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1793.7586
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 530.0245
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.03077
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T05:40:45.0095248' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T10:40:45.0095248' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61302.4449653821 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T10:40:54.9109378' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61302.4450799767 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     169.411505175908 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9999390061615 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.8344444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     34.1372222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.85083601149655 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits :)

Spent 0.518137 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T05:41:27.4070619' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T10:41:27.4070619' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61302.4454560997 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T10:41:37.3103969' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61302.4455707176 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     169.411505138008 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9999390532931 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.9163888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =              34.2025 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      3.8307821123033 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits :)

Spent 0.544501 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits



fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.94508112
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:40.424 +54:00:17.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:40.424 +54:00:17.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:41.089 +54:00:14.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:41.089 +54:00:14.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:17:40.424 +54:00:17.06
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:41.089 +54:00:14.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HWMHbSoB5u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VzxQh02vgl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9td644lMZ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pTQYwaq7RU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec +47.6705 to +59.4175 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec 47.6705 to 59.4175 deg
Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3490 out of 3670 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6940 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.925500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.925500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.56

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.56

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec +47.6705 to +59.4175 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec 47.6705 to 59.4175 deg
Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3490 out of 3670 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6940 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7805 deg, Dec +47.6704 to +59.4175 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7805 deg, Dec 47.6704 to 59.4175 deg
Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3487 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 6962 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 2.3 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  11.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HWMHbSoB5u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=0, passed=6940
Got 6940 stars (including 6459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1182 n_q3=1249 n_q4=1243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VzxQh02vgl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, bad_region=0, passed=6962
Got 6962 stars (including 6476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1204 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9td644lMZ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=172, bad_region=0, passed=2877
Got 2877 stars (including 2698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2629 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2629 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 2625 stars left (next iteration limit 2887)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2625 robust_rms=9.130 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2625 robust_rms=0.562 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.956 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2625 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2625 robust_rms_before=1.590 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.412 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits N_match=2625 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=704 n_q2=479 n_q3=816 n_q4=626 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pTQYwaq7RU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, bad_region=0, passed=2910
Got 2910 stars (including 2723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2910 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2654 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2654 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 2650 stars left (next iteration limit 2915)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2650 robust_rms=8.827 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.835 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2650 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.917 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2650 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2650 robust_rms_before=1.607 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.432 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.483
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.432 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits N_match=2650 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=724 n_q2=482 n_q3=816 n_q4=628 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.218
ref2=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.294
new2=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.344
reference average sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.1875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496_astrometric_residuals.png (2625 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497_astrometric_residuals.png (2650 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:40.424 +54:00:17.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:40.424 +54:00:17.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:41.089 +54:00:14.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:41.089 +54:00:14.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:17:40.424 +54:00:17.06
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:41.089 +54:00:14.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Bmz84PWun
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XlqktEjiYR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RzqbTl7QEe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x5nPxkhN4T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34820 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec +47.5865 to +59.4409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec 47.5865 to 59.4409 deg
Loaded 5330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3330 out of 3678 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3678 out of 34820 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.814600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.814600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.70

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.70

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34820 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec +47.5865 to +59.4409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec 47.5865 to 59.4409 deg
Loaded 5330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3330 out of 3678 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3678 out of 34820 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 34891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9031 to 183.7805 deg, Dec +47.5448 to +59.4321 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9031 to 183.7805 deg, Dec 47.5448 to 59.4321 deg
Loaded 5335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3674 out of 34891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 123 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 15.7 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  13.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0Bmz84PWun (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1580, bad_region=11, passed=34803
Got 34803 stars (including 33155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XlqktEjiYR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1579, bad_region=13, passed=34870
Got 34870 stars (including 33223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1168 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RzqbTl7QEe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=491, bad_region=28, passed=17527
Got 17527 stars (including 16970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4842 stars left (next iteration limit 5326)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=8.169 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.575 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4842 robust_rms_before=1.571 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.427 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.488
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.427 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits N_match=4842 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1373 n_q2=858 n_q3=1501 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.x5nPxkhN4T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=476, bad_region=27, passed=17731
Got 17731 stars (including 17190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17731 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4845 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=8.257 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.624 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.908 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4845 robust_rms_before=1.589 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.451 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.515
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits N_match=4845 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1380 n_q2=857 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1111 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:47:06.54 +58:42:31.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:17:01.55 +49:28:04.7:  13.33 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:26:01.00 +57:37:26.9:  12.57 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:16:41.92 +53:12:23.0:  12.53 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:26:01.00 +57:37:26.9:  12.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:17:01.55 +49:28:04.7:  13.27 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:47:06.54 +58:42:31.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:06.54 +58:42:31.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:16:41.92 +53:12:23.0:  12.51 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:01.55 +49:28:04.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3891 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:01.00 +57:37:26.9: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4306 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:16:41.92 +53:12:23.0: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7062 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:53:28.34 +49:13:03.8:  12.39 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:53:28.34 +49:13:03.8:  12.37 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:31:48.48 +58:25:40.0:  12.69 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:53:28.34 +49:13:03.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3312 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:33:45.38 +55:34:31.1:  12.91 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:54:39.05 +54:18:18.6:  13.19 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:31:48.48 +58:25:40.0:  12.72 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:48.48 +58:25:40.0: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6614 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:33:45.38 +55:34:31.1:  12.89 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:45.38 +55:34:31.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7292 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:26:29.54 +54:25:20.9:  13.34 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:54:39.05 +54:18:18.6:  13.18 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:39.05 +54:18:18.6: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1113 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:26:29.54 +54:25:20.9:  13.33 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:29.54 +54:25:20.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4298 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2:  16.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1:  16.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2:  16.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2:  16.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53330.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53499.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53573.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52335_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52335_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.09    10:31:58.35 +57:22:34.5   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52338_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.83    10:54:41.22 +53:33:07.9   2750 2886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:54:41.19 +53:33:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    13.41    11:17:01.63 +49:28:03.6   4878 0461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.37    11:17:01.47 +49:28:05.7   4877 0462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52340_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.92    11:11:31.28 +55:40:22.1   4211 4172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52345_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52345_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.96    10:59:42.40 +50:10:38.9   3184 0843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:59:42.47 +50:10:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52346_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    12.73    11:16:41.91 +53:12:23.1   4728 2711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.69    11:16:41.92 +53:12:23.0   4727 2711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52347_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.49    11:00:15.66 +51:30:43.1   3243 1650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  11:00:15.68 +51:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52348_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52348_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    12.40    11:26:00.95 +57:37:26.9   5337 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.47    11:26:01.04 +57:37:26.9   5336 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52349_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52349_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.03    10:38:47.91 +53:30:33.4   1319 2931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:38:47.88 +53:30:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52372_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    9.74    10:47:06.54 +58:42:31.4   2228 6027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    9.74    10:47:06.54 +58:42:31.3   2227 6027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52396_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    10.57    10:28:36.90 +56:57:56.7   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52397_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    10.55    10:25:20.66 +53:49:39.1   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52398_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    10.37    10:58:58.68 +58:06:54.7   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52472_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    10.99    11:19:03.97 +49:38:35.2   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52475_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.10    11:18:27.75 +51:10:51.5   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52512_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.63    11:13:04.42 +58:30:13.7   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52528_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.77    10:47:41.38 +50:24:14.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52529_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.45    11:26:47.61 +51:25:15.2   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52575_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.12    10:38:42.73 +51:12:04.4   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52585_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.06    10:32:47.96 +48:48:01.6   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52607_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.85    11:16:02.49 +48:53:52.8   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52611_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.55    11:52:07.90 +50:29:45.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52643_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.28    11:09:27.75 +56:56:53.5   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52652_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.54    10:35:05.75 +52:45:40.5   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52655_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    11.92    11:47:12.80 +53:42:48.7   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52662_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    12.33    10:53:28.36 +49:13:03.6   2564 0266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.33    10:53:28.32 +49:13:04.1   2562 0266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52712_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52712_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.70    10:35:59.42 +50:16:49.0   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52720_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.99    10:24:31.91 +56:19:29.4   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52728_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.90    10:26:00.29 +55:52:50.7   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52740_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.70    11:06:52.15 +57:02:09.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52742_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.38    11:16:46.01 +49:26:50.8   4852 0448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  11:16:46.02 +49:26:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52743_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.02    10:23:47.76 +57:45:07.2   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52755_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.07    11:57:33.26 +49:40:25.3   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52781_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52781_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.96    10:38:09.76 +49:00:11.1   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52782_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.22    12:00:19.58 +49:16:51.7   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52790_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.04    10:24:22.85 +55:29:45.1   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52791_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.89    10:44:33.27 +50:25:02.5   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52792_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52792_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    12.65    11:31:48.50 +58:25:40.3   5751 5954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.68    11:31:48.46 +58:25:39.7   5750 5954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52793_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.74    11:05:23.75 +50:41:05.6   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52811_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.09    10:37:06.03 +52:22:24.9   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52812_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.06    10:29:44.85 +57:32:21.5   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52819_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.17    10:27:06.77 +54:42:23.6   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52829_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.23    10:31:58.90 +53:58:54.3   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52857_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.13    10:28:30.43 +52:05:12.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.84    11:05:48.91 +55:54:04.1   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52874_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    12.72    11:33:45.36 +55:34:30.5   6097 4259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.74    11:33:45.39 +55:34:31.6   6096 4259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52876_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.13    10:39:47.50 +53:19:38.3   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52885_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.67    12:06:18.08 +53:26:51.9   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52891_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.99    11:00:24.46 +51:28:25.8   3256 1627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  11:00:24.45 +51:28:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52899_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.23    11:02:39.45 +58:42:09.1   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52913_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52913_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.00    10:59:48.46 +50:00:09.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52922_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.96    10:52:22.78 +52:31:32.8   2523 2272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:52:22.79 +52:31:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52935_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.25    10:33:51.42 +50:51:15.7   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52945_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    13.11    10:54:39.12 +54:18:19.2   2759 3339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.11    10:54:38.98 +54:18:18.0   2758 3339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52946_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.12    11:21:36.98 +57:04:12.0   5006 5059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  11:21:36.97 +57:04:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52951_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.33    10:26:01.39 +53:55:40.6   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52963_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.06    11:25:06.19 +57:52:41.7   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52970_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.38    10:38:59.84 +58:08:15.7   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 52997_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.79    12:11:03.52 +57:41:34.5   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53004_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.24    10:48:43.16 +55:45:45.6   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53023_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.57    10:33:52.96 +53:29:21.1   0873 2957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:33:53.05 +53:29:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53025_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 19.44508    2461302.94508    13.49    10:26:29.62 +54:25:20.6   0274 3592   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-40-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.38    10:26:29.45 +54:25:21.2   0273 3592   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53066_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.13    10:46:55.56 +49:13:11.4   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53071_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.99    11:20:45.95 +51:34:04.4   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53076_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53076_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.53    10:35:37.18 +50:47:14.9   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53096_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53096_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.54    10:42:57.09 +57:59:41.9   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53103_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53103_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.92    10:29:05.55 +57:55:28.6   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53124_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.15    12:02:09.73 +57:32:38.3   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53137_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.75    10:42:23.29 +56:50:21.4   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53140_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.64    10:41:23.36 +52:57:14.5   1529 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:41:23.53 +52:57:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53154_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.38    10:29:36.52 +50:43:45.1   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53155_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53155_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.60    10:35:56.35 +54:24:38.6   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53161_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.64    10:27:17.09 +51:47:35.2   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53174_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.15    11:31:57.34 +56:35:32.2   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53184_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.82    11:56:37.54 +50:47:02.2   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53207_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53207_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.06    11:44:41.14 +50:48:37.3   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53222_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.07    11:57:32.53 +55:03:30.3   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53227_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.96    10:35:16.21 +57:17:11.2   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53249_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.34    10:56:44.57 +53:07:01.9   2930 2620   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:56:44.59 +53:07:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53250_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.91    12:03:46.84 +51:31:57.8   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53251_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.56    10:57:06.59 +52:22:01.2   2956 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:06.72 +52:22:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53256_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.26    12:05:39.99 +53:12:28.1   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53260_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.15    11:25:19.83 +51:19:39.9   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53267_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.63    11:01:37.15 +54:52:18.3   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53270_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.09    10:39:09.74 +56:06:12.8   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53272_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53272_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.42    11:23:14.72 +58:34:09.8   5070 5974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:14.75 +58:34:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53294_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53294_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.85    11:00:45.79 +58:31:32.5   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53300_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53300_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.49    11:38:23.97 +58:41:36.3   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53314_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53314_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.06    10:46:46.37 +54:48:02.8   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53320_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53320_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.55    10:38:52.94 +50:27:29.0   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53330_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
Preparing report for the candidate 53330_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53335_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.80    10:26:06.08 +52:37:56.9   0100 2516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  10:26:06.02 +52:37:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53337_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.91    12:07:15.73 +54:26:27.7   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53359_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53359_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.51    11:39:32.64 +52:49:40.2   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53361_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.97    10:39:50.53 +54:50:15.0   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53387_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.11    10:38:32.88 +54:45:35.0   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53397_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53397_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.82    10:46:35.45 +55:53:53.8   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53399_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53399_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.55    11:47:39.35 +51:01:59.2   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53402_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53402_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.73    10:30:02.06 +52:10:53.3   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53415_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53415_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.56    11:41:51.42 +56:45:47.2   6680 5060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

**** FOUND  11:41:51.42 +56:45:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53425_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53425_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.92    11:07:20.46 +53:08:16.1   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53447_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.40    11:51:11.55 +50:55:24.1   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53454_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53454_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.31    12:13:39.97 +57:24:35.9   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53465_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.83    10:54:03.92 +55:12:30.5   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53467_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.88    10:46:31.64 +53:36:01.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53478_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53478_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.01    10:47:05.57 +56:41:53.2   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53499_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
Preparing report for the candidate 53499_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53506_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53506_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.16    10:54:01.27 +51:29:05.4   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53508_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53508_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.17    10:34:14.60 +50:07:20.3   0704 0915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53516_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
Preparing report for the candidate 53516_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53517_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.19    10:40:44.96 +53:01:09.7   1473 2622   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53519_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53519_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.93    11:24:42.74 +55:44:34.8   5323 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53532_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.82    10:51:56.15 +58:13:13.3   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53541_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53541_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.97    11:01:18.62 +52:17:57.4   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53545_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53545_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.90    11:51:01.79 +57:03:25.6   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53552_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.99    11:12:22.54 +55:17:07.8   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53555_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53555_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    14.12    10:59:46.56 +52:07:36.1   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53559_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53559_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.78    11:57:46.64 +54:39:11.0   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53573_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
Preparing report for the candidate 53573_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53580_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 53580_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.74    11:55:54.75 +54:43:54.6   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07615_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 07615_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    12.22    12:02:59.08 +51:19:56.8   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27610_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 27610_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.12    12:01:06.88 +57:55:08.0   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14011_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497
The candidate 14011_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 19.44557    2461302.94557    13.82    10:36:59.53 +52:13:30.1   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_054159_TTUQ1b1x1_3659505_N8id5ppj/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-41-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0497.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4
11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1
11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2
11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2
########### Completed UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4
11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1
11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2
11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2
###################################################################################
11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2  -- not a known variable star
11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2  -- not a known variable star
11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4  -- not a known variable star
11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1  -- not a known variable star
Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
11:04:15.97 +49:10:03.2
11:07:30.69 +58:22:46.2
11:24:59.95 +49:03:56.4
11:56:53.52 +54:32:02.1
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.94508112 -observatory V36
12:50:08.52 -05:42:17.8 Mercury (-0.3mag)
14:01:43.70 -18:32:18.1 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:46:04.96 +22:02:06.1 Mars (1.2mag)
09:18:45.33 +16:15:43.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:48:40.69 +02:17:31.0 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:34.48 +21:01:43.4 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:33.31 -00:11:11.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:51.78 -23:41:55.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:09:00.72 -27:56:08.8 Moon (-10.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 05:43 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.94508112:
09:18:52.36 +16:15:08.1 Io (6.0mag)
09:18:46.37 +16:15:38.5 Europa (6.2mag)
09:18:56.15 +16:14:49.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:18:41.41 +16:16:03.8 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:17:03.20 +16:36:28.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:18:49.64 +16:15:23.2 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:16:28.98 +16:30:50.8 Elara (17.7mag)
09:22:17.01 +15:40:15.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:18:57.27 +16:36:52.9 Carme (18.9mag)
00:48:52.02 +02:17:25.0 Titan (8.3mag)
00:48:39.70 +02:17:34.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:48:21.32 +02:18:06.0 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:48:24.54 +02:17:27.1 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:47:15.67 +02:06:14.7 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 05:44 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.94508112:
23:47:32.49 +12:38:09.8 JWST
15:00:15.21 +52:14:58.3 Chandra
13:10:52.33 -62:23:21.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 05:43 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.94508112 -observatory V36
03:45:55.08 +19:48:49.8 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:08:31.38 -33:58:33.0 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:28:03.81 -71:00:21.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:38.20 +34:01:30.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:03:59.50 +47:00:31.5 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:04:17.71 +27:05:30.6 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:18:44.74 +25:45:41.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:00:35.90 +26:49:36.6 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:56:12.29 +05:09:52.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:25.42 -16:42:32.7 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:48:19.39 +33:42:47.9 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:08:40.45 +15:11:42.7 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:27:49.35 +42:37:31.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:10:45.43 +48:26:58.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:41:13.03 -13:13:16.0 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:14:50.85 +16:02:11.1 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:38:03.22 +17:48:04.4 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:30:03.72 -00:52:49.2 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:18:05.90 +71:44:57.4 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:57:55.91 +45:33:36.3 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:24:39.72 +12:16:48.4 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:36:23.49 -35:01:41.7 13.7mag 10P/Tempel
01:38:21.98 +39:01:20.5 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:56:22.28 -06:24:04.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:33:01.63 -08:53:02.5 17.8mag 63P/Wild
07:01:46.07 +18:13:42.1 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:15:28.48 +15:00:36.0 16.8mag 88P/Howell
06:19:44.00 +33:08:37.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:06:38.83 +21:25:55.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:54:39.42 +18:13:50.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:13:56.09 -25:27:40.8 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos
06:31:15.52 +20:13:12.7 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:22:47.95 -14:42:33.3 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:34:08.67 +07:53:37.0 12.6mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:43.07 +07:17:59.1 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:19:17.85 +39:52:39.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
09:03:21.93 +34:17:31.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:33:44.41 -01:35:45.6 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:38:03.26 +16:14:15.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 05:43 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 05:43 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 05:43 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97  AT 2026aacc  2026-08-23.15 19.4444
15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63  SN 2026aacb  2026-08-29.18 19.5538
20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88  AT 2026aaca  2026-08-30.60 19.51
14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81  SN 2026aabz  2026-08-30.23 18.705
13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17  AT 2026aaby  2026-08-30.72 18.545
06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74  AT 2026aabx  2026-08-30.61 17.869
05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16  AT 2026aabw  2026-08-30.79 18.65
17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48  AT 2026aabv  2026-08-30.35 18.678
03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63  AT 2026aabu  2026-08-22.78 20.13
15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31  AT 2026aabt  2026-08-29.37 19.72
01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26  SN 2026aabs  2026-08-27.78 19.28
22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93  AT 2026aabr  2026-08-30.57 19.11
23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22  SN 2026aabq  2026-08-23.58 19.7
22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11  AT 2026aabp  2026-08-30.61 18.75
00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49  AT 2026aabo  2026-08-29.40 18.5784
01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77  AT 2026aabn  2026-08-28.69 20.82
01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40  AT 2026aabm  2026-08-26.73 20.83
00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16  AT 2026aabl  2026-08-26.72 20.57
00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52  AT 2026aabk  2026-08-23.72 21.3
16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19  AT 2026aabj  2026-08-23.59 21.08
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 05:43 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat Sep 19 05:43:33 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 35s (0.58 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 10s (0.17 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 22s (0.37 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 44s (0.73 min)
FIELD_UMa-07-Q1b1x1: 93s (1.55 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 95s (1.58 min)
Finished: Sat Sep 19 05:45:08 CDT 2026